CVE-2026-126642Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2 missing authorization
CVE-2026-126642 is a missing authorization in Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2, rated medium (6.5 on CVSS 3.1).
Why this priority: Medium severity, with no exploitation signal.
Published · Updated · NVD status: Awaiting Analysis
What it is
An action never checks whether the caller is allowed to perform it.
How it is reached
An attacker can exploit it over the network, with an ordinary user account, and nobody has to click anything.
What an attacker gains
A successful attack can read the data it protects. In practice, this kind of flaw lets an attacker reach data or actions their role should not allow.
Is it being exploited?
There is no public report of exploitation yet.
What to do
- No fixed version is listed yet. Find every place Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2 runs, watch the references for a fix, and plan a replacement if it is no longer supported.
- While there is no fix, review who holds accounts that can reach it.
Description from NVD
An incorrect authorization flaw was found in AWX, the automation controller component of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform. The API access classes for JobTemplate and WorkflowJobTemplate do not check the caller's Credential use_role when assigning the single-valued webhook_credential foreign key: JobTemplateAccess.can_add/can_change and WorkflowJobTemplateAccess.can_change in awx/main/access.py omit the check_related('webhook_credential', Credential, ..., role_field='use_role') call that UnifiedCredentialsMixin.can_attach performs for the normal many-to-many credentials relationship, and the serializer validates only the credential's type and namespace. A user who may administer their own job template (or workflow job template) and use its project and inventory can therefore attach a webhook token credential (for example a GitLab token) that they do not have use permission on. The template administrator can retrieve the template's webhook key; a subsequent webhook event causes AWX to decrypt the attached token and send it in the request header (for GitLab, PRIVATE-TOKEN) to a status URL derived from the event payload, disclosing the victim's token to a destination the attacker can influence. This may disclose another user's personal access token and allow whatever actions that token permits.
What this means for your architecture.
A CVE names a product. Whether it matters depends on where that product sits in your systems: what reaches it, which trust boundary it guards and what it can reach once compromised. Veriom maps your components, their relationships and your trust boundaries from your code, cloud and delivery evidence, so you can see where a component like this sits. The radar itself does not look at your systems.
Components it touches
- Permission checks in APIs and admin surfaces. The flaw sits between one role or tenant and another.
- Multi-tenant services. The flaw sits between one role or tenant and another.
Trust boundaries in play
- Authenticated network access. An account is needed, so exposure follows who can sign in: customers, partners or staff.
- Between one role or tenant and another. An attacker who crosses it can reach data or actions their role should not allow.
Questions to answer about your own systems
- Where does Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2 run in your systems, and at which version?
- Which of those instances can be reached from the internet or partner networks?
- What can it reach once compromised: which data stores, secrets and services?
Read more
Issue reports
More reading
Sources
- CVE records and CVSS scores from the NVD CVE API. This product uses the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD.
- Exploitation status from CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.
- Exploit likelihood from FIRST’s Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS), refreshed daily.
- Explanations are written by Veriom from fixed templates over each record’s data, not by a person reviewing each CVE. Descriptions are quoted from the records as published.