Free tool · No sign-in
CVE radar: the latest vulnerabilities, explained.
Every new CVE from NVD, with whether it is exploited in the wild (CISA KEV), how likely it is to be (FIRST EPSS), and what it means for your architecture in plain language.
Updated 12 Nov, 03:28 UTC from NVD, CISA KEV and FIRST EPSSMarkdownRSSJSON Feed
Patch first
Exploited in the wild, newest first.
CISA adds a CVE to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog when attackers are using it. Patch these first, then CVEs with a high EPSS score, then the most severe, starting with anything reachable from the internet.
Microsoft Office Outlook Missing User Interaction for Potentially Unsafe Action Vulnerability
Medium6.5Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS 1.6%, higher than 76% of scored CVEsMicrosoft Office and 6 moreCVSS 3.1 · 6.5CWE-356
Google Chromium Use-After-Free Vulnerability
High8.8Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS 0.96%, higher than 62% of scored CVEsGoogle Chromium and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-416
Barracuda Networks Email Security Gateway (ESG) Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel Vulnerability
Critical9.3Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-13EPSS 8.9%, higher than 95% of scored CVEsBarracuda Email Security Gateway (ESG)CVSS 4.0 · 9.3CWE-288
Barracuda Networks Multiple Products OS Command Injection Vulnerability
High8.6Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-13EPSS 6.2%, higher than 94% of scored CVEsBarracuda Email Security Gateway (ESG) and 5 moreCVSS 4.0 · 8.6CWE-78
Openwave Messaging Limited Webtop Media Transcoder Incorrect Resource Transfer Between Spheres Vulnerability
Medium4.3Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS 0.64%, higher than 51% of scored CVEsOpenwave Messaging Limited Webtop Media Transcoder and 2 moreCVSS 3.1 · 4.3CWE-669
Trends
The last 30 days, by severity.
5,355 CVEs published, 388 of them critical. Many arrive without a score yet: NVD and the reporting organisations add CVSS over the following days.
Show the numbers
| Day | Critical | High | Medium | Low | Not scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14 Oct 2026 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 Oct 2026 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 Oct 2026 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 Oct 2026 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 Oct 2026 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 Oct 2026 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1 Nov 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 Nov 2026 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 3 Nov 2026 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 4 Nov 2026 | 35 | 158 | 138 | 32 | 1 |
| 5 Nov 2026 | 55 | 213 | 148 | 36 | 1 |
| 6 Nov 2026 | 40 | 146 | 205 | 47 | 6 |
| 7 Nov 2026 | 57 | 161 | 232 | 11 | 13 |
| 8 Nov 2026 | 23 | 128 | 143 | 26 | 0 |
| 9 Nov 2026 | 22 | 149 | 218 | 42 | 39 |
| 10 Nov 2026 | 103 | 1150 | 590 | 43 | 230 |
| 11 Nov 2026 | 44 | 233 | 221 | 34 | 132 |
| 12 Nov 2026 | 1 | 24 | 6 | 1 | 1 |
Exploit likelihood (EPSS), last 30 days
- Under 1%4630
- 1% to 10%174
- 10% to 50%2
- 50% or more5
- Not scored yet544
Most affected vendors, last 30 days
Most common weaknesses, last 30 days
- Cross-site scripting (CWE-79)399
- Heap-based buffer overflow (CWE-122)353
- Use after free (CWE-416)312
- Missing authorization (CWE-862)292
- Insecure direct object reference (CWE-639)188
- Out-of-bounds read (CWE-125)183
- Server-side request forgery (CWE-918)162
- Incorrect authorization (CWE-863)156
- Path traversal (CWE-22)146
- Out-of-bounds write (CWE-787)146
Matching CVEs
2,204 CVEs match these filters, page 24 of 89.
Microsoft Windows Server 2016 use after free
High7.4EPSS 0.28%, higher than 21% of scored CVEsMicrosoft Windows Server 2016 and 6 moreCVSS 3.1 · 7.4CWE-416
Use after free in Remote Desktop Gateway Service allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally.
Microsoft SQL Server 2025 CU10 heap-based buffer overflow
High8.8EPSS 0.96%, higher than 62% of scored CVEsMicrosoft SQL Server 2025 CU10 and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-122
Heap-based buffer overflow in SQL Server allows an authorized attacker to execute code over a network.
Microsoft SQL Server 2017 (GDR) heap-based buffer overflow
High8.8EPSS 0.77%, higher than 56% of scored CVEsMicrosoft SQL Server 2017 (GDR) and 7 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-122
Heap-based buffer overflow in SQL Server allows an authorized attacker to execute code over a network.
Microsoft SQL Server 2017 (GDR) heap-based buffer overflow
High8.8EPSS 0.93%, higher than 61% of scored CVEsMicrosoft SQL Server 2017 (GDR) and 7 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-122
Heap-based buffer overflow in SQL Server allows an authorized attacker to execute code over a network.
Microsoft SQL Server 2017 (GDR) heap-based buffer overflow
High8.8EPSS 0.93%, higher than 61% of scored CVEsMicrosoft SQL Server 2017 (GDR) and 7 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-122
Heap-based buffer overflow in SQL Server allows an authorized attacker to execute code over a network.
Microsoft SQL Server 2017 (GDR) untrusted pointer dereference
High8.8EPSS 1.0%, higher than 64% of scored CVEsMicrosoft SQL Server 2017 (GDR) and 7 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-822
Untrusted pointer dereference in SQL Server allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.
Microsoft SQL Server 2025 for x64-based Systems (GDR) stack-based buffer overflow
High8.8EPSS 0.86%, higher than 59% of scored CVEsMicrosoft SQL Server 2025 for x64-based Systems (GDR)CVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-121
Stack-based buffer overflow in SQL Server allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.
Microsoft SQL Server 2017 (GDR) heap-based buffer overflow
High8.8EPSS 0.82%, higher than 58% of scored CVEsMicrosoft SQL Server 2017 (GDR) and 7 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-122
Heap-based buffer overflow in SQL Server allows an authorized attacker to execute code over a network.
Microsoft SQL Server 2025 CU10 heap-based buffer overflow
High8.8EPSS 0.82%, higher than 58% of scored CVEsMicrosoft SQL Server 2025 CU10 and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-122
Heap-based buffer overflow in SQL Server allows an authorized attacker to execute code over a network.
Microsoft SQL Server 2017 (GDR) out-of-bounds read
High8.1EPSS 0.72%, higher than 54% of scored CVEsMicrosoft SQL Server 2017 (GDR) and 7 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.1CWE-125
Out-of-bounds read in SQL Server allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.
Microsoft Microsoft.Data.SqlClient 6.1 capture-replay
High7.4EPSS 0.65%, higher than 51% of scored CVEsMicrosoft Microsoft.Data.SqlClient 6.1 and 2 moreCVSS 3.1 · 7.4CWE-294
Authentication bypass by capture-replay in SQL Server allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.
BlackBerry Ltd QNX Software Development Platform heap-based buffer overflow
High7.4EPSS 0.11%, higher than 1% of scored CVEsBlackBerry Ltd QNX Software Development PlatformCVSS 3.1 · 7.4CWE-122
Heap-based Buffer Overflow in the io-char library's DCMD_CHR_WAITINFO devctl() handler could allow an attacker with local access to cause data tampering, arbitrary code execution, or a crash in the Character I/O device driver.
BlackBerry Ltd QNX Software Development Platform heap-based buffer overflow
High8.4EPSS 0.13%, higher than 2% of scored CVEsBlackBerry Ltd QNX Software Development Platform and 2 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.4CWE-122
Heap-based Buffer Overflow in the DCMD_PROC_EVENT handler of the procnto could allow an attacker with local access to cause an information disclosure, data tampering or a crash of the QNX Neutrino kernel.
TianoCore EDK2 out-of-bounds write
High7.0EPSS 0.12%, higher than 2% of scored CVEsTianoCore EDK2CVSS 4.0 · 7.0CWE-787
EDK2 contains vulnerabilities in BIOS where skilled and privileged users or attackers may cause “Out-of-bounds Write” by local access. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could compromise SMM handler integrity, cause system instability, and lead to denial of service.…
digitalbazaar forge improper certificate validation
High7.4EPSS 0.23%, higher than 14% of scored CVEsdigitalbazaar forgeCVSS 3.1 · 7.4CWE-295
Forge (also called node-forge) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. Prior to 1.4.3, pki.verifyCertificateChain() in lib/x509.js does not decode or enforce the X.509 nameConstraints extension while validating certificate paths. A name-constrained…
harnessrouter insecure direct object reference
High7.5EPSS 0.35%, higher than 29% of scored CVEsharnessrouterCVSS 3.1 · 7.5CWE-639
HarnessRouter is a self-hosted unified API for agent harnesses. From version 0.4.2 until 0.31.7, routes that accept a session ID or response ID validate only the caller's organization and do not enforce the workspace scope of a non-default workspace API key. A key holder who…
usekaneo kaneo insufficiently protected credentials
High8.4EPSS 0.34%, higher than 28% of scored CVEsusekaneo kaneoCVSS 4.0 · 8.4CWE-200, CWE-522
Kaneo is a project management application with boards, Gantt charts, and GitHub integration that can be self-hosted or used as a cloud service. Prior to 2.13.0, GET /api/external-link/task/:taskId returns integration.config to any workspace member, including the viewer role,…
pgEdge pgedge-rag-server allocation without limits
High7.5EPSS 0.45%, higher than 39% of scored CVEspgEdge pgedge-rag-serverCVSS 3.1 · 7.5CWE-405, CWE-770
pgEdge RAG Server is an API server for retrieval-augmented generation over PostgreSQL content using pgvector. Prior to 2.0.0, the unauthenticated query endpoint uses FetchDocuments in internal/database/search.go to read the entire filtered corpus without a LIMIT and rebuild an…
Microsoft Windows 10 heap-based buffer overflow
High7.8EPSS 0.27%, higher than 19% of scored CVEsMicrosoft Windows 10 Version 1809 and 9 moreCVSS 3.1 · 7.8CWE-122
Heap-based buffer overflow in Windows Graphics Kernel allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.
Microsoft Windows 10 heap-based buffer overflow
High8.8EPSS 0.48%, higher than 42% of scored CVEsMicrosoft Windows 10 Version 1607 and 8 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-122
Heap-based buffer overflow in Windows Network Connected Devices Auto-Setup Service allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over an adjacent network.
Microsoft Windows 10 use after free
High7.5EPSS 0.38%, higher than 32% of scored CVEsMicrosoft Windows 10 Version 1607 and 9 moreCVSS 3.1 · 7.5CWE-416
Use after free in Windows Function Discovery Resource Publication allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over an adjacent network.
Microsoft 365 Apps for Enterprise path traversal
High8.8EPSS 0.76%, higher than 56% of scored CVEsMicrosoft 365 Apps for Enterprise and 2 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-22
Improper limitation of a pathname to a restricted directory ('path traversal') in Microsoft Office Outlook allows an authorized attacker to execute code over a network.
Microsoft 365 Apps for Enterprise use of uninitialized resource
High7.5EPSS 0.48%, higher than 42% of scored CVEsMicrosoft 365 Apps for Enterprise and 2 moreCVSS 3.1 · 7.5CWE-908
Use of uninitialized resource in Microsoft Office Outlook allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.
Microsoft Windows 10 unnecessary privileges
High8.8EPSS 0.26%, higher than 19% of scored CVEsMicrosoft Windows 10 Version 1607 and 9 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-250
Execution with unnecessary privileges in Windows PowerShell allows an authorized attacker to bypass a security feature locally.
Microsoft Windows 10 code injection
High7.8EPSS 0.36%, higher than 31% of scored CVEsMicrosoft Windows 10 Version 1607 and 9 moreCVSS 3.1 · 7.8CWE-94
Improper control of generation of code ('code injection') in Windows PowerShell allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally.
Reading the radar
CVSS, KEV and EPSS, briefly.
What is a CVE?
A CVE is a public identifier for one vulnerability in one product, such as CVE-2026-59310. The CVE program assigns it; NVD, run by the US National Institute of Standards and Technology, adds scores, weakness classes and affected product lists.
What does the CVSS score tell me?
CVSS rates how severe a vulnerability is on its own, from 0 to 10, and its vector says how it is reached: over the network or locally, with or without an account, with or without someone clicking. It says nothing about whether anyone is exploiting it. The radar shows the newest CVSS version scored and names it, because version 4.0 and 3.1 scores differ.
What is CISA KEV?
The Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog is CISA's list of CVEs with reliable evidence of exploitation in the wild. US federal agencies must fix each one by its due date, and it is the strongest signal of what to patch first.
What is EPSS?
FIRST's Exploit Prediction Scoring System estimates the probability that a CVE will see exploitation activity in the next 30 days, recomputed daily. Most CVEs score well under 1%, so the radar also shows the percentile: how a CVE ranks against every scored CVE.
How should I prioritise?
Patch what CISA lists as exploited first. Then CVEs with a high EPSS score, then the most severe by CVSS. Within each group, start with whatever is reachable from the internet without an account.
Where do the explanations come from?
Veriom writes them from fixed templates over each record: the weakness class says what went wrong and where in an architecture it lives, the CVSS vector says how it is reached and what it affects, and KEV, EPSS and CISA's assessment say whether it is exploited. Nobody reviews each CVE by hand, so read the description and the references before acting.
How fresh is the data?
New and changed CVEs arrive from NVD every hour, the KEV catalog every six hours and EPSS scores once a day. Each page shows when the data was last updated.
Know where a vulnerable component would sit in your systems.
A CVE names a product. Whether it matters depends on where that product sits in your systems: what reaches it, which trust boundary it guards and what it can reach once compromised. Veriom maps your components, their relationships and your trust boundaries from your code, cloud and delivery evidence, so you can see where a component like this sits. The radar itself does not look at your systems.
Sources
- CVE records and CVSS scores from the NVD CVE API. This product uses the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD.
- Exploitation status from CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.
- Exploit likelihood from FIRST’s Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS), refreshed daily.
- Explanations are written by Veriom from fixed templates over each record’s data, not by a person reviewing each CVE. Descriptions are quoted from the records as published. The radar covers CVEs published since 4 Nov 2026, plus every CVE in the KEV catalog.