Free tool · No sign-in
CVE radar: the latest vulnerabilities, explained.
Every new CVE from NVD, with whether it is exploited in the wild (CISA KEV), how likely it is to be (FIRST EPSS), and what it means for your architecture in plain language.
Updated 14 Nov, 05:18 UTC from NVD, CISA KEV and FIRST EPSSMarkdownRSSJSON Feed
Patch first
Exploited in the wild, newest first.
CISA adds a CVE to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog when attackers are using it. Patch these first, then CVEs with a high EPSS score, then the most severe, starting with anything reachable from the internet.
Check Point Multiple Products Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource Vulnerability
High7.8Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-16EPSS 1.3%, higher than 70% of scored CVEscheckpoint Quantum Security Gateway and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 7.8CWE-732, CWE-862
UnrealIRCd Improper Neutralization of Delimiters Vulnerability
High8.6Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-16EPSS 0.30%, higher than 23% of scored CVEsUnrealIRCdCVSS 3.1 · 8.6CWE-140
Microsoft Office Outlook Missing User Interaction for Potentially Unsafe Action Vulnerability
Medium6.5Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS 1.6%, higher than 76% of scored CVEsMicrosoft Office and 6 moreCVSS 3.1 · 6.5CWE-356
Google Chromium Use-After-Free Vulnerability
High8.8Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS 0.96%, higher than 62% of scored CVEsGoogle Chromium and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-416
Barracuda Networks Email Security Gateway (ESG) Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel Vulnerability
Critical9.3Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-13EPSS 11%, higher than 96% of scored CVEsBarracuda Email Security Gateway (ESG) and 5 moreCVSS 4.0 · 9.3CWE-288
Trends
The last 30 days, by severity.
6,463 CVEs published, 508 of them critical. Many arrive without a score yet: NVD and the reporting organisations add CVSS over the following days.
Show the numbers
| Day | Critical | High | Medium | Low | Not scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 Oct 2026 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 Oct 2026 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 Oct 2026 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 Oct 2026 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1 Nov 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 Nov 2026 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 3 Nov 2026 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 4 Nov 2026 | 35 | 158 | 142 | 29 | 0 |
| 5 Nov 2026 | 55 | 213 | 149 | 36 | 0 |
| 6 Nov 2026 | 41 | 148 | 202 | 47 | 6 |
| 7 Nov 2026 | 54 | 165 | 232 | 10 | 13 |
| 8 Nov 2026 | 23 | 128 | 143 | 26 | 0 |
| 9 Nov 2026 | 32 | 164 | 231 | 42 | 1 |
| 10 Nov 2026 | 117 | 1221 | 623 | 61 | 92 |
| 11 Nov 2026 | 51 | 285 | 237 | 44 | 47 |
| 12 Nov 2026 | 28 | 172 | 129 | 23 | 6 |
| 13 Nov 2026 | 67 | 327 | 337 | 52 | 9 |
| 14 Nov 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Exploit likelihood (EPSS), last 30 days
- Under 1%5902
- 1% to 10%217
- 10% to 50%4
- 50% or more3
- Not scored yet337
Most affected vendors, last 30 days
Most common weaknesses, last 30 days
- Cross-site scripting (CWE-79)514
- Missing authorization (CWE-862)382
- Heap-based buffer overflow (CWE-122)363
- Use after free (CWE-416)340
- Insecure direct object reference (CWE-639)228
- Incorrect authorization (CWE-863)212
- Out-of-bounds read (CWE-125)206
- SQL injection (CWE-89)184
- Server-side request forgery (CWE-918)183
- Out-of-bounds write (CWE-787)181
Matching CVEs
372 CVEs match these filters, page 8 of 15.
openobserve improper authentication
Critical9.8EPSS 1.2%, higher than 69% of scored CVEsopenobserveCVSS 3.1 · 9.8CWE-287
OpenObserve is a cloud-native observability platform. Prior to 1.1.0, the shared authentication validator in src/api/common/src/auth/validator.rs accepts an empty or whitespace-only HTTP Basic password for an account whose password_ext value is missing or empty. SSO-provisioned…
MongoDB Server use after free
Critical9.5EPSS 0.71%, higher than 54% of scored CVEsMongoDB Server and 1 moreCVSS 4.0 · 9.5CWE-416
A use-after-free in the replication component of MongoDB Server can occur when a newly elected replica set primary completes catch-up. The condition can be caused by requests that do not require authentication, and may result in the server terminating unexpectedly or, under…
Google Android use after free
Critical9.8EPSS 0.32%, higher than 25% of scored CVEsGoogle AndroidCVSS 3.1 · 9.8CWE-416
In SendInfo of UssiController.cpp, there is a possible way to corrupt memory via a dangling connection listener pointer due to a use after free. This could lead to remote escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for…
Google Android out-of-bounds write
Critical9.8EPSS 0.33%, higher than 27% of scored CVEsGoogle AndroidCVSS 3.1 · 9.8CWE-787
In GetTwiddledMiptreeSparsePageMap of texmgmt.c, there is a possible way to trigger an out of bounds write due to a logic error. This could lead to remote code execution with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Google Android use after free
Critical9.8EPSS 0.17%, higher than 6% of scored CVEsGoogle AndroidCVSS 3.1 · 9.8CWE-416
In IMG_vkCreateImageView of image_view.c, there is a possible way to trigger a use after free due to memory corruption. This could lead to remote code execution with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Google Android out-of-bounds write
Critical9.8EPSS 0.17%, higher than 6% of scored CVEsGoogle AndroidCVSS 3.1 · 9.8CWE-119, CWE-787
In multiple functions of rmmi_utility.c, there is a possible way to trigger an out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to remote code execution with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Google Android memory buffer error
Critical9.8EPSS 0.17%, higher than 6% of scored CVEsGoogle AndroidCVSS 3.1 · 9.8CWE-119
In multiple locations, there is a possible out-of-bounds write due to an incorrect bounds check. This could lead to remote escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Google Android use after free
Critical9.8EPSS 0.17%, higher than 6% of scored CVEsGoogle AndroidCVSS 3.1 · 9.8CWE-416
In NotifySipResponse of SessionEx.cpp, there is a possible way to corrupt memory via a dangling connection pointer in the pending response queue due to a use after free. This could lead to remote escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User…
Google Android heap-based buffer overflow
Critical9.8EPSS 0.18%, higher than 8% of scored CVEsGoogle AndroidCVSS 3.1 · 9.8CWE-122, CWE-693
In chppProcessDiscoverAllResponse of system/chre/chpp/clients/discovery.c, there is a possible Heap Buffer Overflow due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to remote escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed…
Google Android memory buffer error
Critical9.8EPSS 0.31%, higher than 24% of scored CVEsGoogle AndroidCVSS 3.1 · 9.8CWE-119
In handleEvent of gscan.cpp, there is a possible way to trigger an out of bounds write on the heap due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to remote escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Google Android integer overflow
Critical9.8EPSS 0.17%, higher than 6% of scored CVEsGoogle AndroidCVSS 3.1 · 9.8CWE-190
In multiple locations, there is a possible out-of-bounds write due to an integer overflow. This could lead to remote code execution with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Google Android out-of-bounds write
Critical9.8EPSS 0.17%, higher than 6% of scored CVEsGoogle AndroidCVSS 3.1 · 9.8CWE-119, CWE-787
In __mfc_core_nal_q_get_dec_metadata_sei_nal of mfc_core_nal_q.c, there is a possible out-of-bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to remote code execution with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Google Android out-of-bounds write
Critical9.8EPSS 0.18%, higher than 7% of scored CVEsGoogle AndroidCVSS 3.1 · 9.8CWE-693, CWE-787
In EncodeLastScanBufferElement of data_manager.cc, there is a possible out-of-bounds write due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to remote escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Google Android double free
Critical9.8EPSS 0.18%, higher than 7% of scored CVEsGoogle AndroidCVSS 3.1 · 9.8CWE-415
In AudioSession::SendInternalEvent of AudioSession.cpp, there is a possible Double Free due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to remote code execution with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Google Android memory buffer error
Critical9.8EPSS 0.17%, higher than 6% of scored CVEsGoogle AndroidCVSS 3.1 · 9.8CWE-119
In multiple files, there is a possible out-of-bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to remote code execution with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Google Android use after free
Critical9.8EPSS 0.18%, higher than 7% of scored CVEsGoogle AndroidCVSS 3.1 · 9.8CWE-416
In multiple locations, there is a possible use-after-free due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to remote code execution with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Fortinet FortiClientMac origin validation error
Critical9.6EPSS 0.22%, higher than 12% of scored CVEsFortinet FortiClientMac and 2 moreCVSS 3.1 · 9.6CWE-346
A origin validation error vulnerability in Fortinet FortiClientMac 7.4.0 through 7.4.7, FortiClientWindows 7.4.0 through 7.4.7, FortiClientWindows 7.2.0 through 7.2.14, FortiClientWindowsPAM 7.4.7, FortiClientWindowsPAM 7.2.14 may allow an unauthorized remote attacker to…
Arista Networks EOS allocation without limits
Critical9.2EPSS 0.51%, higher than 44% of scored CVEsArista Networks EOSCVSS 4.0 · 9.2CWE-770
On affected platforms running Arista EOS with Precision Time Protocol (PTP) configured, an unauthenticated attacker with network access to a PTP-enabled port can create a denial of service (DoS) condition by sending traffic to the system.
Arista Networks EOS unchecked quantity
Critical9.2EPSS 0.46%, higher than 40% of scored CVEsArista Networks EOSCVSS 4.0 · 9.2CWE-1284
On affected platforms running Arista EOS configured as S-BFD peers, an unauthenticated attacker could send a crafted S-BFD PDU to an initiator device. This crafted PDU could cause the kernel on the initiator device to crash, resulting in an unexpected device reboot.
Arista Networks EOS stack-based buffer overflow
Critical9.3EPSS 0.64%, higher than 51% of scored CVEsArista Networks EOSCVSS 4.0 · 9.3CWE-121
On affected platforms running Arista EOS with BGP configured, a specially crafted packet can cause the BGP agent to crash. Successful exploitation causes the BGP agent process to terminate, resulting in the loss of all BGP sessions on the affected device and possible disruption…
MongoDB Server improper certificate validation
Critical9.1EPSS 0.17%, higher than 7% of scored CVEsMongoDB ServerCVSS 4.0 · 9.1CWE-295
An issue exists in MongoDB's macOS TLS client implementation where certificate chain-of-trust validation is bypassed for outbound connections to IPv6-addressed peers. When a MongoDB process using the Apple SecureTransport TLS backend connects to an IPv6 target, the trust…
Arista Networks Wi-Fi Access Point hard-coded credentials
Critical9.4EPSS 0.23%, higher than 14% of scored CVEsArista Networks Wi-Fi Access PointCVSS 4.0 · 9.4CWE-798
Arista C-260 and C-250 access points ship with fleet-wide static cryptographic keys used for firmware image verification and SSLP authentication. An attacker who is able to access these keys would be able to create modified firmware that will pass verification checks. This…
Microsoft Windows 10 heap-based buffer overflow
Critical9.8EPSS 0.91%, higher than 60% of scored CVEsMicrosoft Windows 10 Version 1607 and 9 moreCVSS 3.1 · 9.8CWE-122
Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Windows Media Foundation allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.
Microsoft Windows 10 heap-based buffer overflow
Critical9.8EPSS 1.00%, higher than 63% of scored CVEsMicrosoft Windows 10 Version 1607 and 9 moreCVSS 3.1 · 9.8CWE-122, CWE-191
Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Color Management allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.
Microsoft Windows 10 integer overflow
Critical9.8EPSS 0.90%, higher than 60% of scored CVEsMicrosoft Windows 10 Version 1607 and 9 moreCVSS 3.1 · 9.8CWE-190
Integer overflow or wraparound in Microsoft Color Management allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.
Reading the radar
CVSS, KEV and EPSS, briefly.
What is a CVE?
A CVE is a public identifier for one vulnerability in one product, such as CVE-2026-59310. The CVE program assigns it; NVD, run by the US National Institute of Standards and Technology, adds scores, weakness classes and affected product lists.
What does the CVSS score tell me?
CVSS rates how severe a vulnerability is on its own, from 0 to 10, and its vector says how it is reached: over the network or locally, with or without an account, with or without someone clicking. It says nothing about whether anyone is exploiting it. The radar shows the newest CVSS version scored and names it, because version 4.0 and 3.1 scores differ.
What is CISA KEV?
The Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog is CISA's list of CVEs with reliable evidence of exploitation in the wild. US federal agencies must fix each one by its due date, and it is the strongest signal of what to patch first.
What is EPSS?
FIRST's Exploit Prediction Scoring System estimates the probability that a CVE will see exploitation activity in the next 30 days, recomputed daily. Most CVEs score well under 1%, so the radar also shows the percentile: how a CVE ranks against every scored CVE.
How should I prioritise?
Patch what CISA lists as exploited first. Then CVEs with a high EPSS score, then the most severe by CVSS. Within each group, start with whatever is reachable from the internet without an account.
Where do the explanations come from?
Veriom writes them from fixed templates over each record: the weakness class says what went wrong and where in an architecture it lives, the CVSS vector says how it is reached and what it affects, and KEV, EPSS and CISA's assessment say whether it is exploited. Nobody reviews each CVE by hand, so read the description and the references before acting.
How fresh is the data?
New and changed CVEs arrive from NVD every hour, the KEV catalog every six hours and EPSS scores once a day. Each page shows when the data was last updated.
Know where a vulnerable component would sit in your systems.
A CVE names a product. Whether it matters depends on where that product sits in your systems: what reaches it, which trust boundary it guards and what it can reach once compromised. Veriom maps your components, their relationships and your trust boundaries from your code, cloud and delivery evidence, so you can see where a component like this sits. The radar itself does not look at your systems.
Sources
- CVE records and CVSS scores from the NVD CVE API. This product uses the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD.
- Exploitation status from CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.
- Exploit likelihood from FIRST’s Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS), refreshed daily.
- Explanations are written by Veriom from fixed templates over each record’s data, not by a person reviewing each CVE. Descriptions are quoted from the records as published. The radar covers CVEs published since 4 Nov 2026, plus every CVE in the KEV catalog.