Free tool · No sign-in
CVE radar: the latest vulnerabilities, explained.
Every new CVE from NVD, with whether it is exploited in the wild (CISA KEV), how likely it is to be (FIRST EPSS), and what it means for your architecture in plain language.
Updated 12 Nov, 11:28 UTC from NVD, CISA KEV and FIRST EPSSMarkdownRSSJSON Feed
Patch first
Exploited in the wild, newest first.
CISA adds a CVE to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog when attackers are using it. Patch these first, then CVEs with a high EPSS score, then the most severe, starting with anything reachable from the internet.
Microsoft Office Outlook Missing User Interaction for Potentially Unsafe Action Vulnerability
Medium6.5Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS 1.6%, higher than 76% of scored CVEsMicrosoft Office and 6 moreCVSS 3.1 · 6.5CWE-356
Google Chromium Use-After-Free Vulnerability
High8.8Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS 0.96%, higher than 62% of scored CVEsGoogle Chromium and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-416
Barracuda Networks Email Security Gateway (ESG) Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel Vulnerability
Critical9.3Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-13EPSS 8.9%, higher than 95% of scored CVEsBarracuda Email Security Gateway (ESG)CVSS 4.0 · 9.3CWE-288
Barracuda Networks Multiple Products OS Command Injection Vulnerability
High8.6Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-13EPSS 6.2%, higher than 94% of scored CVEsBarracuda Email Security Gateway (ESG) and 5 moreCVSS 4.0 · 8.6CWE-78
Openwave Messaging Limited Webtop Media Transcoder Incorrect Resource Transfer Between Spheres Vulnerability
Medium4.3Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS 0.64%, higher than 51% of scored CVEsOpenwave Messaging Limited Webtop Media Transcoder and 2 moreCVSS 3.1 · 4.3CWE-669
Trends
The last 30 days, by severity.
5,439 CVEs published, 395 of them critical. Many arrive without a score yet: NVD and the reporting organisations add CVSS over the following days.
Show the numbers
| Day | Critical | High | Medium | Low | Not scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14 Oct 2026 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 Oct 2026 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 Oct 2026 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 Oct 2026 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 Oct 2026 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 Oct 2026 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1 Nov 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 Nov 2026 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 3 Nov 2026 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 4 Nov 2026 | 35 | 158 | 138 | 32 | 1 |
| 5 Nov 2026 | 55 | 213 | 148 | 36 | 1 |
| 6 Nov 2026 | 40 | 146 | 205 | 47 | 6 |
| 7 Nov 2026 | 57 | 161 | 232 | 11 | 13 |
| 8 Nov 2026 | 23 | 128 | 143 | 26 | 0 |
| 9 Nov 2026 | 22 | 149 | 218 | 42 | 39 |
| 10 Nov 2026 | 103 | 1150 | 590 | 43 | 230 |
| 11 Nov 2026 | 44 | 233 | 221 | 34 | 132 |
| 12 Nov 2026 | 8 | 49 | 32 | 4 | 24 |
Exploit likelihood (EPSS), last 30 days
- Under 1%4630
- 1% to 10%174
- 10% to 50%2
- 50% or more5
- Not scored yet628
Most affected vendors, last 30 days
Most common weaknesses, last 30 days
- Cross-site scripting (CWE-79)406
- Heap-based buffer overflow (CWE-122)353
- Use after free (CWE-416)312
- Missing authorization (CWE-862)299
- Insecure direct object reference (CWE-639)189
- Out-of-bounds read (CWE-125)184
- Server-side request forgery (CWE-918)163
- Incorrect authorization (CWE-863)158
- Path traversal (CWE-22)149
- Out-of-bounds write (CWE-787)146
Matching CVEs
2,229 CVEs match these filters, page 80 of 90.
JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA inclusion of untrusted functionality
High7.8EPSS 0.19%, higher than 9% of scored CVEsJetBrains IntelliJ IDEACVSS 3.1 · 7.8CWE-829
In JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA before 2026.3 code execution in untrusted projects via a configured ShellCheck path
JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA inclusion of untrusted functionality
High7.8EPSS 0.19%, higher than 9% of scored CVEsJetBrains IntelliJ IDEACVSS 3.1 · 7.8CWE-829
In JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA before 2026.3, 2026.2.4, 2026.1.5.1, 2025.3.6.2 code execution was possible in untrusted projects via script engine discovery
JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA cross-site scripting
High8.2EPSS 0.27%, higher than 19% of scored CVEsJetBrains IntelliJ IDEACVSS 3.1 · 8.2CWE-79
In JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA before 2026.3 dOM-based XSS in the OpenAPI preview error view was possible
JetBrains Hub incorrect authorization
High7.5EPSS 0.32%, higher than 25% of scored CVEsJetBrains HubCVSS 3.1 · 7.5CWE-863
In JetBrains Hub before 2026.2.52519 privilege escalation via forged email verification was possible
JetBrains Hub incorrect authorization
High8.1EPSS 0.39%, higher than 33% of scored CVEsJetBrains HubCVSS 3.1 · 8.1CWE-863
In JetBrains Hub before 2026.2.52519 enforced two-factor authentication could be disabled via the profile update endpoint
JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA inclusion of untrusted functionality
High7.8EPSS 0.19%, higher than 9% of scored CVEsJetBrains IntelliJ IDEACVSS 3.1 · 7.8CWE-829
In JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA before 2026.3, 2026.2.4 code execution was possible in untrusted projects via the Terraform tool path setting
JetBrains Datalore vulnerability
High7.4EPSS 0.28%, higher than 20% of scored CVEsJetBrains DataloreCVSS 3.1 · 7.4CWE-672
In JetBrains Datalore before 2026.4 missing expiration validation of account tokens allowed a new authenticated session
JetBrains Datalore argument injection
High7.5EPSS 0.36%, higher than 31% of scored CVEsJetBrains DataloreCVSS 3.1 · 7.5CWE-88
In JetBrains Datalore before 2026.4 notebook code could execute commands in the sidecar container via the mount broker
JetBrains Datalore incorrect authorization
High8.1EPSS 0.39%, higher than 34% of scored CVEsJetBrains DataloreCVSS 3.1 · 8.1CWE-863
In JetBrains Datalore before 2026.2.4 unauthenticated users could execute code via published interactive reports
JetBrains CLion inclusion of untrusted functionality
High7.8EPSS 0.19%, higher than 9% of scored CVEsJetBrains CLionCVSS 3.1 · 7.8CWE-829
In JetBrains CLion before 2026.3, 2026.2.4.1 code execution was possible in Safe Mode via a crafted GDB server debug profile
ninenines cowboy allocation without limits
High8.2EPSS 0.54%, higher than 46% of scored CVEsninenines cowboyCVSS 4.0 · 8.2CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling vulnerability in ninenines cowboy allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to exhaust connection process memory over HTTP/1.1. Once a request has been received in full and its handler is still running, cowboy_http:parse/2 in…
ninenines cowlib allocation without limits
High8.7EPSS 0.42%, higher than 37% of scored CVEsninenines cowlibCVSS 4.0 · 8.7CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling vulnerability in ninenines cowlib allows an unauthenticated remote peer to exhaust the memory of an HTTP/2 endpoint via HPACK-indexed header fields. cow_http2_machine:headers_decode/4 in src/cow_http2_machine.erl decodes…
wahid0003 Product Feed Manager for WooCommerce code injection
High7.2EPSS 0.95%, higher than 62% of scored CVEswahid0003 Product Feed Manager for WooCommerce – CTX Feed – Support 220+ Shopping, AI & Social ChannelsCVSS 3.1 · 7.2CWE-94
The Product Feed Manager for WooCommerce – CTX Feed – Support 220+ Shopping, AI & Social Channels plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to PHP Code Injection in all versions up to, and including, 8.0.26. This is due to insufficient sanitization of the `feedConfigCustom2` parameter…
Grafana OSS missing authorization
High8.5EPSS 0.21%, higher than 11% of scored CVEsGrafana OSS and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.5CWE-862
A user with any role, including Viewer or a service account with no permissions, can create, externally publish, and delete dashboard snapshots (missing authorization). Only Grafana OSS and Grafana Enterprise 12.4 are affected; earlier versions and Grafana 13 are not.
Atmira SIREC SQL injection
High8.7EPSS 0.25%, higher than 17% of scored CVEsAtmira SIRECCVSS 4.0 · 8.7CWE-89
SQL injection vulnerability in Atmira’s SIREC. The server retrieves the value of a field from a JSON object containing user-supplied information and concatenates it into an SQL statement without properly sanitising the input. This allows the original query to be altered via…
undici origin validation error
High7.4EPSS 0.16%, higher than 5% of scored CVEsundiciCVSS 3.1 · 7.4CWE-346, CWE-524
undici is an HTTP client for Node.js. In versions 7.30.1 and 8.12.2 through 8.12.3, when an originless Agent composes the redirect and shared cache interceptors, undici decides whether to store the final response under the original request key by inspecting only the final…
realmag777 MDTF – Meta Data and Taxonomies Filter cross-site scripting
High7.2EPSS 0.36%, higher than 31% of scored CVEsrealmag777 MDTF – Meta Data and Taxonomies FilterCVSS 3.1 · 7.2CWE-79
The MDTF – Meta Data and Taxonomies Filter plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the 'vars' parameter in all versions up to, and including, 1.4.1 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for…
INFINITT ULite unlimited sign-in attempts
High7.5EPSS 0.29%, higher than 22% of scored CVEsINFINITT ULiteCVSS 3.1 · 7.5CWE-307, CWE-331
INFINITT ULite 5.0.2.1_BN48_20260528 and earlier protects image-share links with a low-entropy password and does not restrict repeated password attempts, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to brute-force the password within the link validity window and gain…
iqonicdesign Graphina cross-site scripting
High7.2EPSS 0.25%, higher than 16% of scored CVEsiqonicdesign Graphina – Charts and Graphs For ElementorCVSS 3.1 · 7.2CWE-79
The Graphina – Charts and Graphs For Elementor plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the 'iq_tree_chart_node_font_family (and any text control serialized into chart_data['settings'])' parameter in all versions up to, and including, 3.1.13 due to…
MDJM Event Management cross-site scripting
High8.0EPSS 0.28%, higher than 21% of scored CVEsMDJM Event Management and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.0CWE-79
The MDJM Event Management and Mobile Events Manager WordPress plugins through 1.7.8.7 do not check a capability or a nonce before creating a WordPress role from a name supplied in the request, and store that name without escaping it, allowing any authenticated user, such as a…
MDJM Event Management insecure direct object reference
High8.8EPSS 0.29%, higher than 21% of scored CVEsMDJM Event Management and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-639
The MDJM Event Management and Mobile Events Manager WordPress plugins through 1.7.8.7 do not check ownership or capability on the identifier supplied to their client profile update, allowing any authenticated user, such as a subscriber, to change the password and email address…
WC Lovers WCFM Membership cross-site scripting
High7.1EPSS 0.15%, higher than 4% of scored CVEsWC Lovers WCFM MembershipCVSS 3.1 · 7.1CWE-79
Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in WC Lovers WCFM Membership wc-multivendor-membership allows Stored XSS.This issue affects WCFM Membership: from n/a through 2.12.0.
LY Corporation Armeria vulnerability
High8.7EPSS 0.41%, higher than 36% of scored CVEsLY Corporation ArmeriaCVSS 4.0 · 8.7
A vulnerability has been identified in armeria versions prior to 1.43.0, where processing malformed Thrift messages can cause excessive memory allocation, potentially resulting in denial of service.
LY Corporation Armeria vulnerability
High8.7EPSS 0.44%, higher than 39% of scored CVEsLY Corporation ArmeriaCVSS 4.0 · 8.7
A vulnerability has been identified in armeria versions prior to 1.43.0, where inconsistent request path normalization can allow unauthenticated attackers to bypass path-based access controls and access protected resources.
LY Corporation Armeria vulnerability
High8.7EPSS 0.40%, higher than 35% of scored CVEsLY Corporation ArmeriaCVSS 4.0 · 8.7
A vulnerability has been identified in armeria-saml versions prior to 1.43.0, where the HTTP-Redirect binding decoder decompresses attacker-supplied SAML messages without limiting the output size before signature validation, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to…
Reading the radar
CVSS, KEV and EPSS, briefly.
What is a CVE?
A CVE is a public identifier for one vulnerability in one product, such as CVE-2026-59310. The CVE program assigns it; NVD, run by the US National Institute of Standards and Technology, adds scores, weakness classes and affected product lists.
What does the CVSS score tell me?
CVSS rates how severe a vulnerability is on its own, from 0 to 10, and its vector says how it is reached: over the network or locally, with or without an account, with or without someone clicking. It says nothing about whether anyone is exploiting it. The radar shows the newest CVSS version scored and names it, because version 4.0 and 3.1 scores differ.
What is CISA KEV?
The Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog is CISA's list of CVEs with reliable evidence of exploitation in the wild. US federal agencies must fix each one by its due date, and it is the strongest signal of what to patch first.
What is EPSS?
FIRST's Exploit Prediction Scoring System estimates the probability that a CVE will see exploitation activity in the next 30 days, recomputed daily. Most CVEs score well under 1%, so the radar also shows the percentile: how a CVE ranks against every scored CVE.
How should I prioritise?
Patch what CISA lists as exploited first. Then CVEs with a high EPSS score, then the most severe by CVSS. Within each group, start with whatever is reachable from the internet without an account.
Where do the explanations come from?
Veriom writes them from fixed templates over each record: the weakness class says what went wrong and where in an architecture it lives, the CVSS vector says how it is reached and what it affects, and KEV, EPSS and CISA's assessment say whether it is exploited. Nobody reviews each CVE by hand, so read the description and the references before acting.
How fresh is the data?
New and changed CVEs arrive from NVD every hour, the KEV catalog every six hours and EPSS scores once a day. Each page shows when the data was last updated.
Know where a vulnerable component would sit in your systems.
A CVE names a product. Whether it matters depends on where that product sits in your systems: what reaches it, which trust boundary it guards and what it can reach once compromised. Veriom maps your components, their relationships and your trust boundaries from your code, cloud and delivery evidence, so you can see where a component like this sits. The radar itself does not look at your systems.
Sources
- CVE records and CVSS scores from the NVD CVE API. This product uses the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD.
- Exploitation status from CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.
- Exploit likelihood from FIRST’s Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS), refreshed daily.
- Explanations are written by Veriom from fixed templates over each record’s data, not by a person reviewing each CVE. Descriptions are quoted from the records as published. The radar covers CVEs published since 4 Nov 2026, plus every CVE in the KEV catalog.