Skip to main content

CVE-2026-76806solidtime-io solidtime path traversal

Low priorityMedium6.3EPSS 0.25%, higher than 17% of scored CVEs

CVE-2026-76806 is a path traversal in solidtime-io solidtime, rated medium (6.3 on CVSS 3.1).

Why this priority: Medium severity, with no exploitation signal.

Published · Updated · NVD status: Received

What it is

A file name from the request can climb out of the intended folder with sequences like ../, reaching files the service never meant to expose.

How it is reached

An attacker can exploit it over the network, with an ordinary user account, and nobody has to click anything.

What an attacker gains

The direct impact is limited: partial access to data or a partial outage. In practice, this kind of flaw lets an attacker read or write files outside the folders the service meant to expose.

Is it being exploited?

There is no public report of exploitation yet. EPSS estimates a 0.25% chance of exploitation activity in the next 30 days, higher than 17% of scored CVEs.

What to do

  1. Upgrade solidtime-io solidtime to 0.16.0 or later.
  2. Until it is patched, review who holds accounts that can reach it.

Description from NVD

Solidtime is an open-source time-tracking app. Prior to 0.16.0, TogglDataImporter::importData() read attacker-controlled project id values from projects.json in uploaded ZIP imports and concatenated them into filesystem paths without validation. Because Spatie\TemporaryDirectory\TemporaryDirectory::path() creates missing parent directories, traversal sequences could escape the temporary sandbox and create directories at arbitrary writable host paths. Distinguishable ImportController responses for existing versus missing targets exposed whether suffix-constrained host paths derived from projects_users/{id}.json or tasks/{id}.json existed, because the importer always appended .json. Any registered user able to create an organization and use POST /api/v1/organizations/{org}/import with type=toggl_data_importer could reach the flaw, potentially causing minor availability impact through directory exhaustion and disclosing host layout information. This issue is fixed in version 0.16.0.

What this means for your architecture.

A CVE names a product. Whether it matters depends on where that product sits in your systems: what reaches it, which trust boundary it guards and what it can reach once compromised. Veriom maps your components, their relationships and your trust boundaries from your code, cloud and delivery evidence, so you can see where a component like this sits. The radar itself does not look at your systems.

Components it touches

  • File storage the service can read or write. The flaw sits between the application and the file system it can reach.

Trust boundaries in play

  • Authenticated network access. An account is needed, so exposure follows who can sign in: customers, partners or staff.
  • Between the application and the file system it can reach. An attacker who crosses it can read or write files outside the folders the service meant to expose.

Questions to answer about your own systems

  • Where does solidtime-io solidtime run in your systems, and at which version?
  • Which of those instances can be reached from the internet or partner networks?
  • What can it reach once compromised: which data stores, secrets and services?

Sources

  • CVE records and CVSS scores from the NVD CVE API. This product uses the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD.
  • Exploitation status from CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.
  • Exploit likelihood from FIRST’s Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS), refreshed daily.
  • Explanations are written by Veriom from fixed templates over each record’s data, not by a person reviewing each CVE. Descriptions are quoted from the records as published.