Skip to main content

CVE-2026-86005chartbrew missing authentication

High priorityCritical9.3EPSS not scored yet

CVE-2026-86005 is a missing authentication in chartbrew, rated critical (9.3 on CVSS 4.0).

Why this priority: Critical, and reachable over the network without an account.

Published · Updated · NVD status: Deferred

What it is

A function that should require sign-in can be called by anyone.

How it is reached

An attacker can exploit it over the network, without an account, and nobody has to click anything.

What an attacker gains

A successful attack can read the data it protects, change data or behaviour and take it offline. In practice, this kind of flaw lets an attacker act as a signed-in user, or an administrator, without valid credentials.

Is it being exploited?

CISA's SSVC assessment notes a public proof of concept. It can be exploited automatically, at scale.

What to do

  1. Upgrade chartbrew to 5.2.3 or later.
  2. Until it is patched, keep it off the internet or behind a VPN, allowlist or authenticating proxy.

Description from NVD

Chartbrew is an open-source web application that can connect directly to databases and APIs and use the data to create charts. Prior to 5.2.3, the administrative BullMQ dashboard was mounted without an authentication check. The vulnerable surface is the Bull Board/BullMQ administration dashboard at /apps/queues. A remote unauthenticated attacker reaches /apps/queues on a Chartbrew instance where Redis and BullMQ are enabled and a reverse proxy does not independently block the route. The dashboard trusted network reachability as authorization and exposed its queue-management interface directly. Redis and BullMQ must be enabled and the route must be reachable. Available actions depend on the installed Bull Board version and queue state, while confidentiality depends on job payload and log contents. An unauthenticated user can inspect exposed job payloads and logs and, when enabled by the installed version and queue state, retry or delete jobs or otherwise alter queue processing, affecting confidentiality, integrity, or availability. This issue is fixed in version 5.2.3.

What this means for your architecture.

A CVE names a product. Whether it matters depends on where that product sits in your systems: what reaches it, which trust boundary it guards and what it can reach once compromised. Veriom maps your components, their relationships and your trust boundaries from your code, cloud and delivery evidence, so you can see where a component like this sits. The radar itself does not look at your systems.

Components it touches

  • Sign-in, session and token handling. The flaw sits between anonymous callers and authenticated sessions.
  • Identity providers and SSO. The flaw sits between anonymous callers and authenticated sessions.

Trust boundaries in play

  • Internet-facing entry points. No account is needed. Any instance reachable from outside your perimeter, through a load balancer, gateway, VPN or exposed admin port, is in scope.
  • Between anonymous callers and authenticated sessions. An attacker who crosses it can act as a signed-in user, or an administrator, without valid credentials.

Questions to answer about your own systems

  • Where does chartbrew run in your systems, and at which version?
  • Which of those instances can be reached from the internet or partner networks?
  • What can it reach once compromised: which data stores, secrets and services?

Sources

  • CVE records and CVSS scores from the NVD CVE API. This product uses the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD.
  • Exploitation status from CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.
  • Exploit likelihood from FIRST’s Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS), refreshed daily.
  • Explanations are written by Veriom from fixed templates over each record’s data, not by a person reviewing each CVE. Descriptions are quoted from the records as published.