Free tool · No sign-in
CVE radar: the latest vulnerabilities, explained.
Every new CVE from NVD, with whether it is exploited in the wild (CISA KEV), how likely it is to be (FIRST EPSS), and what it means for your architecture in plain language.
Updated 15 Nov, 03:22 UTC from NVD, CISA KEV and FIRST EPSSMarkdownRSSJSON Feed
Patch first
Exploited in the wild, newest first.
CISA adds a CVE to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog when attackers are using it. Patch these first, then CVEs with a high EPSS score, then the most severe, starting with anything reachable from the internet.
Check Point Multiple Products Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource Vulnerability
High7.8Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-16EPSS 1.3%, higher than 70% of scored CVEscheckpoint Quantum Security Gateway and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 7.8CWE-732, CWE-862
UnrealIRCd Improper Neutralization of Delimiters Vulnerability
High8.6Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-16EPSS 0.30%, higher than 23% of scored CVEsUnrealIRCdCVSS 3.1 · 8.6CWE-140
Microsoft Office Outlook Missing User Interaction for Potentially Unsafe Action Vulnerability
Medium6.5Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS 1.6%, higher than 76% of scored CVEsMicrosoft Office and 6 moreCVSS 3.1 · 6.5CWE-356
Google Chromium Use-After-Free Vulnerability
High8.8Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS 0.96%, higher than 62% of scored CVEsGoogle Chromium and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-416
Barracuda Networks Email Security Gateway (ESG) Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel Vulnerability
Critical9.3Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-13EPSS 11%, higher than 96% of scored CVEsBarracuda Email Security Gateway (ESG) and 5 moreCVSS 4.0 · 9.3CWE-288
Trends
The last 30 days, by severity.
6,538 CVEs published, 517 of them critical. Many arrive without a score yet: NVD and the reporting organisations add CVSS over the following days.
Show the numbers
| Day | Critical | High | Medium | Low | Not scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 Oct 2026 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 Oct 2026 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 Oct 2026 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 Oct 2026 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1 Nov 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 Nov 2026 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 3 Nov 2026 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 4 Nov 2026 | 35 | 158 | 142 | 29 | 0 |
| 5 Nov 2026 | 55 | 213 | 149 | 36 | 0 |
| 6 Nov 2026 | 41 | 148 | 202 | 47 | 6 |
| 7 Nov 2026 | 54 | 165 | 232 | 10 | 13 |
| 8 Nov 2026 | 23 | 128 | 143 | 26 | 0 |
| 9 Nov 2026 | 32 | 164 | 231 | 42 | 1 |
| 10 Nov 2026 | 117 | 1221 | 623 | 61 | 92 |
| 11 Nov 2026 | 51 | 285 | 237 | 44 | 47 |
| 12 Nov 2026 | 28 | 172 | 129 | 23 | 6 |
| 13 Nov 2026 | 67 | 327 | 337 | 52 | 9 |
| 14 Nov 2026 | 7 | 13 | 12 | 6 | 26 |
| 15 Nov 2026 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 0 |
Exploit likelihood (EPSS), last 30 days
- Under 1%5901
- 1% to 10%217
- 10% to 50%4
- 50% or more3
- Not scored yet413
Most affected vendors, last 30 days
Most common weaknesses, last 30 days
- Cross-site scripting (CWE-79)529
- Missing authorization (CWE-862)387
- Heap-based buffer overflow (CWE-122)364
- Use after free (CWE-416)342
- Insecure direct object reference (CWE-639)232
- Incorrect authorization (CWE-863)214
- Out-of-bounds read (CWE-125)208
- SQL injection (CWE-89)185
- Path traversal (CWE-22)183
- Out-of-bounds write (CWE-787)183
Matching CVEs
2,313 CVEs match these filters, page 17 of 93.
Docker Sandboxes vulnerability
High7.3EPSS 0.10%, higher than 1% of scored CVEsDocker SandboxesCVSS 4.0 · 7.3CWE-282
Docker Sandboxes reuses existing state and configuration directories without verifying their ownership. If sbx or sandboxd is run as root with HOME or, on Linux, XDG_STATE_HOME pointing to an attacker-controlled location, a local unprivileged user can substitute control-plane…
PostgreSQL uncontrolled search path
High7.2EPSS 0.61%, higher than 50% of scored CVEsPostgreSQLCVSS 3.1 · 7.2CWE-427
Uncontrolled search path element in PostgreSQL CREATE EXTENSION allows an attacker with database-level CREATE privilege to execute arbitrary code as the bootstrap superuser, via ALTER SCHEMA ... RENAME or CREATE EXTENSION ... SCHEMA "$user". ALTER EXTENSION was also affected. A…
PostgreSQL type confusion
High8.8EPSS 0.59%, higher than 49% of scored CVEsPostgreSQLCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-843
Type confusion in PostgreSQL allows an object creator to execute arbitrary code as the operating system user running the database, via ALTER ... SET DATA TYPE primarily. Other DDL attack routes exist, such as "ALTER TABLE ... ADD COLUMN; ROLLBACK; ALTER TABLE ... ADD COLUMN".…
PostgreSQL type confusion
High8.8EPSS 0.59%, higher than 49% of scored CVEsPostgreSQLCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-843
Type confusion in PostgreSQL SQL-language functions allows an object creator to execute arbitrary code as the operating system user running the database, via an output parameter of type "any". Versions before PostgreSQL 18.7, 17.12, 16.16, 15.20, and 14.25 are affected.
PostgreSQL external control of a file name
High8.1EPSS 0.43%, higher than 38% of scored CVEsPostgreSQLCVSS 3.1 · 8.1CWE-73
External control of file name in PostgreSQL dblink and CREATE/ALTER SUBSCRIPTION allows a user to achieve persistent denial of service, via appending invalid data to a chosen file. Specifically, the "sslkeylogfile" connection parameter appends data, in NSS keylog format, to a…
PostgreSQL SQL injection
High7.2EPSS 0.55%, higher than 47% of scored CVEsPostgreSQLCVSS 3.1 · 7.2CWE-89
SQL injection in PostgreSQL extension-script substitutions allows an attacker with database-level CREATE privilege to execute arbitrary code as the bootstrap superuser, via a schema or owner name containing newlines or other special substrings. This is similar to…
PostgreSQL type confusion
High8.8EPSS 0.59%, higher than 49% of scored CVEsPostgreSQLCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-843
Type confusion in PostgreSQL plpgsql record-field assignment allows an object creator to execute arbitrary code as the operating system user running the database, via a reentrant domain CHECK that changes a RECORD variable's row type while a value is being cast. Versions before…
PostgreSQL use after free
High8.8EPSS 0.58%, higher than 48% of scored CVEsPostgreSQLCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-416
Use after free in PostgreSQL expanded-record domain checks allows an object creator to execute arbitrary code as the operating system user running the database, via repeated checks of a domain over a composite type that cause reuse of a dangling memory-context pointer. Versions…
PostgreSQL heap-based buffer overflow
High8.8EPSS 0.60%, higher than 49% of scored CVEsPostgreSQLCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-122
Heap-based buffer overflow in PostgreSQL foreign batch inserts allows a foreign server to execute arbitrary code, via reporting that it inserted more rows than the server supplied. postgres_fdw can legitimately encounter this when a rule on the remote table expands an INSERT…
PostgreSQL type confusion
High8.1EPSS 0.48%, higher than 42% of scored CVEsPostgreSQLCVSS 3.1 · 8.1CWE-843
Type confusion in PostgreSQL extended statistics allows an object creator to execute arbitrary code as the operating system user running the database, via a statistics expression of an anonymous RECORD type whose backend-local type identifier denotes a different row type in…
PostgreSQL use after free
High8.8EPSS 0.59%, higher than 49% of scored CVEsPostgreSQLCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-416
Use after free in the PostgreSQL dblink extension allows an object creator to execute arbitrary code as the operating system user running the database, via type conversion code that re-enters dblink and closes a connection whose results an outer dblink call is reading. Versions…
PostgreSQL missing authorization
High8.8EPSS 0.54%, higher than 46% of scored CVEsPostgreSQLCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-862
Missing authorization in PostgreSQL logical replication allows a compromised publisher to execute arbitrary code as the operating system user running the superuser-owned subscription, via naming a system catalog as a replication target. Only subscriptions owned by a superuser…
PostgreSQL type confusion
High8.8EPSS 0.59%, higher than 49% of scored CVEsPostgreSQLCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-843
Type confusion from incomplete PostgreSQL type-cache invalidation allows an object creator to execute arbitrary code as the operating system user running the database, via a composite type change while its cache entry is being populated. Within major version 18, minor versions…
PostgreSQL use after free
High8.8EPSS 0.59%, higher than 49% of scored CVEsPostgreSQLCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-416
Use after free in PostgreSQL trigger functions allows an object creator to execute arbitrary code as the operating system user running the database, via a cursor over a transition table. Versions before PostgreSQL 18.7, 17.12, 16.16, 15.20, and 14.25 are affected.
PostgreSQL type confusion
High8.8EPSS 0.59%, higher than 49% of scored CVEsPostgreSQLCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-843
Type confusion in PostgreSQL anonymous RECORD types allows an object creator to execute arbitrary code as the operating system user running the database, via row types having dropped attributes in the same positions but with different widths or alignments. Within major versions…
PostgreSQL type confusion
High8.8EPSS 0.59%, higher than 49% of scored CVEsPostgreSQLCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-843
Type confusion in PostgreSQL materialized set-returning functions allows a database user to execute arbitrary code as the operating system user running the database, via returning rows having different dynamic RECORD return types. json_populate_recordset() is one affected…
PostgreSQL integer overflow
High8.8EPSS 0.59%, higher than 49% of scored CVEsPostgreSQLCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-190
Integer wraparound in PostgreSQL in-memory tuple-size calculations allows a database user to execute arbitrary code as the operating system user running the database, via oversized tuple data. Versions before PostgreSQL 18.7, 17.12, 16.16, 15.20, and 14.25 are affected.
PostgreSQL type confusion
High8.8EPSS 0.64%, higher than 51% of scored CVEsPostgreSQLCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-672, CWE-843
Operation on a dropped index in PostgreSQL REINDEX CONCURRENTLY allows an object creator to execute arbitrary code as the operating system user running the database, via an index expression that issues DROP INDEX. Versions before PostgreSQL 18.7, 17.12, 16.16, 15.20, and 14.25…
PostgreSQL type confusion
High8.8EPSS 0.59%, higher than 49% of scored CVEsPostgreSQLCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-843
Type confusion in PostgreSQL operator commutator and negator links allows an object creator to execute arbitrary code as the operating system user running the database, via linking operators having different result types or creating inconsistent reciprocal links. Versions…
PostgreSQL use after free
High8.8EPSS 0.59%, higher than 49% of scored CVEsPostgreSQLCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-416
Use after free in PostgreSQL portal setup allows an object creator to execute arbitrary code as the operating system user running the database, via running user-defined code during planning or executor startup that closes the portal currently being prepared. Versions before…
PostgreSQL type confusion
High8.8EPSS 0.59%, higher than 49% of scored CVEsPostgreSQLCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-843
Type confusion in PostgreSQL min/max aggregate optimization allows an object creator to execute arbitrary code as the operating system user running the database, via a user-defined aggregate whose SORTOP option causes the planner to treat the aggregate's input and result as the…
PostgreSQL inclusion of untrusted functionality
High8.8EPSS 0.37%, higher than 32% of scored CVEsPostgreSQLCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-829
Untrusted data inclusion in PostgreSQL pg_dump tar-format restore.sql allows a compromised origin server to execute arbitrary code as the client operating system account running psql, via the predictable restriction key in restore.sql. This is a gap in the fix for…
PostgreSQL type confusion
High8.8EPSS 0.59%, higher than 49% of scored CVEsPostgreSQLCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-843
Type confusion in PostgreSQL statistics import allows a table maintainer to execute arbitrary code as the operating system user running the database, via nested SET DATA TYPE during conversion of values to import. Within major version 18, minor versions before PostgreSQL 18.7…
PostgreSQL integer overflow
High8.8EPSS 0.59%, higher than 49% of scored CVEsPostgreSQLCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-190
Integer wraparound in PostgreSQL generation memory contexts allows a database user to execute arbitrary code as the operating system user running the database, via freeing an allocation larger than 1 GB and causing its block to be reused for smaller chunks whose back-pointer…
PostgreSQL vulnerability
High8.8EPSS 0.64%, higher than 51% of scored CVEsPostgreSQLCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-672
Uncaught exceptions in PostgreSQL plperl allow an object creator to cause use of a stale sigjmp_buf, via a tied Perl object, or a Perl object whose overloaded conversion throws while plperl is handling another error. We have not ruled out arbitrary code execution on some…
Reading the radar
CVSS, KEV and EPSS, briefly.
What is a CVE?
A CVE is a public identifier for one vulnerability in one product, such as CVE-2026-59310. The CVE program assigns it; NVD, run by the US National Institute of Standards and Technology, adds scores, weakness classes and affected product lists.
What does the CVSS score tell me?
CVSS rates how severe a vulnerability is on its own, from 0 to 10, and its vector says how it is reached: over the network or locally, with or without an account, with or without someone clicking. It says nothing about whether anyone is exploiting it. The radar shows the newest CVSS version scored and names it, because version 4.0 and 3.1 scores differ.
What is CISA KEV?
The Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog is CISA's list of CVEs with reliable evidence of exploitation in the wild. US federal agencies must fix each one by its due date, and it is the strongest signal of what to patch first.
What is EPSS?
FIRST's Exploit Prediction Scoring System estimates the probability that a CVE will see exploitation activity in the next 30 days, recomputed daily. Most CVEs score well under 1%, so the radar also shows the percentile: how a CVE ranks against every scored CVE.
How should I prioritise?
Patch what CISA lists as exploited first. Then CVEs with a high EPSS score, then the most severe by CVSS. Within each group, start with whatever is reachable from the internet without an account.
Where do the explanations come from?
Veriom writes them from fixed templates over each record: the weakness class says what went wrong and where in an architecture it lives, the CVSS vector says how it is reached and what it affects, and KEV, EPSS and CISA's assessment say whether it is exploited. Nobody reviews each CVE by hand, so read the description and the references before acting.
How fresh is the data?
New and changed CVEs arrive from NVD every hour, the KEV catalog every six hours and EPSS scores once a day. Each page shows when the data was last updated.
Know where a vulnerable component would sit in your systems.
A CVE names a product. Whether it matters depends on where that product sits in your systems: what reaches it, which trust boundary it guards and what it can reach once compromised. Veriom maps your components, their relationships and your trust boundaries from your code, cloud and delivery evidence, so you can see where a component like this sits. The radar itself does not look at your systems.
Sources
- CVE records and CVSS scores from the NVD CVE API. This product uses the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD.
- Exploitation status from CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.
- Exploit likelihood from FIRST’s Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS), refreshed daily.
- Explanations are written by Veriom from fixed templates over each record’s data, not by a person reviewing each CVE. Descriptions are quoted from the records as published. The radar covers CVEs published since 4 Nov 2026, plus every CVE in the KEV catalog.