Skip to main content

CVE-2026-126367grpc grpc-node incorrect authorization

Low priorityMedium4.8EPSS not scored yet

CVE-2026-126367 is a incorrect authorization in grpc grpc-node, rated medium (4.8 on CVSS 3.1).

Why this priority: Medium severity, with no exploitation signal.

Published · Updated · NVD status: Received

What it is

A permission check exists but gets the answer wrong for some callers.

How it is reached

An attacker can exploit it over the network, without an account, and nobody has to click anything. Success also depends on conditions the attacker does not fully control.

What an attacker gains

The direct impact is limited: partial access to data or a partial outage. In practice, this kind of flaw lets an attacker reach data or actions their role should not allow.

Is it being exploited?

There is no public report of exploitation yet.

What to do

  1. Upgrade grpc grpc-node to a fixed version for your release line (1.13.2, 1.14.2).
  2. Until it is patched, keep it off the internet or behind a VPN, allowlist or authenticating proxy.

Description from NVD

@grpc/grpc-js implements the core functionality of gRPC purely in JavaScript, without a C++ addon. Before 1.13.2, and from 1.14.0 through 1.14.1, the @grpc/grpc-js-xds SafeRegexValueMatcher and PathSafeRegexValueMatcher add start and end anchors without grouping a supplied top-level alternation. An expression intended to match one of several complete values can therefore match a prefix, substring, or suffix. The affected matchers are used for route selection, xDS credential identity matching, and RBAC URL path, principal name, server name, and header rules. An ALLOW policy using an alternation can consequently accept a method, certificate identity, or header value outside the intended set, while a DENY policy becomes broader rather than permissive. This issue is fixed in versions 1.13.2 and 1.14.2.

What this means for your architecture.

A CVE names a product. Whether it matters depends on where that product sits in your systems: what reaches it, which trust boundary it guards and what it can reach once compromised. Veriom maps your components, their relationships and your trust boundaries from your code, cloud and delivery evidence, so you can see where a component like this sits. The radar itself does not look at your systems.

Components it touches

  • Permission checks in APIs and admin surfaces. The flaw sits between one role or tenant and another.
  • Multi-tenant services. The flaw sits between one role or tenant and another.

Trust boundaries in play

  • Internet-facing entry points. No account is needed. Any instance reachable from outside your perimeter, through a load balancer, gateway, VPN or exposed admin port, is in scope.
  • Between one role or tenant and another. An attacker who crosses it can reach data or actions their role should not allow.

Questions to answer about your own systems

  • Where does grpc grpc-node run in your systems, and at which version?
  • Which of those instances can be reached from the internet or partner networks?
  • What can it reach once compromised: which data stores, secrets and services?

Sources

  • CVE records and CVSS scores from the NVD CVE API. This product uses the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD.
  • Exploitation status from CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.
  • Exploit likelihood from FIRST’s Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS), refreshed daily.
  • Explanations are written by Veriom from fixed templates over each record’s data, not by a person reviewing each CVE. Descriptions are quoted from the records as published.