Free tool · No sign-in
CVE radar: the latest vulnerabilities, explained.
Every new CVE from NVD, with whether it is exploited in the wild (CISA KEV), how likely it is to be (FIRST EPSS), and what it means for your architecture in plain language.
Updated 15 Nov, 04:23 UTC from NVD, CISA KEV and FIRST EPSSMarkdownRSSJSON Feed
Patch first
Exploited in the wild, newest first.
CISA adds a CVE to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog when attackers are using it. Patch these first, then CVEs with a high EPSS score, then the most severe, starting with anything reachable from the internet.
Check Point Multiple Products Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource Vulnerability
High7.8Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-16EPSS 1.3%, higher than 70% of scored CVEscheckpoint Quantum Security Gateway and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 7.8CWE-732, CWE-862
UnrealIRCd Improper Neutralization of Delimiters Vulnerability
High8.6Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-16EPSS 0.30%, higher than 23% of scored CVEsUnrealIRCdCVSS 3.1 · 8.6CWE-140
Microsoft Office Outlook Missing User Interaction for Potentially Unsafe Action Vulnerability
Medium6.5Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS 1.6%, higher than 76% of scored CVEsMicrosoft Office and 6 moreCVSS 3.1 · 6.5CWE-356
Google Chromium Use-After-Free Vulnerability
High8.8Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS 0.96%, higher than 62% of scored CVEsGoogle Chromium and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-416
Barracuda Networks Email Security Gateway (ESG) Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel Vulnerability
Critical9.3Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-13EPSS 11%, higher than 96% of scored CVEsBarracuda Email Security Gateway (ESG) and 5 moreCVSS 4.0 · 9.3CWE-288
Trends
The last 30 days, by severity.
6,539 CVEs published, 517 of them critical. Many arrive without a score yet: NVD and the reporting organisations add CVSS over the following days.
Show the numbers
| Day | Critical | High | Medium | Low | Not scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 Oct 2026 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 Oct 2026 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 Oct 2026 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 Oct 2026 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1 Nov 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 Nov 2026 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 3 Nov 2026 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 4 Nov 2026 | 35 | 158 | 142 | 29 | 0 |
| 5 Nov 2026 | 55 | 213 | 149 | 36 | 0 |
| 6 Nov 2026 | 41 | 148 | 202 | 47 | 6 |
| 7 Nov 2026 | 54 | 165 | 232 | 10 | 13 |
| 8 Nov 2026 | 23 | 128 | 143 | 26 | 0 |
| 9 Nov 2026 | 32 | 164 | 231 | 42 | 1 |
| 10 Nov 2026 | 117 | 1221 | 623 | 61 | 92 |
| 11 Nov 2026 | 51 | 285 | 237 | 44 | 47 |
| 12 Nov 2026 | 28 | 172 | 129 | 23 | 6 |
| 13 Nov 2026 | 67 | 327 | 337 | 52 | 9 |
| 14 Nov 2026 | 7 | 13 | 12 | 6 | 26 |
| 15 Nov 2026 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 0 |
Exploit likelihood (EPSS), last 30 days
- Under 1%5901
- 1% to 10%217
- 10% to 50%4
- 50% or more3
- Not scored yet414
Most affected vendors, last 30 days
Most common weaknesses, last 30 days
- Cross-site scripting (CWE-79)529
- Missing authorization (CWE-862)387
- Heap-based buffer overflow (CWE-122)364
- Use after free (CWE-416)342
- Insecure direct object reference (CWE-639)232
- Incorrect authorization (CWE-863)214
- Out-of-bounds read (CWE-125)208
- SQL injection (CWE-89)185
- Path traversal (CWE-22)183
- Out-of-bounds write (CWE-787)183
Matching CVEs
2,313 CVEs match these filters, page 24 of 93.
heymrun heym code injection
High8.8EPSS 0.97%, higher than 62% of scored CVEsheymrun heymCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-94
Heym builds and runs agentic systems and business-process automations on self-hosted infrastructure. Prior to version 0.0.71, Heym's workflow engine accepts an arbitrary Python code string in the playwrightCode field of a Playwright node. This string is written to a temporary…
heymrun heym code injection
High8.8EPSS 0.64%, higher than 51% of scored CVEsheymrun heymCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-94, CWE-269
Heym builds and runs agentic systems and business-process automations on self-hosted infrastructure. Prior to version 0.0.70, heym hardens one untrusted-code path but not its sibling. The Python tool executor (python_tool_executor.py) treats user code as untrusted and mandates…
heymrun heym server-side request forgery
High7.1EPSS 0.34%, higher than 28% of scored CVEsheymrun heymCVSS 3.1 · 7.1CWE-918
Heym builds and runs agentic systems and business-process automations on self-hosted infrastructure. Prior to version 0.0.70, POST /api/mcp/fetch-tools is reachable by any authenticated user (lowest role; no admin/workflow association) and fetches an attacker-supplied URL…
heymrun heym incorrect privilege assignment
High8.1EPSS 0.40%, higher than 34% of scored CVEsheymrun heymCVSS 3.1 · 8.1CWE-266, CWE-862
Heym builds and runs agentic systems and business-process automations on self-hosted infrastructure. Prior to version 0.0.70, team-member management (add / remove / update) is gated only on team membership, not on the team creator/admin role — and TeamMember has no role column.…
Power-Components livewire-powergrid SQL injection
High7.6EPSS 0.36%, higher than 30% of scored CVEsPower-Components livewire-powergridCVSS 3.1 · 7.6CWE-89
Livewire PowerGrid creates data tables based on Laravel Livewire library. From version 6.0.0 to before version 6.10.4, the public Livewire property sortDirection is interpolated verbatim into a raw SQL ORDER BY clause and is not restricted to asc/desc, allowing arbitrary SQL…
Lenovo XClarity Integrator for WAC OS command injection
High8.6EPSS 0.60%, higher than 49% of scored CVEsLenovo XClarity Integrator for WACCVSS 4.0 · 8.6CWE-78, CWE-94
Improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command in Lenovo XClarity Integrator for Microsoft Windows Admin Center 5.1.1 and 5.2.0 allows an authenticated remote attacker to execute arbitrary PowerShell commands by submitting a crafted hostname.
Fortinet FortiOS stack-based buffer overflow
High7.5EPSS 0.58%, higher than 48% of scored CVEsFortinet FortiOSCVSS 3.1 · 7.5CWE-121
A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability in Fortinet FortiOS 8.0.0, FortiOS 7.6.7 may allow an unauthenticated attacker with wad port access to crash proxy or ZTNA sessions via crafted HTTP or HTTPS requests.
Fortinet FortiOS out-of-bounds read
High7.4EPSS 0.57%, higher than 48% of scored CVEsFortinet FortiOSCVSS 3.1 · 7.4CWE-125
A out-of-bounds read vulnerability in Fortinet FortiOS 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiOS 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiOS 7.4.0 through 7.4.12, FortiOS 7.2.0 through 7.2.13 may allow a remote privileged attacker to execute arbitrary code or command via crafted paquets.
Fortinet FortiOS path traversal
High7.4EPSS 0.75%, higher than 56% of scored CVEsFortinet FortiOS and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 7.4CWE-24
A path traversal: '../filedir' vulnerability in Fortinet FortiOS 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiOS 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiOS 7.4.0 through 7.4.12, FortiOS 7.2.0 through 7.2.13, FortiPAM 1.6 all versions, FortiPAM 1.5 all versions, FortiPAM 1.4 all versions, FortiPAM 1.3 all…
Fortinet FortiAuthenticator SQL injection
High8.3EPSS 0.35%, higher than 29% of scored CVEsFortinet FortiAuthenticatorCVSS 3.1 · 8.3CWE-89
A improper neutralization of special elements used in an sql command ('sql injection') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAuthenticator 8.0.0 through 8.0.3, FortiAuthenticator 6.6.0 through 6.6.10 may allow an authenticated attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via http…
Fortinet FortiAuthenticator incorrect authorization
High8.2EPSS 0.37%, higher than 31% of scored CVEsFortinet FortiAuthenticatorCVSS 3.1 · 8.2CWE-863
A incorrect authorization vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAuthenticator 8.0.0 through 8.0.3, FortiAuthenticator 6.6.0 through 6.6.10 may allow an unauthenticated attacker to cause a denial of service via HTTP requests.
Fortinet FortiAuthenticator improper privilege management
High7.2EPSS 0.43%, higher than 38% of scored CVEsFortinet FortiAuthenticatorCVSS 3.1 · 7.2CWE-269
A improper privilege management vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAuthenticator 8.0.0 through 8.0.3, FortiAuthenticator 6.6.0 through 6.6.10 may allow an authenticated attacker to escalate privileges.
Fortinet FortiAuthenticator insufficiently protected credentials
High7.5EPSS 0.40%, higher than 34% of scored CVEsFortinet FortiAuthenticatorCVSS 3.1 · 7.5CWE-522
A insufficiently protected credentials vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAuthenticator 8.0.0 through 8.0.3, FortiAuthenticator 6.6.0 through 6.6.10 may allow an unauthenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information via HTTPS requests.
Fortinet FortiAuthenticator format string
High7.2EPSS 0.34%, higher than 28% of scored CVEsFortinet FortiAuthenticatorCVSS 3.1 · 7.2CWE-134
A use of externally-controlled format string vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAuthenticator 8.0.0 through 8.0.3, FortiAuthenticator 6.6.0 through 6.6.10 may allow an authenticated privileged attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via http requests.
Fortinet FortiAuthenticator null pointer dereference
High7.5EPSS 0.34%, higher than 28% of scored CVEsFortinet FortiAuthenticatorCVSS 3.1 · 7.5CWE-476
A null pointer dereference vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAuthenticator 8.0.0 through 8.0.3, FortiAuthenticator 6.6.0 through 6.6.10 may allow an unauthenticated attacker to perform a denial of service attack via http requests.
Fortinet FortiAuthenticator out-of-bounds write
High8.1EPSS 0.30%, higher than 24% of scored CVEsFortinet FortiAuthenticatorCVSS 3.1 · 8.1CWE-787
A out-of-bounds write vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAuthenticator 8.0.0 through 8.0.3, FortiAuthenticator 6.6.0 through 6.6.10 may allow an unauthenticated attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via http requests, should the attacker be able to defeat ASLR…
Fortinet FortiAuthenticator allocation without limits
High7.5EPSS 0.34%, higher than 28% of scored CVEsFortinet FortiAuthenticatorCVSS 3.1 · 7.5CWE-770
A allocation of resources without limits or throttling vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAuthenticator 8.0.0 through 8.0.3, FortiAuthenticator 6.6.0 through 6.6.10 may allow an unauthenticated attacker to exhaust system resources, potentially resulting in a denial of service (DoS).
Fortinet FortiAuthenticator incorrect authorization
High7.2EPSS 0.41%, higher than 36% of scored CVEsFortinet FortiAuthenticatorCVSS 3.1 · 7.2CWE-863
A incorrect authorization vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAuthenticator 8.0.0 through 8.0.3, FortiAuthenticator 6.6.0 through 6.6.10 may allow an attacker to bypass authentication and gain unauthorized access. Full impersonation however requires the attacker to obtain…
Fortinet FortiAuthenticator incorrect authorization
High7.4EPSS 0.31%, higher than 24% of scored CVEsFortinet FortiAuthenticatorCVSS 3.1 · 7.4CWE-863
A incorrect authorization vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAuthenticator 8.0.0 through 8.0.3, FortiAuthenticator 6.6.0 through 6.6.10 may allow an attacker to bypass authentication and gain unauthorized access. Full impersonation however requires the attacker to obtain…
Fortinet FortiAuthenticator SQL injection
High8.8EPSS 0.29%, higher than 22% of scored CVEsFortinet FortiAuthenticatorCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-89
A improper neutralization of special elements used in an sql command ('sql injection') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAuthenticator 8.0.0 through 8.0.3, FortiAuthenticator 6.6.0 through 6.6.10 may allow an authenticated attacker to execute unauthorized SQL commands on the…
Fortinet FortiAuthenticator LDAP injection
High8.2EPSS 0.28%, higher than 21% of scored CVEsFortinet FortiAuthenticatorCVSS 3.1 · 8.2CWE-90
A improper neutralization of special elements used in an ldap query ('ldap injection') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAuthenticator 8.0.0 through 8.0.3, FortiAuthenticator 6.6.0 through 6.6.10 may allow an authenticated attacker to bypass authentication. Successful exploitation…
Fortinet FortiAuthenticator stack-based buffer overflow
High7.5EPSS 0.41%, higher than 36% of scored CVEsFortinet FortiAuthenticatorCVSS 3.1 · 7.5CWE-121
A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAuthenticator 8.0.0 through 8.0.3, FortiAuthenticator 6.6.0 through 6.6.10 may allow an unauthenticated attacker to crash the FSSO subsystem via crafted http requests
Fortinet FortiAuthenticator incorrect authorization
High8.6EPSS 0.28%, higher than 21% of scored CVEsFortinet FortiAuthenticatorCVSS 3.1 · 8.6CWE-863
A incorrect authorization vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAuthenticator 8.0.0 through 8.0.3, FortiAuthenticator 6.6.0 through 6.6.10 may allow an unauthenticated attacker to bypass authorization checks and gain unauthorized access to restricted functionality.
Fortinet FortiAuthenticator infinite loop
High7.5EPSS 0.30%, higher than 23% of scored CVEsFortinet FortiAuthenticatorCVSS 3.1 · 7.5CWE-835
A loop with unreachable exit condition ('infinite loop') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAuthenticator 8.0.0 through 8.0.3, FortiAuthenticator 6.6.0 through 6.6.10 may allow an attacker to cause a denial of service via crafted TCP requests.
Fortinet FortiManager OS command injection
High7.2EPSS 1.6%, higher than 76% of scored CVEsFortinet FortiManager and 3 moreCVSS 3.1 · 7.2CWE-78
A improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command ('os command injection') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAnalyzer 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiAnalyzer 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiAnalyzer 7.4.0 through 7.4.11, FortiAnalyzer 7.2.0 through 7.2.12, FortiAnalyzer…
Reading the radar
CVSS, KEV and EPSS, briefly.
What is a CVE?
A CVE is a public identifier for one vulnerability in one product, such as CVE-2026-59310. The CVE program assigns it; NVD, run by the US National Institute of Standards and Technology, adds scores, weakness classes and affected product lists.
What does the CVSS score tell me?
CVSS rates how severe a vulnerability is on its own, from 0 to 10, and its vector says how it is reached: over the network or locally, with or without an account, with or without someone clicking. It says nothing about whether anyone is exploiting it. The radar shows the newest CVSS version scored and names it, because version 4.0 and 3.1 scores differ.
What is CISA KEV?
The Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog is CISA's list of CVEs with reliable evidence of exploitation in the wild. US federal agencies must fix each one by its due date, and it is the strongest signal of what to patch first.
What is EPSS?
FIRST's Exploit Prediction Scoring System estimates the probability that a CVE will see exploitation activity in the next 30 days, recomputed daily. Most CVEs score well under 1%, so the radar also shows the percentile: how a CVE ranks against every scored CVE.
How should I prioritise?
Patch what CISA lists as exploited first. Then CVEs with a high EPSS score, then the most severe by CVSS. Within each group, start with whatever is reachable from the internet without an account.
Where do the explanations come from?
Veriom writes them from fixed templates over each record: the weakness class says what went wrong and where in an architecture it lives, the CVSS vector says how it is reached and what it affects, and KEV, EPSS and CISA's assessment say whether it is exploited. Nobody reviews each CVE by hand, so read the description and the references before acting.
How fresh is the data?
New and changed CVEs arrive from NVD every hour, the KEV catalog every six hours and EPSS scores once a day. Each page shows when the data was last updated.
Know where a vulnerable component would sit in your systems.
A CVE names a product. Whether it matters depends on where that product sits in your systems: what reaches it, which trust boundary it guards and what it can reach once compromised. Veriom maps your components, their relationships and your trust boundaries from your code, cloud and delivery evidence, so you can see where a component like this sits. The radar itself does not look at your systems.
Sources
- CVE records and CVSS scores from the NVD CVE API. This product uses the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD.
- Exploitation status from CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.
- Exploit likelihood from FIRST’s Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS), refreshed daily.
- Explanations are written by Veriom from fixed templates over each record’s data, not by a person reviewing each CVE. Descriptions are quoted from the records as published. The radar covers CVEs published since 4 Nov 2026, plus every CVE in the KEV catalog.