Free tool · No sign-in
CVE radar: the latest vulnerabilities, explained.
Every new CVE from NVD, with whether it is exploited in the wild (CISA KEV), how likely it is to be (FIRST EPSS), and what it means for your architecture in plain language.
Updated 11 Nov, 11:27 UTC from NVD, CISA KEV and FIRST EPSSMarkdownRSSJSON Feed
Patch first
Exploited in the wild, newest first.
CISA adds a CVE to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog when attackers are using it. Patch these first, then CVEs with a high EPSS score, then the most severe, starting with anything reachable from the internet.
Microsoft Office Outlook Missing User Interaction for Potentially Unsafe Action Vulnerability
Medium6.5Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS not scored yetMicrosoft Office and 6 moreCVSS 3.1 · 6.5CWE-356
Google Chromium Use-After-Free Vulnerability
High8.8Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS not scored yetGoogle Chromium and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-416
Barracuda Networks Email Security Gateway (ESG) Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel Vulnerability
Critical9.3Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-13EPSS 1.6%, higher than 76% of scored CVEsBarracuda Email Security Gateway (ESG)CVSS 4.0 · 9.3CWE-288
Barracuda Networks Multiple Products OS Command Injection Vulnerability
High8.6Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-13EPSS 1.1%, higher than 65% of scored CVEsBarracuda Email Security Gateway (ESG) and 5 moreCVSS 4.0 · 8.6CWE-78
Openwave Messaging Limited Webtop Media Transcoder Incorrect Resource Transfer Between Spheres Vulnerability
Medium4.3Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS 0.27%, higher than 20% of scored CVEsOpenwave Messaging Limited Webtop Media Transcoder and 2 moreCVSS 3.1 · 4.3CWE-669
Trends
The last 30 days, by severity.
4,830 CVEs published, 354 of them critical. Many arrive without a score yet: NVD and the reporting organisations add CVSS over the following days.
Show the numbers
| Day | Critical | High | Medium | Low | Not scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13 Oct 2026 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 Oct 2026 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 Oct 2026 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 Oct 2026 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 Oct 2026 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 Oct 2026 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 Oct 2026 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1 Nov 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 Nov 2026 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 3 Nov 2026 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 4 Nov 2026 | 35 | 158 | 138 | 32 | 1 |
| 5 Nov 2026 | 55 | 213 | 148 | 36 | 1 |
| 6 Nov 2026 | 40 | 146 | 205 | 47 | 6 |
| 7 Nov 2026 | 57 | 161 | 232 | 11 | 13 |
| 8 Nov 2026 | 23 | 128 | 143 | 26 | 0 |
| 9 Nov 2026 | 22 | 149 | 218 | 42 | 39 |
| 10 Nov 2026 | 103 | 1151 | 587 | 43 | 233 |
| 11 Nov 2026 | 10 | 44 | 38 | 2 | 74 |
Exploit likelihood (EPSS), last 30 days
- Under 1%713
- 1% to 10%25
- 10% to 50%2
- 50% or more7
- Not scored yet4083
Most affected vendors, last 30 days
Most common weaknesses, last 30 days
- Heap-based buffer overflow (CWE-122)343
- Cross-site scripting (CWE-79)342
- Use after free (CWE-416)276
- Missing authorization (CWE-862)231
- Out-of-bounds read (CWE-125)173
- Insecure direct object reference (CWE-639)164
- Server-side request forgery (CWE-918)148
- Path traversal (CWE-22)130
- Out-of-bounds write (CWE-787)130
- Incorrect authorization (CWE-863)129
Matching CVEs
2,150 CVEs match these filters, page 58 of 86.
hickory-dns insufficient verification of data authenticity
High8.7EPSS not scored yethickory-dnsCVSS 4.0 · 8.7CWE-345
Hickory DNS hickory-proto 0.25 through 0.26.0-alpha.1 and hickory-net 0.26.0-beta.1 before 0.26.2 contain a DNSSEC validation flaw in the validating recursor's NSEC3 handler, which matches the closest encloser by hash alone without checking the type bitmap and so accepts…
hickory-dns vulnerability
High8.2EPSS not scored yethickory-dnsCVSS 4.0 · 8.2CWE-1025
The hickory-net crate in Hickory DNS 0.26.0-beta.1 before 0.26.2 allows DNSSEC validation bypass because Name's Hash ignores label lengths and ValidationCacheKey compares only that hash. An attacker controlling an unsigned delegation whose name differs from a signed target only…
hickory-dns insufficient verification of data authenticity
High8.2EPSS not scored yethickory-dnsCVSS 4.0 · 8.2CWE-345
Hickory DNS hickory-net 0.26.0-beta.1 before 0.26.2 and hickory-proto through 0.26.0-alpha.1 fail to verify, per RFC 6840 §4.4, that an NSEC or NSEC3 record denying a DS RRset also proves the delegation's NS record exists. Attackers can reuse child-side NSEC or NSEC3 records to…
hickory-dns unchecked unusual condition
High8.7EPSS not scored yethickory-dnsCVSS 4.0 · 8.7CWE-754
The recursive resolver in Hickory DNS (all versions of the hickory-recursor crate, and hickory-resolver 0.26.0 before 0.26.2) caches an empty connection pool when it follows a referral with no glue records and all queries for the name servers' IP addresses fail. An attacker…
hickory-dns authentication bypass by spoofing
High8.9EPSS not scored yethickory-dnsCVSS 4.0 · 8.9CWE-290
The DNSSEC validation in the Hickory DNS hickory-net crate 0.26.0 before 0.26.2 identifies wraparound NSEC records by comparing the next domain name to an SOA record in the response, accepting that SOA even if it fails validation. Attackers who can supply DNS responses can…
hickory-dns uncontrolled resource consumption
High8.7EPSS not scored yethickory-dnsCVSS 4.0 · 8.7CWE-400
Hickory DNS 0.25.0-alpha.3 through 0.25.2 contains a query amplification vulnerability in its recursive resolver, which mishandles cyclic sibling name server referrals that lack glue records. Attackers controlling two zones whose name servers reference each other without glue…
hickory-dns vulnerability
High8.2EPSS not scored yethickory-dnsCVSS 4.0 · 8.2CWE-696
The hickory-net crate in Hickory DNS 0.26.0 before 0.26.2 stops listening and returns an error when a client UDP connection receives a datagram that cannot be parsed as a DNS message. Remote attackers who guess the query's source port, without knowing the transaction ID, can…
hickory-dns authentication bypass by spoofing
High8.7EPSS not scored yethickory-dnsCVSS 4.0 · 8.7CWE-290
Hickory DNS hickory-net 0.26.0-beta.1 before 0.26.2 and hickory-proto through 0.26.0-alpha.1 perform insufficient checks on NSEC3 record names during DNSSEC verification, comparing only the hashed label without confirming the record belongs to the correct zone. Attackers can…
hickory-dns allocation without limits
High8.7EPSS not scored yethickory-dnsCVSS 4.0 · 8.7CWE-770
Hickory DNS from 0.24.0 before 0.26.2 contains a resource exhaustion vulnerability that allows remote attackers to consume server memory via unbounded DoH request bodies. Attackers can send large request bodies over HTTP/2 or HTTP/3 to a DNS over HTTP server, causing memory…
hickory-dns allocation without limits
High8.7EPSS not scored yethickory-dnsCVSS 4.0 · 8.7CWE-770
Hickory DNS 0.24.0 through 0.26.1 contains a memory exhaustion vulnerability that allows remote attackers to consume server resources by sending incomplete DNS-over-QUIC request bodies. Attackers can open many connections and send only large length prefixes, causing…
hickory-dns allocation without limits
High8.7EPSS not scored yethickory-dnsCVSS 4.0 · 8.7CWE-770
Hickory DNS before 0.26.2 contains a resource exhaustion vulnerability in its DNS-over-HTTPS HTTP/2 server that lacks sufficient timeouts or limits for incomplete request bodies. Remote attackers can open DoH connections, send incomplete request bodies, and hold connections…
hickory-dns improper input validation
High8.7EPSS not scored yethickory-dnsCVSS 4.0 · 8.7CWE-20
The zone file parser in the hickory-proto crate of Hickory DNS 0.24.0 before 0.26.2 panics when a single token in a zone file is 4096 bytes or longer. Attackers who can supply untrusted zone files to an application using the parser can trigger the panic to cause a denial of…
hickory-dns improper input validation
High8.7EPSS not scored yethickory-dnsCVSS 4.0 · 8.7CWE-20
hickory-dns from 0.20.1 before 0.26.2 contains a denial of service vulnerability in the hickory-proto SVCB and HTTPS record presentation format parser. Attackers can supply untrusted zone files where only a single or double quote replaces a service parameter value, triggering a…
hickory-dns vulnerability
High8.7EPSS not scored yethickory-dnsCVSS 4.0 · 8.7CWE-1286
Hickory-dns from 0.20.1 before 0.26.2 contains a denial of service vulnerability in the hickory-proto SVCB and HTTPS record presentation format parser, which panics on malformed alpn values. Attackers can supply untrusted zone files with unbalanced quotes, consecutive commas,…
hickory-dns integer underflow
High8.7EPSS not scored yethickory-dnsCVSS 4.0 · 8.7CWE-191
Hickory DNS from 0.26.0 before 0.26.2 contains an integer underflow vulnerability in TSIG RDATA decoding that allows remote attackers to trigger a panic via malformed records. Attackers can send a crafted TSIG record in DNS wire format to cause unchecked subtraction underflow,…
hickory-dns uncontrolled resource consumption
High8.7EPSS not scored yethickory-dnsCVSS 4.0 · 8.7CWE-400
The DNS wire-format message parser in hickory-proto (Hickory DNS) 0.18 before 0.26.2 preallocates record vectors sized by the untrusted ANCOUNT, NSCOUNT, and ARCOUNT header fields before reading record data. Remote attackers can send a UDP datagram, or a spoofed response to a…
sveltejs devalue allocation without limits
High8.7EPSS not scored yetsveltejs devalueCVSS 4.0 · 8.7CWE-770
The devalue package for npm before 5.6.3 can consume excessive CPU and memory when serializing sparse arrays with uneval or stringify. An attacker who manages to get a sparse array created on the server, which mainstream wire formats do not allow, and serialized there can cause…
sveltejs devalue uncontrolled resource consumption
High8.7EPSS not scored yetsveltejs devalueCVSS 4.0 · 8.7CWE-400
Sveltejs devalue before 5.9.3 contains a denial of service vulnerability that allows attackers to cause CPU amplification by supplying sparse arrays to uneval. Attackers who influence sparse values passed to uneval can force synchronous work proportional to the declared array…
sveltejs devalue uncontrolled resource consumption
High8.7EPSS not scored yetsveltejs devalueCVSS 4.0 · 8.7CWE-400
Sveltejs devalue before 5.9.3 contains a resource exhaustion vulnerability where repeated primitive strings cause quadratic expansion in the uneval function. Attackers can supply a small crafted payload that is parsed and then passed to uneval, producing a very large serialized…
sveltejs devalue allocation without limits
High8.7EPSS not scored yetsveltejs devalueCVSS 4.0 · 8.7CWE-770
Sveltejs devalue from 1.0.0 before 5.9.3 contains a memory exhaustion flaw in uneval, whose generated code for sparse arrays allocates memory proportional to the array's declared length when evaluated. Attackers who can influence a very large sparse array serialized by an…
sveltejs devalue excessive memory allocation
High8.7EPSS not scored yetsveltejs devalueCVSS 4.0 · 8.7CWE-789
Devalue before 5.9.3 contains a validation bypass vulnerability that allows custom ArrayBuffer revivers to skip typed-array allocation checks in the parse function. Attackers can supply very small crafted input processed by a malformed ArrayBuffer reviver to allocate massive…
sveltejs devalue uncaught exception
High8.7EPSS not scored yetsveltejs devalueCVSS 4.0 · 8.7CWE-248
devalue (sveltejs/devalue) 5.8.0 before 5.9.3 contains an unhandled promise rejection in stringifyAsync: when serializing multiple promises, a later promise rejecting before an earlier one settles leaves an internal rejection unhandled, even if the caller catches the returned…
ZcashFoundation zebra incomplete cleanup
High8.7EPSS not scored yetZcashFoundation zebraCVSS 4.0 · 8.7CWE-459
Zebra before 7.0.0 contains an incomplete cleanup vulnerability that allows unauthenticated peers to stall initial sync by serving a forged checkpoint block body. Attackers can supply a body with forged authorizing data near the final checkpoint, leaving rejected hashes in the…
ZcashFoundation zebra inefficient algorithmic complexity
High8.7EPSS not scored yetZcashFoundation zebraCVSS 4.0 · 8.7CWE-407
Zebra before 7.0.0 contains an inefficient algorithmic complexity vulnerability that allows unauthenticated peers to exhaust verification threads by submitting transactions with many transparent inputs. Attackers can relay invalid transactions with tens of thousands of inputs,…
ZcashFoundation zebra vulnerability
High8.7EPSS not scored yetZcashFoundation zebraCVSS 4.0 · 8.7CWE-460
Zebra zebrad before 7.0.0 contains a denial of service vulnerability that allows a malicious peer to stall checkpoint sync by cancelling the verifier rewind after a failed commit. Attackers can serve a forged block with altered authorizing data plus a restart-triggering block,…
Reading the radar
CVSS, KEV and EPSS, briefly.
What is a CVE?
A CVE is a public identifier for one vulnerability in one product, such as CVE-2026-59310. The CVE program assigns it; NVD, run by the US National Institute of Standards and Technology, adds scores, weakness classes and affected product lists.
What does the CVSS score tell me?
CVSS rates how severe a vulnerability is on its own, from 0 to 10, and its vector says how it is reached: over the network or locally, with or without an account, with or without someone clicking. It says nothing about whether anyone is exploiting it. The radar shows the newest CVSS version scored and names it, because version 4.0 and 3.1 scores differ.
What is CISA KEV?
The Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog is CISA's list of CVEs with reliable evidence of exploitation in the wild. US federal agencies must fix each one by its due date, and it is the strongest signal of what to patch first.
What is EPSS?
FIRST's Exploit Prediction Scoring System estimates the probability that a CVE will see exploitation activity in the next 30 days, recomputed daily. Most CVEs score well under 1%, so the radar also shows the percentile: how a CVE ranks against every scored CVE.
How should I prioritise?
Patch what CISA lists as exploited first. Then CVEs with a high EPSS score, then the most severe by CVSS. Within each group, start with whatever is reachable from the internet without an account.
Where do the explanations come from?
Veriom writes them from fixed templates over each record: the weakness class says what went wrong and where in an architecture it lives, the CVSS vector says how it is reached and what it affects, and KEV, EPSS and CISA's assessment say whether it is exploited. Nobody reviews each CVE by hand, so read the description and the references before acting.
How fresh is the data?
New and changed CVEs arrive from NVD every hour, the KEV catalog every six hours and EPSS scores once a day. Each page shows when the data was last updated.
Know where a vulnerable component would sit in your systems.
A CVE names a product. Whether it matters depends on where that product sits in your systems: what reaches it, which trust boundary it guards and what it can reach once compromised. Veriom maps your components, their relationships and your trust boundaries from your code, cloud and delivery evidence, so you can see where a component like this sits. The radar itself does not look at your systems.
Sources
- CVE records and CVSS scores from the NVD CVE API. This product uses the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD.
- Exploitation status from CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.
- Exploit likelihood from FIRST’s Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS), refreshed daily.
- Explanations are written by Veriom from fixed templates over each record’s data, not by a person reviewing each CVE. Descriptions are quoted from the records as published. The radar covers CVEs published since 4 Nov 2026, plus every CVE in the KEV catalog.