Skip to main content

CVE-2021-36742Trend Micro Multiple Products Improper Input Validation Vulnerability

Patch nowHigh7.8Exploited, CISA due date 2021-11-17EPSS 1.5%, higher than 74% of scored CVEs

CVE-2021-36742 is a improper input validation in Trend Micro Apex One, Apex One as a Service, and Worry-Free Business Security, rated high (7.8 on CVSS 3.1).

Why this priority: Exploited in the wild: listed in CISA's KEV catalog.

Published · Updated · NVD status: Analyzed

What it is

The software trusts input it should check, so crafted values reach code that assumes they are well formed.

How it is reached

An attacker can exploit it by someone who can already run code or sign in on the machine, with an ordinary user account, and nobody has to click anything.

What an attacker gains

A successful attack can read the data it protects, change data or behaviour and take it offline. In practice, this kind of flaw lets an attacker drive the component into behaviour its authors did not intend.

Is it being exploited?

CISA added it to the Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog on 2021-11-03: it is being exploited in the wild. EPSS estimates a 1.5% chance of exploitation activity in the next 30 days, higher than 74% of scored CVEs.

What to do

  1. Treat it as urgent: it is on CISA's KEV list. CISA's deadline for US federal agencies: 2021-11-17.
  2. No fixed version is listed yet. Find every place Trend Micro Apex One, Apex One as a Service, and Worry-Free Business Security runs, watch the references for a fix, and plan a replacement if it is no longer supported.
  3. Limit who can run code or sign in on the hosts that run it.
  4. Check exposed instances for signs of compromise, not only for the version.

Description from NVD

A improper input validation vulnerability in Trend Micro Apex One, Apex One as a Service, OfficeScan XG and Worry-Free Business Security 10.0 SP1 allows a local attacker to escalate privileges on affected installations. Please note: an attacker must first obtain the ability to execute low-privileged code on the target system in order to exploit this vulnerability.

What this means for your architecture.

A CVE names a product. Whether it matters depends on where that product sits in your systems: what reaches it, which trust boundary it guards and what it can reach once compromised. Veriom maps your components, their relationships and your trust boundaries from your code, cloud and delivery evidence, so you can see where a component like this sits. The radar itself does not look at your systems.

Components it touches

  • Interfaces that accept external input. The flaw sits at the input boundary of the affected component.

Trust boundaries in play

  • Host boundary. The attacker needs a foothold on the machine first; the flaw turns a small foothold into a bigger one.
  • At the input boundary of the affected component. An attacker who crosses it can drive the component into behaviour its authors did not intend.

Questions to answer about your own systems

  • Where does Trend Micro Apex One, Apex One as a Service, and Worry-Free Business Security run in your systems, and at which version?
  • Which of those hosts also run code or users you do not fully trust?
  • What can it reach once compromised: which data stores, secrets and services?

Sources

  • CVE records and CVSS scores from the NVD CVE API. This product uses the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD.
  • Exploitation status from CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.
  • Exploit likelihood from FIRST’s Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS), refreshed daily.
  • Explanations are written by Veriom from fixed templates over each record’s data, not by a person reviewing each CVE. Descriptions are quoted from the records as published.