Free tool · No sign-in
CVE radar: the latest vulnerabilities, explained.
Every new CVE from NVD, with whether it is exploited in the wild (CISA KEV), how likely it is to be (FIRST EPSS), and what it means for your architecture in plain language.
Updated 15 Nov, 05:24 UTC from NVD, CISA KEV and FIRST EPSSMarkdownRSSJSON Feed
Patch first
Exploited in the wild, newest first.
CISA adds a CVE to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog when attackers are using it. Patch these first, then CVEs with a high EPSS score, then the most severe, starting with anything reachable from the internet.
Check Point Multiple Products Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource Vulnerability
High7.8Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-16EPSS 1.3%, higher than 70% of scored CVEscheckpoint Quantum Security Gateway and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 7.8CWE-732, CWE-862
UnrealIRCd Improper Neutralization of Delimiters Vulnerability
High8.6Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-16EPSS 0.30%, higher than 23% of scored CVEsUnrealIRCdCVSS 3.1 · 8.6CWE-140
Microsoft Office Outlook Missing User Interaction for Potentially Unsafe Action Vulnerability
Medium6.5Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS 1.6%, higher than 76% of scored CVEsMicrosoft Office and 6 moreCVSS 3.1 · 6.5CWE-356
Google Chromium Use-After-Free Vulnerability
High8.8Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS 0.96%, higher than 62% of scored CVEsGoogle Chromium and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-416
Barracuda Networks Email Security Gateway (ESG) Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel Vulnerability
Critical9.3Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-13EPSS 11%, higher than 96% of scored CVEsBarracuda Email Security Gateway (ESG) and 5 moreCVSS 4.0 · 9.3CWE-288
Trends
The last 30 days, by severity.
6,539 CVEs published, 517 of them critical. Many arrive without a score yet: NVD and the reporting organisations add CVSS over the following days.
Show the numbers
| Day | Critical | High | Medium | Low | Not scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 Oct 2026 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 Oct 2026 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 Oct 2026 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 Oct 2026 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1 Nov 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 Nov 2026 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 3 Nov 2026 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 4 Nov 2026 | 35 | 158 | 142 | 29 | 0 |
| 5 Nov 2026 | 55 | 213 | 149 | 36 | 0 |
| 6 Nov 2026 | 41 | 148 | 202 | 47 | 6 |
| 7 Nov 2026 | 54 | 165 | 232 | 10 | 13 |
| 8 Nov 2026 | 23 | 128 | 143 | 26 | 0 |
| 9 Nov 2026 | 32 | 164 | 231 | 42 | 1 |
| 10 Nov 2026 | 117 | 1221 | 623 | 61 | 92 |
| 11 Nov 2026 | 51 | 285 | 237 | 44 | 47 |
| 12 Nov 2026 | 28 | 172 | 129 | 23 | 6 |
| 13 Nov 2026 | 67 | 327 | 337 | 52 | 9 |
| 14 Nov 2026 | 7 | 13 | 12 | 6 | 26 |
| 15 Nov 2026 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 0 |
Exploit likelihood (EPSS), last 30 days
- Under 1%5901
- 1% to 10%217
- 10% to 50%4
- 50% or more3
- Not scored yet414
Most affected vendors, last 30 days
Most common weaknesses, last 30 days
- Cross-site scripting (CWE-79)529
- Missing authorization (CWE-862)387
- Heap-based buffer overflow (CWE-122)364
- Use after free (CWE-416)342
- Insecure direct object reference (CWE-639)232
- Incorrect authorization (CWE-863)214
- Out-of-bounds read (CWE-125)208
- SQL injection (CWE-89)185
- Path traversal (CWE-22)183
- Out-of-bounds write (CWE-787)183
Matching CVEs
2,313 CVEs match these filters, page 33 of 93.
AMD EPYC™ 7003 Series Processors improper signature verification
High8.4EPSS 0.11%, higher than 1% of scored CVEsAMD EPYC™ 7003 Series Processors and 8 moreCVSS 4.0 · 8.4CWE-347
Insufficient verification of data authenticity may allow a local attacker to bypass Secure Debug Unlock (SDU), potentially resulting in unauthorized debug access.
Kong Gateway Enterprise vulnerability
High8.2EPSS 0.45%, higher than 40% of scored CVEsKong Gateway EnterpriseCVSS 4.0 · 8.2CWE-636
The ai-azure-content-safety plugin in Kong Gateway Enterprise skips inspection of request bodies larger than the in-memory body buffer, allowing prompts to bypass input content-safety checks.
Kong Gateway Enterprise vulnerability
High8.7EPSS 0.36%, higher than 30% of scored CVEsKong Gateway Enterprise and 1 moreCVSS 4.0 · 8.7CWE-524
The proxy-cache and proxy-cache-advanced plugins in Kong Gateway Enterprise and Kong AI Gateway omit the request hostname from the cache key which may allow a response cached for a hostname to be served for another.
Kong Gateway Enterprise vulnerability
High8.2EPSS 0.45%, higher than 39% of scored CVEsKong Gateway Enterprise and 1 moreCVSS 4.0 · 8.2CWE-524
The caching plugins in Kong Gateway Enterprise and Kong AI Gateway may serve a response cached for a request carrying an Authorization or Proxy-Authorization to different callers.
Kong Gateway Enterprise vulnerability
High8.3EPSS 0.45%, higher than 39% of scored CVEsKong Gateway Enterprise and 1 moreCVSS 4.0 · 8.3CWE-524
The graphql-proxy-cache-advanced plugin in Kong Gateway Enterprise omits the caller's identity from the cache key, allowing a response cached for one caller to be served to another.
Kong Gateway Enterprise CRLF injection
High7.8EPSS 0.37%, higher than 32% of scored CVEsKong Gateway Enterprise and 1 moreCVSS 4.0 · 7.8CWE-93
Kong Gateway Enterprise and Kong AI Gateway include decoded CR/LF characters from the request path in the X-Forwarded-Prefix header on regex Routes, allowing HTTP header injection and request smuggling to the upstream.
Kong Gateway Enterprise improper authentication
High7.8EPSS 0.34%, higher than 28% of scored CVEsKong Gateway Enterprise and 1 moreCVSS 4.0 · 7.8CWE-287
The SAML plugin in Kong Gateway Enterprise does not enforce AudienceRestriction, allowing a valid assertion issued for another Service Provider to be replayed to authenticate to Kong.
N-able N-central missing authentication
High8.4EPSS 0.20%, higher than 10% of scored CVEsN-able N-centralCVSS 4.0 · 8.4CWE-306
Missing authentication for critical function vulnerability in N-able N-central allows Privilege Escalation. This issue affects N-central: before 2026.4.1.
zephyrproject zephyr out-of-bounds write
High7.8EPSS 0.15%, higher than 5% of scored CVEszephyrproject zephyrCVSS 3.1 · 7.8CWE-787
The simulated EEPROM driver validated access ranges in eeprom_range_is_valid() (drivers/eeprom/eeprom_simulator.c) with a single test, (offset + len) <= config->size. Because offset is a signed off_t and len an unsigned size_t of the same rank, the addition is evaluated in…
zephyrproject zephyr out-of-bounds read
High8.3EPSS 0.35%, higher than 29% of scored CVEszephyrproject zephyrCVSS 3.1 · 8.3CWE-125, CWE-191
The RFCOMM multiplexer control-channel handler in subsys/bluetooth/host/classic/rfcomm.c computed the echo length for a BT_RFCOMM_TEST command as buf->len - 1 and passed it to rfcomm_send_test(), whose length parameter is a uint8_t. A malformed but FCS-valid UIH frame on DLCI 0…
rails vulnerability
High8.8EPSS 0.51%, higher than 44% of scored CVEsrailsCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-646
Active Storage makes it simple to upload and reference files in cloud services and attach those files to Active Record objects. Prior to 8.1.4.1 and 8.0.5.2, ActiveStorage::Blob#open writes a blob to a tempfile whose name carries the extension of the uploaded filename, and…
BeeS Software Solutions ERP insecure direct object reference
High7.1EPSS 0.35%, higher than 30% of scored CVEsBeeS Software Solutions ERPCVSS 4.0 · 7.1CWE-639, CWE-862
BeeS Software Solutions ERP before 04 September 2026 allows any low-privileged user to navigate directly to the administrative dashboard endpoint and gain access to the administrative console, including unrestricted access to institutional, employee, and student data.
N-able N-central download without integrity check
High7.5EPSS 0.17%, higher than 6% of scored CVEsN-able N-centralCVSS 4.0 · 7.5CWE-494
Download of code without integrity check vulnerability in N-able N-central allows Remote Code Inclusion. This issue affects N-central: through 24.6.1.
N-able N-central relative path traversal
High8.6EPSS 0.55%, higher than 46% of scored CVEsN-able N-centralCVSS 4.0 · 8.6CWE-23
Relative path traversal vulnerability in N-able N-central allows Path Traversal. This issue affects N-central: before 26.4.1.
N-able N-central vulnerability
High8.3EPSS 0.47%, higher than 41% of scored CVEsN-able N-centralCVSS 4.0 · 8.3CWE-644
Improper neutralization of HTTP headers for scripting syntax vulnerability in N-able N-central allows Cross-Site Scripting (XSS). This issue affects N-central: before 26.4.1.
N-able N-central incorrect privilege assignment
High8.6EPSS 0.40%, higher than 35% of scored CVEsN-able N-centralCVSS 4.0 · 8.6CWE-266
Incorrect privilege assignment vulnerability in N-able N-central allows Privilege Escalation. This issue affects N-central: before 26.4.1.
N-able N-central cross-site scripting
High8.7EPSS 0.41%, higher than 36% of scored CVEsN-able N-centralCVSS 4.0 · 8.7CWE-79
Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') vulnerability in N-able N-central allows Resource Injection. This issue affects N-central: before 26.4.1.
Kong Gateway Enterprise vulnerability
High8.2EPSS 0.45%, higher than 39% of scored CVEsKong Gateway Enterprise and 1 moreCVSS 4.0 · 8.2CWE-524
The request-callout plugin in Kong Gateway Enterprise and Kong AI Gateway omits callout headers not sent by the client from its cache key, allowing a cached callout response for a caller to be served to another.
Adobe Connect cross-site scripting
High8.7EPSS 0.66%, higher than 52% of scored CVEsAdobe ConnectCVSS 3.1 · 8.7CWE-79
Adobe Connect is affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low-privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim's browser when they browse to the page…
Adobe Connect incorrect authorization
High8.8EPSS 0.87%, higher than 59% of scored CVEsAdobe ConnectCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-863
Adobe Connect is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. A low-privileged attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain elevated access to sensitive information or functionality. Exploitation of this issue does not…
Adobe Connect SQL injection
High8.3EPSS 0.94%, higher than 61% of scored CVEsAdobe ConnectCVSS 3.1 · 8.3CWE-89
Adobe Connect is affected by an Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. A low-privileged attacker could exploit this vulnerability to…
Adobe Connect XML external entity
High7.7EPSS 0.84%, higher than 58% of scored CVEsAdobe ConnectCVSS 3.1 · 7.7CWE-611
Adobe Connect is affected by an Improper Restriction of XML External Entity Reference ('XXE') vulnerability that could lead to arbitrary file system read. A low-privileged attacker could exploit this vulnerability to access sensitive files and directories outside the intended…
Adobe Connect SQL injection
High7.7EPSS 0.75%, higher than 56% of scored CVEsAdobe ConnectCVSS 3.1 · 7.7CWE-89
Adobe Connect is affected by an Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability that could lead to disclosure of sensitive memory. A low-privileged attacker could leverage this vulnerability to disclose sensitive information.…
Adobe Dimension improper input validation
High8.2EPSS 0.31%, higher than 24% of scored CVEsAdobe DimensionCVSS 3.1 · 8.2CWE-20
Dimension is affected by an Improper Input Validation vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. A low-privileged attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code. Exploitation of this issue requires user…
U.S. Geological Survey Area Species Management Research Program unrestricted file upload
High8.7EPSS 0.74%, higher than 55% of scored CVEsU.S. Geological Survey Area Species Management Research ProgramCVSS 4.0 · 8.7CWE-434
U.S. Geological Survey Area Species Management Research Program (ARMI) accepts any uploaded file and stores the file under '/uploads/{upload-file}'. A remote, authenticated attacker could upload a crafted PHP file that executes and returns command output from the server when…
Reading the radar
CVSS, KEV and EPSS, briefly.
What is a CVE?
A CVE is a public identifier for one vulnerability in one product, such as CVE-2026-59310. The CVE program assigns it; NVD, run by the US National Institute of Standards and Technology, adds scores, weakness classes and affected product lists.
What does the CVSS score tell me?
CVSS rates how severe a vulnerability is on its own, from 0 to 10, and its vector says how it is reached: over the network or locally, with or without an account, with or without someone clicking. It says nothing about whether anyone is exploiting it. The radar shows the newest CVSS version scored and names it, because version 4.0 and 3.1 scores differ.
What is CISA KEV?
The Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog is CISA's list of CVEs with reliable evidence of exploitation in the wild. US federal agencies must fix each one by its due date, and it is the strongest signal of what to patch first.
What is EPSS?
FIRST's Exploit Prediction Scoring System estimates the probability that a CVE will see exploitation activity in the next 30 days, recomputed daily. Most CVEs score well under 1%, so the radar also shows the percentile: how a CVE ranks against every scored CVE.
How should I prioritise?
Patch what CISA lists as exploited first. Then CVEs with a high EPSS score, then the most severe by CVSS. Within each group, start with whatever is reachable from the internet without an account.
Where do the explanations come from?
Veriom writes them from fixed templates over each record: the weakness class says what went wrong and where in an architecture it lives, the CVSS vector says how it is reached and what it affects, and KEV, EPSS and CISA's assessment say whether it is exploited. Nobody reviews each CVE by hand, so read the description and the references before acting.
How fresh is the data?
New and changed CVEs arrive from NVD every hour, the KEV catalog every six hours and EPSS scores once a day. Each page shows when the data was last updated.
Know where a vulnerable component would sit in your systems.
A CVE names a product. Whether it matters depends on where that product sits in your systems: what reaches it, which trust boundary it guards and what it can reach once compromised. Veriom maps your components, their relationships and your trust boundaries from your code, cloud and delivery evidence, so you can see where a component like this sits. The radar itself does not look at your systems.
Sources
- CVE records and CVSS scores from the NVD CVE API. This product uses the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD.
- Exploitation status from CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.
- Exploit likelihood from FIRST’s Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS), refreshed daily.
- Explanations are written by Veriom from fixed templates over each record’s data, not by a person reviewing each CVE. Descriptions are quoted from the records as published. The radar covers CVEs published since 4 Nov 2026, plus every CVE in the KEV catalog.