Free tool · No sign-in
CVE radar: the latest vulnerabilities, explained.
Every new CVE from NVD, with whether it is exploited in the wild (CISA KEV), how likely it is to be (FIRST EPSS), and what it means for your architecture in plain language.
Updated 15 Nov, 06:24 UTC from NVD, CISA KEV and FIRST EPSSMarkdownRSSJSON Feed
Patch first
Exploited in the wild, newest first.
CISA adds a CVE to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog when attackers are using it. Patch these first, then CVEs with a high EPSS score, then the most severe, starting with anything reachable from the internet.
Check Point Multiple Products Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource Vulnerability
High7.8Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-16EPSS 2.2%, higher than 83% of scored CVEscheckpoint Quantum Security Gateway and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 7.8CWE-732, CWE-862
UnrealIRCd Improper Neutralization of Delimiters Vulnerability
High8.6Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-16EPSS 0.51%, higher than 44% of scored CVEsUnrealIRCdCVSS 3.1 · 8.6CWE-140
Microsoft Office Outlook Missing User Interaction for Potentially Unsafe Action Vulnerability
Medium6.5Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS 1.6%, higher than 76% of scored CVEsMicrosoft Office and 6 moreCVSS 3.1 · 6.5CWE-356
Google Chromium Use-After-Free Vulnerability
High8.8Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS 0.96%, higher than 62% of scored CVEsGoogle Chromium and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-416
Barracuda Networks Email Security Gateway (ESG) Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel Vulnerability
Critical9.3Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-13EPSS 11%, higher than 96% of scored CVEsBarracuda Email Security Gateway (ESG) and 5 moreCVSS 4.0 · 9.3CWE-288
Trends
The last 30 days, by severity.
6,539 CVEs published, 517 of them critical. Many arrive without a score yet: NVD and the reporting organisations add CVSS over the following days.
Show the numbers
| Day | Critical | High | Medium | Low | Not scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 Oct 2026 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 Oct 2026 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 Oct 2026 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 Oct 2026 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1 Nov 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 Nov 2026 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 3 Nov 2026 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 4 Nov 2026 | 35 | 158 | 142 | 29 | 0 |
| 5 Nov 2026 | 55 | 213 | 149 | 36 | 0 |
| 6 Nov 2026 | 41 | 148 | 202 | 47 | 6 |
| 7 Nov 2026 | 54 | 165 | 232 | 10 | 13 |
| 8 Nov 2026 | 23 | 128 | 143 | 26 | 0 |
| 9 Nov 2026 | 32 | 164 | 231 | 42 | 1 |
| 10 Nov 2026 | 117 | 1221 | 623 | 61 | 92 |
| 11 Nov 2026 | 51 | 285 | 237 | 44 | 47 |
| 12 Nov 2026 | 28 | 172 | 129 | 23 | 6 |
| 13 Nov 2026 | 67 | 327 | 337 | 52 | 9 |
| 14 Nov 2026 | 7 | 13 | 12 | 6 | 26 |
| 15 Nov 2026 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 0 |
Exploit likelihood (EPSS), last 30 days
- Under 1%6252
- 1% to 10%225
- 10% to 50%4
- 50% or more3
- Not scored yet55
Most affected vendors, last 30 days
Most common weaknesses, last 30 days
- Cross-site scripting (CWE-79)529
- Missing authorization (CWE-862)387
- Heap-based buffer overflow (CWE-122)364
- Use after free (CWE-416)342
- Insecure direct object reference (CWE-639)232
- Incorrect authorization (CWE-863)214
- Out-of-bounds read (CWE-125)208
- SQL injection (CWE-89)185
- Path traversal (CWE-22)183
- Out-of-bounds write (CWE-787)183
Matching CVEs
2,313 CVEs match these filters, page 39 of 93.
Google Android protection mechanism failure
High7.8EPSS 0.13%, higher than 2% of scored CVEsGoogle AndroidCVSS 3.1 · 7.8CWE-693
In ac_remove_smmu_prot_internal of acfw_smmu.c, there is a possible Logic error due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with execution privileges needed. User interaction is for exploitation.
Google Android memory buffer error
High8.4EPSS 0.08%, higher than 0% of scored CVEsGoogle AndroidCVSS 3.1 · 8.4CWE-119
In multiple locations, there is a possible way to trigger an out of bounds read and write in shared memory due to an incorrect bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for…
Google Android broken cryptography
High8.4EPSS 0.14%, higher than 4% of scored CVEsGoogle AndroidCVSS 3.1 · 8.4CWE-327
In aes256_cmac_sw of aes.rs, there is a possible way to forge message authentication codes over multi-block messages due to improperly used crypto. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed…
Google Android protection mechanism failure
High8.4EPSS 0.10%, higher than 1% of scored CVEsGoogle AndroidCVSS 3.1 · 8.4CWE-693
In secure_transport_usecase_handshake of secure_transport.c, there is a possible way to bypass secure transport channel encryption due to a logic error. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not…
Google Android memory buffer error
High7.8EPSS 0.08%, higher than 0% of scored CVEsGoogle AndroidCVSS 3.1 · 7.8CWE-119
In TzSharedMemory of TzSharedMemory.c, there is a possible Heap buffer overflow due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with execution privileges needed. User interaction is for exploitation.
Google Android memory buffer error
High7.8EPSS 0.08%, higher than 0% of scored CVEsGoogle AndroidCVSS 3.1 · 7.8CWE-119
In parse_prime256v1 of keymint_asn1.c, there is a possible Heap Buffer Overflow due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with execution privileges needed. User interaction is for exploitation.
Google Android memory buffer error
High8.4EPSS 0.12%, higher than 2% of scored CVEsGoogle AndroidCVSS 3.1 · 8.4CWE-119
In thread_free of thread.c, there is a possible way to corrupt kernel heap metadata on thread creation failure due to memory corruption. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for…
Google Android memory buffer error
High7.8EPSS 0.08%, higher than 0% of scored CVEsGoogle AndroidCVSS 3.1 · 7.8CWE-119
In insert_node of remap.c, there is a possible way to trigger an out of bounds write in the address remapping table due to a non-heap buffer overflow. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for…
Google Android protection mechanism failure
High8.4EPSS 0.13%, higher than 2% of scored CVEsGoogle AndroidCVSS 3.1 · 8.4CWE-693
In N/A of gdmc/gsp/project/gdmc.mk, there is a possible Logic error due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Google Android protection mechanism failure
High8.4EPSS 0.14%, higher than 4% of scored CVEsGoogle AndroidCVSS 3.1 · 8.4CWE-693
In multiple functions of verifier.rs, there is a possible way to bypass secure boot signature verification via fault injection due to a logic error. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed…
BlackBerry Ltd QNX Hypervisor out-of-bounds write
High7.7EPSS 0.12%, higher than 2% of scored CVEsBlackBerry Ltd QNX Hypervisor and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 7.7CWE-787
Invalid Memory Access via the MSI-X table in QVM could allow an attacker in the guest to execute arbitrary code in the QVM to cause memory corruption, information disclosure or a crash of the QVM.
Fortinet FortiSandbox cross-site scripting
High8.8EPSS 0.55%, higher than 47% of scored CVEsFortinet FortiSandbox and 2 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-79
A improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiSandbox 5.0.0 through 5.0.5, FortiSandbox 4.4.0 through 4.4.8, FortiSandbox 4.2 all versions, FortiSandbox Cloud 5.0.4 through 5.0.5, FortiSandbox PaaS 5.0.4…
wintercms winter missing authorization
High8.3EPSS 0.44%, higher than 39% of scored CVEswintercms winterCVSS 3.1 · 8.3CWE-862, CWE-863
Winter CMS is a content management system built on the Laravel PHP framework. Prior to 1.2.14, the ImportExportController behavior applies userHasAccess() only to the import() and export() page actions, while Backend\Classes\Controller::execAjaxHandlers() dispatches onImport(),…
Arista Networks EOS path traversal
High8.7EPSS 0.68%, higher than 53% of scored CVEsArista Networks EOSCVSS 4.0 · 8.7CWE-22
On affected EOS versions with the eAPI service enabled, a specially crafted HTTP request can allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to read arbitrary files, including sensitive credentials from the switch filesystem.
Arista Networks EOS out-of-bounds write
High8.9EPSS 0.54%, higher than 46% of scored CVEsArista Networks EOSCVSS 4.0 · 8.9CWE-787
On affected platforms running Arista EOS with Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) configured to use keyed MD5 or keyed SHA1 authentication, an unauthenticated attacker with network adjacency (direct or multi-hop) to a BFD-enabled interface can send a specially crafted BFD…
Arista Networks EOS out-of-bounds read
High8.3EPSS 0.43%, higher than 37% of scored CVEsArista Networks EOSCVSS 4.0 · 8.3CWE-125
A malformed Error Report can cause EOS to read beyond packet boundaries, potentially terminating the RPKI agent or exposing unintended memory contents through logging.
Arista Networks EOS vulnerability
High8.3EPSS 0.41%, higher than 36% of scored CVEsArista Networks EOSCVSS 4.0 · 8.3CWE-696
A crafted Error Report can leave EOS stuck believing that a cache reset is in progress, preventing ROA publication, withdrawal reconciliation, and BGP origin-validation updates.
Arista Networks EOS vulnerability
High8.3EPSS 0.36%, higher than 30% of scored CVEsArista Networks EOSCVSS 4.0 · 8.3CWE-420
On affected platforms running Arista EOS with Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) changing the BGP listen port from its default value disables default protective Access Control List (ACL) rules against unexpected BGP peering attempts.
Arista Networks EOS vulnerability
High7.7EPSS 0.24%, higher than 15% of scored CVEsArista Networks EOSCVSS 4.0 · 7.7CWE-124
An unauthenticated attacker on an adjacent network segment can send crafted RIPv2 packets to a RIP-enabled interface on the device to trigger the Rip agent crash without providing valid credentials. Repeated exploitation reliably interrupts routing service on the affected…
Arista Networks EOS vulnerability
High8.7EPSS 0.35%, higher than 29% of scored CVEsArista Networks EOSCVSS 4.0 · 8.7CWE-440
On affected platforms running Arista EOS with Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) configured, An unauthenticated attacker who can establish a BGP peering session with an affected device and can send specially crafted BGP messages to cause repeated BGP session resets, enabling…
Arista Networks EOS untrusted input in a security decision
High7.1EPSS 0.16%, higher than 5% of scored CVEsArista Networks EOSCVSS 4.0 · 7.1CWE-807
On affected platforms running Arista EOS with 802.1X with Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) device profiling enabled, a network-adjacent attacker can send a crafted DHCP packet to force the device to record a spoofed device profile. This may potentially allow the…
Arista Networks EOS sensitive data in logs
High7.0EPSS 0.14%, higher than 3% of scored CVEsArista Networks EOSCVSS 4.0 · 7.0CWE-532
On affected platforms running Arista EOS with IEEE 802.1X authentication and MACsec using dynamically derived keys, sensitive authentication information may be recorded in diagnostic data during a Smart Switch Upgrade (SSU). An attacker with administrative access on the device…
MongoDB Server incorrect authorization
High8.6EPSS 0.14%, higher than 3% of scored CVEsMongoDB ServerCVSS 4.0 · 8.6CWE-863
An incorrect authorization check in the MongoDB Server authorization subsystem may allow an unauthenticated party with local host access to obtain administrative privileges on a database server that has authorization enabled. This may result in unintended access to stored data…
MongoDB Server unnecessary privileges
High7.5EPSS 0.36%, higher than 31% of scored CVEsMongoDB ServerCVSS 4.0 · 7.5CWE-250
An improper privilege management issue in the sharding subsystem of MongoDB Server may allow a user holding certain shard-level administrative privileges to cause persisted internal coordination state to be reprocessed with elevated internal authority. Because that state is…
MongoDB Server interpretation conflict
High8.2EPSS 0.18%, higher than 8% of scored CVEsMongoDB ServerCVSS 4.0 · 8.2CWE-436
An issue in MongoDB Server's client-side field-level encryption (CSFLE) schema processing component allows encryption metadata to be silently dropped during schema parsing under certain conditions. A party who can deliver a specially crafted schema to a user's CSFLE client may…
Reading the radar
CVSS, KEV and EPSS, briefly.
What is a CVE?
A CVE is a public identifier for one vulnerability in one product, such as CVE-2026-59310. The CVE program assigns it; NVD, run by the US National Institute of Standards and Technology, adds scores, weakness classes and affected product lists.
What does the CVSS score tell me?
CVSS rates how severe a vulnerability is on its own, from 0 to 10, and its vector says how it is reached: over the network or locally, with or without an account, with or without someone clicking. It says nothing about whether anyone is exploiting it. The radar shows the newest CVSS version scored and names it, because version 4.0 and 3.1 scores differ.
What is CISA KEV?
The Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog is CISA's list of CVEs with reliable evidence of exploitation in the wild. US federal agencies must fix each one by its due date, and it is the strongest signal of what to patch first.
What is EPSS?
FIRST's Exploit Prediction Scoring System estimates the probability that a CVE will see exploitation activity in the next 30 days, recomputed daily. Most CVEs score well under 1%, so the radar also shows the percentile: how a CVE ranks against every scored CVE.
How should I prioritise?
Patch what CISA lists as exploited first. Then CVEs with a high EPSS score, then the most severe by CVSS. Within each group, start with whatever is reachable from the internet without an account.
Where do the explanations come from?
Veriom writes them from fixed templates over each record: the weakness class says what went wrong and where in an architecture it lives, the CVSS vector says how it is reached and what it affects, and KEV, EPSS and CISA's assessment say whether it is exploited. Nobody reviews each CVE by hand, so read the description and the references before acting.
How fresh is the data?
New and changed CVEs arrive from NVD every hour, the KEV catalog every six hours and EPSS scores once a day. Each page shows when the data was last updated.
Know where a vulnerable component would sit in your systems.
A CVE names a product. Whether it matters depends on where that product sits in your systems: what reaches it, which trust boundary it guards and what it can reach once compromised. Veriom maps your components, their relationships and your trust boundaries from your code, cloud and delivery evidence, so you can see where a component like this sits. The radar itself does not look at your systems.
Sources
- CVE records and CVSS scores from the NVD CVE API. This product uses the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD.
- Exploitation status from CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.
- Exploit likelihood from FIRST’s Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS), refreshed daily.
- Explanations are written by Veriom from fixed templates over each record’s data, not by a person reviewing each CVE. Descriptions are quoted from the records as published. The radar covers CVEs published since 4 Nov 2026, plus every CVE in the KEV catalog.