Skip to main content

CVE-2026-118517sensiolabs symfony incomplete denylist

Low priorityLow2.3EPSS 0.26%, higher than 18% of scored CVEs

CVE-2026-118517 is a incomplete denylist in sensiolabs symfony, rated low (2.3 on CVSS 4.0).

Why this priority: Low severity, with no exploitation signal.

Published · Updated · NVD status: Awaiting Analysis

What it is

A list of forbidden inputs misses some, so a variant gets through. Two components read the same input differently, and an attacker exploits the gap.

How it is reached

An attacker can exploit it over the network, without an account, but someone has to act first, such as opening a file or following a link. Success also depends on conditions the attacker does not fully control.

What an attacker gains

The direct impact is limited: partial access to data or a partial outage. In practice, this kind of flaw lets an attacker drive the component into behaviour its authors did not intend.

Is it being exploited?

CISA's SSVC assessment notes a public proof of concept. EPSS estimates a 0.26% chance of exploitation activity in the next 30 days, higher than 18% of scored CVEs.

What to do

  1. No fixed version is listed yet. Find every place sensiolabs symfony runs, watch the references for a fix, and plan a replacement if it is no longer supported.
  2. While there is no fix, keep it off the internet or behind a VPN, allowlist or authenticating proxy.
  3. Warn the people who use it, and filter files and links on the way in.

Description from NVD

The Symfony HtmlSanitizer component UrlSanitizer parses URLs differently from browsers, allowing the allowLinkHosts() and allowMediaHosts() checks to be bypassed for URLs without a well-formed authority, resulting in untrusted hosts being referenced in sanitized output in Symfony versions 6.1.x prior to 6.4.50, 7.x prior to 7.4.23, and 8.x prior to 8.1.11.

UrlSanitizer parses URLs with league/uri, which follows RFC 3986, while browsers follow the WHATWG URL standard. For URLs without a well-formed authority, such as http:evil.example, ///evil.example, or https://://evil.example/ the sanitizer finds no host, whereas browsers resolve them to evil.example. The guard added for CVE-2026-45066 missed the zero-slash form, and the host 0 was also skipped because PHP treats it as falsy.

This is exploitable when a host allow-list is combined with allowRelativeLinks(true) or allowRelativeMedias(true). The default configuration is not affected.

What this means for your architecture.

A CVE names a product. Whether it matters depends on where that product sits in your systems: what reaches it, which trust boundary it guards and what it can reach once compromised. Veriom maps your components, their relationships and your trust boundaries from your code, cloud and delivery evidence, so you can see where a component like this sits. The radar itself does not look at your systems.

Components it touches

  • Interfaces that accept external input. The flaw sits at the input boundary of the affected component.
  • Proxies, load balancers and the servers behind them. The flaw sits between a front-end proxy and its back end.

Trust boundaries in play

  • Internet-facing entry points. No account is needed. Any instance reachable from outside your perimeter, through a load balancer, gateway, VPN or exposed admin port, is in scope.
  • People who open files and links. Mail, chat and browsers are the delivery path.
  • At the input boundary of the affected component. An attacker who crosses it can drive the component into behaviour its authors did not intend.
  • Between a front-end proxy and its back end. An attacker who crosses it can smuggle requests past the proxy's checks.

Questions to answer about your own systems

  • Where does sensiolabs symfony run in your systems, and at which version?
  • Which of those instances can be reached from the internet or partner networks?
  • What can it reach once compromised: which data stores, secrets and services?

Sources

  • CVE records and CVSS scores from the NVD CVE API. This product uses the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD.
  • Exploitation status from CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.
  • Exploit likelihood from FIRST’s Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS), refreshed daily.
  • Explanations are written by Veriom from fixed templates over each record’s data, not by a person reviewing each CVE. Descriptions are quoted from the records as published.