Skip to main content

CVE-2026-126192facelessuser soupsieve uncontrolled resource consumption

Low priorityMedium6.3EPSS not scored yet

CVE-2026-126192 is a uncontrolled resource consumption in facelessuser soupsieve, rated medium (6.3 on CVSS 4.0).

Why this priority: Medium severity, with no exploitation signal.

Published · Updated · NVD status: Awaiting Analysis

What it is

Requests can consume unbounded CPU, memory or connections and starve the service. Crafted input triggers a worst-case algorithm that ties up the service.

How it is reached

An attacker can exploit it over the network, without an account, and nobody has to click anything. Success also depends on conditions the attacker does not fully control.

What an attacker gains

The direct impact is limited: partial access to data or a partial outage. In practice, this kind of flaw lets an attacker exhaust CPU, memory or connections until the service stops answering.

Is it being exploited?

There is no public report of exploitation yet.

What to do

  1. Upgrade facelessuser soupsieve to 2.10 or later.
  2. Until it is patched, keep it off the internet or behind a VPN, allowlist or authenticating proxy.

Description from NVD

Soup Sieve is a CSS selector library designed to be used with Beautiful Soup 4. Prior to 2.10, matching a developer-authored selector that places the general sibling combinator inside :has() repeatedly scans each candidate element's following siblings when the right-hand side is absent, producing quadratic work on attacker-controlled HTML. Applications that evaluate a fixed selector such as div:has(a ~ b) over untrusted markup can have a worker occupied for minutes by a small document, while the adjacent sibling form and trusted-only document processing are not affected in the same way. This issue is fixed in version 2.10.

What this means for your architecture.

A CVE names a product. Whether it matters depends on where that product sits in your systems: what reaches it, which trust boundary it guards and what it can reach once compromised. Veriom maps your components, their relationships and your trust boundaries from your code, cloud and delivery evidence, so you can see where a component like this sits. The radar itself does not look at your systems.

Components it touches

  • Public entry points and shared services that must stay up. The flaw sits between untrusted traffic and shared capacity.

Trust boundaries in play

  • Internet-facing entry points. No account is needed. Any instance reachable from outside your perimeter, through a load balancer, gateway, VPN or exposed admin port, is in scope.
  • Between untrusted traffic and shared capacity. An attacker who crosses it can exhaust CPU, memory or connections until the service stops answering.

Questions to answer about your own systems

  • Where does facelessuser soupsieve run in your systems, and at which version?
  • Which of those instances can be reached from the internet or partner networks?
  • What can it reach once compromised: which data stores, secrets and services?

Sources

  • CVE records and CVSS scores from the NVD CVE API. This product uses the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD.
  • Exploitation status from CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.
  • Exploit likelihood from FIRST’s Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS), refreshed daily.
  • Explanations are written by Veriom from fixed templates over each record’s data, not by a person reviewing each CVE. Descriptions are quoted from the records as published.