Free tool · No sign-in
CVE radar: the latest vulnerabilities, explained.
Every new CVE from NVD, with whether it is exploited in the wild (CISA KEV), how likely it is to be (FIRST EPSS), and what it means for your architecture in plain language.
Updated 15 Nov, 07:24 UTC from NVD, CISA KEV and FIRST EPSSMarkdownRSSJSON Feed
Patch first
Exploited in the wild, newest first.
CISA adds a CVE to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog when attackers are using it. Patch these first, then CVEs with a high EPSS score, then the most severe, starting with anything reachable from the internet.
Check Point Multiple Products Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource Vulnerability
High7.8Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-16EPSS 2.2%, higher than 83% of scored CVEscheckpoint Quantum Security Gateway and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 7.8CWE-732, CWE-862
UnrealIRCd Improper Neutralization of Delimiters Vulnerability
High8.6Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-16EPSS 0.51%, higher than 44% of scored CVEsUnrealIRCdCVSS 3.1 · 8.6CWE-140
Microsoft Office Outlook Missing User Interaction for Potentially Unsafe Action Vulnerability
Medium6.5Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS 1.6%, higher than 76% of scored CVEsMicrosoft Office and 6 moreCVSS 3.1 · 6.5CWE-356
Google Chromium Use-After-Free Vulnerability
High8.8Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS 0.96%, higher than 62% of scored CVEsGoogle Chromium and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-416
Barracuda Networks Email Security Gateway (ESG) Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel Vulnerability
Critical9.3Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-13EPSS 11%, higher than 96% of scored CVEsBarracuda Email Security Gateway (ESG) and 5 moreCVSS 4.0 · 9.3CWE-288
Trends
The last 30 days, by severity.
6,551 CVEs published, 517 of them critical. Many arrive without a score yet: NVD and the reporting organisations add CVSS over the following days.
Show the numbers
| Day | Critical | High | Medium | Low | Not scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 Oct 2026 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 Oct 2026 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 Oct 2026 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 Oct 2026 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1 Nov 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 Nov 2026 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 3 Nov 2026 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 4 Nov 2026 | 35 | 158 | 142 | 29 | 0 |
| 5 Nov 2026 | 55 | 213 | 149 | 36 | 0 |
| 6 Nov 2026 | 41 | 148 | 202 | 47 | 6 |
| 7 Nov 2026 | 54 | 165 | 232 | 10 | 13 |
| 8 Nov 2026 | 23 | 128 | 143 | 26 | 0 |
| 9 Nov 2026 | 32 | 164 | 231 | 42 | 1 |
| 10 Nov 2026 | 117 | 1221 | 623 | 61 | 92 |
| 11 Nov 2026 | 51 | 285 | 237 | 44 | 47 |
| 12 Nov 2026 | 28 | 172 | 129 | 23 | 6 |
| 13 Nov 2026 | 67 | 327 | 337 | 52 | 9 |
| 14 Nov 2026 | 7 | 13 | 12 | 6 | 26 |
| 15 Nov 2026 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 12 |
Exploit likelihood (EPSS), last 30 days
- Under 1%6252
- 1% to 10%225
- 10% to 50%4
- 50% or more3
- Not scored yet67
Most affected vendors, last 30 days
Most common weaknesses, last 30 days
- Cross-site scripting (CWE-79)529
- Missing authorization (CWE-862)387
- Heap-based buffer overflow (CWE-122)364
- Use after free (CWE-416)342
- Insecure direct object reference (CWE-639)232
- Incorrect authorization (CWE-863)214
- Out-of-bounds read (CWE-125)208
- SQL injection (CWE-89)185
- Path traversal (CWE-22)183
- Out-of-bounds write (CWE-787)183
Matching CVEs
2,313 CVEs match these filters, page 48 of 93.
Microsoft Windows Server 2016 use after free
High7.5EPSS 0.48%, higher than 42% of scored CVEsMicrosoft Windows Server 2016 and 6 moreCVSS 3.1 · 7.5CWE-416
Use after free in Remote Desktop Gateway Service allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.
Microsoft Windows Server 2016 use after free
High8.1EPSS 0.67%, higher than 53% of scored CVEsMicrosoft Windows Server 2016 and 6 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.1CWE-416
Use after free in Windows DHCP Server allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.
Microsoft Windows 10 memory leak
High7.5EPSS 1.1%, higher than 66% of scored CVEsMicrosoft Windows 10 Version 1607 and 9 moreCVSS 3.1 · 7.5CWE-401
Missing release of memory after effective lifetime in Windows Kerberos allows an unauthorized attacker to deny service over a network.
Microsoft Windows 10 use after free
High7.0EPSS 0.29%, higher than 21% of scored CVEsMicrosoft Windows 10 Version 1607 and 9 moreCVSS 3.1 · 7.0CWE-416
Use after free in Windows Local Security Authority Subsystem Service (LSASS) allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.
Microsoft Windows 11 weak authentication
High7.8EPSS 0.29%, higher than 21% of scored CVEsMicrosoft Windows 11 Version 24H2 and 3 moreCVSS 3.1 · 7.8CWE-1390
Weak authentication in Windows Bind Filter Driver allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.
Microsoft Windows 10 use after free
High7.0EPSS 0.31%, higher than 24% of scored CVEsMicrosoft Windows 10 Version 1607 and 9 moreCVSS 3.1 · 7.0CWE-416
Use after free in Microsoft Bluetooth Driver allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.
Microsoft Visual Studio Code untrusted search path
High8.8EPSS 0.72%, higher than 54% of scored CVEsMicrosoft Visual Studio CodeCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-426
Untrusted search path in Visual Studio Code allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.
Microsoft JDBC Driver for SQL Server 13.4 improper signature verification
High8.7EPSS 0.30%, higher than 23% of scored CVEsMicrosoft JDBC Driver for SQL Server 13.4CVSS 3.1 · 8.7CWE-347
Improper verification of cryptographic signature in JDBC Driver for SQL Server allows an unauthorized attacker to bypass a security feature over a network.
Microsoft Teams for Android origin validation error
High7.5EPSS 0.39%, higher than 34% of scored CVEsMicrosoft Teams for AndroidCVSS 3.1 · 7.5CWE-346
Origin validation error in Microsoft Teams for Android allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.
Microsoft Windows Server 2016 use after free
High7.0EPSS 0.27%, higher than 19% of scored CVEsMicrosoft Windows Server 2016 and 6 moreCVSS 3.1 · 7.0CWE-416
Use after free in Remote Desktop Gateway Service allows an authorized attacker to execute code locally.
Microsoft Windows Server 2016 use after free
High7.4EPSS 0.28%, higher than 21% of scored CVEsMicrosoft Windows Server 2016 and 6 moreCVSS 3.1 · 7.4CWE-416
Use after free in Remote Desktop Gateway Service allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally.
Microsoft SQL Server 2025 CU10 heap-based buffer overflow
High8.8EPSS 0.96%, higher than 62% of scored CVEsMicrosoft SQL Server 2025 CU10 and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-122
Heap-based buffer overflow in SQL Server allows an authorized attacker to execute code over a network.
Microsoft SQL Server 2017 (GDR) heap-based buffer overflow
High8.8EPSS 0.77%, higher than 56% of scored CVEsMicrosoft SQL Server 2017 (GDR) and 7 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-122
Heap-based buffer overflow in SQL Server allows an authorized attacker to execute code over a network.
Microsoft SQL Server 2017 (GDR) heap-based buffer overflow
High8.8EPSS 0.93%, higher than 61% of scored CVEsMicrosoft SQL Server 2017 (GDR) and 7 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-122
Heap-based buffer overflow in SQL Server allows an authorized attacker to execute code over a network.
Microsoft SQL Server 2017 (GDR) heap-based buffer overflow
High8.8EPSS 0.93%, higher than 61% of scored CVEsMicrosoft SQL Server 2017 (GDR) and 7 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-122
Heap-based buffer overflow in SQL Server allows an authorized attacker to execute code over a network.
Microsoft SQL Server 2017 (GDR) untrusted pointer dereference
High8.8EPSS 1.0%, higher than 64% of scored CVEsMicrosoft SQL Server 2017 (GDR) and 7 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-822
Untrusted pointer dereference in SQL Server allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.
Microsoft SQL Server 2025 for x64-based Systems (GDR) stack-based buffer overflow
High8.8EPSS 0.86%, higher than 59% of scored CVEsMicrosoft SQL Server 2025 for x64-based Systems (GDR)CVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-121
Stack-based buffer overflow in SQL Server allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.
Microsoft SQL Server 2017 (GDR) heap-based buffer overflow
High8.8EPSS 0.82%, higher than 58% of scored CVEsMicrosoft SQL Server 2017 (GDR) and 7 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-122
Heap-based buffer overflow in SQL Server allows an authorized attacker to execute code over a network.
Microsoft SQL Server 2025 CU10 heap-based buffer overflow
High8.8EPSS 0.82%, higher than 58% of scored CVEsMicrosoft SQL Server 2025 CU10 and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-122
Heap-based buffer overflow in SQL Server allows an authorized attacker to execute code over a network.
Microsoft SQL Server 2017 (GDR) out-of-bounds read
High8.1EPSS 0.72%, higher than 54% of scored CVEsMicrosoft SQL Server 2017 (GDR) and 7 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.1CWE-125
Out-of-bounds read in SQL Server allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.
Microsoft Microsoft.Data.SqlClient 6.1 capture-replay
High7.4EPSS 0.65%, higher than 52% of scored CVEsMicrosoft Microsoft.Data.SqlClient 6.1 and 2 moreCVSS 3.1 · 7.4CWE-294
Authentication bypass by capture-replay in SQL Server allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.
BlackBerry Ltd QNX Software Development Platform heap-based buffer overflow
High7.4EPSS 0.11%, higher than 1% of scored CVEsBlackBerry Ltd QNX Software Development PlatformCVSS 3.1 · 7.4CWE-122
Heap-based Buffer Overflow in the io-char library's DCMD_CHR_WAITINFO devctl() handler could allow an attacker with local access to cause data tampering, arbitrary code execution, or a crash in the Character I/O device driver.
BlackBerry Ltd QNX Software Development Platform heap-based buffer overflow
High8.4EPSS 0.13%, higher than 2% of scored CVEsBlackBerry Ltd QNX Software Development Platform and 2 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.4CWE-122
Heap-based Buffer Overflow in the DCMD_PROC_EVENT handler of the procnto could allow an attacker with local access to cause an information disclosure, data tampering or a crash of the QNX Neutrino kernel.
TianoCore EDK2 out-of-bounds write
High7.0EPSS 0.12%, higher than 2% of scored CVEsTianoCore EDK2CVSS 4.0 · 7.0CWE-787
EDK2 contains vulnerabilities in BIOS where skilled and privileged users or attackers may cause “Out-of-bounds Write” by local access. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could compromise SMM handler integrity, cause system instability, and lead to denial of service.…
digitalbazaar forge improper certificate validation
High7.4EPSS 0.23%, higher than 14% of scored CVEsdigitalbazaar forgeCVSS 3.1 · 7.4CWE-295
Forge (also called node-forge) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. Prior to 1.4.3, pki.verifyCertificateChain() in lib/x509.js does not decode or enforce the X.509 nameConstraints extension while validating certificate paths. A name-constrained…
Reading the radar
CVSS, KEV and EPSS, briefly.
What is a CVE?
A CVE is a public identifier for one vulnerability in one product, such as CVE-2026-59310. The CVE program assigns it; NVD, run by the US National Institute of Standards and Technology, adds scores, weakness classes and affected product lists.
What does the CVSS score tell me?
CVSS rates how severe a vulnerability is on its own, from 0 to 10, and its vector says how it is reached: over the network or locally, with or without an account, with or without someone clicking. It says nothing about whether anyone is exploiting it. The radar shows the newest CVSS version scored and names it, because version 4.0 and 3.1 scores differ.
What is CISA KEV?
The Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog is CISA's list of CVEs with reliable evidence of exploitation in the wild. US federal agencies must fix each one by its due date, and it is the strongest signal of what to patch first.
What is EPSS?
FIRST's Exploit Prediction Scoring System estimates the probability that a CVE will see exploitation activity in the next 30 days, recomputed daily. Most CVEs score well under 1%, so the radar also shows the percentile: how a CVE ranks against every scored CVE.
How should I prioritise?
Patch what CISA lists as exploited first. Then CVEs with a high EPSS score, then the most severe by CVSS. Within each group, start with whatever is reachable from the internet without an account.
Where do the explanations come from?
Veriom writes them from fixed templates over each record: the weakness class says what went wrong and where in an architecture it lives, the CVSS vector says how it is reached and what it affects, and KEV, EPSS and CISA's assessment say whether it is exploited. Nobody reviews each CVE by hand, so read the description and the references before acting.
How fresh is the data?
New and changed CVEs arrive from NVD every hour, the KEV catalog every six hours and EPSS scores once a day. Each page shows when the data was last updated.
Know where a vulnerable component would sit in your systems.
A CVE names a product. Whether it matters depends on where that product sits in your systems: what reaches it, which trust boundary it guards and what it can reach once compromised. Veriom maps your components, their relationships and your trust boundaries from your code, cloud and delivery evidence, so you can see where a component like this sits. The radar itself does not look at your systems.
Sources
- CVE records and CVSS scores from the NVD CVE API. This product uses the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD.
- Exploitation status from CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.
- Exploit likelihood from FIRST’s Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS), refreshed daily.
- Explanations are written by Veriom from fixed templates over each record’s data, not by a person reviewing each CVE. Descriptions are quoted from the records as published. The radar covers CVEs published since 4 Nov 2026, plus every CVE in the KEV catalog.