Free tool · No sign-in
CVE radar: the latest vulnerabilities, explained.
Every new CVE from NVD, with whether it is exploited in the wild (CISA KEV), how likely it is to be (FIRST EPSS), and what it means for your architecture in plain language.
Updated 11 Nov, 16:27 UTC from NVD, CISA KEV and FIRST EPSSMarkdownRSSJSON Feed
Patch first
Exploited in the wild, newest first.
CISA adds a CVE to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog when attackers are using it. Patch these first, then CVEs with a high EPSS score, then the most severe, starting with anything reachable from the internet.
Microsoft Office Outlook Missing User Interaction for Potentially Unsafe Action Vulnerability
Medium6.5Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS not scored yetMicrosoft Office and 6 moreCVSS 3.1 · 6.5CWE-356
Google Chromium Use-After-Free Vulnerability
High8.8Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS not scored yetGoogle Chromium and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-416
Barracuda Networks Email Security Gateway (ESG) Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel Vulnerability
Critical9.3Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-13EPSS 1.6%, higher than 76% of scored CVEsBarracuda Email Security Gateway (ESG)CVSS 4.0 · 9.3CWE-288
Barracuda Networks Multiple Products OS Command Injection Vulnerability
High8.6Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-13EPSS 1.1%, higher than 65% of scored CVEsBarracuda Email Security Gateway (ESG) and 5 moreCVSS 4.0 · 8.6CWE-78
Openwave Messaging Limited Webtop Media Transcoder Incorrect Resource Transfer Between Spheres Vulnerability
Medium4.3Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS 0.27%, higher than 20% of scored CVEsOpenwave Messaging Limited Webtop Media Transcoder and 2 moreCVSS 3.1 · 4.3CWE-669
Trends
The last 30 days, by severity.
4,964 CVEs published, 363 of them critical. Many arrive without a score yet: NVD and the reporting organisations add CVSS over the following days.
Show the numbers
| Day | Critical | High | Medium | Low | Not scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13 Oct 2026 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 Oct 2026 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 Oct 2026 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 Oct 2026 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 Oct 2026 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 Oct 2026 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 Oct 2026 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1 Nov 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 Nov 2026 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 3 Nov 2026 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 4 Nov 2026 | 35 | 158 | 138 | 32 | 1 |
| 5 Nov 2026 | 55 | 213 | 148 | 36 | 1 |
| 6 Nov 2026 | 40 | 146 | 205 | 47 | 6 |
| 7 Nov 2026 | 57 | 161 | 232 | 11 | 13 |
| 8 Nov 2026 | 23 | 128 | 143 | 26 | 0 |
| 9 Nov 2026 | 22 | 149 | 218 | 42 | 39 |
| 10 Nov 2026 | 103 | 1151 | 590 | 43 | 230 |
| 11 Nov 2026 | 19 | 82 | 152 | 17 | 32 |
Exploit likelihood (EPSS), last 30 days
- Under 1%713
- 1% to 10%25
- 10% to 50%2
- 50% or more7
- Not scored yet4217
Most affected vendors, last 30 days
Most common weaknesses, last 30 days
- Cross-site scripting (CWE-79)379
- Heap-based buffer overflow (CWE-122)343
- Missing authorization (CWE-862)280
- Use after free (CWE-416)277
- Out-of-bounds read (CWE-125)173
- Insecure direct object reference (CWE-639)171
- Server-side request forgery (CWE-918)152
- Incorrect authorization (CWE-863)136
- Path traversal (CWE-22)134
- Out-of-bounds write (CWE-787)131
Matching CVEs
2,188 CVEs match these filters, page 88 of 88.
Stape Conversion Tracking server-side request forgery
High7.1EPSS 0.18%, higher than 8% of scored CVEsStape Conversion TrackingCVSS 3.1 · 7.1CWE-918
The Stape Conversion Tracking WordPress plugin before 2.3.11 does not validate the sub-path appended to its same-origin proxy's upstream endpoint, allowing unauthenticated visitors to redirect the server-side request to an arbitrary host and have the response body and its…
SEOPress cross-site scripting
High7.1EPSS 0.29%, higher than 22% of scored CVEsSEOPressCVSS 3.1 · 7.1CWE-79
The SEOPress WordPress plugin before 10.4 does not sanitise and escape some of its analytics tracking settings before outputting them in an inline script printed on every front-end page, allowing users granted a SEOPress WordPress plugin before 10.4 capability that an…
Form Maker by 10Web cross-site scripting
High7.5EPSS 0.27%, higher than 19% of scored CVEsForm Maker by 10WebCVSS 3.1 · 7.5CWE-79
The Form Maker by 10Web WordPress plugin before 1.15.51 does not consistently escape user-submitted field values before rendering them on its submissions admin page, allowing unauthenticated users to store a payload that executes as arbitrary web scripts in the session of an…
WSO2 Identity Server improper privilege management
High7.2EPSS 0.36%, higher than 29% of scored CVEsWSO2 Identity Server and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 7.2CWE-269
The system fails to properly enforce scope authorization when the `authorize_all_scopes` configuration is enabled. This allows applications using the client credentials grant type to obtain all API scopes, including sensitive internal and console scopes, without requiring…
Unisoc (Shanghai) Technologies Co., Ltd. Bootloader out-of-bounds write
High7.6EPSS 0.24%, higher than 16% of scored CVEsUnisoc (Shanghai) Technologies Co., Ltd. BootloaderCVSS 3.1 · 7.6CWE-787
Memory Corruption when processing firmware update data in Download mode due to a missing bounds check.
Unisoc (Shanghai) Technologies Co., Ltd. Modem improper input validation
High7.5EPSS 0.46%, higher than 40% of scored CVEsUnisoc (Shanghai) Technologies Co., Ltd. ModemCVSS 3.1 · 7.5CWE-20
Transient DOS when processing a malformed NR RRC configuration message due to improper input validation.
Linksys E5600 out-of-bounds write
High7.7EPSS 0.47%, higher than 41% of scored CVEsLinksys E5600CVSS 4.0 · 7.7CWE-119, CWE-787
A security flaw has been discovered in Linksys E5600 1.1.0.26. Affected by this issue is the function init_multipart of the file /cgi-bin/upload_fw.cgi of the component Header Parser. The manipulation results in out-of-bounds write. The attack may be launched remotely. The…
ASUS Router firmware stack-based buffer overflow
High8.7EPSS 0.34%, higher than 28% of scored CVEsASUS Router firmwareCVSS 4.0 · 8.7CWE-121
Stack-based buffer overflow in certain ASUS Router firmware allows an unauthenticated nearby attacker to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges via a crafted device name. Refer to the ' Security Update for ASUS Router AiCloud Feature ' section on the ASUS Security…
ASUS Router firmware out-of-bounds write
High7.2EPSS 0.17%, higher than 6% of scored CVEsASUS Router firmwareCVSS 4.0 · 7.2CWE-787
Out-of-bounds write in certain ASUS Router firmware allow an unauthenticated nearby attacker to write data beyond the intended buffer or potentially cause a denial-of-service (DoS) via a crafted packet. Refer to the ' Security Update for ASUS Router Firmware ' section on the…
ASUS System Control Interface vulnerability
High8.5EPSS 0.11%, higher than 1% of scored CVEsASUS System Control InterfaceCVSS 4.0 · 8.5CWE-782
An exposed IOCTL with insufficient access control in ASUS System Control Interface allows a local, low-privileged user to read and write arbitrary physical memory through crafted device control requests, ultimately resulting in a complete compromise of the affected system.…
TOTOLINK A950RG stack-based buffer overflow
High8.6EPSS 0.47%, higher than 41% of scored CVEsTOTOLINK A950RGCVSS 4.0 · 8.6CWE-119, CWE-121
A flaw has been found in TOTOLINK A950RG 4.1.2cu.5268_B20221104. Affected by this vulnerability is the function setMacFilterRules of the file /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi of the component MAC Filter Handler. This manipulation of the argument addEffect causes stack-based buffer…
TOTOLINK A950RG stack-based buffer overflow
High8.6EPSS 0.47%, higher than 41% of scored CVEsTOTOLINK A950RGCVSS 4.0 · 8.6CWE-119, CWE-121
A vulnerability was detected in TOTOLINK A950RG 4.1.2cu.5268_B20221104. Affected is the function setWiFiMultipleConfig/delWiFiMultipleConfig of the file /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi of the component Multi-SSID Configuration. The manipulation of the argument wepkey2/wepkey3 results in…
TOTOLINK A950RG stack-based buffer overflow
High8.6EPSS 0.47%, higher than 41% of scored CVEsTOTOLINK A950RGCVSS 4.0 · 8.6CWE-119, CWE-121
A security vulnerability has been detected in TOTOLINK A950RG 4.1.2cu.5268_B20221104. This impacts the function strcpy of the file /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi of the component Basic Wireless Configuration Handler. The manipulation of the argument wepkey leads to stack-based buffer…
Reading the radar
CVSS, KEV and EPSS, briefly.
What is a CVE?
A CVE is a public identifier for one vulnerability in one product, such as CVE-2026-59310. The CVE program assigns it; NVD, run by the US National Institute of Standards and Technology, adds scores, weakness classes and affected product lists.
What does the CVSS score tell me?
CVSS rates how severe a vulnerability is on its own, from 0 to 10, and its vector says how it is reached: over the network or locally, with or without an account, with or without someone clicking. It says nothing about whether anyone is exploiting it. The radar shows the newest CVSS version scored and names it, because version 4.0 and 3.1 scores differ.
What is CISA KEV?
The Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog is CISA's list of CVEs with reliable evidence of exploitation in the wild. US federal agencies must fix each one by its due date, and it is the strongest signal of what to patch first.
What is EPSS?
FIRST's Exploit Prediction Scoring System estimates the probability that a CVE will see exploitation activity in the next 30 days, recomputed daily. Most CVEs score well under 1%, so the radar also shows the percentile: how a CVE ranks against every scored CVE.
How should I prioritise?
Patch what CISA lists as exploited first. Then CVEs with a high EPSS score, then the most severe by CVSS. Within each group, start with whatever is reachable from the internet without an account.
Where do the explanations come from?
Veriom writes them from fixed templates over each record: the weakness class says what went wrong and where in an architecture it lives, the CVSS vector says how it is reached and what it affects, and KEV, EPSS and CISA's assessment say whether it is exploited. Nobody reviews each CVE by hand, so read the description and the references before acting.
How fresh is the data?
New and changed CVEs arrive from NVD every hour, the KEV catalog every six hours and EPSS scores once a day. Each page shows when the data was last updated.
Know where a vulnerable component would sit in your systems.
A CVE names a product. Whether it matters depends on where that product sits in your systems: what reaches it, which trust boundary it guards and what it can reach once compromised. Veriom maps your components, their relationships and your trust boundaries from your code, cloud and delivery evidence, so you can see where a component like this sits. The radar itself does not look at your systems.
Sources
- CVE records and CVSS scores from the NVD CVE API. This product uses the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD.
- Exploitation status from CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.
- Exploit likelihood from FIRST’s Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS), refreshed daily.
- Explanations are written by Veriom from fixed templates over each record’s data, not by a person reviewing each CVE. Descriptions are quoted from the records as published. The radar covers CVEs published since 4 Nov 2026, plus every CVE in the KEV catalog.