Free tool · No sign-in
CVE radar: the latest vulnerabilities, explained.
Every new CVE from NVD, with whether it is exploited in the wild (CISA KEV), how likely it is to be (FIRST EPSS), and what it means for your architecture in plain language.
Updated 12 Nov, 00:28 UTC from NVD, CISA KEV and FIRST EPSSMarkdownRSSJSON Feed
Patch first
Exploited in the wild, newest first.
CISA adds a CVE to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog when attackers are using it. Patch these first, then CVEs with a high EPSS score, then the most severe, starting with anything reachable from the internet.
Microsoft Office Outlook Missing User Interaction for Potentially Unsafe Action Vulnerability
Medium6.5Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS 1.6%, higher than 76% of scored CVEsMicrosoft Office and 6 moreCVSS 3.1 · 6.5CWE-356
Google Chromium Use-After-Free Vulnerability
High8.8Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS 0.96%, higher than 62% of scored CVEsGoogle Chromium and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-416
Barracuda Networks Email Security Gateway (ESG) Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel Vulnerability
Critical9.3Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-13EPSS 8.9%, higher than 95% of scored CVEsBarracuda Email Security Gateway (ESG)CVSS 4.0 · 9.3CWE-288
Barracuda Networks Multiple Products OS Command Injection Vulnerability
High8.6Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-13EPSS 6.2%, higher than 94% of scored CVEsBarracuda Email Security Gateway (ESG) and 5 moreCVSS 4.0 · 8.6CWE-78
Openwave Messaging Limited Webtop Media Transcoder Incorrect Resource Transfer Between Spheres Vulnerability
Medium4.3Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS 0.64%, higher than 51% of scored CVEsOpenwave Messaging Limited Webtop Media Transcoder and 2 moreCVSS 3.1 · 4.3CWE-669
Trends
The last 30 days, by severity.
5,323 CVEs published, 387 of them critical. Many arrive without a score yet: NVD and the reporting organisations add CVSS over the following days.
Show the numbers
| Day | Critical | High | Medium | Low | Not scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14 Oct 2026 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 Oct 2026 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 Oct 2026 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 Oct 2026 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 Oct 2026 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 Oct 2026 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1 Nov 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 Nov 2026 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 3 Nov 2026 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 4 Nov 2026 | 35 | 158 | 138 | 32 | 1 |
| 5 Nov 2026 | 55 | 213 | 148 | 36 | 1 |
| 6 Nov 2026 | 40 | 146 | 205 | 47 | 6 |
| 7 Nov 2026 | 57 | 161 | 232 | 11 | 13 |
| 8 Nov 2026 | 23 | 128 | 143 | 26 | 0 |
| 9 Nov 2026 | 22 | 149 | 218 | 42 | 39 |
| 10 Nov 2026 | 103 | 1150 | 590 | 43 | 230 |
| 11 Nov 2026 | 44 | 233 | 221 | 34 | 132 |
| 12 Nov 2026 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Exploit likelihood (EPSS), last 30 days
- Under 1%4630
- 1% to 10%174
- 10% to 50%2
- 50% or more5
- Not scored yet512
Most affected vendors, last 30 days
Most common weaknesses, last 30 days
- Cross-site scripting (CWE-79)398
- Heap-based buffer overflow (CWE-122)348
- Use after free (CWE-416)309
- Missing authorization (CWE-862)291
- Insecure direct object reference (CWE-639)188
- Out-of-bounds read (CWE-125)182
- Server-side request forgery (CWE-918)162
- Incorrect authorization (CWE-863)156
- Path traversal (CWE-22)145
- Out-of-bounds write (CWE-787)138
Matching CVEs
344 CVEs match these filters, page 4 of 14.
MongoDB Server use after free
Critical9.5EPSS 0.71%, higher than 54% of scored CVEsMongoDB ServerCVSS 4.0 · 9.5CWE-416
A use-after-free in the replication component of MongoDB Server can occur when a newly elected replica set primary completes catch-up. The condition can be caused by requests that do not require authentication, and may result in the server terminating unexpectedly or, under…
Fortinet FortiClientMac origin validation error
Critical9.6EPSS 0.22%, higher than 12% of scored CVEsFortinet FortiClientMac and 2 moreCVSS 3.1 · 9.6CWE-346
A origin validation error vulnerability in Fortinet FortiClientMac 7.4.0 through 7.4.7, FortiClientWindows 7.4.0 through 7.4.7, FortiClientWindows 7.2.0 through 7.2.14, FortiClientWindowsPAM 7.4.7, FortiClientWindowsPAM 7.2.14 may allow an unauthorized remote attacker to…
Arista Networks EOS allocation without limits
Critical9.2EPSS 0.51%, higher than 44% of scored CVEsArista Networks EOSCVSS 4.0 · 9.2CWE-770
On affected platforms running Arista EOS with Precision Time Protocol (PTP) configured, an unauthenticated attacker with network access to a PTP-enabled port can create a denial of service (DoS) condition by sending traffic to the system.
Arista Networks EOS unchecked quantity
Critical9.2EPSS 0.46%, higher than 40% of scored CVEsArista Networks EOSCVSS 4.0 · 9.2CWE-1284
On affected platforms running Arista EOS configured as S-BFD peers, an unauthenticated attacker could send a crafted S-BFD PDU to an initiator device. This crafted PDU could cause the kernel on the initiator device to crash, resulting in an unexpected device reboot.
Arista Networks EOS stack-based buffer overflow
Critical9.3EPSS 0.64%, higher than 51% of scored CVEsArista Networks EOSCVSS 4.0 · 9.3CWE-121
On affected platforms running Arista EOS with BGP configured, a specially crafted packet can cause the BGP agent to crash. Successful exploitation causes the BGP agent process to terminate, resulting in the loss of all BGP sessions on the affected device and possible disruption…
MongoDB Server improper certificate validation
Critical9.1EPSS 0.17%, higher than 7% of scored CVEsMongoDB ServerCVSS 4.0 · 9.1CWE-295
An issue exists in MongoDB's macOS TLS client implementation where certificate chain-of-trust validation is bypassed for outbound connections to IPv6-addressed peers. When a MongoDB process using the Apple SecureTransport TLS backend connects to an IPv6 target, the trust…
Arista Networks Wi-Fi Access Point hard-coded credentials
Critical9.4EPSS 0.23%, higher than 14% of scored CVEsArista Networks Wi-Fi Access PointCVSS 4.0 · 9.4CWE-798
Arista C-260 and C-250 access points ship with fleet-wide static cryptographic keys used for firmware image verification and SSLP authentication. An attacker who is able to access these keys would be able to create modified firmware that will pass verification checks. This…
Microsoft Windows 10 heap-based buffer overflow
Critical9.8EPSS 0.91%, higher than 60% of scored CVEsMicrosoft Windows 10 Version 1607 and 9 moreCVSS 3.1 · 9.8CWE-122
Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Windows Media Foundation allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.
Microsoft Windows 10 heap-based buffer overflow
Critical9.8EPSS 1.00%, higher than 63% of scored CVEsMicrosoft Windows 10 Version 1607 and 9 moreCVSS 3.1 · 9.8CWE-122, CWE-191
Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Color Management allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.
Microsoft Windows 10 integer overflow
Critical9.8EPSS 0.90%, higher than 60% of scored CVEsMicrosoft Windows 10 Version 1607 and 9 moreCVSS 3.1 · 9.8CWE-190
Integer overflow or wraparound in Microsoft Color Management allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.
Microsoft Windows 10 use after free
Critical9.0EPSS 0.72%, higher than 54% of scored CVEsMicrosoft Windows 10 Version 1809 and 9 moreCVSS 3.1 · 9.0CWE-416
Use after free in Windows Virtual Filtering Platform (VFP) allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.
Microsoft Windows 10 double free
Critical9.8EPSS 1.00%, higher than 63% of scored CVEsMicrosoft Windows 10 Version 1607 and 9 moreCVSS 3.1 · 9.8CWE-415
Double free in Windows Microsoft DirectMusic allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.
Microsoft Windows 10 stack-based buffer overflow
Critical9.8EPSS 0.97%, higher than 62% of scored CVEsMicrosoft Windows 10 Version 1607 and 9 moreCVSS 3.1 · 9.8CWE-121
Stack-based buffer overflow in Windows Microsoft DirectMusic allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.
Microsoft Windows Server 2016 out-of-bounds read
Critical9.8EPSS 1.0%, higher than 63% of scored CVEsMicrosoft Windows Server 2016 and 6 moreCVSS 3.1 · 9.8CWE-125
Out-of-bounds read in Windows DHCP Server allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.
Microsoft Windows Server 2016 vulnerability
Critical9.8EPSS 0.85%, higher than 59% of scored CVEsMicrosoft Windows Server 2016 and 6 moreCVSS 3.1 · 9.8CWE-763
Release of invalid pointer or reference in Windows iSCSI allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.
Microsoft Windows 10 double free
Critical9.8EPSS 1.1%, higher than 67% of scored CVEsMicrosoft Windows 10 Version 1607 and 9 moreCVSS 3.1 · 9.8CWE-415
Double free in Windows DNS allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.
Microsoft Windows 10 authentication bypass by alternate path
Critical9.8EPSS 1.0%, higher than 65% of scored CVEsMicrosoft Windows 10 Version 1607 and 9 moreCVSS 3.1 · 9.8CWE-288
Authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel in Windows Kerberos allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.
Microsoft SharePoint Server Subscription Edition cross-site scripting
Critical9.0EPSS 0.81%, higher than 57% of scored CVEsMicrosoft SharePoint Server Subscription EditionCVSS 3.1 · 9.0CWE-79
Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') in Microsoft Office SharePoint allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.
Microsoft GDK heap-based buffer overflow
Critical9.8EPSS 1.1%, higher than 67% of scored CVEsMicrosoft GDKCVSS 3.1 · 9.8CWE-122
Heap-based buffer overflow in Xbox allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.
AWS openjd-sessions untrusted search path
Critical9.4EPSS 0.76%, higher than 56% of scored CVEsAWS openjd-sessions and 1 moreCVSS 4.0 · 9.4CWE-426
Untrusted search path in the cross-user process launcher in Open Job Description (OpenJD) Sessions for Python before 0.11.0, as used in the AWS Deadline Cloud worker agent before 0.33.0, on Linux might allow an authenticated remote user with permission to submit jobs to a queue…
harnessrouter missing authorization
Critical9.1EPSS 0.30%, higher than 23% of scored CVEsharnessrouterCVSS 3.1 · 9.1CWE-862, CWE-863
HarnessRouter is a self-hosted unified API for running agent harnesses with sessions, streaming, files, cancellation, and failure handling. Prior to 0.31.8, a console that is not in self-hosted mode attaches the server's internal key to requests carrying an Authorization header…
Microsoft Visual Studio Code code injection
Critical9.6EPSS 0.64%, higher than 51% of scored CVEsMicrosoft Visual Studio CodeCVSS 3.1 · 9.6CWE-94
Improper control of generation of code ('code injection') in Visual Studio Code allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.
Microsoft SharePoint Server Subscription Edition incorrect authorization
Critical9.9EPSS 0.86%, higher than 59% of scored CVEsMicrosoft SharePoint Server Subscription EditionCVSS 3.1 · 9.9CWE-863
Incorrect authorization in Microsoft Office SharePoint allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.
Microsoft Azure Open AI missing authentication
Critical9.8EPSS 0.92%, higher than 61% of scored CVEsMicrosoft Azure Open AICVSS 3.1 · 9.8CWE-306
Missing authentication for critical function in Azure OpenAI allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.
Microsoft Windows 10 out-of-bounds write
Critical9.8EPSS 1.3%, higher than 70% of scored CVEsMicrosoft Windows 10 Version 1607 and 9 moreCVSS 3.1 · 9.8CWE-787
Out-of-bounds write in Windows LDAP - Lightweight Directory Access Protocol allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.
Reading the radar
CVSS, KEV and EPSS, briefly.
What is a CVE?
A CVE is a public identifier for one vulnerability in one product, such as CVE-2026-59310. The CVE program assigns it; NVD, run by the US National Institute of Standards and Technology, adds scores, weakness classes and affected product lists.
What does the CVSS score tell me?
CVSS rates how severe a vulnerability is on its own, from 0 to 10, and its vector says how it is reached: over the network or locally, with or without an account, with or without someone clicking. It says nothing about whether anyone is exploiting it. The radar shows the newest CVSS version scored and names it, because version 4.0 and 3.1 scores differ.
What is CISA KEV?
The Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog is CISA's list of CVEs with reliable evidence of exploitation in the wild. US federal agencies must fix each one by its due date, and it is the strongest signal of what to patch first.
What is EPSS?
FIRST's Exploit Prediction Scoring System estimates the probability that a CVE will see exploitation activity in the next 30 days, recomputed daily. Most CVEs score well under 1%, so the radar also shows the percentile: how a CVE ranks against every scored CVE.
How should I prioritise?
Patch what CISA lists as exploited first. Then CVEs with a high EPSS score, then the most severe by CVSS. Within each group, start with whatever is reachable from the internet without an account.
Where do the explanations come from?
Veriom writes them from fixed templates over each record: the weakness class says what went wrong and where in an architecture it lives, the CVSS vector says how it is reached and what it affects, and KEV, EPSS and CISA's assessment say whether it is exploited. Nobody reviews each CVE by hand, so read the description and the references before acting.
How fresh is the data?
New and changed CVEs arrive from NVD every hour, the KEV catalog every six hours and EPSS scores once a day. Each page shows when the data was last updated.
Know where a vulnerable component would sit in your systems.
A CVE names a product. Whether it matters depends on where that product sits in your systems: what reaches it, which trust boundary it guards and what it can reach once compromised. Veriom maps your components, their relationships and your trust boundaries from your code, cloud and delivery evidence, so you can see where a component like this sits. The radar itself does not look at your systems.
Sources
- CVE records and CVSS scores from the NVD CVE API. This product uses the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD.
- Exploitation status from CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.
- Exploit likelihood from FIRST’s Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS), refreshed daily.
- Explanations are written by Veriom from fixed templates over each record’s data, not by a person reviewing each CVE. Descriptions are quoted from the records as published. The radar covers CVEs published since 4 Nov 2026, plus every CVE in the KEV catalog.