Skip to main content

CVE-2026-63660mapbox node-fontnik integer overflow

Schedule itHigh8.1EPSS not scored yet

CVE-2026-63660 is a integer overflow in mapbox node-fontnik, rated high (8.1 on CVSS 3.1).

Why this priority: High severity, with no exploitation signal yet.

Published · Updated · NVD status: Received

What it is

A calculation wraps around, so a size or count ends up far smaller or larger than intended, often leading to memory corruption. Code writes past the end of a buffer, corrupting memory in ways an attacker can often turn into code execution.

How it is reached

An attacker can exploit it over the network, with an ordinary user account, and nobody has to click anything.

What an attacker gains

A successful attack can change data or behaviour and take it offline. In practice, this kind of flaw lets an attacker crash the process, read memory, or in the worst case run code.

Is it being exploited?

There is no public report of exploitation yet.

What to do

  1. Upgrade mapbox node-fontnik to 0.7.7 or later.
  2. Until it is patched, review who holds accounts that can reach it.

Description from NVD

node-fontnik is a library that delivers a range of glyphs rendered as SDFs (signed distance fields) in a protocol buffer. Prior to version 0.7.7, a crafted font could trigger a heap out-of-bounds write in RenderSDF (include/mapbox/glyph_foundry_impl.hpp). RenderSDF computed the SDF bitmap allocation size as buffered_width * buffered_height in 32-bit unsigned int. Glyph dimensions are derived from the uploaded font's outline bounding box with no upper bound, so a glyph large enough to make that product exceed 2³² wrapped to a small value. The buffer was then under-allocated while the render loop still wrote one byte per pixel, corrupting the heap (CWE-190 → CWE-787) and crashing the process. A 680-byte font is enough to drive FreeType to a 65536×65536 buffered glyph, wrapping the size to 0. This issue has been patched in version 0.7.7.

What this means for your architecture.

A CVE names a product. Whether it matters depends on where that product sits in your systems: what reaches it, which trust boundary it guards and what it can reach once compromised. Veriom maps your components, their relationships and your trust boundaries from your code, cloud and delivery evidence, so you can see where a component like this sits. The radar itself does not look at your systems.

Components it touches

  • Native code: operating systems, browsers and firmware. The flaw sits wherever native code reads untrusted data.
  • Network appliances and media or file parsers. The flaw sits wherever native code reads untrusted data.

Trust boundaries in play

  • Authenticated network access. An account is needed, so exposure follows who can sign in: customers, partners or staff.
  • Wherever native code reads untrusted data. An attacker who crosses it can crash the process, read memory, or in the worst case run code.

Questions to answer about your own systems

  • Where does mapbox node-fontnik run in your systems, and at which version?
  • Which of those instances can be reached from the internet or partner networks?
  • What can it reach once compromised: which data stores, secrets and services?

Sources

  • CVE records and CVSS scores from the NVD CVE API. This product uses the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD.
  • Exploitation status from CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.
  • Exploit likelihood from FIRST’s Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS), refreshed daily.
  • Explanations are written by Veriom from fixed templates over each record’s data, not by a person reviewing each CVE. Descriptions are quoted from the records as published.