Skip to main content

CVE-2026-122188DeepGraphLearning KnowledgeGraphEmbedding path traversal

Low priorityLow2.1EPSS 0.36%, higher than 30% of scored CVEs

CVE-2026-122188 is a path traversal in DeepGraphLearning KnowledgeGraphEmbedding, rated low (2.1 on CVSS 4.0).

Why this priority: Low severity, with no exploitation signal.

Published · Updated · NVD status: Deferred

What it is

A file name from the request can climb out of the intended folder with sequences like ../, reaching files the service never meant to expose.

How it is reached

An attacker can exploit it over the network, without an account, but someone has to act first, such as opening a file or following a link.

What an attacker gains

The direct impact is limited: partial access to data or a partial outage. In practice, this kind of flaw lets an attacker read or write files outside the folders the service meant to expose.

Is it being exploited?

CISA's SSVC assessment notes a public proof of concept. EPSS estimates a 0.36% chance of exploitation activity in the next 30 days, higher than 30% of scored CVEs.

What to do

  1. No fixed version is listed yet. Find every place DeepGraphLearning KnowledgeGraphEmbedding runs, watch the references for a fix, and plan a replacement if it is no longer supported.
  2. While there is no fix, keep it off the internet or behind a VPN, allowlist or authenticating proxy.
  3. Warn the people who use it, and filter files and links on the way in.

Description from NVD

A flaw has been found in DeepGraphLearning KnowledgeGraphEmbedding up to 2e440e0f9c687314d5ff67ead68ce985dc446e3a. Impacted is the function override_config of the file codes/run.py of the component Checkpoint Loading. This manipulation of the argument data_path causes path traversal. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. Continious delivery with rolling releases is used by this product. Therefore, no version details of affected nor updated releases are available. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

What this means for your architecture.

A CVE names a product. Whether it matters depends on where that product sits in your systems: what reaches it, which trust boundary it guards and what it can reach once compromised. Veriom maps your components, their relationships and your trust boundaries from your code, cloud and delivery evidence, so you can see where a component like this sits. The radar itself does not look at your systems.

Components it touches

  • File storage the service can read or write. The flaw sits between the application and the file system it can reach.

Trust boundaries in play

  • Internet-facing entry points. No account is needed. Any instance reachable from outside your perimeter, through a load balancer, gateway, VPN or exposed admin port, is in scope.
  • People who open files and links. Mail, chat and browsers are the delivery path.
  • Between the application and the file system it can reach. An attacker who crosses it can read or write files outside the folders the service meant to expose.

Questions to answer about your own systems

  • Where does DeepGraphLearning KnowledgeGraphEmbedding run in your systems, and at which version?
  • Which of those instances can be reached from the internet or partner networks?
  • What can it reach once compromised: which data stores, secrets and services?

Sources

  • CVE records and CVSS scores from the NVD CVE API. This product uses the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD.
  • Exploitation status from CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.
  • Exploit likelihood from FIRST’s Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS), refreshed daily.
  • Explanations are written by Veriom from fixed templates over each record’s data, not by a person reviewing each CVE. Descriptions are quoted from the records as published.