Free tool · No sign-in
CVE radar: the latest vulnerabilities, explained.
Every new CVE from NVD, with whether it is exploited in the wild (CISA KEV), how likely it is to be (FIRST EPSS), and what it means for your architecture in plain language.
Updated 15 Nov, 10:24 UTC from NVD, CISA KEV and FIRST EPSSMarkdownRSSJSON Feed
Patch first
Exploited in the wild, newest first.
CISA adds a CVE to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog when attackers are using it. Patch these first, then CVEs with a high EPSS score, then the most severe, starting with anything reachable from the internet.
Check Point Multiple Products Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource Vulnerability
High7.8Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-16EPSS 2.2%, higher than 83% of scored CVEscheckpoint Quantum Security Gateway and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 7.8CWE-732, CWE-862
UnrealIRCd Improper Neutralization of Delimiters Vulnerability
High8.6Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-16EPSS 0.51%, higher than 44% of scored CVEsUnrealIRCdCVSS 3.1 · 8.6CWE-140
Microsoft Office Outlook Missing User Interaction for Potentially Unsafe Action Vulnerability
Medium6.5Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS 1.6%, higher than 76% of scored CVEsMicrosoft Office and 6 moreCVSS 3.1 · 6.5CWE-356
Google Chromium Use-After-Free Vulnerability
High8.8Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS 0.96%, higher than 62% of scored CVEsGoogle Chromium and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-416
Barracuda Networks Email Security Gateway (ESG) Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel Vulnerability
Critical9.3Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-13EPSS 11%, higher than 96% of scored CVEsBarracuda Email Security Gateway (ESG) and 5 moreCVSS 4.0 · 9.3CWE-288
Trends
The last 30 days, by severity.
6,557 CVEs published, 519 of them critical. Many arrive without a score yet: NVD and the reporting organisations add CVSS over the following days.
Show the numbers
| Day | Critical | High | Medium | Low | Not scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 Oct 2026 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 Oct 2026 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 Oct 2026 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 Oct 2026 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1 Nov 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 Nov 2026 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 3 Nov 2026 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 4 Nov 2026 | 35 | 158 | 142 | 29 | 0 |
| 5 Nov 2026 | 55 | 213 | 149 | 36 | 0 |
| 6 Nov 2026 | 41 | 148 | 202 | 47 | 6 |
| 7 Nov 2026 | 54 | 165 | 232 | 10 | 13 |
| 8 Nov 2026 | 23 | 128 | 143 | 26 | 0 |
| 9 Nov 2026 | 32 | 164 | 231 | 42 | 1 |
| 10 Nov 2026 | 117 | 1221 | 623 | 61 | 92 |
| 11 Nov 2026 | 51 | 285 | 237 | 44 | 47 |
| 12 Nov 2026 | 28 | 172 | 129 | 23 | 6 |
| 13 Nov 2026 | 67 | 327 | 337 | 52 | 9 |
| 14 Nov 2026 | 7 | 13 | 12 | 6 | 26 |
| 15 Nov 2026 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 12 |
Exploit likelihood (EPSS), last 30 days
- Under 1%6252
- 1% to 10%225
- 10% to 50%4
- 50% or more3
- Not scored yet73
Most affected vendors, last 30 days
Most common weaknesses, last 30 days
- Cross-site scripting (CWE-79)529
- Missing authorization (CWE-862)387
- Heap-based buffer overflow (CWE-122)364
- Use after free (CWE-416)342
- Insecure direct object reference (CWE-639)232
- Incorrect authorization (CWE-863)215
- Out-of-bounds read (CWE-125)208
- SQL injection (CWE-89)187
- Path traversal (CWE-22)183
- Out-of-bounds write (CWE-787)183
Matching CVEs
2,313 CVEs match these filters, page 77 of 93.
Mozilla Firefox use after free
High8.8EPSS 0.40%, higher than 34% of scored CVEsMozilla Firefox and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-416
Use-after-free in the DOM: HTML Parser component. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox 160, Firefox ESR 115.45, Firefox ESR 153.7, Thunderbird 160, and Thunderbird 153.7.
Mozilla Firefox use after free
High8.8EPSS 0.38%, higher than 33% of scored CVEsMozilla Firefox and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-416
Use-after-free in the DOM: Core & HTML component. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox 160, Firefox ESR 153.7, Thunderbird 160, and Thunderbird 153.7.
Mozilla Firefox use after free
High8.8EPSS 0.40%, higher than 34% of scored CVEsMozilla Firefox and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-416
Use-after-free in the Audio/Video component. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox 160, Firefox ESR 115.45, Firefox ESR 153.7, Thunderbird 160, and Thunderbird 153.7.
Mozilla Firefox use after free
High8.8EPSS 0.40%, higher than 34% of scored CVEsMozilla Firefox and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-416
Use-after-free in the DOM: HTML Parser component. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox 160, Firefox ESR 115.45, Firefox ESR 153.7, Thunderbird 160, and Thunderbird 153.7.
Mozilla Firefox use after free
High8.8EPSS 0.40%, higher than 34% of scored CVEsMozilla Firefox and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-416
Use-after-free in the Graphics: Canvas2D component. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox 160, Firefox ESR 115.45, Firefox ESR 153.7, Thunderbird 160, and Thunderbird 153.7.
Mozilla Firefox classic buffer overflow
High8.8EPSS 0.39%, higher than 34% of scored CVEsMozilla Firefox and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-120
Incorrect boundary conditions in the Networking: HTTP component. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox 160, Firefox ESR 153.7, Thunderbird 160, and Thunderbird 153.7.
Mozilla Firefox improper privilege management
High8.8EPSS 0.18%, higher than 8% of scored CVEsMozilla Firefox and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-269
Privilege escalation in the DOM: Navigation component. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox 160, Firefox ESR 153.7, Thunderbird 160, and Thunderbird 153.7.
Mozilla Firefox classic buffer overflow
High8.8EPSS 0.38%, higher than 32% of scored CVEsMozilla Firefox and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-120
Incorrect boundary conditions in the Graphics: CanvasWebGL component. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox 160 and Thunderbird 160.
Red Hat Edge Manager 1 vulnerability
High7.5EPSS 0.34%, higher than 28% of scored CVEsRed Hat Edge Manager 1CVSS 3.1 · 7.5CWE-1322
A flaw was found in flightctl. A TLS handshake is performed synchronously in the HTTP server’s connection-context callback without a deadline. A network-reachable unauthenticated client can stall the handshake and prevent the affected listener from accepting new connections.
TÜBİTAK BİLGEM Software Technologies Research Institute pardus-nvidia-installer vulnerability
High7.0EPSS 0.19%, higher than 9% of scored CVEsTÜBİTAK BİLGEM Software Technologies Research Institute pardus-nvidia-installerCVSS 3.1 · 7.0CWE-183
Permissive list of allowed inputs vulnerability in TÜBİTAK BİLGEM Software Technologies Research Institute pardus-nvidia-installer allows Privilege Escalation. This issue affects pardus-nvidia-installer: before 2.0.1.
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 out-of-bounds write
High7.5EPSS 0.29%, higher than 22% of scored CVEsRed Hat Enterprise Linux 6 and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 7.5CWE-787
A flaw was found in BusyBox. When resuming a download over File Transfer Protocol (FTP), the wget utility fails to verify that the resume offset does not exceed the file size reported by the server, resulting in an integer calculation error. A malicious FTP server or an on-path…
TÜBİTAK BİLGEM Software Technologies Research Institute eta-remote incorrect default permissions
High7.8EPSS 0.10%, higher than 1% of scored CVEsTÜBİTAK BİLGEM Software Technologies Research Institute eta-remoteCVSS 3.1 · 7.8CWE-276
Incorrect default permissions vulnerability in TÜBİTAK BİLGEM Software Technologies Research Institute eta-remote allows Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs. This issue affects eta-remote: from 0.0.2 before 0.0.3.
Siemens SIMATIC WinCC vulnerability
High8.5EPSS 0.13%, higher than 2% of scored CVEsSiemens SIMATIC WinCC V7.5 and 2 moreCVSS 4.0 · 8.5CWE-357
A vulnerability has been identified in SIMATIC WinCC V7.5 (All versions), SIMATIC WinCC V8.0 (All versions), SIMATIC WinCC V8.1 (All versions). Affected devices implicitly execute active content when opening files. This could allow an attacker to make the user execute arbitrary…
Siemens SIMATIC BATCH weak authentication
High7.7EPSS 0.34%, higher than 28% of scored CVEsSiemens SIMATIC BATCH V9.1 and 9 moreCVSS 4.0 · 7.7CWE-1390
A vulnerability has been identified in SIMATIC BATCH V9.1 (All versions), SIMATIC Information Server 2020 (All versions), SIMATIC Information Server 2022 (All versions), SIMATIC PCS 7 V9.1 (All versions), SIMATIC Process Historian 2020 (All versions), SIMATIC Process Historian…
Zohocorp DDI Central cross-site scripting
High8.1EPSS 0.87%, higher than 59% of scored CVEsZohocorp DDI CentralCVSS 3.1 · 8.1CWE-79
Zoho Corporation ManageEngine DDI Central versions 6200 and below are vulnerable to Server-side HTML/JavaScript injection in analytics PDF generation leading to local file disclosure.
Zohocorp DDI Central command injection
High8.8EPSS 3.2%, higher than 88% of scored CVEsZohocorp DDI CentralCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-77
Zoho Corporation ManageEngine DDI Central versions 6200 and below are vulnerable to Cisco IOS command injection via DHCP pool name leading to arbitrary commands on managed Cisco routers.
Zohocorp DDI Central SQL injection
High7.2EPSS 3.4%, higher than 89% of scored CVEsZohocorp DDI CentralCVSS 3.1 · 7.2CWE-89
Zoho Corporation ManageEngine DDI Central version below 6201 is vulnerable to SQL injection in HA replication username handling leading to command execution as the PostgreSQL service account.
Zohocorp DDI Central missing authorization
High7.6EPSS 0.42%, higher than 37% of scored CVEsZohocorp DDI CentralCVSS 3.1 · 7.6CWE-862
Zoho Corporation ManageEngine DDI Central versions 6200 and below are vulnerable to LDAP bind password exposure through insufficiently protected LDAP settings API.
7-Zip out-of-bounds write
High8.5EPSS 0.18%, higher than 8% of scored CVEs7-ZipCVSS 4.0 · 8.5CWE-787
7-Zip before 26.06 contains a heap out-of-bounds write vulnerability in the LZX decoder that lets attackers corrupt memory when a continuation CAB volume declares a smaller window. Attackers can entice victims to extract crafted multi-volume CAB archives, where a stale _pos…
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 out-of-bounds read
High7.5EPSS 0.52%, higher than 45% of scored CVEsRed Hat Enterprise Linux 10 and 4 moreCVSS 3.1 · 7.5CWE-125
A flaw was found in GStreamer's gst-plugins-base RTCP SDES packet parser. A remote sender able to reach an active media session can supply a malformed SDES entry whose declared length exceeds the received packet. Missing bounds validation can cause the receiver to read beyond…
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 out-of-bounds write
High7.1EPSS 0.29%, higher than 21% of scored CVEsRed Hat Enterprise Linux 10 and 4 moreCVSS 3.1 · 7.1CWE-787
A flaw was found in GStreamer's MXF demuxer. When an application processes a crafted MXF file, an off-by-one bounds check can allow a one-byte write past the logical end of a temporal offset array. This may corrupt memory and cause the application to crash. The extent of the…
Eclipse CSI otterdog OS command injection
High8.8EPSS 1.1%, higher than 66% of scored CVEsEclipse CSI otterdogCVSS 4.0 · 8.8CWE-78
OS command injection in the pass and bitwarden credential providers in Eclipse Foundation Eclipse Otterdog through 1.7.1 allows a user able to modify an organization configuration to execute arbitrary commands with the privileges of the operator running otterdog, including…
Siemens meta-iot2050 OS command injection
High7.0EPSS 0.17%, higher than 7% of scored CVEsSiemens meta-iot2050CVSS 4.0 · 7.0CWE-78
A vulnerability has been identified in meta-iot2050 (All versions >= V01.03.01). Affected devices take parts from a configuration file and execute them unchecked. This could allow an attacker which is able to manipulate the configuration file to make the user execute arbitrary…
Siemens ROS# code injection
High8.6EPSS 0.12%, higher than 2% of scored CVEsSiemens ROS#CVSS 4.0 · 8.6CWE-94
A vulnerability has been identified in ROS# (All versions < V2.3.1). Affected systems do not properly escape text of message definition files. This could allow an attacker that is able to pass a crafted message definition file to the user to inject arbitrary code into the…
Zohocorp DDI Central missing authentication
High7.5EPSS 1.3%, higher than 71% of scored CVEsZohocorp DDI CentralCVSS 3.1 · 7.5CWE-306
Zoho Corporation ManageEngine DDI Central versions 6500 and below are vulnerable to an unauthenticated GSS-TSIG keytab update vulnerability in the Linux Node Agent.
Reading the radar
CVSS, KEV and EPSS, briefly.
What is a CVE?
A CVE is a public identifier for one vulnerability in one product, such as CVE-2026-59310. The CVE program assigns it; NVD, run by the US National Institute of Standards and Technology, adds scores, weakness classes and affected product lists.
What does the CVSS score tell me?
CVSS rates how severe a vulnerability is on its own, from 0 to 10, and its vector says how it is reached: over the network or locally, with or without an account, with or without someone clicking. It says nothing about whether anyone is exploiting it. The radar shows the newest CVSS version scored and names it, because version 4.0 and 3.1 scores differ.
What is CISA KEV?
The Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog is CISA's list of CVEs with reliable evidence of exploitation in the wild. US federal agencies must fix each one by its due date, and it is the strongest signal of what to patch first.
What is EPSS?
FIRST's Exploit Prediction Scoring System estimates the probability that a CVE will see exploitation activity in the next 30 days, recomputed daily. Most CVEs score well under 1%, so the radar also shows the percentile: how a CVE ranks against every scored CVE.
How should I prioritise?
Patch what CISA lists as exploited first. Then CVEs with a high EPSS score, then the most severe by CVSS. Within each group, start with whatever is reachable from the internet without an account.
Where do the explanations come from?
Veriom writes them from fixed templates over each record: the weakness class says what went wrong and where in an architecture it lives, the CVSS vector says how it is reached and what it affects, and KEV, EPSS and CISA's assessment say whether it is exploited. Nobody reviews each CVE by hand, so read the description and the references before acting.
How fresh is the data?
New and changed CVEs arrive from NVD every hour, the KEV catalog every six hours and EPSS scores once a day. Each page shows when the data was last updated.
Know where a vulnerable component would sit in your systems.
A CVE names a product. Whether it matters depends on where that product sits in your systems: what reaches it, which trust boundary it guards and what it can reach once compromised. Veriom maps your components, their relationships and your trust boundaries from your code, cloud and delivery evidence, so you can see where a component like this sits. The radar itself does not look at your systems.
Sources
- CVE records and CVSS scores from the NVD CVE API. This product uses the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD.
- Exploitation status from CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.
- Exploit likelihood from FIRST’s Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS), refreshed daily.
- Explanations are written by Veriom from fixed templates over each record’s data, not by a person reviewing each CVE. Descriptions are quoted from the records as published. The radar covers CVEs published since 4 Nov 2026, plus every CVE in the KEV catalog.