Free tool · No sign-in
CVE radar: the latest vulnerabilities, explained.
Every new CVE from NVD, with whether it is exploited in the wild (CISA KEV), how likely it is to be (FIRST EPSS), and what it means for your architecture in plain language.
Updated 11 Nov, 23:28 UTC from NVD, CISA KEV and FIRST EPSSMarkdownRSSJSON Feed
Patch first
Exploited in the wild, newest first.
CISA adds a CVE to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog when attackers are using it. Patch these first, then CVEs with a high EPSS score, then the most severe, starting with anything reachable from the internet.
Microsoft Office Outlook Missing User Interaction for Potentially Unsafe Action Vulnerability
Medium6.5Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS 1.6%, higher than 76% of scored CVEsMicrosoft Office and 6 moreCVSS 3.1 · 6.5CWE-356
Google Chromium Use-After-Free Vulnerability
High8.8Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS 0.96%, higher than 62% of scored CVEsGoogle Chromium and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-416
Barracuda Networks Email Security Gateway (ESG) Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel Vulnerability
Critical9.3Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-13EPSS 8.9%, higher than 95% of scored CVEsBarracuda Email Security Gateway (ESG)CVSS 4.0 · 9.3CWE-288
Barracuda Networks Multiple Products OS Command Injection Vulnerability
High8.6Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-13EPSS 6.2%, higher than 94% of scored CVEsBarracuda Email Security Gateway (ESG) and 5 moreCVSS 4.0 · 8.6CWE-78
Openwave Messaging Limited Webtop Media Transcoder Incorrect Resource Transfer Between Spheres Vulnerability
Medium4.3Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS 0.64%, higher than 51% of scored CVEsOpenwave Messaging Limited Webtop Media Transcoder and 2 moreCVSS 3.1 · 4.3CWE-669
Trends
The last 30 days, by severity.
5,322 CVEs published, 387 of them critical. Many arrive without a score yet: NVD and the reporting organisations add CVSS over the following days.
Show the numbers
| Day | Critical | High | Medium | Low | Not scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14 Oct 2026 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 Oct 2026 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 Oct 2026 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 Oct 2026 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 Oct 2026 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 Oct 2026 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1 Nov 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 Nov 2026 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 3 Nov 2026 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 4 Nov 2026 | 35 | 158 | 138 | 32 | 1 |
| 5 Nov 2026 | 55 | 213 | 148 | 36 | 1 |
| 6 Nov 2026 | 40 | 146 | 205 | 47 | 6 |
| 7 Nov 2026 | 57 | 161 | 232 | 11 | 13 |
| 8 Nov 2026 | 23 | 128 | 143 | 26 | 0 |
| 9 Nov 2026 | 22 | 149 | 218 | 42 | 39 |
| 10 Nov 2026 | 103 | 1150 | 590 | 43 | 230 |
| 11 Nov 2026 | 44 | 233 | 221 | 34 | 132 |
| 12 Nov 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Exploit likelihood (EPSS), last 30 days
- Under 1%4630
- 1% to 10%174
- 10% to 50%2
- 50% or more5
- Not scored yet511
Most affected vendors, last 30 days
Most common weaknesses, last 30 days
- Cross-site scripting (CWE-79)398
- Heap-based buffer overflow (CWE-122)348
- Use after free (CWE-416)309
- Missing authorization (CWE-862)291
- Insecure direct object reference (CWE-639)188
- Out-of-bounds read (CWE-125)182
- Server-side request forgery (CWE-918)162
- Incorrect authorization (CWE-863)156
- Path traversal (CWE-22)145
- Out-of-bounds write (CWE-787)138
Matching CVEs
2,180 CVEs match these filters, page 1 of 88.
konflux-ci code injection
High7.2EPSS not scored yetkonflux-ciCVSS 3.1 · 7.2CWE-94
A flaw was found in the Konflux UI proxy. Hostname values defined in the KonfluxUI custom resource are inserted directly into proxy configuration files without adequate validation or sanitization. An authenticated user with permissions to modify the custom resource can inject…
Lenovo XClarity Controller vulnerability
High7.1EPSS not scored yetLenovo XClarity ControllerCVSS 4.0 · 7.1CWE-1392
An internal security review identified a development regression from ThinkSystem v4 XClarity Controller 3 (XCC3) versions (2.51) IHX432Y to (2.56) IHX436K which re-introduces the default OpenBMC root password upon performing an XCC Reset to Default operation. An attacker can…
fulgur-rs fulgur uncontrolled resource consumption
High7.5EPSS not scored yetfulgur-rs fulgurCVSS 3.1 · 7.5CWE-400, CWE-405
fulgur converts untrusted HTML/CSS into PDF, commonly on a server that processes input supplied by many tenants. From version 0.6.0 to before version 0.33.0, quadratic style-list reprocessing during containing-block resolution for absolutely-positioned pseudo-elements cause…
fulgur-rs fulgur uncontrolled resource consumption
High7.5EPSS not scored yetfulgur-rs fulgurCVSS 3.1 · 7.5CWE-400, CWE-770
fulgur converts untrusted HTML/CSS into PDF, commonly on a server that processes input supplied by many tenants. From version 0.4.4 to before version 0.29.0, the CSS string-set named-string values resolved from a document were accumulated per element with no memory budget,…
fulgur-rs fulgur uncontrolled resource consumption
High7.5EPSS not scored yetfulgur-rs fulgurCVSS 3.1 · 7.5CWE-400
fulgur converts untrusted HTML/CSS into PDF, commonly on a server that processes input supplied by many tenants. From version 0.15.0 to before version 0.27.0, resolving the CSS counters(name, sep) function in generated content was bounded neither in the size of a single…
jaylfc taOS missing authorization
High8.3EPSS not scored yetjaylfc taOSCVSS 3.1 · 8.3CWE-862
taOS is a self-hosted AI agent OS. Prior to version 1.0.0-beta.25, tinyagentos (taOS) registers all system settings routes under a single APIRouter() instance created with no admin authorization dependency. Any authenticated user—including non-admin invited users whose is_admin…
jaylfc taOS missing authorization
High8.8EPSS not scored yetjaylfc taOSCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-862
taOS is a self-hosted AI agent OS. Prior to version 1.0.0-beta.23, the POST /api/skill-exec/{skill_id}/call endpoint in taOS executes built-in skills — including the code_exec skill which runs arbitrary Python via subprocess.run(["python3", "-c", code]) — without performing any…
heymrun heym code injection
High8.8EPSS not scored yetheymrun heymCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-94
Heym builds and runs agentic systems and business-process automations on self-hosted infrastructure. Prior to version 0.0.75, the same POST /api/mcp/fetch-tools endpoint (any authenticated user, lowest role) also accepts the stdio transport, which spawns the attacker-supplied…
heymrun heym server-side request forgery
High7.4EPSS not scored yetheymrun heymCVSS 3.1 · 7.4CWE-918
Heym builds and runs agentic systems and business-process automations on self-hosted infrastructure. Prior to version 0.0.73, the HTTP workflow node in Heym makes outbound HTTP requests to user-supplied URLs without validation of the target host or IP address. If a workflow…
heymrun heym code injection
High8.8EPSS not scored yetheymrun heymCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-94
Heym builds and runs agentic systems and business-process automations on self-hosted infrastructure. Prior to version 0.0.71, Heym's workflow engine accepts an arbitrary Python code string in the playwrightCode field of a Playwright node. This string is written to a temporary…
heymrun heym code injection
High8.8EPSS not scored yetheymrun heymCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-94, CWE-269
Heym builds and runs agentic systems and business-process automations on self-hosted infrastructure. Prior to version 0.0.70, heym hardens one untrusted-code path but not its sibling. The Python tool executor (python_tool_executor.py) treats user code as untrusted and mandates…
heymrun heym server-side request forgery
High7.1EPSS not scored yetheymrun heymCVSS 3.1 · 7.1CWE-918
Heym builds and runs agentic systems and business-process automations on self-hosted infrastructure. Prior to version 0.0.70, POST /api/mcp/fetch-tools is reachable by any authenticated user (lowest role; no admin/workflow association) and fetches an attacker-supplied URL…
heymrun heym incorrect privilege assignment
High8.1EPSS not scored yetheymrun heymCVSS 3.1 · 8.1CWE-266, CWE-862
Heym builds and runs agentic systems and business-process automations on self-hosted infrastructure. Prior to version 0.0.70, team-member management (add / remove / update) is gated only on team membership, not on the team creator/admin role — and TeamMember has no role column.…
Power-Components livewire-powergrid SQL injection
High7.6EPSS not scored yetPower-Components livewire-powergridCVSS 3.1 · 7.6CWE-89
Livewire PowerGrid creates data tables based on Laravel Livewire library. From version 6.0.0 to before version 6.10.4, the public Livewire property sortDirection is interpolated verbatim into a raw SQL ORDER BY clause and is not restricted to asc/desc, allowing arbitrary SQL…
Lenovo XClarity Integrator for WAC OS command injection
High8.6EPSS not scored yetLenovo XClarity Integrator for WACCVSS 4.0 · 8.6CWE-78, CWE-94
Improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command in Lenovo XClarity Integrator for Microsoft Windows Admin Center 5.1.1 and 5.2.0 allows an authenticated remote attacker to execute arbitrary PowerShell commands by submitting a crafted hostname.
Fortinet FortiOS stack-based buffer overflow
High7.5EPSS not scored yetFortinet FortiOSCVSS 3.1 · 7.5CWE-121
A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability in Fortinet FortiOS 8.0.0, FortiOS 7.6.7 may allow an unauthenticated attacker with wad port access to crash proxy or ZTNA sessions via crafted HTTP or HTTPS requests.
Fortinet FortiOS out-of-bounds read
High7.4EPSS not scored yetFortinet FortiOSCVSS 3.1 · 7.4CWE-125
A out-of-bounds read vulnerability in Fortinet FortiOS 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiOS 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiOS 7.4 all versions, FortiOS 7.2 all versions, FortiOS 7.0 all versions may allow a remote privileged attacker to execute arbitrary code or command via crafted paquets.
Fortinet FortiOS path traversal
High7.4EPSS not scored yetFortinet FortiOS and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 7.4CWE-24
A path traversal: '../filedir' vulnerability in Fortinet FortiOS 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiOS 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiOS 7.4.0 through 7.4.12, FortiOS 7.2.0 through 7.2.13, FortiPAM 1.6 all versions, FortiPAM 1.5 all versions, FortiPAM 1.4 all versions, FortiPAM 1.3 all…
Fortinet FortiAuthenticator SQL injection
High8.3EPSS not scored yetFortinet FortiAuthenticatorCVSS 3.1 · 8.3CWE-89
A improper neutralization of special elements used in an sql command ('sql injection') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAuthenticator 8.0.0 through 8.0.3, FortiAuthenticator 6.6.0 through 6.6.10 may allow an authenticated attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via http…
Fortinet FortiAuthenticator incorrect authorization
High8.2EPSS not scored yetFortinet FortiAuthenticatorCVSS 3.1 · 8.2CWE-863
A incorrect authorization vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAuthenticator 8.0.0 through 8.0.3, FortiAuthenticator 6.6.0 through 6.6.10 may allow an unauthenticated attacker to cause a denial of service via HTTP requests.
Fortinet FortiAuthenticator improper privilege management
High7.2EPSS not scored yetFortinet FortiAuthenticatorCVSS 3.1 · 7.2CWE-269
A improper privilege management vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAuthenticator 8.0.0 through 8.0.3, FortiAuthenticator 6.6.0 through 6.6.10 may allow an authenticated attacker to escalate privileges.
Fortinet FortiAuthenticator insufficiently protected credentials
High7.5EPSS not scored yetFortinet FortiAuthenticatorCVSS 3.1 · 7.5CWE-522
A insufficiently protected credentials vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAuthenticator 8.0.0 through 8.0.3, FortiAuthenticator 6.6.0 through 6.6.10 may allow an unauthenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information via HTTPS requests.
Fortinet FortiAuthenticator format string
High7.2EPSS not scored yetFortinet FortiAuthenticatorCVSS 3.1 · 7.2CWE-134
A use of externally-controlled format string vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAuthenticator 8.0.0 through 8.0.3, FortiAuthenticator 6.6.0 through 6.6.10 may allow an authenticated privileged attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via http requests.
Fortinet FortiAuthenticator null pointer dereference
High7.5EPSS not scored yetFortinet FortiAuthenticatorCVSS 3.1 · 7.5CWE-476
A null pointer dereference vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAuthenticator 8.0.0 through 8.0.3, FortiAuthenticator 6.6.0 through 6.6.10 may allow an unauthenticated attacker to perform a denial of service attack via http requests.
Fortinet FortiAuthenticator out-of-bounds write
High8.1EPSS not scored yetFortinet FortiAuthenticatorCVSS 3.1 · 8.1CWE-787
A out-of-bounds write vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAuthenticator 8.0.0 through 8.0.3, FortiAuthenticator 6.6.0 through 6.6.10 may allow an unauthenticated attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via http requests, should the attacker be able to defeat ASLR…
Reading the radar
CVSS, KEV and EPSS, briefly.
What is a CVE?
A CVE is a public identifier for one vulnerability in one product, such as CVE-2026-59310. The CVE program assigns it; NVD, run by the US National Institute of Standards and Technology, adds scores, weakness classes and affected product lists.
What does the CVSS score tell me?
CVSS rates how severe a vulnerability is on its own, from 0 to 10, and its vector says how it is reached: over the network or locally, with or without an account, with or without someone clicking. It says nothing about whether anyone is exploiting it. The radar shows the newest CVSS version scored and names it, because version 4.0 and 3.1 scores differ.
What is CISA KEV?
The Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog is CISA's list of CVEs with reliable evidence of exploitation in the wild. US federal agencies must fix each one by its due date, and it is the strongest signal of what to patch first.
What is EPSS?
FIRST's Exploit Prediction Scoring System estimates the probability that a CVE will see exploitation activity in the next 30 days, recomputed daily. Most CVEs score well under 1%, so the radar also shows the percentile: how a CVE ranks against every scored CVE.
How should I prioritise?
Patch what CISA lists as exploited first. Then CVEs with a high EPSS score, then the most severe by CVSS. Within each group, start with whatever is reachable from the internet without an account.
Where do the explanations come from?
Veriom writes them from fixed templates over each record: the weakness class says what went wrong and where in an architecture it lives, the CVSS vector says how it is reached and what it affects, and KEV, EPSS and CISA's assessment say whether it is exploited. Nobody reviews each CVE by hand, so read the description and the references before acting.
How fresh is the data?
New and changed CVEs arrive from NVD every hour, the KEV catalog every six hours and EPSS scores once a day. Each page shows when the data was last updated.
Know where a vulnerable component would sit in your systems.
A CVE names a product. Whether it matters depends on where that product sits in your systems: what reaches it, which trust boundary it guards and what it can reach once compromised. Veriom maps your components, their relationships and your trust boundaries from your code, cloud and delivery evidence, so you can see where a component like this sits. The radar itself does not look at your systems.
Sources
- CVE records and CVSS scores from the NVD CVE API. This product uses the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD.
- Exploitation status from CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.
- Exploit likelihood from FIRST’s Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS), refreshed daily.
- Explanations are written by Veriom from fixed templates over each record’s data, not by a person reviewing each CVE. Descriptions are quoted from the records as published. The radar covers CVEs published since 4 Nov 2026, plus every CVE in the KEV catalog.