CVE-2026-63505getprobo probo insecure direct object reference
CVE-2026-63505 is a insecure direct object reference in getprobo probo, rated medium (4.9 on CVSS 3.1).
Why this priority: Medium severity, with no exploitation signal.
Published · Updated · NVD status: Deferred
What it is
Changing an identifier in a request reaches another user's records.
How it is reached
An attacker can exploit it over the network, with an ordinary user account, and nobody has to click anything. Success also depends on conditions the attacker does not fully control.
What an attacker gains
The direct impact is limited: partial access to data or a partial outage. In practice, this kind of flaw lets an attacker reach data or actions their role should not allow. The damage can spread past the vulnerable component into others.
Is it being exploited?
There is no public report of exploitation yet.
What to do
- Upgrade getprobo probo to 0.223.1 or later.
- Until it is patched, review who holds accounts that can reach it.
Description from NVD
Probo is a self-hostable governance, risk, and compliance (GRC) platform built for engineering and security teams. Prior to version 0.223.1, Probo's console GraphQL API is a multi-tenant GRC platform where all data is scoped to an organization. A Finding can reference a Risk via finding.riskId. That reference is stored without validating that the risk belongs to the caller's organization, and the Finding.risk field resolver authorizes the finding (caller's org) instead of the risk, then loads the risk with a tenant scope derived from the risk's own global ID. As a result, an authenticated member of organization A can attach an arbitrary organization B risk GID to a finding they own and then read organization B's Risk (name, description, treatment, category, severity, owner) — with no membership in B. The stored cross-tenant reference also blocks B from deleting its own risk (ON DELETE RESTRICT), a cross-tenant integrity/DoS. This issue has been patched in version 0.223.1.
What this means for your architecture.
A CVE names a product. Whether it matters depends on where that product sits in your systems: what reaches it, which trust boundary it guards and what it can reach once compromised. Veriom maps your components, their relationships and your trust boundaries from your code, cloud and delivery evidence, so you can see where a component like this sits. The radar itself does not look at your systems.
Components it touches
- Permission checks in APIs and admin surfaces. The flaw sits between one role or tenant and another.
- Multi-tenant services. The flaw sits between one role or tenant and another.
Trust boundaries in play
- Authenticated network access. An account is needed, so exposure follows who can sign in: customers, partners or staff.
- Isolation between components. The impact crosses out of the vulnerable component into others it should be isolated from.
- Between one role or tenant and another. An attacker who crosses it can reach data or actions their role should not allow.
Questions to answer about your own systems
- Where does getprobo probo run in your systems, and at which version?
- Which of those instances can be reached from the internet or partner networks?
- What can it reach once compromised: which data stores, secrets and services?
Sources
- CVE records and CVSS scores from the NVD CVE API. This product uses the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD.
- Exploitation status from CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.
- Exploit likelihood from FIRST’s Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS), refreshed daily.
- Explanations are written by Veriom from fixed templates over each record’s data, not by a person reviewing each CVE. Descriptions are quoted from the records as published.