Free tool · No sign-in
CVE radar: the latest vulnerabilities, explained.
Every new CVE from NVD, with whether it is exploited in the wild (CISA KEV), how likely it is to be (FIRST EPSS), and what it means for your architecture in plain language.
Updated 11 Nov, 02:49 UTC from NVD, CISA KEV and FIRST EPSSMarkdownRSSJSON Feed
Patch first
Exploited in the wild, newest first.
CISA adds a CVE to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog when attackers are using it. Patch these first, then CVEs with a high EPSS score, then the most severe, starting with anything reachable from the internet.
Microsoft Office Outlook Missing User Interaction for Potentially Unsafe Action Vulnerability
Medium6.5Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS not scored yetMicrosoft Office and 6 moreCVSS 3.1 · 6.5CWE-356
Google Chromium Use-After-Free Vulnerability
High8.8Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS not scored yetGoogle Chromium and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-416
Barracuda Networks Email Security Gateway (ESG) Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel Vulnerability
Critical9.3Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-13EPSS 1.6%, higher than 76% of scored CVEsBarracuda Email Security Gateway (ESG)CVSS 4.0 · 9.3CWE-288
Barracuda Networks Multiple Products OS Command Injection Vulnerability
High8.6Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-13EPSS 1.1%, higher than 65% of scored CVEsBarracuda Email Security Gateway (ESG) and 5 moreCVSS 4.0 · 8.6CWE-78
Openwave Messaging Limited Webtop Media Transcoder Incorrect Resource Transfer Between Spheres Vulnerability
Medium4.3Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS 0.27%, higher than 20% of scored CVEsOpenwave Messaging Limited Webtop Media Transcoder and 2 moreCVSS 3.1 · 4.3CWE-669
Trends
The last 30 days, by severity.
4,675 CVEs published, 346 of them critical. Many arrive without a score yet: NVD and the reporting organisations add CVSS over the following days.
Show the numbers
| Day | Critical | High | Medium | Low | Not scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13 Oct 2026 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 Oct 2026 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 Oct 2026 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 Oct 2026 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 Oct 2026 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 Oct 2026 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 Oct 2026 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1 Nov 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 Nov 2026 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 3 Nov 2026 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 4 Nov 2026 | 35 | 158 | 138 | 32 | 1 |
| 5 Nov 2026 | 55 | 213 | 148 | 36 | 1 |
| 6 Nov 2026 | 40 | 146 | 205 | 47 | 6 |
| 7 Nov 2026 | 57 | 161 | 232 | 11 | 13 |
| 8 Nov 2026 | 23 | 128 | 143 | 26 | 0 |
| 9 Nov 2026 | 22 | 149 | 218 | 42 | 39 |
| 10 Nov 2026 | 103 | 1151 | 587 | 43 | 233 |
| 11 Nov 2026 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 1 | 0 |
Exploit likelihood (EPSS), last 30 days
- Under 1%713
- 1% to 10%25
- 10% to 50%2
- 50% or more7
- Not scored yet3928
Most affected vendors, last 30 days
Most common weaknesses, last 30 days
- Heap-based buffer overflow (CWE-122)343
- Cross-site scripting (CWE-79)323
- Use after free (CWE-416)276
- Missing authorization (CWE-862)229
- Out-of-bounds read (CWE-125)172
- Insecure direct object reference (CWE-639)164
- Server-side request forgery (CWE-918)147
- Path traversal (CWE-22)127
- Out-of-bounds write (CWE-787)126
- Incorrect authorization (CWE-863)126
Matching CVEs
2,110 CVEs match these filters, page 5 of 85.
BlackBerry Ltd QNX Hypervisor out-of-bounds write
High7.7EPSS not scored yetBlackBerry Ltd QNX Hypervisor and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 7.7CWE-787
Invalid Memory Access via the MSI-X table in QVM could allow an attacker in the guest to execute arbitrary code in the QVM to cause memory corruption, information disclosure or a crash of the QVM.
Fortinet FortiSandbox cross-site scripting
High8.8EPSS not scored yetFortinet FortiSandbox and 2 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-79
A improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiSandbox 5.0.0 through 5.0.5, FortiSandbox 4.4.0 through 4.4.8, FortiSandbox Cloud 5.0.4 through 5.0.5, FortiSandbox PaaS 5.0.4 through 5.0.5 may allow an…
wintercms winter missing authorization
High8.3EPSS not scored yetwintercms winterCVSS 3.1 · 8.3CWE-862, CWE-863
Winter CMS is a content management system built on the Laravel PHP framework. Prior to 1.2.14, the ImportExportController behavior applies userHasAccess() only to the import() and export() page actions, while Backend\Classes\Controller::execAjaxHandlers() dispatches onImport(),…
Arista Networks EOS path traversal
High8.7EPSS not scored yetArista Networks EOSCVSS 4.0 · 8.7CWE-22
On affected EOS versions with the eAPI service enabled, a specially crafted HTTP request can allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to read arbitrary files, including sensitive credentials from the switch filesystem.
Arista Networks EOS out-of-bounds write
High8.9EPSS not scored yetArista Networks EOSCVSS 4.0 · 8.9CWE-787
On affected platforms running Arista EOS with Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) configured to use keyed MD5 or keyed SHA1 authentication, an unauthenticated attacker with network adjacency (direct or multi-hop) to a BFD-enabled interface can send a specially crafted BFD…
Arista Networks EOS out-of-bounds read
High8.3EPSS not scored yetArista Networks EOSCVSS 4.0 · 8.3CWE-125
A malformed Error Report can cause EOS to read beyond packet boundaries, potentially terminating the RPKI agent or exposing unintended memory contents through logging.
Arista Networks EOS vulnerability
High8.3EPSS not scored yetArista Networks EOSCVSS 4.0 · 8.3CWE-696
A crafted Error Report can leave EOS stuck believing that a cache reset is in progress, preventing ROA publication, withdrawal reconciliation, and BGP origin-validation updates.
Arista Networks EOS vulnerability
High8.3EPSS not scored yetArista Networks EOSCVSS 4.0 · 8.3CWE-420
On affected platforms running Arista EOS with Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) changing the BGP listen port from its default value disables default protective Access Control List (ACL) rules against unexpected BGP peering attempts.
Arista Networks EOS vulnerability
High7.7EPSS not scored yetArista Networks EOSCVSS 4.0 · 7.7CWE-124
An unauthenticated attacker on an adjacent network segment can send crafted RIPv2 packets to a RIP-enabled interface on the device to trigger the Rip agent crash without providing valid credentials. Repeated exploitation reliably interrupts routing service on the affected…
Arista Networks EOS vulnerability
High8.7EPSS not scored yetArista Networks EOSCVSS 4.0 · 8.7CWE-440
On affected platforms running Arista EOS with Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) configured, An unauthenticated attacker who can establish a BGP peering session with an affected device and can send specially crafted BGP messages to cause repeated BGP session resets, enabling…
Arista Networks EOS untrusted input in a security decision
High7.1EPSS not scored yetArista Networks EOSCVSS 4.0 · 7.1CWE-807
On affected platforms running Arista EOS with 802.1X with Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) device profiling enabled, a network-adjacent attacker can send a crafted DHCP packet to force the device to record a spoofed device profile. This may potentially allow the…
Arista Networks EOS sensitive data in logs
High7.0EPSS not scored yetArista Networks EOSCVSS 4.0 · 7.0CWE-532
On affected platforms running Arista EOS with IEEE 802.1X authentication and MACsec using dynamically derived keys, sensitive authentication information may be recorded in diagnostic data during a Smart Switch Upgrade (SSU). An attacker with administrative access on the device…
MongoDB Server incorrect authorization
High8.6EPSS not scored yetMongoDB ServerCVSS 4.0 · 8.6CWE-863
An incorrect authorization check in the MongoDB Server authorization subsystem may allow an unauthenticated party with local host access to obtain administrative privileges on a database server that has authorization enabled. This may result in unintended access to stored data…
MongoDB Server unnecessary privileges
High7.5EPSS not scored yetMongoDB ServerCVSS 4.0 · 7.5CWE-250
An improper privilege management issue in the sharding subsystem of MongoDB Server may allow a user holding certain shard-level administrative privileges to cause persisted internal coordination state to be reprocessed with elevated internal authority. Because that state is…
MongoDB Server interpretation conflict
High8.2EPSS not scored yetMongoDB ServerCVSS 4.0 · 8.2CWE-436
An issue in MongoDB Server's client-side field-level encryption (CSFLE) schema processing component allows encryption metadata to be silently dropped during schema parsing under certain conditions. A party who can deliver a specially crafted schema to a user's CSFLE client may…
MongoDB Server allocation without limits
High7.1EPSS not scored yetMongoDB ServerCVSS 4.0 · 7.1CWE-770
An issue in MongoDB server’s aggregation framework allows an authenticated user with read privileges to cause a denial of service by sending specially crafted aggregate commands using an internal expression. Despite its internal naming, this expression is registered as…
MongoDB Server unchecked unusual condition
High7.5EPSS not scored yetMongoDB ServerCVSS 4.0 · 7.5CWE-754
A flaw in MongoDB’s X.509 cluster-membership authentication guard could allow a holder of a cluster-member certificate to gain elevated internal privileges when a specific deployment configuration is in use. An internal check, which prevents a certificate recognized as a…
MongoDB Server incomplete cleanup
High7.0EPSS not scored yetMongoDB ServerCVSS 4.0 · 7.0CWE-459
A flaw in MongoDB Server's user management commands may lead to incomplete cleanup of role authorization data when roles are dropped from a database. Due to incorrect internal query predicates, the drop operation removes role definitions but fails to remove stale references in…
MongoDB Server resource never released
High8.2EPSS not scored yetMongoDB ServerCVSS 4.0 · 8.2CWE-772
A flaw exists in the server-side SSPI Kerberos authentication handler on Windows Enterprise builds of MongoDB. When processing certain authentication requests, the server fails to properly release an underlying system resource due to an internal tracking error. An…
MongoDB Server use after free
High7.1EPSS not scored yetMongoDB ServerCVSS 4.0 · 7.1CWE-416
A use-after-free issue exists in MongoDB’s SBE (Slot-Based Execution) implementation of a window function accumulator used by certain $setWindowFields aggregation pipelines. Under specific conditions, the accumulator can retain a dangling pointer to memory that has since been…
moby SwarmKit unintended proxy
High7.7EPSS not scored yetmoby SwarmKit and 2 moreCVSS 4.0 · 7.7CWE-441
SwarmKit's Cluster-API proxy can overwrite a forwarded client's TLS identity with an intermediary manager's identity. WithMetadataForwardTLSInfo replaces outgoing metadata with a copy of the incoming metadata, discarding the redirect guard's changes when built with grpc-go 1.39…
Docker Engine protection mechanism failure
High7.0EPSS not scored yetDocker Engine and 1 moreCVSS 4.0 · 7.0CWE-693
Moby's overlay network driver does not restore the iptables rules for encrypted overlay networks after firewalld deletes them. Unlike other Docker Engine networking components, the overlay driver does not handle firewalld reload or start signals over D-Bus. The missing rules…
wpeverest Everest Forms path traversal
High7.5EPSS not scored yetwpeverest Everest Forms – Contact Form, Payment Form, Quiz, Survey & Custom Form Builder with AICVSS 3.1 · 7.5CWE-22
The Everest Forms plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Arbitrary File Read in all versions up to, and including, 3.6.3 via the attach_entry_files() function. This is due to the function attaching any entry field value whose meta key matches /signature_/ to the notification…
worklenz SQL injection
High7.1EPSS not scored yetworklenzCVSS 4.0 · 7.1CWE-89
Worklenz before 3.3.0 contains an SQL injection vulnerability in the reporting members endpoints that allows authenticated attackers to read arbitrary database contents by injecting SQL through the projects and status parameters. Attackers can send crafted values to POST…
Fortinet FortiManager path traversal
High8.1EPSS not scored yetFortinet FortiManager and 2 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.1CWE-22
An improper limitation of a pathname to a restricted directory ('path traversal') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAnalyzer 7.6.0 through 7.6.4, FortiAnalyzer 7.4.0 through 7.4.7, FortiAnalyzer 7.2.0 through 7.2.11, FortiManager 7.6.0 through 7.6.4, FortiManager 7.4.0 through…
Reading the radar
CVSS, KEV and EPSS, briefly.
What is a CVE?
A CVE is a public identifier for one vulnerability in one product, such as CVE-2026-59310. The CVE program assigns it; NVD, run by the US National Institute of Standards and Technology, adds scores, weakness classes and affected product lists.
What does the CVSS score tell me?
CVSS rates how severe a vulnerability is on its own, from 0 to 10, and its vector says how it is reached: over the network or locally, with or without an account, with or without someone clicking. It says nothing about whether anyone is exploiting it. The radar shows the newest CVSS version scored and names it, because version 4.0 and 3.1 scores differ.
What is CISA KEV?
The Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog is CISA's list of CVEs with reliable evidence of exploitation in the wild. US federal agencies must fix each one by its due date, and it is the strongest signal of what to patch first.
What is EPSS?
FIRST's Exploit Prediction Scoring System estimates the probability that a CVE will see exploitation activity in the next 30 days, recomputed daily. Most CVEs score well under 1%, so the radar also shows the percentile: how a CVE ranks against every scored CVE.
How should I prioritise?
Patch what CISA lists as exploited first. Then CVEs with a high EPSS score, then the most severe by CVSS. Within each group, start with whatever is reachable from the internet without an account.
Where do the explanations come from?
Veriom writes them from fixed templates over each record: the weakness class says what went wrong and where in an architecture it lives, the CVSS vector says how it is reached and what it affects, and KEV, EPSS and CISA's assessment say whether it is exploited. Nobody reviews each CVE by hand, so read the description and the references before acting.
How fresh is the data?
New and changed CVEs arrive from NVD every hour, the KEV catalog every six hours and EPSS scores once a day. Each page shows when the data was last updated.
Know where a vulnerable component would sit in your systems.
A CVE names a product. Whether it matters depends on where that product sits in your systems: what reaches it, which trust boundary it guards and what it can reach once compromised. Veriom maps your components, their relationships and your trust boundaries from your code, cloud and delivery evidence, so you can see where a component like this sits. The radar itself does not look at your systems.
Sources
- CVE records and CVSS scores from the NVD CVE API. This product uses the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD.
- Exploitation status from CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.
- Exploit likelihood from FIRST’s Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS), refreshed daily.
- Explanations are written by Veriom from fixed templates over each record’s data, not by a person reviewing each CVE. Descriptions are quoted from the records as published. The radar covers CVEs published since 4 Nov 2026, plus every CVE in the KEV catalog.