Free tool · No sign-in
CVE radar: the latest vulnerabilities, explained.
Every new CVE from NVD, with whether it is exploited in the wild (CISA KEV), how likely it is to be (FIRST EPSS), and what it means for your architecture in plain language.
Updated 11 Nov, 15:27 UTC from NVD, CISA KEV and FIRST EPSSMarkdownRSSJSON Feed
Patch first
Exploited in the wild, newest first.
CISA adds a CVE to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog when attackers are using it. Patch these first, then CVEs with a high EPSS score, then the most severe, starting with anything reachable from the internet.
Microsoft Office Outlook Missing User Interaction for Potentially Unsafe Action Vulnerability
Medium6.5Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS not scored yetMicrosoft Office and 6 moreCVSS 3.1 · 6.5CWE-356
Google Chromium Use-After-Free Vulnerability
High8.8Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS not scored yetGoogle Chromium and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-416
Barracuda Networks Email Security Gateway (ESG) Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel Vulnerability
Critical9.3Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-13EPSS 1.6%, higher than 76% of scored CVEsBarracuda Email Security Gateway (ESG)CVSS 4.0 · 9.3CWE-288
Barracuda Networks Multiple Products OS Command Injection Vulnerability
High8.6Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-13EPSS 1.1%, higher than 65% of scored CVEsBarracuda Email Security Gateway (ESG) and 5 moreCVSS 4.0 · 8.6CWE-78
Openwave Messaging Limited Webtop Media Transcoder Incorrect Resource Transfer Between Spheres Vulnerability
Medium4.3Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS 0.27%, higher than 20% of scored CVEsOpenwave Messaging Limited Webtop Media Transcoder and 2 moreCVSS 3.1 · 4.3CWE-669
Trends
The last 30 days, by severity.
4,959 CVEs published, 363 of them critical. Many arrive without a score yet: NVD and the reporting organisations add CVSS over the following days.
Show the numbers
| Day | Critical | High | Medium | Low | Not scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13 Oct 2026 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 Oct 2026 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 Oct 2026 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 Oct 2026 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 Oct 2026 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 Oct 2026 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 Oct 2026 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1 Nov 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 Nov 2026 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 3 Nov 2026 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 4 Nov 2026 | 35 | 158 | 138 | 32 | 1 |
| 5 Nov 2026 | 55 | 213 | 148 | 36 | 1 |
| 6 Nov 2026 | 40 | 146 | 205 | 47 | 6 |
| 7 Nov 2026 | 57 | 161 | 232 | 11 | 13 |
| 8 Nov 2026 | 23 | 128 | 143 | 26 | 0 |
| 9 Nov 2026 | 22 | 149 | 218 | 42 | 39 |
| 10 Nov 2026 | 103 | 1151 | 590 | 43 | 230 |
| 11 Nov 2026 | 19 | 80 | 150 | 16 | 32 |
Exploit likelihood (EPSS), last 30 days
- Under 1%713
- 1% to 10%25
- 10% to 50%2
- 50% or more7
- Not scored yet4212
Most affected vendors, last 30 days
Most common weaknesses, last 30 days
- Cross-site scripting (CWE-79)379
- Heap-based buffer overflow (CWE-122)343
- Missing authorization (CWE-862)279
- Use after free (CWE-416)277
- Out-of-bounds read (CWE-125)173
- Insecure direct object reference (CWE-639)171
- Server-side request forgery (CWE-918)152
- Incorrect authorization (CWE-863)136
- Path traversal (CWE-22)134
- Out-of-bounds write (CWE-787)131
Matching CVEs
2,186 CVEs match these filters, page 85 of 88.
FreeRDP heap-based buffer overflow
High8.7EPSS 0.30%, higher than 23% of scored CVEsFreeRDPCVSS 4.0 · 8.7CWE-122
FreeRDP through 3.32.1 has a heap out-of-bounds write in the RDPGFX client because the delete_surface callback truncates surface hash keys to 16 bits, leaving the surface table inconsistent so HashTable_GetKeys writes past its allocated key array. A malicious or…
FreeRDP race condition
High8.7EPSS 0.24%, higher than 16% of scored CVEsFreeRDPCVSS 4.0 · 8.7CWE-362
FreeRDP before 3.32.2 contains a use-after-free vulnerability that allows malicious RDP servers to corrupt client memory by racing the RDPGFX ResetGraphics handler against the planar bitmap decoder. Attackers can send ResetGraphics while concurrently sending compressed bitmaps…
FreeRDP double free
High8.7EPSS 0.43%, higher than 38% of scored CVEsFreeRDPCVSS 4.0 · 8.7CWE-415
FreeRDP before 3.32.2 contains a double free in the WinPR Kerberos SSPI retrieveSomeTgt function, which installs the krb5 default realm into a target principal that has an empty realm without taking ownership of it. Unauthenticated remote clients can send a crafted NLA/CredSSP…
FreeRDP use after free
High8.7EPSS 0.34%, higher than 28% of scored CVEsFreeRDPCVSS 4.0 · 8.7CWE-416
FreeRDP before 3.32.2 contains a use-after-free vulnerability in Emulate_SCardReleaseContext that frees the emulated SCardContext before its worker thread is cancelled and joined. A malicious server can send ESTABLISHCONTEXT, a long-timeout GETSTATUSCHANGE, then RELEASECONTEXT…
FreeRDP out-of-bounds write
High7.1EPSS 0.35%, higher than 29% of scored CVEsFreeRDPCVSS 4.0 · 7.1CWE-787
FreeRDP before 3.32.2 has a heap out-of-bounds write in the planar codec because freerdp_bitmap_planar_context_reset commits new dimensions before buffer reallocation succeeds, and a failed ResetGraphics is only logged. A malicious RDP server can send an oversized ResetGraphics…
FreeRDP reachable assertion
High8.7EPSS 0.42%, higher than 37% of scored CVEsFreeRDPCVSS 4.0 · 8.7CWE-617
FreeRDP 3.0.0 before 3.32.2 server-side RDP peer input parsing skips the six-byte body of a slow-path input event with an unknown message type without checking it lies within the packet's declared length, causing a WinPR stream assertion failure. A remote RDP client with an…
FreeRDP heap-based buffer overflow
High7.1EPSS 0.34%, higher than 27% of scored CVEsFreeRDPCVSS 4.0 · 7.1CWE-122
FreeRDP before 3.32.2 does not check the product of surface dimensions in gdi_CreateSurface when handling an RDPGFX CREATE_SURFACE PDU, causing an integer wrap and heap buffer overflow on 32-bit builds and an approximately 4 GiB allocation on 64-bit builds. A malicious RDP…
ProSoft Technology X35-HWC-A unlimited sign-in attempts
High8.2EPSS 0.43%, higher than 38% of scored CVEsProSoft Technology X35-HWC-A and 1 moreCVSS 4.0 · 8.2CWE-307, CWE-602
ProSoft Technology ICX35 devices (X35-HWC-A and ICX35-HWC-E) contain a login lockout bypass in the integrated module web page. The account lockout mechanism that restricts repeated failed authentication attempts is enforced in client-side JavaScript, so a remote attacker can…
Debian APT time-of-check to time-of-use race
High7.7EPSS 0.93%, higher than 61% of scored CVEsDebian APT and 1 moreCVSS 4.0 · 7.7CWE-62, CWE-367
On Debian, Ubuntu, and derivative Linux distributions, an on-path attacker who can manipulate the HTTP traffic (including a malicious mirror or proxy) between an APT client and an archive server triggered by a package install can trick the client into installing an…
FasterXML jackson-dataformat-cbor inefficient algorithmic complexity
High7.5EPSS 0.18%, higher than 7% of scored CVEsFasterXML jackson-dataformat-cborCVSS 3.1 · 7.5CWE-407
One CBOR-parsing issue in jackson-dataformats-binary's CBOR module: an unbounded run of CBOR tags drives quadratic-time TagList growth (CPU/GC-exhaustion DoS, PoC-proven). PoC executed against com.fasterxml.jackson.dataformat:jackson-dataformat-cbor:2.18.2; present in current…
On HP Poly EagleEye Cube USB 1.3.1-001267 devices, one of the API functions available on a management service accessible via USB allows command injection.
High7.2EPSS 1.0%, higher than 64% of scored CVEsProduct not named yetCVSS 3.1 · 7.2CWE-77
On HP Poly EagleEye Cube USB 1.3.1-001267 devices, one of the API functions available on a management service accessible via USB allows command injection. This allows attackers (without administrator-level access) to execute arbitrary commands on the device as root. This is due…
oqtane oqtane.framework insecure direct object reference
High7.4EPSS 0.38%, higher than 33% of scored CVEsoqtane oqtane.frameworkCVSS 4.0 · 7.4CWE-639
Oqtane Framework before 10.3.0 contains a broken access control vulnerability in SettingController.cs that allows an authenticated site administrator to read and modify settings belonging to other sites within the same tenant database by supplying an arbitrary entityId for Site…
WatchGuard AuthPoint Authentication Gateway insufficient verification of data authenticity
High8.9EPSS 0.26%, higher than 18% of scored CVEsWatchGuard AuthPoint Authentication GatewayCVSS 4.0 · 8.9CWE-345
An improper integrity validation vulnerability in WatchGuard AuthPoint Gateway's LDAP authentication callback allows a network attacker who has obtained a valid header signature to forge the authentication result and transaction identifier in the request body, resulting in…
SQL-Abstract SQL injection
High7.3EPSS 0.18%, higher than 8% of scored CVEsSQL-AbstractCVSS 3.1 · 7.3CWE-89
SQL::Abstract versions from 1.90_01 before 2.000001_04 for Perl skip the injection_guard check for function names given with -func. injection_guard is documented to apply to every function name, but only the { -name => ... } shorthand goes through it. The explicit { -func => […
SQL-Abstract SQL injection
High7.3EPSS 0.18%, higher than 8% of scored CVEsSQL-AbstractCVSS 3.1 · 7.3CWE-89
SQL::Abstract versions from 1.90_01 before 2.000001_04 for Perl allow SQL injection via the where values of a nested statement in an identifier position. A nested statement such as { -select => ... } in a position where plain scalars are identifiers treats its own plain scalars…
elixir-ecto ecto allocation without limits
High8.9EPSS 0.49%, higher than 43% of scored CVEselixir-ecto ectoCVSS 4.0 · 8.9CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling vulnerability in elixir-ecto ecto allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to exhaust memory in the application and in the database server by sending requests with distinct JSON keys or list lengths where the application…
CoopCycle coopcycle-web insecure direct object reference
High7.2EPSS 0.41%, higher than 35% of scored CVEsCoopCycle coopcycle-webCVSS 4.0 · 7.2CWE-639
CoopCycle coopcycle-web before 6.20.1 contains a broken access control vulnerability that allows any courier to read and modify every incident because Incident operations only check ROLE_COURIER. Attackers can enumerate sequential incident ids and use PUT…
munt libmt32emu heap-based buffer overflow
High8.5EPSS 0.26%, higher than 18% of scored CVEsmunt libmt32emuCVSS 4.0 · 8.5CWE-122
libmt32emu before 2.8.4 contains a heap buffer overflow vulnerability in MidiStreamParserImpl::parseSysex that allows attackers to write past a heap allocation by supplying oversized unterminated SysEx messages. Attackers can feed more than 32768 SysEx data bytes through the…
Stonewuu ai-fusion-video insecure direct object reference
High8.7EPSS 0.45%, higher than 40% of scored CVEsStonewuu ai-fusion-videoCVSS 4.0 · 8.7CWE-639
Stonewuu ai-fusion-video before 1.3.0 contains an insecure direct object reference vulnerability that allows authenticated users to access other users' projects by supplying unscoped object ids. Attackers can enumerate auto-increment ids on /api/project, /api/asset and…
CoopCycle coopcycle-web insufficient verification of data authenticity
High8.3EPSS 0.22%, higher than 13% of scored CVEsCoopCycle coopcycle-webCVSS 4.0 · 8.3CWE-345
CoopCycle coopcycle-web 5.6.0 before 6.20.0 contains a missing authentication vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to forge Zelty webhook events because the x-zelty-hmac-sha256 HMAC signature is never verified. Attackers can POST forged dish, menu, option and…
Tata Motors iRA 2.0 improper certificate validation
High8.5EPSS 0.09%, higher than 0% of scored CVEsTata Motors iRA 2.0 and 1 moreCVSS 4.0 · 8.5CWE-295
This vulnerability exists in the iRA 2.0 and iRA.ev mobile applications due to improper implementation of SSL certificate pinning in the network security configuration, resulting in ineffective certificate pinning controls. An attacker positioned to intercept network traffic…
Tata Motors iRA 2.0 origin validation error
High7.1EPSS 0.21%, higher than 12% of scored CVEsTata Motors iRA 2.0 and 1 moreCVSS 4.0 · 7.1CWE-346, CWE-749
This vulnerability exists in the iRA 2.0 and iRA.ev mobile applications due to insufficient validation of URLs and origins loaded within the WebView component. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending malicious web content to the affected WebView.…
Tata Motors iRA 2.0 hard-coded credentials
High8.8EPSS 0.30%, higher than 23% of scored CVEsTata Motors iRA 2.0 and 1 moreCVSS 4.0 · 8.8CWE-798
This vulnerability exists in the iRA 2.0 and iRA.ev mobile applications due to presence of hardcoded service account credentials, API Keys and authorization tokens within the application package. An unauthenticated remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability by downloading…
Noptin cross-site scripting
High7.1EPSS 0.20%, higher than 10% of scored CVEsNoptinCVSS 3.1 · 7.1CWE-79
Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in Noptin Newsletter Team Noptin newsletter-optin-box allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Noptin: from n/a through 4.4.2.
sensiolabs symfony authentication bypass by spoofing
High7.7EPSS 0.27%, higher than 19% of scored CVEssensiolabs symfonyCVSS 4.0 · 7.7CWE-290
Authentication bypass by spoofing in X509Authenticator and X509AuthenticationListener of Symfony versions prior to 5.4.56, 6.x prior to 6.4.50, 7.x prior to 7.4.23, and 8.x prior to 8.1.11 allows an attacker holding a certificate from the application's trusted CA who can…
Reading the radar
CVSS, KEV and EPSS, briefly.
What is a CVE?
A CVE is a public identifier for one vulnerability in one product, such as CVE-2026-59310. The CVE program assigns it; NVD, run by the US National Institute of Standards and Technology, adds scores, weakness classes and affected product lists.
What does the CVSS score tell me?
CVSS rates how severe a vulnerability is on its own, from 0 to 10, and its vector says how it is reached: over the network or locally, with or without an account, with or without someone clicking. It says nothing about whether anyone is exploiting it. The radar shows the newest CVSS version scored and names it, because version 4.0 and 3.1 scores differ.
What is CISA KEV?
The Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog is CISA's list of CVEs with reliable evidence of exploitation in the wild. US federal agencies must fix each one by its due date, and it is the strongest signal of what to patch first.
What is EPSS?
FIRST's Exploit Prediction Scoring System estimates the probability that a CVE will see exploitation activity in the next 30 days, recomputed daily. Most CVEs score well under 1%, so the radar also shows the percentile: how a CVE ranks against every scored CVE.
How should I prioritise?
Patch what CISA lists as exploited first. Then CVEs with a high EPSS score, then the most severe by CVSS. Within each group, start with whatever is reachable from the internet without an account.
Where do the explanations come from?
Veriom writes them from fixed templates over each record: the weakness class says what went wrong and where in an architecture it lives, the CVSS vector says how it is reached and what it affects, and KEV, EPSS and CISA's assessment say whether it is exploited. Nobody reviews each CVE by hand, so read the description and the references before acting.
How fresh is the data?
New and changed CVEs arrive from NVD every hour, the KEV catalog every six hours and EPSS scores once a day. Each page shows when the data was last updated.
Know where a vulnerable component would sit in your systems.
A CVE names a product. Whether it matters depends on where that product sits in your systems: what reaches it, which trust boundary it guards and what it can reach once compromised. Veriom maps your components, their relationships and your trust boundaries from your code, cloud and delivery evidence, so you can see where a component like this sits. The radar itself does not look at your systems.
Sources
- CVE records and CVSS scores from the NVD CVE API. This product uses the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD.
- Exploitation status from CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.
- Exploit likelihood from FIRST’s Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS), refreshed daily.
- Explanations are written by Veriom from fixed templates over each record’s data, not by a person reviewing each CVE. Descriptions are quoted from the records as published. The radar covers CVEs published since 4 Nov 2026, plus every CVE in the KEV catalog.