Free tool · No sign-in
CVE radar: the latest vulnerabilities, explained.
Every new CVE from NVD, with whether it is exploited in the wild (CISA KEV), how likely it is to be (FIRST EPSS), and what it means for your architecture in plain language.
Updated 12 Nov, 01:28 UTC from NVD, CISA KEV and FIRST EPSSMarkdownRSSJSON Feed
Patch first
Exploited in the wild, newest first.
CISA adds a CVE to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog when attackers are using it. Patch these first, then CVEs with a high EPSS score, then the most severe, starting with anything reachable from the internet.
Microsoft Office Outlook Missing User Interaction for Potentially Unsafe Action Vulnerability
Medium6.5Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS 1.6%, higher than 76% of scored CVEsMicrosoft Office and 6 moreCVSS 3.1 · 6.5CWE-356
Google Chromium Use-After-Free Vulnerability
High8.8Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS 0.96%, higher than 62% of scored CVEsGoogle Chromium and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-416
Barracuda Networks Email Security Gateway (ESG) Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel Vulnerability
Critical9.3Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-13EPSS 8.9%, higher than 95% of scored CVEsBarracuda Email Security Gateway (ESG)CVSS 4.0 · 9.3CWE-288
Barracuda Networks Multiple Products OS Command Injection Vulnerability
High8.6Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-13EPSS 6.2%, higher than 94% of scored CVEsBarracuda Email Security Gateway (ESG) and 5 moreCVSS 4.0 · 8.6CWE-78
Openwave Messaging Limited Webtop Media Transcoder Incorrect Resource Transfer Between Spheres Vulnerability
Medium4.3Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS 0.64%, higher than 51% of scored CVEsOpenwave Messaging Limited Webtop Media Transcoder and 2 moreCVSS 3.1 · 4.3CWE-669
Trends
The last 30 days, by severity.
5,328 CVEs published, 388 of them critical. Many arrive without a score yet: NVD and the reporting organisations add CVSS over the following days.
Show the numbers
| Day | Critical | High | Medium | Low | Not scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14 Oct 2026 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 Oct 2026 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 Oct 2026 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 Oct 2026 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 Oct 2026 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 Oct 2026 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1 Nov 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 Nov 2026 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 3 Nov 2026 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 4 Nov 2026 | 35 | 158 | 138 | 32 | 1 |
| 5 Nov 2026 | 55 | 213 | 148 | 36 | 1 |
| 6 Nov 2026 | 40 | 146 | 205 | 47 | 6 |
| 7 Nov 2026 | 57 | 161 | 232 | 11 | 13 |
| 8 Nov 2026 | 23 | 128 | 143 | 26 | 0 |
| 9 Nov 2026 | 22 | 149 | 218 | 42 | 39 |
| 10 Nov 2026 | 103 | 1150 | 590 | 43 | 230 |
| 11 Nov 2026 | 44 | 233 | 221 | 34 | 132 |
| 12 Nov 2026 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 1 |
Exploit likelihood (EPSS), last 30 days
- Under 1%4630
- 1% to 10%174
- 10% to 50%2
- 50% or more5
- Not scored yet517
Most affected vendors, last 30 days
Most common weaknesses, last 30 days
- Cross-site scripting (CWE-79)399
- Heap-based buffer overflow (CWE-122)348
- Use after free (CWE-416)309
- Missing authorization (CWE-862)292
- Insecure direct object reference (CWE-639)188
- Out-of-bounds read (CWE-125)182
- Server-side request forgery (CWE-918)162
- Incorrect authorization (CWE-863)156
- Path traversal (CWE-22)145
- Out-of-bounds write (CWE-787)138
Matching CVEs
345 CVEs match these filters, page 9 of 14.
naimurrahmannahid Naimur Email OTP Verification for WooCommerce improper authentication
Critical9.8EPSS 0.72%, higher than 54% of scored CVEsnaimurrahmannahid Naimur Email OTP Verification for WooCommerceCVSS 3.1 · 9.8CWE-287
The Naimur Email OTP Verification for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to authentication bypass in versions up to, and including, 2.1.0. This is due to the plugin's password-reset finalization endpoint (the wp_ajax_nopriv_ceovw_update_new_password action handled…
Fiber Admin code injection
Critical9.0EPSS 0.40%, higher than 34% of scored CVEsFiber AdminCVSS 3.1 · 9.0CWE-94
The Fiber Admin WordPress plugin before 4.0.1 does not validate or escape a request header before writing it into a PHP file it regenerates on an unprotected admin hook, allowing unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary code when its custom database error page is enabled…
Tournamatch external control of a file name
Critical9.6EPSS 0.30%, higher than 23% of scored CVEsTournamatchCVSS 3.1 · 9.6CWE-73
The Tournamatch WordPress plugin before 4.7.1 does not validate or restrict the path of a previously stored profile or team image before deleting it when a new image is uploaded, allowing users with a role as low as Subscriber to delete arbitrary files on the server, such as…
IBM API Connect authentication bypass by spoofing
Critical9.4EPSS 0.67%, higher than 53% of scored CVEsIBM API ConnectCVSS 3.1 · 9.4CWE-290
IBM API Connect 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information and modify API configurations due to improper authentication. Identity information supplied in requests is not sufficiently verified, which could allow a caller to…
IBM API Connect server-side request forgery
Critical9.3EPSS 0.41%, higher than 35% of scored CVEsIBM API ConnectCVSS 3.1 · 9.3CWE-918
IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information due to server-side request forgery. The affected component can be made to send requests to unintended destinations and return the response to…
IBM API Connect regular expression denial of service
Critical9.6EPSS 0.29%, higher than 21% of scored CVEsIBM API ConnectCVSS 3.1 · 9.6CWE-1333
IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 are vulnerable to a Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) attack and to improper neutralisation of wildcard query operators.
IBM API Connect argument injection
Critical9.9EPSS 0.66%, higher than 52% of scored CVEsIBM API ConnectCVSS 3.1 · 9.9CWE-88
IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to access and modify other tenants' portal data due to improper neutralization of argument delimiters.
IBM API Connect case-sensitivity mistake
Critical9.4EPSS 0.55%, higher than 47% of scored CVEsIBM API ConnectCVSS 3.1 · 9.4CWE-178
IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote attacker to execute unauthorized administrative operations and obtain sensitive information due to improper handling of case sensitivity. Access controls are not applied consistently…
IBM API Connect OS command injection
Critical9.8EPSS 0.93%, higher than 61% of scored CVEsIBM API ConnectCVSS 3.1 · 9.8CWE-78
IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper neutralization of special elements in an OS command.
IBM API Connect hard-coded credentials
Critical9.0EPSS 0.50%, higher than 43% of scored CVEsIBM API ConnectCVSS 3.1 · 9.0CWE-798
IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote attacker to gain full administrative control due to the use of hard-coded credentials.
IBM API Connect OS command injection
Critical9.9EPSS 1.9%, higher than 80% of scored CVEsIBM API ConnectCVSS 3.1 · 9.9CWE-78
IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands due to OS command injection. User-supplied input is not properly neutralized before it is passed to the operating system, which…
IBM API Connect unrestricted file upload
Critical9.9EPSS 0.79%, higher than 57% of scored CVEsIBM API ConnectCVSS 3.1 · 9.9CWE-434
IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to insufficient validation of uploaded content. Content uploaded to the product is not sufficiently checked before it is processed,…
IBM API Connect SQL injection
Critical9.6EPSS 0.50%, higher than 43% of scored CVEsIBM API ConnectCVSS 3.1 · 9.6CWE-89
IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to SQL injection.
IBM API Connect mass assignment
Critical9.6EPSS 0.52%, higher than 44% of scored CVEsIBM API ConnectCVSS 3.1 · 9.6CWE-915
IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to improperly controlled modification of object attributes. A user-supplied value could change an access-related setting that…
IBM API Connect LDAP injection
Critical9.9EPSS 0.66%, higher than 52% of scored CVEsIBM API ConnectCVSS 3.1 · 9.9CWE-90
IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to gain unauthorized administrative access to other tenants due to LDAP injection. User-supplied input is not properly neutralized in directory queries, which…
IBM API Connect hard-coded credentials
Critical9.8EPSS 0.58%, higher than 48% of scored CVEsIBM API ConnectCVSS 3.1 · 9.8CWE-798
IBM API Connect 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote attacker to gain full administrative control due to the use of hard-coded credentials.
IBM API Connect code injection
Critical9.9EPSS 0.85%, higher than 59% of scored CVEsIBM API ConnectCVSS 3.1 · 9.9CWE-94
IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper control of generation of code. A user-supplied value can influence code that the product generates, which could lead to…
IBM API Connect path traversal
Critical9.9EPSS 0.66%, higher than 52% of scored CVEsIBM API ConnectCVSS 3.1 · 9.9CWE-22
IBM API Connect 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to perform arbitrary file writes due to path traversal.
IBM API Connect server-side request forgery
Critical9.6EPSS 0.46%, higher than 40% of scored CVEsIBM API ConnectCVSS 3.1 · 9.6CWE-918
IBM API Connect 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information and bypass security restrictions due to server-side request forgery.
IBM API Connect server-side request forgery
Critical9.3EPSS 0.51%, higher than 44% of scored CVEsIBM API ConnectCVSS 3.1 · 9.3CWE-918
IBM API Connect 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information due to server-side request forgery. A service that can be reached without authentication could be made to send requests to unintended destinations.
IBM API Connect code injection
Critical9.9EPSS 0.85%, higher than 59% of scored CVEsIBM API ConnectCVSS 3.1 · 9.9CWE-94
IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper control of generation of code.
IBM API Connect path traversal
Critical9.8EPSS 0.92%, higher than 61% of scored CVEsIBM API ConnectCVSS 3.1 · 9.8CWE-22
IBM API Connect 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a path traversal vulnerability.
IBM API Connect path traversal
Critical9.1EPSS 0.49%, higher than 43% of scored CVEsIBM API ConnectCVSS 3.1 · 9.1CWE-22
IBM API Connect 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to access or delete resources belonging to other tenants due to path traversal.
IBM API Connect insecure direct object reference
Critical9.1EPSS 0.38%, higher than 33% of scored CVEsIBM API ConnectCVSS 3.1 · 9.1CWE-639
IBM API Connect 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to broken object-level authorization.
IBM API Connect SQL injection
Critical9.9EPSS 0.62%, higher than 50% of scored CVEsIBM API ConnectCVSS 3.1 · 9.9CWE-89
IBM API Connect 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary SQL commands due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an SQL command.
Reading the radar
CVSS, KEV and EPSS, briefly.
What is a CVE?
A CVE is a public identifier for one vulnerability in one product, such as CVE-2026-59310. The CVE program assigns it; NVD, run by the US National Institute of Standards and Technology, adds scores, weakness classes and affected product lists.
What does the CVSS score tell me?
CVSS rates how severe a vulnerability is on its own, from 0 to 10, and its vector says how it is reached: over the network or locally, with or without an account, with or without someone clicking. It says nothing about whether anyone is exploiting it. The radar shows the newest CVSS version scored and names it, because version 4.0 and 3.1 scores differ.
What is CISA KEV?
The Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog is CISA's list of CVEs with reliable evidence of exploitation in the wild. US federal agencies must fix each one by its due date, and it is the strongest signal of what to patch first.
What is EPSS?
FIRST's Exploit Prediction Scoring System estimates the probability that a CVE will see exploitation activity in the next 30 days, recomputed daily. Most CVEs score well under 1%, so the radar also shows the percentile: how a CVE ranks against every scored CVE.
How should I prioritise?
Patch what CISA lists as exploited first. Then CVEs with a high EPSS score, then the most severe by CVSS. Within each group, start with whatever is reachable from the internet without an account.
Where do the explanations come from?
Veriom writes them from fixed templates over each record: the weakness class says what went wrong and where in an architecture it lives, the CVSS vector says how it is reached and what it affects, and KEV, EPSS and CISA's assessment say whether it is exploited. Nobody reviews each CVE by hand, so read the description and the references before acting.
How fresh is the data?
New and changed CVEs arrive from NVD every hour, the KEV catalog every six hours and EPSS scores once a day. Each page shows when the data was last updated.
Know where a vulnerable component would sit in your systems.
A CVE names a product. Whether it matters depends on where that product sits in your systems: what reaches it, which trust boundary it guards and what it can reach once compromised. Veriom maps your components, their relationships and your trust boundaries from your code, cloud and delivery evidence, so you can see where a component like this sits. The radar itself does not look at your systems.
Sources
- CVE records and CVSS scores from the NVD CVE API. This product uses the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD.
- Exploitation status from CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.
- Exploit likelihood from FIRST’s Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS), refreshed daily.
- Explanations are written by Veriom from fixed templates over each record’s data, not by a person reviewing each CVE. Descriptions are quoted from the records as published. The radar covers CVEs published since 4 Nov 2026, plus every CVE in the KEV catalog.