Free tool · No sign-in
CVE radar: the latest vulnerabilities, explained.
Every new CVE from NVD, with whether it is exploited in the wild (CISA KEV), how likely it is to be (FIRST EPSS), and what it means for your architecture in plain language.
Updated 15 Nov, 06:24 UTC from NVD, CISA KEV and FIRST EPSSMarkdownRSSJSON Feed
Patch first
Exploited in the wild, newest first.
CISA adds a CVE to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog when attackers are using it. Patch these first, then CVEs with a high EPSS score, then the most severe, starting with anything reachable from the internet.
Check Point Multiple Products Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource Vulnerability
High7.8Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-16EPSS 2.2%, higher than 83% of scored CVEscheckpoint Quantum Security Gateway and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 7.8CWE-732, CWE-862
UnrealIRCd Improper Neutralization of Delimiters Vulnerability
High8.6Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-16EPSS 0.51%, higher than 44% of scored CVEsUnrealIRCdCVSS 3.1 · 8.6CWE-140
Microsoft Office Outlook Missing User Interaction for Potentially Unsafe Action Vulnerability
Medium6.5Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS 1.6%, higher than 76% of scored CVEsMicrosoft Office and 6 moreCVSS 3.1 · 6.5CWE-356
Google Chromium Use-After-Free Vulnerability
High8.8Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS 0.96%, higher than 62% of scored CVEsGoogle Chromium and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-416
Barracuda Networks Email Security Gateway (ESG) Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel Vulnerability
Critical9.3Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-13EPSS 11%, higher than 96% of scored CVEsBarracuda Email Security Gateway (ESG) and 5 moreCVSS 4.0 · 9.3CWE-288
Trends
The last 30 days, by severity.
6,539 CVEs published, 517 of them critical. Many arrive without a score yet: NVD and the reporting organisations add CVSS over the following days.
Show the numbers
| Day | Critical | High | Medium | Low | Not scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 Oct 2026 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 Oct 2026 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 Oct 2026 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 Oct 2026 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1 Nov 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 Nov 2026 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 3 Nov 2026 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 4 Nov 2026 | 35 | 158 | 142 | 29 | 0 |
| 5 Nov 2026 | 55 | 213 | 149 | 36 | 0 |
| 6 Nov 2026 | 41 | 148 | 202 | 47 | 6 |
| 7 Nov 2026 | 54 | 165 | 232 | 10 | 13 |
| 8 Nov 2026 | 23 | 128 | 143 | 26 | 0 |
| 9 Nov 2026 | 32 | 164 | 231 | 42 | 1 |
| 10 Nov 2026 | 117 | 1221 | 623 | 61 | 92 |
| 11 Nov 2026 | 51 | 285 | 237 | 44 | 47 |
| 12 Nov 2026 | 28 | 172 | 129 | 23 | 6 |
| 13 Nov 2026 | 67 | 327 | 337 | 52 | 9 |
| 14 Nov 2026 | 7 | 13 | 12 | 6 | 26 |
| 15 Nov 2026 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 0 |
Exploit likelihood (EPSS), last 30 days
- Under 1%6252
- 1% to 10%225
- 10% to 50%4
- 50% or more3
- Not scored yet55
Most affected vendors, last 30 days
Most common weaknesses, last 30 days
- Cross-site scripting (CWE-79)529
- Missing authorization (CWE-862)387
- Heap-based buffer overflow (CWE-122)364
- Use after free (CWE-416)342
- Insecure direct object reference (CWE-639)232
- Incorrect authorization (CWE-863)214
- Out-of-bounds read (CWE-125)208
- SQL injection (CWE-89)185
- Path traversal (CWE-22)183
- Out-of-bounds write (CWE-787)183
Matching CVEs
2,313 CVEs match these filters, page 40 of 93.
MongoDB Server allocation without limits
High7.1EPSS 0.31%, higher than 24% of scored CVEsMongoDB ServerCVSS 4.0 · 7.1CWE-770
An issue in MongoDB server’s aggregation framework allows an authenticated user with read privileges to cause a denial of service by sending specially crafted aggregate commands using an internal expression. Despite its internal naming, this expression is registered as…
MongoDB Server unchecked unusual condition
High7.5EPSS 0.23%, higher than 14% of scored CVEsMongoDB ServerCVSS 4.0 · 7.5CWE-754
A flaw in MongoDB’s X.509 cluster-membership authentication guard could allow a holder of a cluster-member certificate to gain elevated internal privileges when a specific deployment configuration is in use. An internal check, which prevents a certificate recognized as a…
MongoDB Server incomplete cleanup
High7.0EPSS 0.24%, higher than 16% of scored CVEsMongoDB ServerCVSS 4.0 · 7.0CWE-459
A flaw in MongoDB Server's user management commands may lead to incomplete cleanup of role authorization data when roles are dropped from a database. Due to incorrect internal query predicates, the drop operation removes role definitions but fails to remove stale references in…
MongoDB Server resource never released
High8.2EPSS 0.55%, higher than 47% of scored CVEsMongoDB ServerCVSS 4.0 · 8.2CWE-772
A flaw exists in the server-side SSPI Kerberos authentication handler on Windows Enterprise builds of MongoDB. When processing certain authentication requests, the server fails to properly release an underlying system resource due to an internal tracking error. An…
MongoDB Server use after free
High7.1EPSS 0.37%, higher than 31% of scored CVEsMongoDB ServerCVSS 4.0 · 7.1CWE-416
A use-after-free issue exists in MongoDB’s SBE (Slot-Based Execution) implementation of a window function accumulator used by certain $setWindowFields aggregation pipelines. Under specific conditions, the accumulator can retain a dangling pointer to memory that has since been…
moby SwarmKit unintended proxy
High7.7EPSS 0.21%, higher than 12% of scored CVEsmoby SwarmKit and 2 moreCVSS 4.0 · 7.7CWE-441
SwarmKit's Cluster-API proxy can overwrite a forwarded client's TLS identity with an intermediary manager's identity. WithMetadataForwardTLSInfo replaces outgoing metadata with a copy of the incoming metadata, discarding the redirect guard's changes when built with grpc-go 1.39…
Docker Engine protection mechanism failure
High7.0EPSS 0.31%, higher than 24% of scored CVEsDocker Engine and 1 moreCVSS 4.0 · 7.0CWE-693
Moby's overlay network driver does not restore the iptables rules for encrypted overlay networks after firewalld deletes them. Unlike other Docker Engine networking components, the overlay driver does not handle firewalld reload or start signals over D-Bus. The missing rules…
wpeverest Everest Forms path traversal
High7.5EPSS 0.64%, higher than 51% of scored CVEswpeverest Everest Forms – Contact Form, Payment Form, Quiz, Survey & Custom Form Builder with AICVSS 3.1 · 7.5CWE-22
The Everest Forms plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Arbitrary File Read in all versions up to, and including, 3.6.3 via the attach_entry_files() function. This is due to the function attaching any entry field value whose meta key matches /signature_/ to the notification…
worklenz SQL injection
High7.1EPSS 0.31%, higher than 24% of scored CVEsworklenzCVSS 4.0 · 7.1CWE-89
Worklenz before 3.3.0 contains an SQL injection vulnerability in the reporting members endpoints that allows authenticated attackers to read arbitrary database contents by injecting SQL through the projects and status parameters. Attackers can send crafted values to POST…
Google Android protection mechanism failure
High7.8EPSS 0.12%, higher than 2% of scored CVEsGoogle AndroidCVSS 3.1 · 7.8CWE-693
In event_set_sub of acropora_event.c, there is a possible Logic error due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with execution privileges needed. User interaction is for exploitation.
Google Android protection mechanism failure
High8.4EPSS 0.15%, higher than 4% of scored CVEsGoogle AndroidCVSS 3.1 · 8.4CWE-693
In multiple locations, there is a possible way to bypass key authorization policies during wrapped key import due to a logic error. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Google Android vulnerability
High8.4EPSS 0.10%, higher than 1% of scored CVEsGoogle AndroidCVSS 3.1 · 8.4CWE-489
In multiple functions of Android.bp, there is a possible way to bind to a privileged debug overlay service due to test or debugging code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for…
Fortinet FortiManager path traversal
High8.1EPSS 0.72%, higher than 54% of scored CVEsFortinet FortiManager and 2 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.1CWE-22
An improper limitation of a pathname to a restricted directory ('path traversal') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAnalyzer 7.6.0 through 7.6.4, FortiAnalyzer 7.4.0 through 7.4.7, FortiAnalyzer 7.2.0 through 7.2.11, FortiManager 7.6.0 through 7.6.4, FortiManager 7.4.0 through…
Microsoft Windows 10 type confusion
High7.8EPSS 0.34%, higher than 28% of scored CVEsMicrosoft Windows 10 Version 1607 and 9 moreCVSS 3.1 · 7.8CWE-843
Access of resource using incompatible type ('type confusion') in Windows Shell allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.
Microsoft Windows 10 out-of-bounds read
High7.5EPSS 0.27%, higher than 19% of scored CVEsMicrosoft Windows 10 Version 1809 and 9 moreCVSS 3.1 · 7.5CWE-125
Out-of-bounds read in Windows VMSwitch allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.
Microsoft Windows 10 null pointer dereference
High7.0EPSS 0.26%, higher than 18% of scored CVEsMicrosoft Windows 10 Version 21H2 and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 7.0CWE-476
Null pointer dereference in Windows USM Communication Manager allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.
Microsoft Windows 10 use after free
High7.0EPSS 0.26%, higher than 18% of scored CVEsMicrosoft Windows 10 Version 1607 and 9 moreCVSS 3.1 · 7.0CWE-416
Use after free in Winsock allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.
Microsoft Windows 10 heap-based buffer overflow
High7.5EPSS 0.57%, higher than 48% of scored CVEsMicrosoft Windows 10 Version 1607 and 9 moreCVSS 3.1 · 7.5CWE-122, CWE-763
Release of invalid pointer or reference in Windows Performance Monitor allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.
Microsoft Windows 10 use after free
High7.0EPSS 0.26%, higher than 18% of scored CVEsMicrosoft Windows 10 Version 1607 and 9 moreCVSS 3.1 · 7.0CWE-416
Use after free in Windows Credential User Interface allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.
Microsoft Windows 10 use after free
High7.0EPSS 0.27%, higher than 19% of scored CVEsMicrosoft Windows 10 Version 1809 and 9 moreCVSS 3.1 · 7.0CWE-416
Use after free in Windows Encrypting File System (EFS) allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.
Microsoft Windows Server 2016 out-of-bounds read
High7.5EPSS 0.97%, higher than 63% of scored CVEsMicrosoft Windows Server 2016 and 6 moreCVSS 3.1 · 7.5CWE-125
Out-of-bounds read in Windows DNS allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.
Microsoft Windows 10 use after free
High7.0EPSS 0.27%, higher than 19% of scored CVEsMicrosoft Windows 10 Version 1607 and 9 moreCVSS 3.1 · 7.0CWE-416
Use after free in Windows NetBIOS allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.
Microsoft Windows 10 double free
High7.0EPSS 0.29%, higher than 21% of scored CVEsMicrosoft Windows 10 Version 21H2 and 9 moreCVSS 3.1 · 7.0CWE-415
Double free in Windows TCP/IP allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.
Microsoft Windows 10 missing authorization
High7.8EPSS 0.30%, higher than 24% of scored CVEsMicrosoft Windows 10 Version 1607 and 9 moreCVSS 3.1 · 7.8CWE-862
Improper authorization in Windows Task Scheduler allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.
Microsoft Windows 10 heap-based buffer overflow
High7.8EPSS 0.34%, higher than 28% of scored CVEsMicrosoft Windows 10 Version 1607 and 9 moreCVSS 3.1 · 7.8CWE-122
Heap-based buffer overflow in Windows Modern Device Management (MDM) allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.
Reading the radar
CVSS, KEV and EPSS, briefly.
What is a CVE?
A CVE is a public identifier for one vulnerability in one product, such as CVE-2026-59310. The CVE program assigns it; NVD, run by the US National Institute of Standards and Technology, adds scores, weakness classes and affected product lists.
What does the CVSS score tell me?
CVSS rates how severe a vulnerability is on its own, from 0 to 10, and its vector says how it is reached: over the network or locally, with or without an account, with or without someone clicking. It says nothing about whether anyone is exploiting it. The radar shows the newest CVSS version scored and names it, because version 4.0 and 3.1 scores differ.
What is CISA KEV?
The Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog is CISA's list of CVEs with reliable evidence of exploitation in the wild. US federal agencies must fix each one by its due date, and it is the strongest signal of what to patch first.
What is EPSS?
FIRST's Exploit Prediction Scoring System estimates the probability that a CVE will see exploitation activity in the next 30 days, recomputed daily. Most CVEs score well under 1%, so the radar also shows the percentile: how a CVE ranks against every scored CVE.
How should I prioritise?
Patch what CISA lists as exploited first. Then CVEs with a high EPSS score, then the most severe by CVSS. Within each group, start with whatever is reachable from the internet without an account.
Where do the explanations come from?
Veriom writes them from fixed templates over each record: the weakness class says what went wrong and where in an architecture it lives, the CVSS vector says how it is reached and what it affects, and KEV, EPSS and CISA's assessment say whether it is exploited. Nobody reviews each CVE by hand, so read the description and the references before acting.
How fresh is the data?
New and changed CVEs arrive from NVD every hour, the KEV catalog every six hours and EPSS scores once a day. Each page shows when the data was last updated.
Know where a vulnerable component would sit in your systems.
A CVE names a product. Whether it matters depends on where that product sits in your systems: what reaches it, which trust boundary it guards and what it can reach once compromised. Veriom maps your components, their relationships and your trust boundaries from your code, cloud and delivery evidence, so you can see where a component like this sits. The radar itself does not look at your systems.
Sources
- CVE records and CVSS scores from the NVD CVE API. This product uses the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD.
- Exploitation status from CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.
- Exploit likelihood from FIRST’s Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS), refreshed daily.
- Explanations are written by Veriom from fixed templates over each record’s data, not by a person reviewing each CVE. Descriptions are quoted from the records as published. The radar covers CVEs published since 4 Nov 2026, plus every CVE in the KEV catalog.