Free tool · No sign-in
CVE radar: the latest vulnerabilities, explained.
Every new CVE from NVD, with whether it is exploited in the wild (CISA KEV), how likely it is to be (FIRST EPSS), and what it means for your architecture in plain language.
Updated 12 Nov, 00:28 UTC from NVD, CISA KEV and FIRST EPSSMarkdownRSSJSON Feed
Patch first
Exploited in the wild, newest first.
CISA adds a CVE to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog when attackers are using it. Patch these first, then CVEs with a high EPSS score, then the most severe, starting with anything reachable from the internet.
Microsoft Office Outlook Missing User Interaction for Potentially Unsafe Action Vulnerability
Medium6.5Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS 1.6%, higher than 76% of scored CVEsMicrosoft Office and 6 moreCVSS 3.1 · 6.5CWE-356
Google Chromium Use-After-Free Vulnerability
High8.8Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS 0.96%, higher than 62% of scored CVEsGoogle Chromium and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-416
Barracuda Networks Email Security Gateway (ESG) Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel Vulnerability
Critical9.3Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-13EPSS 8.9%, higher than 95% of scored CVEsBarracuda Email Security Gateway (ESG)CVSS 4.0 · 9.3CWE-288
Barracuda Networks Multiple Products OS Command Injection Vulnerability
High8.6Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-13EPSS 6.2%, higher than 94% of scored CVEsBarracuda Email Security Gateway (ESG) and 5 moreCVSS 4.0 · 8.6CWE-78
Openwave Messaging Limited Webtop Media Transcoder Incorrect Resource Transfer Between Spheres Vulnerability
Medium4.3Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS 0.64%, higher than 51% of scored CVEsOpenwave Messaging Limited Webtop Media Transcoder and 2 moreCVSS 3.1 · 4.3CWE-669
Trends
The last 30 days, by severity.
5,323 CVEs published, 387 of them critical. Many arrive without a score yet: NVD and the reporting organisations add CVSS over the following days.
Show the numbers
| Day | Critical | High | Medium | Low | Not scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14 Oct 2026 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 Oct 2026 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 Oct 2026 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 Oct 2026 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 Oct 2026 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 Oct 2026 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1 Nov 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 Nov 2026 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 3 Nov 2026 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 4 Nov 2026 | 35 | 158 | 138 | 32 | 1 |
| 5 Nov 2026 | 55 | 213 | 148 | 36 | 1 |
| 6 Nov 2026 | 40 | 146 | 205 | 47 | 6 |
| 7 Nov 2026 | 57 | 161 | 232 | 11 | 13 |
| 8 Nov 2026 | 23 | 128 | 143 | 26 | 0 |
| 9 Nov 2026 | 22 | 149 | 218 | 42 | 39 |
| 10 Nov 2026 | 103 | 1150 | 590 | 43 | 230 |
| 11 Nov 2026 | 44 | 233 | 221 | 34 | 132 |
| 12 Nov 2026 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Exploit likelihood (EPSS), last 30 days
- Under 1%4630
- 1% to 10%174
- 10% to 50%2
- 50% or more5
- Not scored yet512
Most affected vendors, last 30 days
Most common weaknesses, last 30 days
- Cross-site scripting (CWE-79)398
- Heap-based buffer overflow (CWE-122)348
- Use after free (CWE-416)309
- Missing authorization (CWE-862)291
- Insecure direct object reference (CWE-639)188
- Out-of-bounds read (CWE-125)182
- Server-side request forgery (CWE-918)162
- Incorrect authorization (CWE-863)156
- Path traversal (CWE-22)145
- Out-of-bounds write (CWE-787)138
Matching CVEs
2,180 CVEs match these filters, page 4 of 88.
Fortinet FortiMail vulnerability
High8.7EPSS not scored yetFortinet FortiMailCVSS 3.1 · 8.7CWE-91
A xml injection (aka blind xpath injection) vulnerability in Fortinet FortiMail 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiMail 7.6.0 through 7.6.6 may allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via a specially crafted request.
Fortinet FortiMail uncontrolled resource consumption
High7.5EPSS not scored yetFortinet FortiMailCVSS 3.1 · 7.5CWE-400
A uncontrolled resource consumption vulnerability in Fortinet FortiMail 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiMail 7.6.0 through 7.6.6, FortiMail 7.4.0 through 7.4.6 may allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to cause a denial of service via repeated unauthenticated POST requests.
Fortinet FortiMail improper authentication
High8.2EPSS not scored yetFortinet FortiMailCVSS 3.1 · 8.2CWE-287
A improper authentication vulnerability in Fortinet FortiMail 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiMail 7.6.0 through 7.6.6, FortiMail 7.4.0 through 7.4.8, FortiMail 7.2 all versions may allow an unauthenticated attacker to escalate privileges and release or delete quarantined messages…
Fortinet FortiMail insecure direct object reference
High7.5EPSS not scored yetFortinet FortiMailCVSS 3.1 · 7.5CWE-639
A authorization bypass through user-controlled key vulnerability in Fortinet FortiMail 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiMail 7.6.0 through 7.6.6, FortiMail 7.4.0 through 7.4.8, FortiMail 7.2 all versions may allow an unauthenticated attacker to release or delete quarantined messages…
Fortinet FortiMail OS command injection
High7.2EPSS not scored yetFortinet FortiMailCVSS 3.1 · 7.2CWE-78
A improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command ('os command injection') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiMail 8.0.0 through 8.0.1 may allow an authenticated administrator to execute unauthorized code or commands as root via specially crafted HTTP requests.
Fortinet FortiMail out-of-bounds write
High7.5EPSS not scored yetFortinet FortiMailCVSS 3.1 · 7.5CWE-787
A out-of-bounds write vulnerability in Fortinet FortiMail 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiMail 7.6.0 through 7.6.6, FortiMail 7.4.0 through 7.4.8, FortiMail 7.2 all versions may allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to cause a denial of service via a specially crafted HTTP request.
Fortinet FortiMail path traversal
High7.5EPSS not scored yetFortinet FortiMailCVSS 3.1 · 7.5CWE-22
A improper limitation of a pathname to a restricted directory ('path traversal') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiMail 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiMail 7.6.0 through 7.6.6, FortiMail 7.4.0 through 7.4.8, FortiMail 7.2 all versions may allow an unauthenticated attacker to execute…
Fortinet FortiMail insecure direct object reference
High7.6EPSS not scored yetFortinet FortiMailCVSS 3.1 · 7.6CWE-639
A authorization bypass through user-controlled key vulnerability in Fortinet FortiMail 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiMail 7.6.0 through 7.6.6, FortiMail 7.4.0 through 7.4.8, FortiMail 7.2 all versions may allow an authenticated remote attacker to delete arbitrary directories as…
Fortinet FortiMail vulnerability
High7.5EPSS not scored yetFortinet FortiMailCVSS 3.1 · 7.5CWE-303
A incorrect implementation of authentication algorithm vulnerability in Fortinet FortiMail 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiMail 7.6.0 through 7.6.6, FortiMail 7.4.0 through 7.4.8, FortiMail 7.2 all versions may allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to gain elevation of privilege…
Fortinet FortiMail integer overflow
High7.5EPSS not scored yetFortinet FortiMailCVSS 3.1 · 7.5CWE-190
A integer overflow or wraparound vulnerability in Fortinet FortiMail 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiMail 7.6.0 through 7.6.6, FortiMail 7.4.0 through 7.4.8, FortiMail 7.2 all versions may allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to crash the daemon.
Fortinet FortiMail OS command injection
High7.2EPSS not scored yetFortinet FortiMail and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 7.2CWE-78
A improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command ('os command injection') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiMail 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiMail 7.6.0 through 7.6.4, FortiMail 7.4.0 through 7.4.6, FortiMail 7.2.0 through 7.2.9, FortiRecorder 7.6.0, FortiRecorder…
Fortinet FortiMail OS command injection
High7.2EPSS not scored yetFortinet FortiMailCVSS 3.1 · 7.2CWE-78
A improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command ('os command injection') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiMail 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiMail 7.6.0 through 7.6.6, FortiMail 7.4.0 through 7.4.8, FortiMail 7.2 all versions may allow an authenticated…
Fortinet FortiMail OS command injection
High8.8EPSS not scored yetFortinet FortiMail and 2 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-78
A improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command ('os command injection') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiMail 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiMail 7.6.0 through 7.6.4, FortiMail 7.4.0 through 7.4.6, FortiMail 7.2 all versions, FortiRecorder 7.6.0 through 7.6.2,…
Fortinet FortiOS improper certificate validation
High8.1EPSS not scored yetFortinet FortiOSCVSS 3.1 · 8.1CWE-295
A improper certificate validation vulnerability in Fortinet FortiOS 7.6.0 through 7.6.4, FortiOS 7.4.0 through 7.4.9, FortiOS 7.2.0 through 7.2.13 may allow a remote and unauthenticated attacker to perform a Man-in-the-Middle attack on the communication channel between the…
Dell Display and Peripheral Manager (DDPM Windows) time-of-check to time-of-use race
High7.0EPSS not scored yetDell Display and Peripheral Manager (DDPM Windows)CVSS 3.1 · 7.0CWE-367
Dell Display and Peripheral Manager (DDPM Windows), versions prior to 2.4.0.17, contain a Time-of-check Time-of-use (TOCTOU) Condition vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Code execution.
winshining nginx-http-flv-module null pointer dereference
High8.7EPSS not scored yetwinshining nginx-http-flv-moduleCVSS 4.0 · 8.7CWE-476
nginx-http-flv-module is a media streaming server based on nginx-rtmp-module. Prior to version 1.2.14, if a server received an HTTP/1.0 request without a header Host, which was permitted by HTTP core of Nginx, then r->headers_in.host was NULL, nginx-http-flv-module used…
3xpyth0n ideon improper authorization
High8.7EPSS not scored yet3xpyth0n ideonCVSS 4.0 · 8.7CWE-285, CWE-862
ideon is a self-hosted visual workspace. Prior to version 0.9.4, several project mutation endpoints under /api/projects/[id]/* resolve the caller's project role but never enforce it, so a user who was granted only the read-only viewer role on a project can perform write…
Roundcube Webmail CRLF injection
High7.4EPSS not scored yetRoundcube WebmailCVSS 4.0 · 7.4CWE-93
Roundcube Webmail before 1.6.21 and 1.7.x before 1.7.6 contains an IMAP command injection vulnerability that allows attackers to inject commands via CRLF in the _uid parameter when messages_cache is enabled. Attackers can lure logged-in victims into opening crafted GET links to…
WWBN AVideo incorrect authorization
High8.6EPSS not scored yetWWBN AVideoCVSS 4.0 · 8.6CWE-863
WWBN AVideo through 29.7.1 contains an incorrect authorization vulnerability that allows delegated Videos Admin users to obtain video_id_hash values bound to any video owner via encoder endpoints like aVideoEncoderStatus.json.php. Attackers can request the hash for an…
WWBN AVideo path traversal
High7.2EPSS not scored yetWWBN AVideoCVSS 4.0 · 7.2CWE-22
WWBN AVideo 12.4 through 29.7.1 contains a path traversal vulnerability in the ADs plugin deleteImage.json.php that allows authenticated users with custom ads to delete arbitrary files. Attackers can set the unvalidated is_regular_user parameter to another user's id or ../…
Rabithua Rote improper privilege management
High8.6EPSS not scored yetRabithua RoteCVSS 4.0 · 8.6CWE-269
Rote through 2.6.0 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows authenticated admins to obtain super_admin rights by reading or overwriting JWT signing secrets via /v2/api/admin/settings. Attackers can retrieve the unmasked jwtSecret from the security settings…
tongcheng-security-team NextScan hard-coded credentials
High8.8EPSS not scored yettongcheng-security-team NextScanCVSS 4.0 · 8.8CWE-798
NextScan 1.1.0 through 1.2.0 contains hardcoded HTTP Basic Auth credentials in ns-admin's AuthAgent and AuthExternal routers that allow unauthenticated attackers to access protected APIs. Attackers can call /agent/config to obtain Redis passwords, etcd details and the server…
Rabithua Rote insecure direct object reference
High8.7EPSS not scored yetRabithua RoteCVSS 4.0 · 8.7CWE-639
Rote 1.2.0 through 2.6.0 contains an authorization bypass in the OAuth bind/merge endpoint that allows authenticated users to merge any OAuth-bound account into their own. Attackers can submit a public existingUserId and GitHub or Apple user ID to take over notes, attachments,…
3xpyth0n ideon server-side request forgery
High7.1EPSS not scored yet3xpyth0n ideonCVSS 4.0 · 7.1CWE-918
ideon is a self-hosted visual workspace. Prior to version 0.9.6, the SSRF protection in safeFetch is bypassed by IPv6 transition addresses that embed private IPv4 addresses. The isPrivateIP function in src/app/lib/ssrf.ts checks only a narrow set of IPv6 ranges (loopback ::1,…
AWS mcp-gateway-registry incorrect privilege assignment
High8.7EPSS not scored yetAWS mcp-gateway-registryCVSS 4.0 · 8.7CWE-266, CWE-862
Missing authorization in the external management API in Amazon mcp-gateway-registry 1.0.9 through 1.24.7 might allow an authenticated remote user to assign the registry administrator scope to their own identity group and obtain administrative control of every registered gateway…
Reading the radar
CVSS, KEV and EPSS, briefly.
What is a CVE?
A CVE is a public identifier for one vulnerability in one product, such as CVE-2026-59310. The CVE program assigns it; NVD, run by the US National Institute of Standards and Technology, adds scores, weakness classes and affected product lists.
What does the CVSS score tell me?
CVSS rates how severe a vulnerability is on its own, from 0 to 10, and its vector says how it is reached: over the network or locally, with or without an account, with or without someone clicking. It says nothing about whether anyone is exploiting it. The radar shows the newest CVSS version scored and names it, because version 4.0 and 3.1 scores differ.
What is CISA KEV?
The Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog is CISA's list of CVEs with reliable evidence of exploitation in the wild. US federal agencies must fix each one by its due date, and it is the strongest signal of what to patch first.
What is EPSS?
FIRST's Exploit Prediction Scoring System estimates the probability that a CVE will see exploitation activity in the next 30 days, recomputed daily. Most CVEs score well under 1%, so the radar also shows the percentile: how a CVE ranks against every scored CVE.
How should I prioritise?
Patch what CISA lists as exploited first. Then CVEs with a high EPSS score, then the most severe by CVSS. Within each group, start with whatever is reachable from the internet without an account.
Where do the explanations come from?
Veriom writes them from fixed templates over each record: the weakness class says what went wrong and where in an architecture it lives, the CVSS vector says how it is reached and what it affects, and KEV, EPSS and CISA's assessment say whether it is exploited. Nobody reviews each CVE by hand, so read the description and the references before acting.
How fresh is the data?
New and changed CVEs arrive from NVD every hour, the KEV catalog every six hours and EPSS scores once a day. Each page shows when the data was last updated.
Know where a vulnerable component would sit in your systems.
A CVE names a product. Whether it matters depends on where that product sits in your systems: what reaches it, which trust boundary it guards and what it can reach once compromised. Veriom maps your components, their relationships and your trust boundaries from your code, cloud and delivery evidence, so you can see where a component like this sits. The radar itself does not look at your systems.
Sources
- CVE records and CVSS scores from the NVD CVE API. This product uses the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD.
- Exploitation status from CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.
- Exploit likelihood from FIRST’s Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS), refreshed daily.
- Explanations are written by Veriom from fixed templates over each record’s data, not by a person reviewing each CVE. Descriptions are quoted from the records as published. The radar covers CVEs published since 4 Nov 2026, plus every CVE in the KEV catalog.