Free tool · No sign-in
CVE radar: the latest vulnerabilities, explained.
Every new CVE from NVD, with whether it is exploited in the wild (CISA KEV), how likely it is to be (FIRST EPSS), and what it means for your architecture in plain language.
Updated 13 Nov, 15:14 UTC from NVD, CISA KEV and FIRST EPSSMarkdownRSSJSON Feed
Patch first
Exploited in the wild, newest first.
CISA adds a CVE to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog when attackers are using it. Patch these first, then CVEs with a high EPSS score, then the most severe, starting with anything reachable from the internet.
Microsoft Office Outlook Missing User Interaction for Potentially Unsafe Action Vulnerability
Medium6.5Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS 1.6%, higher than 76% of scored CVEsMicrosoft Office and 6 moreCVSS 3.1 · 6.5CWE-356
Google Chromium Use-After-Free Vulnerability
High8.8Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS 0.96%, higher than 62% of scored CVEsGoogle Chromium and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-416
Barracuda Networks Email Security Gateway (ESG) Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel Vulnerability
Critical9.3Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-13EPSS 11%, higher than 96% of scored CVEsBarracuda Email Security Gateway (ESG) and 5 moreCVSS 4.0 · 9.3CWE-288
Barracuda Networks Multiple Products OS Command Injection Vulnerability
High8.6Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-13EPSS 9.1%, higher than 95% of scored CVEsBarracuda Email Security Gateway (ESG) and 9 moreCVSS 4.0 · 8.6CWE-78
Openwave Messaging Limited Webtop Media Transcoder Incorrect Resource Transfer Between Spheres Vulnerability
Medium4.3Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS 0.64%, higher than 51% of scored CVEsOpenwave Messaging Limited Webtop Media Transcoder and 2 moreCVSS 3.1 · 4.3CWE-669
Trends
The last 30 days, by severity.
6,173 CVEs published, 473 of them critical. Many arrive without a score yet: NVD and the reporting organisations add CVSS over the following days.
Show the numbers
| Day | Critical | High | Medium | Low | Not scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15 Oct 2026 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 Oct 2026 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 Oct 2026 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 Oct 2026 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 Oct 2026 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1 Nov 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 Nov 2026 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 3 Nov 2026 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 4 Nov 2026 | 35 | 158 | 142 | 29 | 0 |
| 5 Nov 2026 | 55 | 213 | 149 | 36 | 0 |
| 6 Nov 2026 | 40 | 148 | 203 | 47 | 6 |
| 7 Nov 2026 | 54 | 164 | 232 | 11 | 13 |
| 8 Nov 2026 | 23 | 128 | 143 | 26 | 0 |
| 9 Nov 2026 | 31 | 165 | 231 | 42 | 1 |
| 10 Nov 2026 | 110 | 1199 | 601 | 45 | 159 |
| 11 Nov 2026 | 51 | 284 | 237 | 44 | 48 |
| 12 Nov 2026 | 28 | 172 | 129 | 23 | 6 |
| 13 Nov 2026 | 40 | 191 | 204 | 39 | 25 |
Exploit likelihood (EPSS), last 30 days
- Under 1%5904
- 1% to 10%217
- 10% to 50%4
- 50% or more4
- Not scored yet44
Most affected vendors, last 30 days
Most common weaknesses, last 30 days
- Cross-site scripting (CWE-79)475
- Missing authorization (CWE-862)359
- Heap-based buffer overflow (CWE-122)358
- Use after free (CWE-416)338
- Insecure direct object reference (CWE-639)221
- Out-of-bounds read (CWE-125)192
- Incorrect authorization (CWE-863)191
- Server-side request forgery (CWE-918)177
- Path traversal (CWE-22)174
- SQL injection (CWE-89)172
Matching CVEs
203 CVEs match these filters, page 3 of 9.
Zohocorp ADAudit Plus SQL injection
High8.8EPSS 2.9%, higher than 87% of scored CVEsZohocorp ADAudit PlusCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-89
Zoho Corporation ManageEngine ADAudit Plus versions below 8703 are vulnerable to an authenticated SQL injection vulnerability in ADAudit Plus Reports API.
WP Directory Kit SQL injection
Medium6.8EPSS 0.39%, higher than 34% of scored CVEsWP Directory KitCVSS 3.1 · 6.8CWE-89
The WP Directory Kit WordPress plugin before 1.6.3 does not sanitise and escape a parameter before using it in a SQL statement, making it possible for users holding the WP Directory Kit WordPress plugin before 1.6.3's custom Listing Admin role, and above, to perform SQL…
Bahmni bahmni-core SQL injection
High7.1EPSS 0.31%, higher than 24% of scored CVEsBahmni bahmni-coreCVSS 4.0 · 7.1CWE-89
OpenMRS module bahmnicore contains Core OpenMRS modules for Bahmni (including ERP & ELIS Atom Feed Clients). In version 0.93, an attacker with authenticated access could potentially exfiltrate sensitive data from the database. This issue has been patched in version 0.93.1.
LimeSurvey Community Edition SQL injection
High7.1EPSS 0.30%, higher than 23% of scored CVEsLimeSurvey Community EditionCVSS 4.0 · 7.1CWE-89
LimeSurvey Community Edition 7.8.0 contains an SQL injection vulnerability in the survey-archive participant import and SPSS-response export workflow. An authenticated user with global surveys.create permission can import a crafted .lsa archive whose participant XML creates an…
Adobe Connect SQL injection
Critical9.9EPSS 1.1%, higher than 65% of scored CVEsAdobe ConnectCVSS 3.1 · 9.9CWE-89
Adobe Connect is affected by an Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. A low-privileged attacker could exploit this vulnerability to…
Adobe Connect SQL injection
Critical9.4EPSS 1.0%, higher than 64% of scored CVEsAdobe ConnectCVSS 3.1 · 9.4CWE-89
Adobe Connect is affected by an Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary SQL commands, potentially…
Adobe Connect SQL injection
High8.3EPSS 0.94%, higher than 61% of scored CVEsAdobe ConnectCVSS 3.1 · 8.3CWE-89
Adobe Connect is affected by an Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. A low-privileged attacker could exploit this vulnerability to…
Adobe Connect SQL injection
Critical9.9EPSS 1.1%, higher than 65% of scored CVEsAdobe ConnectCVSS 3.1 · 9.9CWE-89
Adobe Connect is affected by an Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. A low-privileged attacker could exploit this vulnerability to…
Adobe Connect SQL injection
Critical9.9EPSS 1.1%, higher than 65% of scored CVEsAdobe ConnectCVSS 3.1 · 9.9CWE-89
Adobe Connect is affected by an Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. A low-privileged attacker could exploit this vulnerability to…
Adobe Connect SQL injection
Critical9.9EPSS 1.1%, higher than 65% of scored CVEsAdobe ConnectCVSS 3.1 · 9.9CWE-89
Adobe Connect is affected by an Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. A low-privileged attacker could exploit this vulnerability to…
Adobe Connect SQL injection
High7.7EPSS 0.75%, higher than 56% of scored CVEsAdobe ConnectCVSS 3.1 · 7.7CWE-89
Adobe Connect is affected by an Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability that could lead to disclosure of sensitive memory. A low-privileged attacker could leverage this vulnerability to disclose sensitive information.…
Kong Gateway Enterprise SQL injection
High8.7EPSS 0.32%, higher than 25% of scored CVEsKong Gateway Enterprise and 1 moreCVSS 4.0 · 8.7CWE-89
SQL injection in the LLM usage counters of Kong Gateway Enterprise and Kong AI Gateway may allow a client to execute arbitrary SQL against the Kong database via a crafted model name.
worklenz SQL injection
High7.1EPSS 0.31%, higher than 24% of scored CVEsworklenzCVSS 4.0 · 7.1CWE-89
Worklenz before 3.3.0 contains an SQL injection vulnerability in the reporting members endpoints that allows authenticated attackers to read arbitrary database contents by injecting SQL through the projects and status parameters. Attackers can send crafted values to POST…
Microsoft SQL Server 2017 (GDR) SQL injection
High8.8EPSS 1.1%, higher than 67% of scored CVEsMicrosoft SQL Server 2017 (GDR) and 7 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-89
Improper neutralization of special elements used in an sql command ('sql injection') in SQL Server allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.
Microsoft SQL Server 2017 (GDR) SQL injection
High8.0EPSS 0.92%, higher than 61% of scored CVEsMicrosoft SQL Server 2017 (GDR) and 7 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.0CWE-89
Improper neutralization of special elements used in an sql command ('sql injection') in SQL Server allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.
Microsoft SQL Server 2017 (GDR) SQL injection
High8.0EPSS 0.92%, higher than 61% of scored CVEsMicrosoft SQL Server 2017 (GDR) and 7 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.0CWE-89
Improper neutralization of special elements used in an sql command ('sql injection') in SQL Server allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.
Microsoft SQL Server 2017 (GDR) SQL injection
High8.0EPSS 0.92%, higher than 61% of scored CVEsMicrosoft SQL Server 2017 (GDR) and 7 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.0CWE-89
Improper neutralization of special elements used in an sql command ('sql injection') in SQL Server allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.
Microsoft SQL Server 2017 (GDR) SQL injection
High7.0EPSS 1.9%, higher than 80% of scored CVEsMicrosoft SQL Server 2017 (GDR) and 7 moreCVSS 3.1 · 7.0CWE-89
Improper neutralization of special elements used in an sql command ('sql injection') in SQL Server allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.
Microsoft SQL Server 2017 (GDR) SQL injection
High7.5EPSS 0.78%, higher than 57% of scored CVEsMicrosoft SQL Server 2017 (GDR) and 5 moreCVSS 3.1 · 7.5CWE-89
Improper neutralization of special elements used in an sql command ('sql injection') in SQL Server allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.
Microsoft SQL Server 2017 (GDR) SQL injection
High7.5EPSS 0.78%, higher than 57% of scored CVEsMicrosoft SQL Server 2017 (GDR) and 7 moreCVSS 3.1 · 7.5CWE-89
Improper neutralization of special elements used in an sql command ('sql injection') in SQL Server allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.
Microsoft SQL Server 2017 (GDR) SQL injection
High8.0EPSS 0.92%, higher than 61% of scored CVEsMicrosoft SQL Server 2017 (GDR) and 7 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.0CWE-89
Improper neutralization of special elements used in an sql command ('sql injection') in SQL Server allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.
Microsoft SQL Server 2017 (GDR) SQL injection
High8.8EPSS 1.1%, higher than 67% of scored CVEsMicrosoft SQL Server 2017 (GDR) and 7 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-89
Improper neutralization of special elements used in an sql command ('sql injection') in SQL Server allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.
Microsoft SQL Server 2017 (GDR) SQL injection
High8.8EPSS 1.1%, higher than 67% of scored CVEsMicrosoft SQL Server 2017 (GDR) and 7 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-89
Improper neutralization of special elements used in an sql command ('sql injection') in SQL Server allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.
Microsoft SQL Server 2017 (GDR) SQL injection
High8.8EPSS 0.92%, higher than 61% of scored CVEsMicrosoft SQL Server 2017 (GDR) and 7 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-89
Improper neutralization of special elements used in an sql command ('sql injection') in SQL Server allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.
pgEdge pgedge-postgres-mcp SQL injection
Medium6.5EPSS 0.33%, higher than 27% of scored CVEspgEdge pgedge-postgres-mcpCVSS 3.1 · 6.5CWE-89, CWE-209
pgEdge Postgres MCP Server enables SQL queries against PostgreSQL databases through Model Context Protocol compatible clients. Prior to 1.1.0, the where parameter of the count_rows tool accepted subqueries against tables other than the table named in the tool call. A caller…
Reading the radar
CVSS, KEV and EPSS, briefly.
What is a CVE?
A CVE is a public identifier for one vulnerability in one product, such as CVE-2026-59310. The CVE program assigns it; NVD, run by the US National Institute of Standards and Technology, adds scores, weakness classes and affected product lists.
What does the CVSS score tell me?
CVSS rates how severe a vulnerability is on its own, from 0 to 10, and its vector says how it is reached: over the network or locally, with or without an account, with or without someone clicking. It says nothing about whether anyone is exploiting it. The radar shows the newest CVSS version scored and names it, because version 4.0 and 3.1 scores differ.
What is CISA KEV?
The Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog is CISA's list of CVEs with reliable evidence of exploitation in the wild. US federal agencies must fix each one by its due date, and it is the strongest signal of what to patch first.
What is EPSS?
FIRST's Exploit Prediction Scoring System estimates the probability that a CVE will see exploitation activity in the next 30 days, recomputed daily. Most CVEs score well under 1%, so the radar also shows the percentile: how a CVE ranks against every scored CVE.
How should I prioritise?
Patch what CISA lists as exploited first. Then CVEs with a high EPSS score, then the most severe by CVSS. Within each group, start with whatever is reachable from the internet without an account.
Where do the explanations come from?
Veriom writes them from fixed templates over each record: the weakness class says what went wrong and where in an architecture it lives, the CVSS vector says how it is reached and what it affects, and KEV, EPSS and CISA's assessment say whether it is exploited. Nobody reviews each CVE by hand, so read the description and the references before acting.
How fresh is the data?
New and changed CVEs arrive from NVD every hour, the KEV catalog every six hours and EPSS scores once a day. Each page shows when the data was last updated.
Know where a vulnerable component would sit in your systems.
A CVE names a product. Whether it matters depends on where that product sits in your systems: what reaches it, which trust boundary it guards and what it can reach once compromised. Veriom maps your components, their relationships and your trust boundaries from your code, cloud and delivery evidence, so you can see where a component like this sits. The radar itself does not look at your systems.
Sources
- CVE records and CVSS scores from the NVD CVE API. This product uses the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD.
- Exploitation status from CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.
- Exploit likelihood from FIRST’s Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS), refreshed daily.
- Explanations are written by Veriom from fixed templates over each record’s data, not by a person reviewing each CVE. Descriptions are quoted from the records as published. The radar covers CVEs published since 4 Nov 2026, plus every CVE in the KEV catalog.