CVE-2026-122310kyverno interpretation conflict
CVE-2026-122310 is a interpretation conflict in kyverno, rated critical (9.4 on CVSS 4.0).
Why this priority: Critical severity, with no exploitation signal yet.
Published · Updated · NVD status: Analyzed
What it is
Two components read the same input differently, and an attacker exploits the gap.
How it is reached
An attacker can exploit it over the network, with an ordinary user account, and nobody has to click anything.
What an attacker gains
A successful attack can read the data it protects, change data or behaviour and take it offline. In practice, this kind of flaw lets an attacker smuggle requests past the proxy's checks. The damage can spread past the vulnerable component into others.
Is it being exploited?
There is no public report of exploitation yet. EPSS estimates a 0.36% chance of exploitation activity in the next 30 days, higher than 30% of scored CVEs.
What to do
- Upgrade kyverno to 1.19.2 or later.
- Until it is patched, review who holds accounts that can reach it.
Description from NVD
Kyverno from 1.19.1 before 1.19.2 validates a Policy's context.apiCall urlPath after cleaning it but executes the raw path, whose fragment or query the Kubernetes client discards. A namespace-scoped user who can create a Policy can hide ../ segments behind # or ? to reach cluster-scoped endpoints with Kyverno's ServiceAccount, gaining cluster admin.
What this means for your architecture.
A CVE names a product. Whether it matters depends on where that product sits in your systems: what reaches it, which trust boundary it guards and what it can reach once compromised. Veriom maps your components, their relationships and your trust boundaries from your code, cloud and delivery evidence, so you can see where a component like this sits. The radar itself does not look at your systems.
Components it touches
- Proxies, load balancers and the servers behind them. The flaw sits between a front-end proxy and its back end.
Trust boundaries in play
- Authenticated network access. An account is needed, so exposure follows who can sign in: customers, partners or staff.
- Isolation between components. The impact crosses out of the vulnerable component into others it should be isolated from.
- Between a front-end proxy and its back end. An attacker who crosses it can smuggle requests past the proxy's checks.
Questions to answer about your own systems
- Where does kyverno run in your systems, and at which version?
- Which of those instances can be reached from the internet or partner networks?
- What can it reach once compromised: which data stores, secrets and services?
Read more
Sources
- CVE records and CVSS scores from the NVD CVE API. This product uses the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD.
- Exploitation status from CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.
- Exploit likelihood from FIRST’s Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS), refreshed daily.
- Explanations are written by Veriom from fixed templates over each record’s data, not by a person reviewing each CVE. Descriptions are quoted from the records as published.