CVE-2026-128790Eclipse BaSyx Go Components incorrect authorization
CVE-2026-128790 is a incorrect authorization in Eclipse BaSyx Go Components, rated high (7.1 on CVSS 4.0).
Why this priority: High severity, with no exploitation signal yet.
Published · Updated · NVD status: Received
What it is
A permission check exists but gets the answer wrong for some callers. The software reveals data to someone who should not see it.
How it is reached
An attacker can exploit it over the network, with an ordinary user account, and nobody has to click anything.
What an attacker gains
A successful attack can read the data it protects. In practice, this kind of flaw lets an attacker reach data or actions their role should not allow.
Is it being exploited?
There is no public report of exploitation yet.
What to do
- Upgrade Eclipse BaSyx Go Components to 1.1.3 or later.
- Until it is patched, review who holds accounts that can reach it.
Description from NVD
In Eclipse BaSyx Go Components versions up to and including 1.1.2, ABAC-enabled deployments of the Submodel Repository and the AAS Environment do not apply an access rule's `FILTERLIST` fragment filters to single Submodel reads.
`GET /submodels` removes the fields that a rule's `FILTERLIST` hides, but `GET /submodels/{submodelIdentifier}` and `GET /submodels/{submodelIdentifier}/$metadata` return them unfiltered. An authenticated caller with READ access to a Submodel can therefore read fields that the access rules hide from them, for example `supplementalSemanticIds` keys that name the other parties allowed to read the Submodel.
If versioning is enabled (`history.mode` set to `api` or `audit`), `GET /submodels/{submodelIdentifier}/$history` and `GET /shells/{aasIdentifier}/$history` in the Submodel Repository, AAS Repository and AAS Environment return the complete stored version without applying the rule's formula or fragment filters. A caller whose rules grant READ on these routes can read fields that the access rules hide, and Submodels and Asset Administration Shells that the direct read does not return to them at all.
The issue is fixed in Eclipse BaSyx Go Components v1.1.3.
What this means for your architecture.
A CVE names a product. Whether it matters depends on where that product sits in your systems: what reaches it, which trust boundary it guards and what it can reach once compromised. Veriom maps your components, their relationships and your trust boundaries from your code, cloud and delivery evidence, so you can see where a component like this sits. The radar itself does not look at your systems.
Components it touches
- Permission checks in APIs and admin surfaces. The flaw sits between one role or tenant and another.
- Multi-tenant services. The flaw sits between one role or tenant and another.
- Error responses, logs and debug endpoints. The flaw sits between internal data and whoever can read the response or log.
- APIs that over-share. The flaw sits between internal data and whoever can read the response or log.
Trust boundaries in play
- Authenticated network access. An account is needed, so exposure follows who can sign in: customers, partners or staff.
- Between one role or tenant and another. An attacker who crosses it can reach data or actions their role should not allow.
- Between internal data and whoever can read the response or log. An attacker who crosses it can learn data or internals that help a follow-up attack.
Questions to answer about your own systems
- Where does Eclipse BaSyx Go Components run in your systems, and at which version?
- Which of those instances can be reached from the internet or partner networks?
- What can it reach once compromised: which data stores, secrets and services?
Read more
Patches and commits
Sources
- CVE records and CVSS scores from the NVD CVE API. This product uses the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD.
- Exploitation status from CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.
- Exploit likelihood from FIRST’s Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS), refreshed daily.
- Explanations are written by Veriom from fixed templates over each record’s data, not by a person reviewing each CVE. Descriptions are quoted from the records as published.