Free tool · No sign-in
CVE radar: the latest vulnerabilities, explained.
Every new CVE from NVD, with whether it is exploited in the wild (CISA KEV), how likely it is to be (FIRST EPSS), and what it means for your architecture in plain language.
Updated 15 Nov, 03:22 UTC from NVD, CISA KEV and FIRST EPSSMarkdownRSSJSON Feed
Patch first
Exploited in the wild, newest first.
CISA adds a CVE to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog when attackers are using it. Patch these first, then CVEs with a high EPSS score, then the most severe, starting with anything reachable from the internet.
Check Point Multiple Products Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource Vulnerability
High7.8Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-16EPSS 1.3%, higher than 70% of scored CVEscheckpoint Quantum Security Gateway and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 7.8CWE-732, CWE-862
UnrealIRCd Improper Neutralization of Delimiters Vulnerability
High8.6Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-16EPSS 0.30%, higher than 23% of scored CVEsUnrealIRCdCVSS 3.1 · 8.6CWE-140
Microsoft Office Outlook Missing User Interaction for Potentially Unsafe Action Vulnerability
Medium6.5Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS 1.6%, higher than 76% of scored CVEsMicrosoft Office and 6 moreCVSS 3.1 · 6.5CWE-356
Google Chromium Use-After-Free Vulnerability
High8.8Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS 0.96%, higher than 62% of scored CVEsGoogle Chromium and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-416
Barracuda Networks Email Security Gateway (ESG) Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel Vulnerability
Critical9.3Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-13EPSS 11%, higher than 96% of scored CVEsBarracuda Email Security Gateway (ESG) and 5 moreCVSS 4.0 · 9.3CWE-288
Trends
The last 30 days, by severity.
6,538 CVEs published, 517 of them critical. Many arrive without a score yet: NVD and the reporting organisations add CVSS over the following days.
Show the numbers
| Day | Critical | High | Medium | Low | Not scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 Oct 2026 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 Oct 2026 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 Oct 2026 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 Oct 2026 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1 Nov 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 Nov 2026 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 3 Nov 2026 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 4 Nov 2026 | 35 | 158 | 142 | 29 | 0 |
| 5 Nov 2026 | 55 | 213 | 149 | 36 | 0 |
| 6 Nov 2026 | 41 | 148 | 202 | 47 | 6 |
| 7 Nov 2026 | 54 | 165 | 232 | 10 | 13 |
| 8 Nov 2026 | 23 | 128 | 143 | 26 | 0 |
| 9 Nov 2026 | 32 | 164 | 231 | 42 | 1 |
| 10 Nov 2026 | 117 | 1221 | 623 | 61 | 92 |
| 11 Nov 2026 | 51 | 285 | 237 | 44 | 47 |
| 12 Nov 2026 | 28 | 172 | 129 | 23 | 6 |
| 13 Nov 2026 | 67 | 327 | 337 | 52 | 9 |
| 14 Nov 2026 | 7 | 13 | 12 | 6 | 26 |
| 15 Nov 2026 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 0 |
Exploit likelihood (EPSS), last 30 days
- Under 1%5901
- 1% to 10%217
- 10% to 50%4
- 50% or more3
- Not scored yet413
Most affected vendors, last 30 days
Most common weaknesses, last 30 days
- Cross-site scripting (CWE-79)529
- Missing authorization (CWE-862)387
- Heap-based buffer overflow (CWE-122)364
- Use after free (CWE-416)342
- Insecure direct object reference (CWE-639)232
- Incorrect authorization (CWE-863)214
- Out-of-bounds read (CWE-125)208
- SQL injection (CWE-89)185
- Path traversal (CWE-22)183
- Out-of-bounds write (CWE-787)183
Matching CVEs
2,313 CVEs match these filters, page 18 of 93.
PostgreSQL SQL injection
High8.0EPSS 0.38%, higher than 32% of scored CVEsPostgreSQLCVSS 3.1 · 8.0CWE-89
SQL injection in PostgreSQL reindexdb allows an object creator to execute arbitrary SQL as the database user running reindexdb, via a crafted index name embedded in the parallel catalog query for --jobs with --index. Within major versions 17-18, minor versions before PostgreSQL…
PostgreSQL use after free
High8.8EPSS 0.59%, higher than 49% of scored CVEsPostgreSQLCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-416
Use after free in PostgreSQL pltcl allows an object creator to execute arbitrary code as the operating system user running the database, via a domain CHECK that re-enters the Tcl interpreter and frees or changes a string still used by the outer result conversion. Versions…
PostgreSQL use after free
High8.8EPSS 0.59%, higher than 49% of scored CVEsPostgreSQLCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-416
Use after free in PostgreSQL plperl allows an object creator to execute arbitrary code as the operating system user running the database, via dropping the final reference to a Perl array or hash while PostgreSQL is converting that object. Versions before PostgreSQL 18.7, 17.12,…
PostgreSQL use after free
High8.8EPSS 0.59%, higher than 49% of scored CVEsPostgreSQLCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-416
Use after free in PostgreSQL plperl allows an object creator to execute arbitrary code as the operating system user running the database, via reentrant return_next() calls. Versions before PostgreSQL 18.7, 17.12, 16.16, 15.20, and 14.25 are affected.
PostgreSQL SQL injection
High8.8EPSS 0.43%, higher than 38% of scored CVEsPostgreSQLCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-89
SQL injection in PostgreSQL pg_dump allows an object creator to execute arbitrary SQL as the user restoring the dump, via an inherited column having a child-local not-null constraint whose name requires quoting. Within major version 18, minor versions before PostgreSQL 18.7 are…
PostgreSQL heap-based buffer overflow
High8.8EPSS 0.60%, higher than 49% of scored CVEsPostgreSQLCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-122
Heap-based buffer overflow in PostgreSQL ts_rank_cd() may allow a database user to execute arbitrary code as the operating system user running the database, via an invalid tsvector containing duplicate positions. Versions before PostgreSQL 18.7, 17.12, 16.16, 15.20, and 14.25…
PostgreSQL vulnerability
High8.8EPSS 0.48%, higher than 42% of scored CVEsPostgreSQLCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-424
Improper protection of alternate path in PostgreSQL security-restricted operations allows an object creator to execute arbitrary SQL as the operation's caller, via a domain, enum, or range type created in pg_temp. The victim session must later run a query containing an…
PostgreSQL heap-based buffer overflow
High8.8EPSS 0.60%, higher than 49% of scored CVEsPostgreSQLCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-122
Heap-based buffer overflow in PostgreSQL tsvector_delete() allows a database user to execute arbitrary code as the operating system user running the database, via a tsvector whose lexeme data uses a nonstandard but valid ordering that requires additional alignment padding in…
PostgreSQL improper input validation
High8.8EPSS 0.53%, higher than 45% of scored CVEsPostgreSQLCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-20
Improper input validation in PostgreSQL pg_restore allows a non-plain archive provider to execute arbitrary code as the operating system user running pg_restore, via a crafted archive. Note a contrast: crafted archive data may legitimately cause arbitrary SQL to execute at the…
PostgreSQL untrusted search path
High7.2EPSS 0.50%, higher than 43% of scored CVEsPostgreSQLCVSS 3.1 · 7.2CWE-426
Untrusted search path in PostgreSQL vacuumdb allows a database owner to execute arbitrary SQL as the database user running vacuumdb, via shadowing operators used in the --missing-stats-only catalog query. The pg_upgrade documentation recommends an affected vacuumdb invocation.…
PostgreSQL type confusion
High8.8EPSS 0.59%, higher than 49% of scored CVEsPostgreSQLCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-843
Type confusion in PostgreSQL plperl may allow an object creator to execute arbitrary code, via blessing a non-hash reference into PostgreSQL::InServer::ARRAY. We have not confirmed or ruled out a way to control the pointer sufficiently to achieve security impact, but we are…
PostgreSQL use after free
High8.8EPSS 0.59%, higher than 49% of scored CVEsPostgreSQLCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-416
Use after free in PostgreSQL plperl allows an object creator to execute arbitrary code as the operating system user running the database, via re-entering plperl and freeing a prepared query while an outer invocation is executing it. Versions before PostgreSQL 18.7, 17.12,…
PostgreSQL type confusion
High8.8EPSS 0.59%, higher than 49% of scored CVEsPostgreSQLCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-843
Type confusion in PostgreSQL composite-value field assignment allows an object creator to execute arbitrary code as the operating system user running the database, via changing a composite type between deforming and reforming a value. Versions before PostgreSQL 18.7, 17.12,…
PostgreSQL use after free
High8.8EPSS 0.59%, higher than 49% of scored CVEsPostgreSQLCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-416, CWE-843
Use after free in PostgreSQL coordination of anonymous RECORD type identifiers among parallel workers allows a database user to execute arbitrary code as the operating system user running the database, via causing one process to free a shared tuple descriptor while another…
TÜBİTAK BİLGEM Yazılım Teknolojileri Araştırma Enstitüsü pardus-image-writer missing authorization
High7.8EPSS 0.14%, higher than 3% of scored CVEsTÜBİTAK BİLGEM Yazılım Teknolojileri Araştırma Enstitüsü pardus-image-writerCVSS 3.1 · 7.8CWE-862
Missing Authorization vulnerability in TÜBİTAK BİLGEM Yazılım Teknolojileri Araştırma Enstitüsü pardus-image-writer allows Privilege Escalation. This issue affects pardus-image-writer: before 0.9.0.
Octopus Server incorrect authorization
High8.7EPSS 0.21%, higher than 11% of scored CVEsOctopus ServerCVSS 4.0 · 8.7CWE-863
In affected versions of Octopus Server, incorrect validation of changes a user made to their own LDAP identity allowed them to edit that identity even when an Administrator had disabled self-service identity editing. This could result in the user gaining membership of teams…
Octopus Server incorrect authorization
High8.7EPSS 0.29%, higher than 22% of scored CVEsOctopus ServerCVSS 4.0 · 8.7CWE-863
In affected versions of Octopus Server, incorrect validation of the external identity linked to a newly registered user could result in that user receiving the LDAP-mapped team memberships and associated permissions of another user. This issue only affects instances with LDAP…
Check Point Multiple Products Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource Vulnerability
High7.8Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-16EPSS 1.3%, higher than 70% of scored CVEscheckpoint Quantum Security Gateway and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 7.8CWE-732, CWE-862
The Gaia OS DynamicCLI daemon runs as root and listens on a world-writable local socket (/tmp/dynamic_socket) without authenticating connecting processes. An authenticated local user can send a command to the socket and have it executed as root.
Octopus Server mass assignment
High8.7EPSS 0.24%, higher than 16% of scored CVEsOctopus ServerCVSS 4.0 · 8.7CWE-915
In affected versions of Octopus Server, insufficient validation of custom claims on OIDC accounts allowed a user with permission to edit accounts to cause Octopus Server to issue signed OIDC tokens that impersonate a different project. This could grant access to external…
checkpoint Quantum Security Gateway improper privilege management
High7.3EPSS 1.9%, higher than 80% of scored CVEscheckpoint Quantum Security Gateway and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 7.3CWE-269
An input and authorization validation vulnerability in Gaia Portal backend handlers could allow an authenticated, non-administrative user to perform privileged operations that should be restricted to administrators.
Zohocorp DDI Central OS command injection
High8.8EPSS 20%, higher than 98% of scored CVEsZohocorp DDI CentralCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-78
Zohocorp ManageEngine DDI Central versions below 6301 is affected by an authorization bypass and PowerShell command injection vulnerability that allowed authenticated non-administrative users to target unauthorized Windows DHCP subnets and potentially execute arbitrary commands…
Zohocorp DDI Central incorrect authorization
High8.1EPSS 1.1%, higher than 67% of scored CVEsZohocorp DDI CentralCVSS 3.1 · 8.1CWE-863
Zohocorp ManageEngine DDI Central versions below 6301 is affected by an authorization bypass vulnerability that allowed authenticated non-administrative users to modify DHCP options on subnets belonging to unauthorized clusters.
Zohocorp DDI Central incorrect authorization
High8.1EPSS 1.1%, higher than 67% of scored CVEsZohocorp DDI CentralCVSS 3.1 · 8.1CWE-863
Zohocorp ManageEngine DDI Central versions below 6301 is affected by an authorization bypass vulnerability that allowed authenticated non-administrative users to modify Windows DHCP filter-list configurations across unauthorized clusters.
Zohocorp DDI Central missing authorization
High8.1EPSS 1.0%, higher than 64% of scored CVEsZohocorp DDI CentralCVSS 3.1 · 8.1CWE-862
Zohocorp ManageEngine DDI Central versions below 6301 is affected by an improper authorization vulnerability that allowed authenticated non-administrative users to delete DNS zones outside their assigned scope.
mholt PapaParse inefficient algorithmic complexity
High8.7EPSS 0.68%, higher than 53% of scored CVEsmholt PapaParseCVSS 4.0 · 8.7CWE-407
PapaParse before 5.7.1 contains an inefficient algorithmic complexity vulnerability that allows remote unauthenticated attackers to cause denial of service by submitting delimiter-free quoted CSV input to Papa.parse(). Attackers can supply a single-column quoted CSV with no…
Reading the radar
CVSS, KEV and EPSS, briefly.
What is a CVE?
A CVE is a public identifier for one vulnerability in one product, such as CVE-2026-59310. The CVE program assigns it; NVD, run by the US National Institute of Standards and Technology, adds scores, weakness classes and affected product lists.
What does the CVSS score tell me?
CVSS rates how severe a vulnerability is on its own, from 0 to 10, and its vector says how it is reached: over the network or locally, with or without an account, with or without someone clicking. It says nothing about whether anyone is exploiting it. The radar shows the newest CVSS version scored and names it, because version 4.0 and 3.1 scores differ.
What is CISA KEV?
The Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog is CISA's list of CVEs with reliable evidence of exploitation in the wild. US federal agencies must fix each one by its due date, and it is the strongest signal of what to patch first.
What is EPSS?
FIRST's Exploit Prediction Scoring System estimates the probability that a CVE will see exploitation activity in the next 30 days, recomputed daily. Most CVEs score well under 1%, so the radar also shows the percentile: how a CVE ranks against every scored CVE.
How should I prioritise?
Patch what CISA lists as exploited first. Then CVEs with a high EPSS score, then the most severe by CVSS. Within each group, start with whatever is reachable from the internet without an account.
Where do the explanations come from?
Veriom writes them from fixed templates over each record: the weakness class says what went wrong and where in an architecture it lives, the CVSS vector says how it is reached and what it affects, and KEV, EPSS and CISA's assessment say whether it is exploited. Nobody reviews each CVE by hand, so read the description and the references before acting.
How fresh is the data?
New and changed CVEs arrive from NVD every hour, the KEV catalog every six hours and EPSS scores once a day. Each page shows when the data was last updated.
Know where a vulnerable component would sit in your systems.
A CVE names a product. Whether it matters depends on where that product sits in your systems: what reaches it, which trust boundary it guards and what it can reach once compromised. Veriom maps your components, their relationships and your trust boundaries from your code, cloud and delivery evidence, so you can see where a component like this sits. The radar itself does not look at your systems.
Sources
- CVE records and CVSS scores from the NVD CVE API. This product uses the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD.
- Exploitation status from CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.
- Exploit likelihood from FIRST’s Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS), refreshed daily.
- Explanations are written by Veriom from fixed templates over each record’s data, not by a person reviewing each CVE. Descriptions are quoted from the records as published. The radar covers CVEs published since 4 Nov 2026, plus every CVE in the KEV catalog.