Free tool · No sign-in
CVE radar: the latest vulnerabilities, explained.
Every new CVE from NVD, with whether it is exploited in the wild (CISA KEV), how likely it is to be (FIRST EPSS), and what it means for your architecture in plain language.
Updated 14 Nov, 08:19 UTC from NVD, CISA KEV and FIRST EPSSMarkdownRSSJSON Feed
Patch first
Exploited in the wild, newest first.
CISA adds a CVE to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog when attackers are using it. Patch these first, then CVEs with a high EPSS score, then the most severe, starting with anything reachable from the internet.
Check Point Multiple Products Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource Vulnerability
High7.8Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-16EPSS 1.3%, higher than 70% of scored CVEscheckpoint Quantum Security Gateway and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 7.8CWE-732, CWE-862
UnrealIRCd Improper Neutralization of Delimiters Vulnerability
High8.6Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-16EPSS 0.30%, higher than 23% of scored CVEsUnrealIRCdCVSS 3.1 · 8.6CWE-140
Microsoft Office Outlook Missing User Interaction for Potentially Unsafe Action Vulnerability
Medium6.5Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS 1.6%, higher than 76% of scored CVEsMicrosoft Office and 6 moreCVSS 3.1 · 6.5CWE-356
Google Chromium Use-After-Free Vulnerability
High8.8Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS 0.96%, higher than 62% of scored CVEsGoogle Chromium and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-416
Barracuda Networks Email Security Gateway (ESG) Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel Vulnerability
Critical9.3Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-13EPSS 11%, higher than 96% of scored CVEsBarracuda Email Security Gateway (ESG) and 5 moreCVSS 4.0 · 9.3CWE-288
Trends
The last 30 days, by severity.
6,484 CVEs published, 509 of them critical. Many arrive without a score yet: NVD and the reporting organisations add CVSS over the following days.
Show the numbers
| Day | Critical | High | Medium | Low | Not scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 Oct 2026 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 Oct 2026 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 Oct 2026 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 Oct 2026 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1 Nov 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 Nov 2026 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 3 Nov 2026 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 4 Nov 2026 | 35 | 158 | 142 | 29 | 0 |
| 5 Nov 2026 | 55 | 213 | 149 | 36 | 0 |
| 6 Nov 2026 | 41 | 148 | 202 | 47 | 6 |
| 7 Nov 2026 | 54 | 165 | 232 | 10 | 13 |
| 8 Nov 2026 | 23 | 128 | 143 | 26 | 0 |
| 9 Nov 2026 | 32 | 164 | 231 | 42 | 1 |
| 10 Nov 2026 | 117 | 1221 | 623 | 61 | 92 |
| 11 Nov 2026 | 51 | 285 | 237 | 44 | 47 |
| 12 Nov 2026 | 28 | 172 | 129 | 23 | 6 |
| 13 Nov 2026 | 67 | 327 | 337 | 52 | 9 |
| 14 Nov 2026 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 17 |
Exploit likelihood (EPSS), last 30 days
- Under 1%5902
- 1% to 10%217
- 10% to 50%4
- 50% or more3
- Not scored yet358
Most affected vendors, last 30 days
Most common weaknesses, last 30 days
- Cross-site scripting (CWE-79)514
- Missing authorization (CWE-862)383
- Heap-based buffer overflow (CWE-122)363
- Use after free (CWE-416)340
- Insecure direct object reference (CWE-639)228
- Incorrect authorization (CWE-863)212
- Out-of-bounds read (CWE-125)206
- SQL injection (CWE-89)185
- Server-side request forgery (CWE-918)183
- Out-of-bounds write (CWE-787)181
Matching CVEs
2,464 CVEs match these filters, page 29 of 99.
Progress Software Kendo UI for jQuery cross-site scripting
High7.1EPSS 0.19%, higher than 9% of scored CVEsProgress Software Kendo UI for jQueryCVSS 3.1 · 7.1CWE-79
In Progress Kendo UI for jQuery versions 2026.3.1014 up to, but not including, 2026.4.1110, ActionSheet does not encode title, subtitle, and header button label values before rendering them. An attacker who can influence these values can inject markup that executes as…
Progress Software Kendo UI for jQuery cross-site scripting
High7.1EPSS 0.19%, higher than 9% of scored CVEsProgress Software Kendo UI for jQueryCVSS 3.1 · 7.1CWE-80
In Progress® Kendo® UI for jQuery prior to 2026.4.1111 the TabStrip, PanelBar, and Menu widgets support mapping a dataSource field to `spriteCssClass`. If an attacker can control the mapped data, they can break out of the attribute and inject markup, including event-handler…
Progress Software Kendo UI for jQuery cross-site scripting
High7.1EPSS 0.19%, higher than 9% of scored CVEsProgress Software Kendo UI for jQueryCVSS 3.1 · 7.1CWE-80
In Progress® Kendo® UI for jQuery versions from 2022.2.621 prior to 2026.4.1111 the DropDownButton and SplitButton allow markup injection through the `id` and `target` attributes. An attacker who can influence these item values can break out of the attributes and inject markup,…
hitoshyamamoto soapbar improper certificate validation
High8.2EPSS 0.19%, higher than 9% of scored CVEshitoshyamamoto soapbarCVSS 3.1 · 8.2CWE-295, CWE-347
soapbar is a SOAP library for Python — client, server, and WSDL handling. Prior to version 0.13.0, verify_envelope_bsp() derived its trust anchor from the message it was verifying. It read the X.509 certificate out of the caller-untrusted wsse:BinarySecurityToken, validated…
Extreme Networks Switch Engine (EXOS) missing authorization
High8.3EPSS 0.36%, higher than 30% of scored CVEsExtreme Networks Switch Engine (EXOS)CVSS 4.0 · 8.3CWE-862
Missing authorization in the JSON-RPC web services interface of Extreme Networks Switch Engine (EXOS) allows an authenticated, low-privileged (read-only) user to execute CLI show commands that are restricted to that role through the command line interface. Successful…
Apache HTTP Server race condition
High8.1EPSS 0.41%, higher than 36% of scored CVEsApache HTTP Server and 2 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.1CWE-362
Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization vulnerability in Apache HTTP Server's mod_http2 in assign_headers() can lead to RCE. This issue affects Apache HTTP Server: from 2.4.55 through 2.4.70. Affected releases of mod_h2 from GitHub: from 2.0.8…
Grafana Enterprise incorrect authorization
High7.1EPSS 0.33%, higher than 26% of scored CVEsGrafana Enterprise and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 7.1CWE-200, CWE-636
A user with the Viewer or Editor role could bypass folder permissions on Git Sync managed resources through the repository files API: a Viewer could read files in folders they could not access, and an Editor could create, modify, move or delete provisioned dashboards and…
Grafana Enterprise improper privilege management
High7.1EPSS 0.21%, higher than 12% of scored CVEsGrafana Enterprise and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 7.1CWE-269, CWE-863
A user with the Editor role who can edit a folder can move it, through the folders resource API, under a folder they administer, and so gain Admin on the moved folder and its contents, including the right to change their permissions. The legacy folder move API refuses the same…
Grafana OSS origin validation error
High7.1EPSS 0.16%, higher than 5% of scored CVEsGrafana OSS and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 7.1CWE-200, CWE-346
When independent Grafana instances share the same [rendering] renderer_token, an image renderer key issued by one instance is accepted by the others, so a user on one instance could act as the user with the same ID on another (origin validation error). This affects instances…
webriti Appointment Dark cross-site request forgery
High8.8EPSS 0.20%, higher than 9% of scored CVEswebriti Appointment DarkCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-352
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in webriti Appointment Dark appointment-dark allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Appointment Dark: from n/a through 1.3.4.
webriti Shk Corporate cross-site request forgery
High8.8EPSS 0.19%, higher than 9% of scored CVEswebriti Shk CorporateCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-352
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in webriti Shk Corporate shk-corporate allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Shk Corporate: from n/a through 2.4.3.
webriti Leo cross-site request forgery
High8.8EPSS 0.19%, higher than 9% of scored CVEswebriti LeoCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-352
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in webriti Leo leo allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Leo: from n/a through 1.7.4.
webriti vdperanto cross-site request forgery
High8.8EPSS 0.19%, higher than 9% of scored CVEswebriti vdperantoCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-352
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in webriti vdperanto vdperanto allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects vdperanto: from n/a through 2.2.
webriti Mazino cross-site request forgery
High8.8EPSS 0.19%, higher than 9% of scored CVEswebriti MazinoCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-352
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in webriti Mazino mazino allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Mazino: from n/a through 1.1.
webriti vdequator cross-site request forgery
High8.8EPSS 0.19%, higher than 9% of scored CVEswebriti vdequatorCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-352
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in webriti vdequator vdequator allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects vdequator: from n/a through 1.2.7.
webriti vice cross-site request forgery
High8.8EPSS 0.21%, higher than 11% of scored CVEswebriti viceCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-352
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in webriti vice vice allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects vice: from n/a through 1.4.
webriti Spasalon cross-site request forgery
High8.8EPSS 0.21%, higher than 11% of scored CVEswebriti SpasalonCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-352
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in webriti Spasalon spasalon allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Spasalon: from n/a through 3.0.
webriti Wallstreet Agency cross-site request forgery
High8.8EPSS 0.21%, higher than 11% of scored CVEswebriti Wallstreet AgencyCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-352
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in webriti Wallstreet Agency wallstreet-agency allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Wallstreet Agency: from n/a through 1.3.4.
webriti Heroic cross-site request forgery
High8.8EPSS 0.21%, higher than 11% of scored CVEswebriti HeroicCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-352
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in webriti Heroic heroic allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Heroic: from n/a through 1.4.2.
webriti Rambo cross-site request forgery
High8.8EPSS 0.21%, higher than 11% of scored CVEswebriti RamboCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-352
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in webriti Rambo rambo allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Rambo: from n/a through 3.0.
webriti ElitePress cross-site request forgery
High8.8EPSS 0.21%, higher than 11% of scored CVEswebriti ElitePressCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-352
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in webriti ElitePress elitepress allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects ElitePress: from n/a through 3.2.1.
webriti Quality cross-site request forgery
High8.8EPSS 0.21%, higher than 12% of scored CVEswebriti QualityCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-352
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in webriti Quality quality allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Quality: from n/a through 3.3.
TrueConf Server incorrect default permissions
High8.5EPSS 0.17%, higher than 6% of scored CVEsTrueConf ServerCVSS 4.0 · 8.5CWE-276
An attacker who gains the ability to execute arbitrary code on a system with TrueConf Server (Linux) versions from 4.7.2 up to, but not including, 5.5.6 installed, running as the user trueconf (by exploiting some other vulnerability), can elevate their privileges to root.
Contao missing authorization
High7.1EPSS 0.36%, higher than 30% of scored CVEsContaoCVSS 4.0 · 7.1CWE-862
Contao 4.0.0 before 5.3.54, 5.4.0 before 5.7.17, and 6.0.0 before 6.0.6 contains an access control bypass vulnerability that allows filemount-restricted backend users to modify folders outside their filemount via the file manager Edit-Multiple operation. Attackers holding the…
blueprintue blueprintue-self-hosted-edition allocation without limits
High8.7EPSS 0.65%, higher than 52% of scored CVEsblueprintue blueprintue-self-hosted-editionCVSS 4.0 · 8.7CWE-770
BlueprintUE Self-Hosted Edition 1.0.0 before 4.3.5 contains a resource exhaustion vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to fill server storage by repeatedly creating anonymous blueprints. Attackers can send large requests to…
Reading the radar
CVSS, KEV and EPSS, briefly.
What is a CVE?
A CVE is a public identifier for one vulnerability in one product, such as CVE-2026-59310. The CVE program assigns it; NVD, run by the US National Institute of Standards and Technology, adds scores, weakness classes and affected product lists.
What does the CVSS score tell me?
CVSS rates how severe a vulnerability is on its own, from 0 to 10, and its vector says how it is reached: over the network or locally, with or without an account, with or without someone clicking. It says nothing about whether anyone is exploiting it. The radar shows the newest CVSS version scored and names it, because version 4.0 and 3.1 scores differ.
What is CISA KEV?
The Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog is CISA's list of CVEs with reliable evidence of exploitation in the wild. US federal agencies must fix each one by its due date, and it is the strongest signal of what to patch first.
What is EPSS?
FIRST's Exploit Prediction Scoring System estimates the probability that a CVE will see exploitation activity in the next 30 days, recomputed daily. Most CVEs score well under 1%, so the radar also shows the percentile: how a CVE ranks against every scored CVE.
How should I prioritise?
Patch what CISA lists as exploited first. Then CVEs with a high EPSS score, then the most severe by CVSS. Within each group, start with whatever is reachable from the internet without an account.
Where do the explanations come from?
Veriom writes them from fixed templates over each record: the weakness class says what went wrong and where in an architecture it lives, the CVSS vector says how it is reached and what it affects, and KEV, EPSS and CISA's assessment say whether it is exploited. Nobody reviews each CVE by hand, so read the description and the references before acting.
How fresh is the data?
New and changed CVEs arrive from NVD every hour, the KEV catalog every six hours and EPSS scores once a day. Each page shows when the data was last updated.
Know where a vulnerable component would sit in your systems.
A CVE names a product. Whether it matters depends on where that product sits in your systems: what reaches it, which trust boundary it guards and what it can reach once compromised. Veriom maps your components, their relationships and your trust boundaries from your code, cloud and delivery evidence, so you can see where a component like this sits. The radar itself does not look at your systems.
Sources
- CVE records and CVSS scores from the NVD CVE API. This product uses the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD.
- Exploitation status from CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.
- Exploit likelihood from FIRST’s Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS), refreshed daily.
- Explanations are written by Veriom from fixed templates over each record’s data, not by a person reviewing each CVE. Descriptions are quoted from the records as published. The radar covers CVEs published since 4 Nov 2026, plus every CVE in the KEV catalog.