Free tool · No sign-in
CVE radar: the latest vulnerabilities, explained.
Every new CVE from NVD, with whether it is exploited in the wild (CISA KEV), how likely it is to be (FIRST EPSS), and what it means for your architecture in plain language.
Updated 12 Nov, 05:28 UTC from NVD, CISA KEV and FIRST EPSSMarkdownRSSJSON Feed
Patch first
Exploited in the wild, newest first.
CISA adds a CVE to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog when attackers are using it. Patch these first, then CVEs with a high EPSS score, then the most severe, starting with anything reachable from the internet.
Microsoft Office Outlook Missing User Interaction for Potentially Unsafe Action Vulnerability
Medium6.5Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS 1.6%, higher than 76% of scored CVEsMicrosoft Office and 6 moreCVSS 3.1 · 6.5CWE-356
Google Chromium Use-After-Free Vulnerability
High8.8Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS 0.96%, higher than 62% of scored CVEsGoogle Chromium and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-416
Barracuda Networks Email Security Gateway (ESG) Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel Vulnerability
Critical9.3Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-13EPSS 8.9%, higher than 95% of scored CVEsBarracuda Email Security Gateway (ESG)CVSS 4.0 · 9.3CWE-288
Barracuda Networks Multiple Products OS Command Injection Vulnerability
High8.6Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-13EPSS 6.2%, higher than 94% of scored CVEsBarracuda Email Security Gateway (ESG) and 5 moreCVSS 4.0 · 8.6CWE-78
Openwave Messaging Limited Webtop Media Transcoder Incorrect Resource Transfer Between Spheres Vulnerability
Medium4.3Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS 0.64%, higher than 51% of scored CVEsOpenwave Messaging Limited Webtop Media Transcoder and 2 moreCVSS 3.1 · 4.3CWE-669
Trends
The last 30 days, by severity.
5,387 CVEs published, 389 of them critical. Many arrive without a score yet: NVD and the reporting organisations add CVSS over the following days.
Show the numbers
| Day | Critical | High | Medium | Low | Not scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14 Oct 2026 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 Oct 2026 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 Oct 2026 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 Oct 2026 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 Oct 2026 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 Oct 2026 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1 Nov 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 Nov 2026 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 3 Nov 2026 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 4 Nov 2026 | 35 | 158 | 138 | 32 | 1 |
| 5 Nov 2026 | 55 | 213 | 148 | 36 | 1 |
| 6 Nov 2026 | 40 | 146 | 205 | 47 | 6 |
| 7 Nov 2026 | 57 | 161 | 232 | 11 | 13 |
| 8 Nov 2026 | 23 | 128 | 143 | 26 | 0 |
| 9 Nov 2026 | 22 | 149 | 218 | 42 | 39 |
| 10 Nov 2026 | 103 | 1150 | 590 | 43 | 230 |
| 11 Nov 2026 | 44 | 233 | 221 | 34 | 132 |
| 12 Nov 2026 | 2 | 35 | 26 | 1 | 1 |
Exploit likelihood (EPSS), last 30 days
- Under 1%4630
- 1% to 10%174
- 10% to 50%2
- 50% or more5
- Not scored yet576
Most affected vendors, last 30 days
Most common weaknesses, last 30 days
- Cross-site scripting (CWE-79)402
- Heap-based buffer overflow (CWE-122)353
- Use after free (CWE-416)312
- Missing authorization (CWE-862)296
- Insecure direct object reference (CWE-639)189
- Out-of-bounds read (CWE-125)183
- Server-side request forgery (CWE-918)163
- Incorrect authorization (CWE-863)157
- Path traversal (CWE-22)148
- Out-of-bounds write (CWE-787)146
Matching CVEs
2,204 CVEs match these filters, page 37 of 89.
Microsoft SQL Server 2022 (GDR) heap-based buffer overflow
High7.2EPSS 1.0%, higher than 63% of scored CVEsMicrosoft SQL Server 2022 (GDR) and 4 moreCVSS 3.1 · 7.2CWE-122
Heap-based buffer overflow in SQL Server allows an authorized attacker to execute code over a network.
Microsoft SQL Server 2017 (GDR) heap-based buffer overflow
High7.5EPSS 0.70%, higher than 54% of scored CVEsMicrosoft SQL Server 2017 (GDR) and 7 moreCVSS 3.1 · 7.5CWE-122
Heap-based buffer overflow in SQL Server allows an authorized attacker to execute code over a network.
Microsoft SQL Server 2017 (GDR) command injection
High8.8EPSS 0.92%, higher than 61% of scored CVEsMicrosoft SQL Server 2017 (GDR) and 7 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-77
Improper neutralization of special elements used in a command ('command injection') in SQL Server allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.
Microsoft SQL Server 2017 (GDR) unnecessary privileges
High7.5EPSS 0.70%, higher than 54% of scored CVEsMicrosoft SQL Server 2017 (GDR) and 7 moreCVSS 3.1 · 7.5CWE-250
Execution with unnecessary privileges in SQL Server allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.
Microsoft 365 Apps for Enterprise heap-based buffer overflow
High8.8EPSS 0.87%, higher than 59% of scored CVEsMicrosoft 365 Apps for Enterprise and 6 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-122
Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Office Excel allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.
Microsoft Teams for Android cross-site scripting
High7.5EPSS 1.1%, higher than 67% of scored CVEsMicrosoft Teams for AndroidCVSS 3.1 · 7.5CWE-79
Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') in Microsoft Teams allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.
Microsoft 365 Apps for Enterprise heap-based buffer overflow
High8.8EPSS 0.68%, higher than 53% of scored CVEsMicrosoft 365 Apps for Enterprise and 5 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-122
Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Office Word allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.
Microsoft 365 Apps for Enterprise heap-based buffer overflow
High8.8EPSS 0.87%, higher than 59% of scored CVEsMicrosoft 365 Apps for Enterprise and 5 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-122
Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Office Word allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.
Microsoft 365 Apps for Enterprise heap-based buffer overflow
High8.8EPSS 0.87%, higher than 59% of scored CVEsMicrosoft 365 Apps for Enterprise and 5 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-122
Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Office Word allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.
Microsoft 365 Apps for Enterprise heap-based buffer overflow
High8.8EPSS 0.87%, higher than 59% of scored CVEsMicrosoft 365 Apps for Enterprise and 5 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-122
Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Office Word allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.
Microsoft 365 Apps for Enterprise heap-based buffer overflow
High8.8EPSS 0.72%, higher than 54% of scored CVEsMicrosoft 365 Apps for Enterprise and 5 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-122
Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Office Word allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.
Microsoft 365 Apps for Enterprise heap-based buffer overflow
High7.5EPSS 0.57%, higher than 47% of scored CVEsMicrosoft 365 Apps for Enterprise and 4 moreCVSS 3.1 · 7.5CWE-122
Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Office Word allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.
Microsoft 365 Apps for Enterprise heap-based buffer overflow
High8.8EPSS 0.87%, higher than 59% of scored CVEsMicrosoft 365 Apps for Enterprise and 5 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-122
Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Office allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.
Microsoft Windows 10 incorrect authorization
High7.8EPSS 0.35%, higher than 29% of scored CVEsMicrosoft Windows 10 Version 21H2 and 3 moreCVSS 3.1 · 7.8CWE-863
Incorrect authorization in Windows AppX Deployment Service allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.
Microsoft Windows 10 heap-based buffer overflow
High8.1EPSS 0.72%, higher than 54% of scored CVEsMicrosoft Windows 10 Version 1607 and 9 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.1CWE-122
Heap-based buffer overflow in Windows Message Queuing allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.
Microsoft Windows 10 use after free
High7.0EPSS 0.31%, higher than 24% of scored CVEsMicrosoft Windows 10 Version 1607 and 9 moreCVSS 3.1 · 7.0CWE-416
Use after free in Windows Link Layer Topology Discovery Protocol allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.
Microsoft Windows 10 use after free
High7.5EPSS 0.42%, higher than 37% of scored CVEsMicrosoft Windows 10 Version 1607 and 9 moreCVSS 3.1 · 7.5CWE-416
Use after free in Windows Link Layer Topology Discovery Protocol allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over an adjacent network.
Microsoft Windows 10 use after free
High7.5EPSS 0.62%, higher than 50% of scored CVEsMicrosoft Windows 10 Version 1607 and 9 moreCVSS 3.1 · 7.5CWE-416
Use after free in Microsoft WDAC OLE DB provider for SQL allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.
Microsoft Visual Studio Code user interface misrepresentation
High8.8EPSS 0.82%, higher than 58% of scored CVEsMicrosoft Visual Studio CodeCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-451
User interface (ui) misrepresentation of critical information in Visual Studio Code allows an unauthorized attacker to bypass a security feature over a network.
Microsoft Windows 10 use after free
High7.8EPSS 0.29%, higher than 21% of scored CVEsMicrosoft Windows 10 Version 1607 and 9 moreCVSS 3.1 · 7.8CWE-416
Use after free in Windows Kernel allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.
Microsoft Raw Image Extension heap-based buffer overflow
High8.8EPSS 0.99%, higher than 63% of scored CVEsMicrosoft Raw Image ExtensionCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-122
Heap-based buffer overflow in Windows Raw Image Extension allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.
Microsoft HEVC Video Extensions heap-based buffer overflow
High7.8EPSS 0.43%, higher than 38% of scored CVEsMicrosoft HEVC Video Extensions and 2 moreCVSS 3.1 · 7.8CWE-122
Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Windows Codecs Library allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally.
Microsoft HEVC Video Extensions heap-based buffer overflow
High7.8EPSS 0.51%, higher than 44% of scored CVEsMicrosoft HEVC Video Extensions and 2 moreCVSS 3.1 · 7.8CWE-122
Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Windows Codecs Library allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally.
Microsoft HEVC Video Extensions integer underflow
High8.8EPSS 0.87%, higher than 59% of scored CVEsMicrosoft HEVC Video Extensions and 2 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-191
Integer underflow (wrap or wraparound) in Microsoft Windows Codecs Library allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.
Microsoft Azure CycleCloud 8.9.2 path traversal
High7.8EPSS 0.43%, higher than 38% of scored CVEsMicrosoft Azure CycleCloud 8.9.2CVSS 3.1 · 7.8CWE-22
Improper limitation of a pathname to a restricted directory ('path traversal') in Azure CycleCloud allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.
Reading the radar
CVSS, KEV and EPSS, briefly.
What is a CVE?
A CVE is a public identifier for one vulnerability in one product, such as CVE-2026-59310. The CVE program assigns it; NVD, run by the US National Institute of Standards and Technology, adds scores, weakness classes and affected product lists.
What does the CVSS score tell me?
CVSS rates how severe a vulnerability is on its own, from 0 to 10, and its vector says how it is reached: over the network or locally, with or without an account, with or without someone clicking. It says nothing about whether anyone is exploiting it. The radar shows the newest CVSS version scored and names it, because version 4.0 and 3.1 scores differ.
What is CISA KEV?
The Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog is CISA's list of CVEs with reliable evidence of exploitation in the wild. US federal agencies must fix each one by its due date, and it is the strongest signal of what to patch first.
What is EPSS?
FIRST's Exploit Prediction Scoring System estimates the probability that a CVE will see exploitation activity in the next 30 days, recomputed daily. Most CVEs score well under 1%, so the radar also shows the percentile: how a CVE ranks against every scored CVE.
How should I prioritise?
Patch what CISA lists as exploited first. Then CVEs with a high EPSS score, then the most severe by CVSS. Within each group, start with whatever is reachable from the internet without an account.
Where do the explanations come from?
Veriom writes them from fixed templates over each record: the weakness class says what went wrong and where in an architecture it lives, the CVSS vector says how it is reached and what it affects, and KEV, EPSS and CISA's assessment say whether it is exploited. Nobody reviews each CVE by hand, so read the description and the references before acting.
How fresh is the data?
New and changed CVEs arrive from NVD every hour, the KEV catalog every six hours and EPSS scores once a day. Each page shows when the data was last updated.
Know where a vulnerable component would sit in your systems.
A CVE names a product. Whether it matters depends on where that product sits in your systems: what reaches it, which trust boundary it guards and what it can reach once compromised. Veriom maps your components, their relationships and your trust boundaries from your code, cloud and delivery evidence, so you can see where a component like this sits. The radar itself does not look at your systems.
Sources
- CVE records and CVSS scores from the NVD CVE API. This product uses the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD.
- Exploitation status from CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.
- Exploit likelihood from FIRST’s Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS), refreshed daily.
- Explanations are written by Veriom from fixed templates over each record’s data, not by a person reviewing each CVE. Descriptions are quoted from the records as published. The radar covers CVEs published since 4 Nov 2026, plus every CVE in the KEV catalog.