Skip to main content

CVE-2026-122311kyverno path traversal

Schedule itCritical9.4EPSS 0.45%, higher than 39% of scored CVEs

CVE-2026-122311 is a path traversal in kyverno, rated critical (9.4 on CVSS 4.0).

Why this priority: Critical severity, with no exploitation signal yet.

Published · Updated · NVD status: Analyzed

What it is

A file name from the request can climb out of the intended folder with sequences like ../, reaching files the service never meant to expose.

How it is reached

An attacker can exploit it over the network, with an ordinary user account, and nobody has to click anything.

What an attacker gains

A successful attack can read the data it protects, change data or behaviour and take it offline. In practice, this kind of flaw lets an attacker read or write files outside the folders the service meant to expose. The damage can spread past the vulnerable component into others.

Is it being exploited?

There is no public report of exploitation yet. EPSS estimates a 0.45% chance of exploitation activity in the next 30 days, higher than 39% of scored CVEs.

What to do

  1. Upgrade kyverno to 1.19.2 or later.
  2. Until it is patched, review who holds accounts that can reach it.

Description from NVD

Kyverno from 1.16.0 before 1.19.2 fails to validate path segments in the resource argument of resource.get() and resource.post(), allowing namespaced CEL policies to escape their namespace. Tenants who can create a NamespacedValidatingPolicy can insert .. segments to read and write arbitrary cluster objects using the admission controller's ServiceAccount, leading to cluster takeover.

What this means for your architecture.

A CVE names a product. Whether it matters depends on where that product sits in your systems: what reaches it, which trust boundary it guards and what it can reach once compromised. Veriom maps your components, their relationships and your trust boundaries from your code, cloud and delivery evidence, so you can see where a component like this sits. The radar itself does not look at your systems.

Components it touches

  • File storage the service can read or write. The flaw sits between the application and the file system it can reach.

Trust boundaries in play

  • Authenticated network access. An account is needed, so exposure follows who can sign in: customers, partners or staff.
  • Isolation between components. The impact crosses out of the vulnerable component into others it should be isolated from.
  • Between the application and the file system it can reach. An attacker who crosses it can read or write files outside the folders the service meant to expose.

Questions to answer about your own systems

  • Where does kyverno run in your systems, and at which version?
  • Which of those instances can be reached from the internet or partner networks?
  • What can it reach once compromised: which data stores, secrets and services?

Sources

  • CVE records and CVSS scores from the NVD CVE API. This product uses the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD.
  • Exploitation status from CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.
  • Exploit likelihood from FIRST’s Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS), refreshed daily.
  • Explanations are written by Veriom from fixed templates over each record’s data, not by a person reviewing each CVE. Descriptions are quoted from the records as published.