Free tool · No sign-in
CVE radar: the latest vulnerabilities, explained.
Every new CVE from NVD, with whether it is exploited in the wild (CISA KEV), how likely it is to be (FIRST EPSS), and what it means for your architecture in plain language.
Updated 15 Nov, 04:23 UTC from NVD, CISA KEV and FIRST EPSSMarkdownRSSJSON Feed
Patch first
Exploited in the wild, newest first.
CISA adds a CVE to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog when attackers are using it. Patch these first, then CVEs with a high EPSS score, then the most severe, starting with anything reachable from the internet.
Check Point Multiple Products Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource Vulnerability
High7.8Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-16EPSS 1.3%, higher than 70% of scored CVEscheckpoint Quantum Security Gateway and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 7.8CWE-732, CWE-862
UnrealIRCd Improper Neutralization of Delimiters Vulnerability
High8.6Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-16EPSS 0.30%, higher than 23% of scored CVEsUnrealIRCdCVSS 3.1 · 8.6CWE-140
Microsoft Office Outlook Missing User Interaction for Potentially Unsafe Action Vulnerability
Medium6.5Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS 1.6%, higher than 76% of scored CVEsMicrosoft Office and 6 moreCVSS 3.1 · 6.5CWE-356
Google Chromium Use-After-Free Vulnerability
High8.8Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS 0.96%, higher than 62% of scored CVEsGoogle Chromium and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-416
Barracuda Networks Email Security Gateway (ESG) Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel Vulnerability
Critical9.3Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-13EPSS 11%, higher than 96% of scored CVEsBarracuda Email Security Gateway (ESG) and 5 moreCVSS 4.0 · 9.3CWE-288
Trends
The last 30 days, by severity.
6,539 CVEs published, 517 of them critical. Many arrive without a score yet: NVD and the reporting organisations add CVSS over the following days.
Show the numbers
| Day | Critical | High | Medium | Low | Not scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 Oct 2026 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 Oct 2026 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 Oct 2026 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 Oct 2026 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1 Nov 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 Nov 2026 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 3 Nov 2026 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 4 Nov 2026 | 35 | 158 | 142 | 29 | 0 |
| 5 Nov 2026 | 55 | 213 | 149 | 36 | 0 |
| 6 Nov 2026 | 41 | 148 | 202 | 47 | 6 |
| 7 Nov 2026 | 54 | 165 | 232 | 10 | 13 |
| 8 Nov 2026 | 23 | 128 | 143 | 26 | 0 |
| 9 Nov 2026 | 32 | 164 | 231 | 42 | 1 |
| 10 Nov 2026 | 117 | 1221 | 623 | 61 | 92 |
| 11 Nov 2026 | 51 | 285 | 237 | 44 | 47 |
| 12 Nov 2026 | 28 | 172 | 129 | 23 | 6 |
| 13 Nov 2026 | 67 | 327 | 337 | 52 | 9 |
| 14 Nov 2026 | 7 | 13 | 12 | 6 | 26 |
| 15 Nov 2026 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 0 |
Exploit likelihood (EPSS), last 30 days
- Under 1%5901
- 1% to 10%217
- 10% to 50%4
- 50% or more3
- Not scored yet414
Most affected vendors, last 30 days
Most common weaknesses, last 30 days
- Cross-site scripting (CWE-79)529
- Missing authorization (CWE-862)387
- Heap-based buffer overflow (CWE-122)364
- Use after free (CWE-416)342
- Insecure direct object reference (CWE-639)232
- Incorrect authorization (CWE-863)214
- Out-of-bounds read (CWE-125)208
- SQL injection (CWE-89)185
- Path traversal (CWE-22)183
- Out-of-bounds write (CWE-787)183
Matching CVEs
2,313 CVEs match these filters, page 23 of 93.
Google Chrome use after free
High8.8EPSS 0.27%, higher than 19% of scored CVEsGoogle ChromeCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-416
Use after free in Frames in Google Chrome prior to 157.0.8103.78 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code inside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)
Google Chrome type confusion
High8.8EPSS 0.24%, higher than 16% of scored CVEsGoogle ChromeCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-843
Type confusion in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 157.0.8103.78 allowed a remote attacker to potentially execute arbitrary code inside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)
Google Chrome use after free
High8.8EPSS 0.34%, higher than 28% of scored CVEsGoogle ChromeCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-416
Use after free in Browser in Google Chrome on on Windows prior to 157.0.8103.78 allowed a remote attacker to potentially execute arbitrary code outside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)
Google Chrome incorrect authorization
High8.8EPSS 0.29%, higher than 22% of scored CVEsGoogle ChromeCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-863
Incorrect authorization in Extensions in Google Chrome prior to 157.0.8103.78 allowed a remote attacker leveraging social engineering to execute arbitrary code inside the sandbox via a crafted Chrome extension. (Chromium security severity: High)
Google Chrome use after free
High8.8EPSS 0.27%, higher than 19% of scored CVEsGoogle ChromeCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-416
Use after free in DOM in Google Chrome prior to 157.0.8103.78 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code inside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)
Google Chrome use after free
High8.8EPSS 0.29%, higher than 22% of scored CVEsGoogle ChromeCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-416
Use after free in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 157.0.8103.78 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code inside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)
Google Chrome use after free
High8.8EPSS 0.27%, higher than 19% of scored CVEsGoogle ChromeCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-416
Use after free in HTML in Google Chrome prior to 157.0.8103.78 allowed a remote attacker to potentially execute arbitrary code inside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)
Google Chrome improper input validation
High7.7EPSS 0.08%, higher than 0% of scored CVEsGoogle ChromeCVSS 3.1 · 7.7CWE-20
Improper input validation in Core in Google Chrome on on Android prior to 157.0.8103.78 allowed a local attacker to bypass web origin policy via a co-installed app. (Chromium security severity: High)
Google Chrome use after free
High8.8EPSS 0.30%, higher than 23% of scored CVEsGoogle ChromeCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-416
Use after free in Media in Google Chrome on on Android prior to 157.0.8103.78 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code inside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)
Google Chrome incorrect authorization
High8.8EPSS 0.24%, higher than 16% of scored CVEsGoogle ChromeCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-863
Incorrect authorization in FileSystem in Google Chrome prior to 157.0.8103.78 allowed a remote attacker leveraging social engineering to potentially execute arbitrary code outside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)
Google Chrome use after free
High8.8EPSS 0.22%, higher than 13% of scored CVEsGoogle ChromeCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-416
Use after free in MediaStream in Google Chrome prior to 157.0.8103.78 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code inside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)
Google Chrome use after free
High8.8EPSS 0.27%, higher than 19% of scored CVEsGoogle ChromeCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-416
Use after free in Accessibility in Google Chrome prior to 157.0.8103.78 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code inside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)
Google Chrome type confusion
High8.8EPSS 0.27%, higher than 20% of scored CVEsGoogle ChromeCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-843
Type confusion in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 157.0.8103.78 allowed a remote attacker to potentially execute arbitrary code inside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)
Google Chrome type confusion
High8.8EPSS 0.33%, higher than 27% of scored CVEsGoogle ChromeCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-843
Type confusion in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 157.0.8103.78 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code inside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)
Google Chrome type confusion
High8.8EPSS 0.29%, higher than 22% of scored CVEsGoogle ChromeCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-843
Type confusion in Turbolev in Google Chrome prior to 157.0.8103.78 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code inside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)
Google Chrome out-of-bounds write
High8.8EPSS 0.30%, higher than 23% of scored CVEsGoogle ChromeCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-787
Out of bounds write in Network in Google Chrome prior to 157.0.8103.78 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code inside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)
konflux-ci code injection
High7.2EPSS 0.72%, higher than 54% of scored CVEskonflux-ciCVSS 3.1 · 7.2CWE-94
A flaw was found in the Konflux UI proxy. Hostname values defined in the KonfluxUI custom resource are inserted directly into proxy configuration files without adequate validation or sanitization. An authenticated user with permissions to modify the custom resource can inject…
Lenovo XClarity Controller vulnerability
High7.1EPSS 0.35%, higher than 29% of scored CVEsLenovo XClarity ControllerCVSS 4.0 · 7.1CWE-1392
An internal security review identified a development regression from ThinkSystem v4 XClarity Controller 3 (XCC3) versions (2.51) IHX432Y to (2.56) IHX436K which re-introduces the default OpenBMC root password upon performing an XCC Reset to Default operation. An attacker can…
fulgur-rs fulgur uncontrolled resource consumption
High7.5EPSS 0.62%, higher than 50% of scored CVEsfulgur-rs fulgurCVSS 3.1 · 7.5CWE-400, CWE-405
fulgur converts untrusted HTML/CSS into PDF, commonly on a server that processes input supplied by many tenants. From version 0.6.0 to before version 0.33.0, quadratic style-list reprocessing during containing-block resolution for absolutely-positioned pseudo-elements cause…
fulgur-rs fulgur uncontrolled resource consumption
High7.5EPSS 0.67%, higher than 53% of scored CVEsfulgur-rs fulgurCVSS 3.1 · 7.5CWE-400, CWE-770
fulgur converts untrusted HTML/CSS into PDF, commonly on a server that processes input supplied by many tenants. From version 0.4.4 to before version 0.29.0, the CSS string-set named-string values resolved from a document were accumulated per element with no memory budget,…
fulgur-rs fulgur uncontrolled resource consumption
High7.5EPSS 0.60%, higher than 49% of scored CVEsfulgur-rs fulgurCVSS 3.1 · 7.5CWE-400
fulgur converts untrusted HTML/CSS into PDF, commonly on a server that processes input supplied by many tenants. From version 0.15.0 to before version 0.27.0, resolving the CSS counters(name, sep) function in generated content was bounded neither in the size of a single…
jaylfc taOS missing authorization
High8.3EPSS 0.42%, higher than 37% of scored CVEsjaylfc taOSCVSS 3.1 · 8.3CWE-862
taOS is a self-hosted AI agent OS. Prior to version 1.0.0-beta.25, tinyagentos (taOS) registers all system settings routes under a single APIRouter() instance created with no admin authorization dependency. Any authenticated user—including non-admin invited users whose is_admin…
jaylfc taOS missing authorization
High8.8EPSS 0.78%, higher than 56% of scored CVEsjaylfc taOSCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-862
taOS is a self-hosted AI agent OS. Prior to version 1.0.0-beta.23, the POST /api/skill-exec/{skill_id}/call endpoint in taOS executes built-in skills — including the code_exec skill which runs arbitrary Python via subprocess.run(["python3", "-c", code]) — without performing any…
heymrun heym code injection
High8.8EPSS 0.62%, higher than 50% of scored CVEsheymrun heymCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-94
Heym builds and runs agentic systems and business-process automations on self-hosted infrastructure. Prior to version 0.0.75, the same POST /api/mcp/fetch-tools endpoint (any authenticated user, lowest role) also accepts the stdio transport, which spawns the attacker-supplied…
heymrun heym server-side request forgery
High7.4EPSS 0.48%, higher than 42% of scored CVEsheymrun heymCVSS 3.1 · 7.4CWE-918
Heym builds and runs agentic systems and business-process automations on self-hosted infrastructure. Prior to version 0.0.73, the HTTP workflow node in Heym makes outbound HTTP requests to user-supplied URLs without validation of the target host or IP address. If a workflow…
Reading the radar
CVSS, KEV and EPSS, briefly.
What is a CVE?
A CVE is a public identifier for one vulnerability in one product, such as CVE-2026-59310. The CVE program assigns it; NVD, run by the US National Institute of Standards and Technology, adds scores, weakness classes and affected product lists.
What does the CVSS score tell me?
CVSS rates how severe a vulnerability is on its own, from 0 to 10, and its vector says how it is reached: over the network or locally, with or without an account, with or without someone clicking. It says nothing about whether anyone is exploiting it. The radar shows the newest CVSS version scored and names it, because version 4.0 and 3.1 scores differ.
What is CISA KEV?
The Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog is CISA's list of CVEs with reliable evidence of exploitation in the wild. US federal agencies must fix each one by its due date, and it is the strongest signal of what to patch first.
What is EPSS?
FIRST's Exploit Prediction Scoring System estimates the probability that a CVE will see exploitation activity in the next 30 days, recomputed daily. Most CVEs score well under 1%, so the radar also shows the percentile: how a CVE ranks against every scored CVE.
How should I prioritise?
Patch what CISA lists as exploited first. Then CVEs with a high EPSS score, then the most severe by CVSS. Within each group, start with whatever is reachable from the internet without an account.
Where do the explanations come from?
Veriom writes them from fixed templates over each record: the weakness class says what went wrong and where in an architecture it lives, the CVSS vector says how it is reached and what it affects, and KEV, EPSS and CISA's assessment say whether it is exploited. Nobody reviews each CVE by hand, so read the description and the references before acting.
How fresh is the data?
New and changed CVEs arrive from NVD every hour, the KEV catalog every six hours and EPSS scores once a day. Each page shows when the data was last updated.
Know where a vulnerable component would sit in your systems.
A CVE names a product. Whether it matters depends on where that product sits in your systems: what reaches it, which trust boundary it guards and what it can reach once compromised. Veriom maps your components, their relationships and your trust boundaries from your code, cloud and delivery evidence, so you can see where a component like this sits. The radar itself does not look at your systems.
Sources
- CVE records and CVSS scores from the NVD CVE API. This product uses the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD.
- Exploitation status from CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.
- Exploit likelihood from FIRST’s Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS), refreshed daily.
- Explanations are written by Veriom from fixed templates over each record’s data, not by a person reviewing each CVE. Descriptions are quoted from the records as published. The radar covers CVEs published since 4 Nov 2026, plus every CVE in the KEV catalog.