Skip to main content

CVE-2026-111453Apache Airflow incorrect authorization

Low priorityMedium4.3EPSS not scored yet

CVE-2026-111453 is a incorrect authorization in Apache Airflow, rated medium (4.3 on CVSS 3.1).

Why this priority: Medium severity, with no exploitation signal.

Published · Updated · NVD status: Awaiting Analysis

What it is

A permission check exists but gets the answer wrong for some callers.

How it is reached

An attacker can exploit it over the network, with an ordinary user account, and nobody has to click anything.

What an attacker gains

The direct impact is limited: partial access to data or a partial outage. In practice, this kind of flaw lets an attacker reach data or actions their role should not allow.

Is it being exploited?

There is no public report of exploitation yet.

What to do

  1. Upgrade Apache Airflow to 3.4.0 or later.
  2. Until it is patched, review who holds accounts that can reach it.

Description from NVD

Apache Airflow's API endpoint for deleting an asset's queued events checked Dag edit permission against the `dag_id` query parameter, but deleted the queued events of every Dag the caller could read. An authenticated user with edit permission on one Dag and read access to others could suppress asset-triggered runs of Dags they cannot edit. This is an incomplete fix for CVE-2026-75157: users who upgraded to apache-airflow 3.3.2 for that fix are still affected and should upgrade to apache-airflow 3.4.0 or later.

What this means for your architecture.

A CVE names a product. Whether it matters depends on where that product sits in your systems: what reaches it, which trust boundary it guards and what it can reach once compromised. Veriom maps your components, their relationships and your trust boundaries from your code, cloud and delivery evidence, so you can see where a component like this sits. The radar itself does not look at your systems.

Components it touches

  • Permission checks in APIs and admin surfaces. The flaw sits between one role or tenant and another.
  • Multi-tenant services. The flaw sits between one role or tenant and another.

Trust boundaries in play

  • Authenticated network access. An account is needed, so exposure follows who can sign in: customers, partners or staff.
  • Between one role or tenant and another. An attacker who crosses it can reach data or actions their role should not allow.

Questions to answer about your own systems

  • Where does Apache Airflow run in your systems, and at which version?
  • Which of those instances can be reached from the internet or partner networks?
  • What can it reach once compromised: which data stores, secrets and services?

Sources

  • CVE records and CVSS scores from the NVD CVE API. This product uses the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD.
  • Exploitation status from CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.
  • Exploit likelihood from FIRST’s Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS), refreshed daily.
  • Explanations are written by Veriom from fixed templates over each record’s data, not by a person reviewing each CVE. Descriptions are quoted from the records as published.