Free tool · No sign-in
CVE radar: the latest vulnerabilities, explained.
Every new CVE from NVD, with whether it is exploited in the wild (CISA KEV), how likely it is to be (FIRST EPSS), and what it means for your architecture in plain language.
Updated 11 Nov, 04:49 UTC from NVD, CISA KEV and FIRST EPSSMarkdownRSSJSON Feed
Patch first
Exploited in the wild, newest first.
CISA adds a CVE to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog when attackers are using it. Patch these first, then CVEs with a high EPSS score, then the most severe, starting with anything reachable from the internet.
Microsoft Office Outlook Missing User Interaction for Potentially Unsafe Action Vulnerability
Medium6.5Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS not scored yetMicrosoft Office and 6 moreCVSS 3.1 · 6.5CWE-356
Google Chromium Use-After-Free Vulnerability
High8.8Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS not scored yetGoogle Chromium and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-416
Barracuda Networks Email Security Gateway (ESG) Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel Vulnerability
Critical9.3Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-13EPSS 1.6%, higher than 76% of scored CVEsBarracuda Email Security Gateway (ESG)CVSS 4.0 · 9.3CWE-288
Barracuda Networks Multiple Products OS Command Injection Vulnerability
High8.6Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-13EPSS 1.1%, higher than 65% of scored CVEsBarracuda Email Security Gateway (ESG) and 5 moreCVSS 4.0 · 8.6CWE-78
Openwave Messaging Limited Webtop Media Transcoder Incorrect Resource Transfer Between Spheres Vulnerability
Medium4.3Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS 0.27%, higher than 20% of scored CVEsOpenwave Messaging Limited Webtop Media Transcoder and 2 moreCVSS 3.1 · 4.3CWE-669
Trends
The last 30 days, by severity.
4,691 CVEs published, 346 of them critical. Many arrive without a score yet: NVD and the reporting organisations add CVSS over the following days.
Show the numbers
| Day | Critical | High | Medium | Low | Not scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13 Oct 2026 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 Oct 2026 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 Oct 2026 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 Oct 2026 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 Oct 2026 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 Oct 2026 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 Oct 2026 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1 Nov 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 Nov 2026 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 3 Nov 2026 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 4 Nov 2026 | 35 | 158 | 138 | 32 | 1 |
| 5 Nov 2026 | 55 | 213 | 148 | 36 | 1 |
| 6 Nov 2026 | 40 | 146 | 205 | 47 | 6 |
| 7 Nov 2026 | 57 | 161 | 232 | 11 | 13 |
| 8 Nov 2026 | 23 | 128 | 143 | 26 | 0 |
| 9 Nov 2026 | 22 | 149 | 218 | 42 | 39 |
| 10 Nov 2026 | 103 | 1151 | 587 | 43 | 233 |
| 11 Nov 2026 | 2 | 11 | 15 | 1 | 0 |
Exploit likelihood (EPSS), last 30 days
- Under 1%713
- 1% to 10%25
- 10% to 50%2
- 50% or more7
- Not scored yet3944
Most affected vendors, last 30 days
Most common weaknesses, last 30 days
- Heap-based buffer overflow (CWE-122)343
- Cross-site scripting (CWE-79)329
- Use after free (CWE-416)276
- Missing authorization (CWE-862)230
- Out-of-bounds read (CWE-125)172
- Insecure direct object reference (CWE-639)164
- Server-side request forgery (CWE-918)147
- Path traversal (CWE-22)128
- Out-of-bounds write (CWE-787)127
- Incorrect authorization (CWE-863)127
Matching CVEs
340 CVEs match these filters, page 14 of 14.
On HP Poly EagleEye Cube USB 1.3.1-001267 devices, the administrator authentication flow is broken: session management and access controls are not enforced d…
Critical9.8EPSS 0.43%, higher than 38% of scored CVEsProduct not named yetCVSS 3.1 · 9.8CWE-287
On HP Poly EagleEye Cube USB 1.3.1-001267 devices, the administrator authentication flow is broken: session management and access controls are not enforced device-side. Thus, an unauthenticated user can change administrator-level settings (without logging in) via a modified…
rubyonrails Active Storage insecure default
Critical9.8EPSS 0.74%, higher than 55% of scored CVEsrubyonrails Active StorageCVSS 3.1 · 9.8CWE-1188
The activestorage gem before 8.1.4.1 for Ruby on Rails, when ImageMagick attachment processing occurs, can allow server read and write operations (e.g., reading secret_key_base) because the ImageMagick analyzer runs when a file is attached, and there is not an ImageMagick…
WatchGuard AuthPoint Authentication Gateway capture-replay
Critical9.1EPSS 0.47%, higher than 41% of scored CVEsWatchGuard AuthPoint Authentication GatewayCVSS 4.0 · 9.1CWE-294
An Authentication Bypass by Capture-replay vulnerability in WatchGuard AuthPoint Gateway allows an attacker who has observed a legitimate request between AuthPoint Gateway components to replay it and perform unauthorized administrative actions, including disrupting…
WatchGuard AuthPoint Authentication Gateway improper authentication
Critical9.2EPSS 0.67%, higher than 52% of scored CVEsWatchGuard AuthPoint Authentication GatewayCVSS 4.0 · 9.2CWE-252, CWE-287
A Missing Authentication for Critical Function vulnerability in WatchGuard AuthPoint Gateway allows a remote unauthenticated attacker with network access to the AuthPoint Gateway host to disrupt authentication services and delete the local directory synchronization configuration.
WatchGuard AuthPoint Authentication Gateway improper certificate validation
Critical9.1EPSS 0.29%, higher than 22% of scored CVEsWatchGuard AuthPoint Authentication GatewayCVSS 4.0 · 9.1CWE-295
An Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability in WatchGuard AuthPoint Gateway allows an attacker with an on-path network position to intercept and modify communications between the AuthPoint Gateway and local authentication providers.
Uncanny Toolkit for LearnDash incorrect privilege assignment
Critical9.8EPSS 0.42%, higher than 37% of scored CVEsUncanny Toolkit for LearnDashCVSS 3.1 · 9.8CWE-266
Incorrect Privilege Assignment vulnerability in Uncanny Owl Uncanny Toolkit for LearnDash uncanny-learndash-toolkit allows Privilege Escalation.This issue affects Uncanny Toolkit for LearnDash: from n/a through 3.8.2.
David-Crty Databasement authentication bypass by spoofing
Critical9.2EPSS 0.54%, higher than 46% of scored CVEsDavid-Crty DatabasementCVSS 4.0 · 9.2CWE-290
Databasement before 1.10.9 contains an authentication bypass vulnerability in OAuthService::findOrCreateLocalUser() that links OIDC identities to local users by email without checking email_verified. Attackers can register an identity provider account with a victim's unverified…
Crocoblock JetFormBuilder incorrect privilege assignment
Critical9.8EPSS 0.42%, higher than 37% of scored CVEsCrocoblock JetFormBuilderCVSS 3.1 · 9.8CWE-266
Incorrect Privilege Assignment vulnerability in Crocoblock JetFormBuilder jetformbuilder allows Privilege Escalation.This issue affects JetFormBuilder: from n/a through 3.6.7.1.
SEPPmail Secure Email Gateway (SEG) external control of a file name
Critical9.2EPSS 0.33%, higher than 26% of scored CVEsSEPPmail Secure Email Gateway (SEG)CVSS 4.0 · 9.2CWE-73
SEPPmail Secure Email Gateway before 15.1.1 trusts a file path supplied in externally provided Large File Transfer attachment metadata. An unauthenticated remote sender can cause the mail-processing worker to disclose, move, or delete an accessible regular file when LFT is…
SEPPmail Secure Email Gateway (SEG) eval injection
Critical9.2EPSS 0.26%, higher than 18% of scored CVEsSEPPmail Secure Email Gateway (SEG)CVSS 4.0 · 9.2CWE-95
SEPPmail Secure Email Gateway before 15.1.1 can evaluate attacker-influenced replacement text as Perl code in sender or recipient replacement rules. An unauthenticated remote sender can execute operating-system commands in the mail-processing worker context when an active rule…
better-auth Better Auth origin validation error
Critical9.1EPSS 0.20%, higher than 10% of scored CVEsbetter-auth Better AuthCVSS 3.1 · 9.1CWE-346
@better-auth/expo before 1.7.16 allows certain account-takeover outcomes (e.g., unauthenticated changes of any account's email address), because it signs a caller-supplied state value without checking whether that value had been issued by the server. NOTE: the application…
Linksys E5600 improper authentication
Critical9.3EPSS 0.75%, higher than 55% of scored CVEsLinksys E5600CVSS 4.0 · 9.3CWE-287
A vulnerability was determined in Linksys E5600 1.1.0.26. Affected is an unknown function of the file /cgi-bin/mesh_login.cgi of the component Login Handler. Executing a manipulation can lead to improper authentication. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been…
Qihoo 360 Whole Home Router M5 hard-coded password
Critical9.3EPSS 0.50%, higher than 43% of scored CVEsQihoo 360 Whole Home Router M5CVSS 4.0 · 9.3CWE-259, CWE-798
A vulnerability was identified in Qihoo 360 Whole Home Router M5 4.0.17.1566. This issue affects the function Home of the file /etc/init.d/mpt of the component Boot Script. The manipulation leads to hard-coded credentials. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The…
Qihoo 360 D603-2 command injection
Critical9.3EPSS 2.0%, higher than 81% of scored CVEsQihoo 360 D603-2 and 3 moreCVSS 4.0 · 9.3CWE-77, CWE-78
A vulnerability was found in Qihoo 360 D603-2, D600-2, D606-6 and D706 up to 6.4.9. This affects the function testspeed_command of the file /fs2/bin/iscm. Performing a manipulation of the argument host results in os command injection. The attack may be initiated remotely. The…
Qihoo 360 D621-2 insufficient verification of data authenticity
Critical9.3EPSS 0.24%, higher than 15% of scored CVEsQihoo 360 D621-2 and 5 moreCVSS 4.0 · 9.3CWE-345, CWE-347
A vulnerability has been found in Qihoo 360 D621-2, D603-2, D600-2, D619, D606-6 and D706 up to 6.4.9. Affected by this issue is the function verify_sign of the file fs2/bin/iscm of the component Firmware Signature Verification. Such manipulation of the argument sign leads to…
Reading the radar
CVSS, KEV and EPSS, briefly.
What is a CVE?
A CVE is a public identifier for one vulnerability in one product, such as CVE-2026-59310. The CVE program assigns it; NVD, run by the US National Institute of Standards and Technology, adds scores, weakness classes and affected product lists.
What does the CVSS score tell me?
CVSS rates how severe a vulnerability is on its own, from 0 to 10, and its vector says how it is reached: over the network or locally, with or without an account, with or without someone clicking. It says nothing about whether anyone is exploiting it. The radar shows the newest CVSS version scored and names it, because version 4.0 and 3.1 scores differ.
What is CISA KEV?
The Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog is CISA's list of CVEs with reliable evidence of exploitation in the wild. US federal agencies must fix each one by its due date, and it is the strongest signal of what to patch first.
What is EPSS?
FIRST's Exploit Prediction Scoring System estimates the probability that a CVE will see exploitation activity in the next 30 days, recomputed daily. Most CVEs score well under 1%, so the radar also shows the percentile: how a CVE ranks against every scored CVE.
How should I prioritise?
Patch what CISA lists as exploited first. Then CVEs with a high EPSS score, then the most severe by CVSS. Within each group, start with whatever is reachable from the internet without an account.
Where do the explanations come from?
Veriom writes them from fixed templates over each record: the weakness class says what went wrong and where in an architecture it lives, the CVSS vector says how it is reached and what it affects, and KEV, EPSS and CISA's assessment say whether it is exploited. Nobody reviews each CVE by hand, so read the description and the references before acting.
How fresh is the data?
New and changed CVEs arrive from NVD every hour, the KEV catalog every six hours and EPSS scores once a day. Each page shows when the data was last updated.
Know where a vulnerable component would sit in your systems.
A CVE names a product. Whether it matters depends on where that product sits in your systems: what reaches it, which trust boundary it guards and what it can reach once compromised. Veriom maps your components, their relationships and your trust boundaries from your code, cloud and delivery evidence, so you can see where a component like this sits. The radar itself does not look at your systems.
Sources
- CVE records and CVSS scores from the NVD CVE API. This product uses the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD.
- Exploitation status from CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.
- Exploit likelihood from FIRST’s Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS), refreshed daily.
- Explanations are written by Veriom from fixed templates over each record’s data, not by a person reviewing each CVE. Descriptions are quoted from the records as published. The radar covers CVEs published since 4 Nov 2026, plus every CVE in the KEV catalog.