Free tool · No sign-in
CVE radar: the latest vulnerabilities, explained.
Every new CVE from NVD, with whether it is exploited in the wild (CISA KEV), how likely it is to be (FIRST EPSS), and what it means for your architecture in plain language.
Updated 15 Nov, 12:25 UTC from NVD, CISA KEV and FIRST EPSSMarkdownRSSJSON Feed
Patch first
Exploited in the wild, newest first.
CISA adds a CVE to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog when attackers are using it. Patch these first, then CVEs with a high EPSS score, then the most severe, starting with anything reachable from the internet.
Check Point Multiple Products Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource Vulnerability
High7.8Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-16EPSS 2.2%, higher than 83% of scored CVEscheckpoint Quantum Security Gateway and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 7.8CWE-732, CWE-862
UnrealIRCd Improper Neutralization of Delimiters Vulnerability
High8.6Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-16EPSS 0.51%, higher than 44% of scored CVEsUnrealIRCdCVSS 3.1 · 8.6CWE-140
Microsoft Office Outlook Missing User Interaction for Potentially Unsafe Action Vulnerability
Medium6.5Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS 1.6%, higher than 76% of scored CVEsMicrosoft Office and 6 moreCVSS 3.1 · 6.5CWE-356
Google Chromium Use-After-Free Vulnerability
High8.8Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS 0.96%, higher than 62% of scored CVEsGoogle Chromium and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-416
Barracuda Networks Email Security Gateway (ESG) Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel Vulnerability
Critical9.3Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-13EPSS 11%, higher than 96% of scored CVEsBarracuda Email Security Gateway (ESG) and 5 moreCVSS 4.0 · 9.3CWE-288
Trends
The last 30 days, by severity.
6,559 CVEs published, 519 of them critical. Many arrive without a score yet: NVD and the reporting organisations add CVSS over the following days.
Show the numbers
| Day | Critical | High | Medium | Low | Not scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 Oct 2026 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 Oct 2026 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 Oct 2026 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 Oct 2026 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1 Nov 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 Nov 2026 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 3 Nov 2026 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 4 Nov 2026 | 35 | 158 | 142 | 29 | 0 |
| 5 Nov 2026 | 55 | 213 | 149 | 36 | 0 |
| 6 Nov 2026 | 41 | 148 | 202 | 47 | 6 |
| 7 Nov 2026 | 54 | 165 | 232 | 10 | 13 |
| 8 Nov 2026 | 23 | 128 | 143 | 26 | 0 |
| 9 Nov 2026 | 32 | 164 | 231 | 42 | 1 |
| 10 Nov 2026 | 117 | 1221 | 623 | 61 | 92 |
| 11 Nov 2026 | 51 | 285 | 237 | 44 | 47 |
| 12 Nov 2026 | 28 | 172 | 129 | 23 | 6 |
| 13 Nov 2026 | 67 | 327 | 337 | 52 | 9 |
| 14 Nov 2026 | 7 | 13 | 12 | 6 | 26 |
| 15 Nov 2026 | 4 | 8 | 5 | 4 | 12 |
Exploit likelihood (EPSS), last 30 days
- Under 1%6252
- 1% to 10%225
- 10% to 50%4
- 50% or more3
- Not scored yet75
Most affected vendors, last 30 days
Most common weaknesses, last 30 days
- Cross-site scripting (CWE-79)529
- Missing authorization (CWE-862)387
- Heap-based buffer overflow (CWE-122)364
- Use after free (CWE-416)342
- Insecure direct object reference (CWE-639)232
- Incorrect authorization (CWE-863)215
- Out-of-bounds read (CWE-125)208
- SQL injection (CWE-89)187
- Path traversal (CWE-22)184
- Out-of-bounds write (CWE-787)183
Matching CVEs
2,313 CVEs match these filters, page 88 of 93.
Limit Login Attempts Security improper authentication
High7.5EPSS 0.24%, higher than 16% of scored CVEsLimit Login Attempts SecurityCVSS 3.1 · 7.5CWE-287
The Limit Login Attempts Security WordPress plugin before 3.4.1 does not confirm that its two-factor authentication step succeeded before completing a login and treats a failure to build that step as success, so an attacker who holds a protected user's password can bypass the…
Limit Login Attempts Security improper authentication
High7.5EPSS 0.23%, higher than 14% of scored CVEsLimit Login Attempts SecurityCVSS 3.1 · 7.5CWE-287
The Limit Login Attempts Security WordPress plugin before 3.4.1 does not enforce its two-factor authentication on every password-authentication route, so an attacker who already knows a protected user's password can authenticate through an alternative login interface and obtain…
Mail Debug for WooCommerce information exposure
High7.5EPSS 0.29%, higher than 22% of scored CVEsMail Debug for WooCommerceCVSS 3.1 · 7.5CWE-200
The Mail Debug for WooCommerce WordPress plugin through 1.3.0 does not perform any capability, authentication, or nonce check on one of its email-logging actions, which is exposed to unauthenticated users and is not restricted to its own data, allowing anyone to read the full…
mView 豆瓣电影 unrestricted file upload
High8.8EPSS 0.41%, higher than 35% of scored CVEsmView 豆瓣电影CVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-434
The mView 豆瓣电影 WordPress plugin through 1.0.3 does not validate the type, name, or source of a remotely fetched file, nor perform any capability or authorization check, before saving it to a web-accessible directory, allowing any authenticated user such as a subscriber to…
AZEXO Store Locator unrestricted file upload
High8.8EPSS 0.41%, higher than 35% of scored CVEsAZEXO Store LocatorCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-434
The AZEXO Store Locator WordPress plugin through 1.4 does not perform capability or nonce checks on its AJAX actions and does not sanitise a request header used to build a file path, allowing any authenticated user such as a subscriber to write a file with an arbitrary name,…
D-Link DIR-878 classic buffer overflow
High7.7EPSS 0.54%, higher than 46% of scored CVEsD-Link DIR-878CVSS 4.0 · 7.7CWE-119, CWE-120
A security flaw has been discovered in D-Link DIR-878 1.20B05. Affected by this vulnerability is the function SetWanSettings of the component HNAP Handler. The manipulation of the argument Primary/Secondary results in buffer overflow. The attack may be launched remotely. The…
D-Link DIR-878 classic buffer overflow
High7.7EPSS 0.54%, higher than 46% of scored CVEsD-Link DIR-878CVSS 4.0 · 7.7CWE-119, CWE-120
A vulnerability was identified in D-Link DIR-878 1.20B05. Affected is the function SetWanSettings of the component HNAP Handler. The manipulation of the argument ConfigDNS/Primary/ConfigDNS/Secondary leads to buffer overflow. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit is…
D-Link DIR-878 stack-based buffer overflow
High7.7EPSS 0.54%, higher than 46% of scored CVEsD-Link DIR-878CVSS 4.0 · 7.7CWE-119, CWE-121
A vulnerability was determined in D-Link DIR-878 1.20B05. This impacts the function SetVLANSettings of the file prog.cgi of the component HNAP Handler. Executing a manipulation of the argument VID can lead to stack-based buffer overflow. The attack can be launched remotely. The…
NEC Corporation WebSAM WinShare incorrect default permissions
High8.5EPSS 0.17%, higher than 6% of scored CVEsNEC Corporation WebSAM WinShareCVSS 4.0 · 8.5CWE-276
Improper Access Control in the program installation folder in NEC Corporation WebSAM Winshare Ver 7.5.0 and earlier (excluding Ver 7.3.3), Ver 7.6.0 and Ver 7.7.0 through 7.7.1 on Windows allows a locally authenticated low-privileged attacker to execute arbitrary code with…
D-Link DIR-878 heap-based buffer overflow
High8.9EPSS 0.72%, higher than 55% of scored CVEsD-Link DIR-878CVSS 4.0 · 8.9CWE-119, CWE-122
A vulnerability was found in D-Link DIR-878 1.20B05. This affects the function GetCAPTCHAsetting of the file bin/prog.cgi of the component HNAP Handler. Performing a manipulation of the argument uid results in heap-based buffer overflow. The attack can be initiated remotely.…
IBM SevOne Network Performance Management uncontrolled resource consumption
High7.5EPSS 0.32%, higher than 25% of scored CVEsIBM SevOne Network Performance ManagementCVSS 3.1 · 7.5CWE-400
IBM SevOne Network Performance Management 7.0.0 through 8.2.2 could allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service due to uncontrolled resource consumption.
IBM webMethods Integration Server improper authentication
High8.1EPSS 0.32%, higher than 26% of scored CVEsIBM webMethods Integration ServerCVSS 3.1 · 8.1CWE-287
IBM webMethods Integration Server 12.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper authentication.
IBM Bob Shell code injection
High8.8EPSS 0.29%, higher than 22% of scored CVEsIBM Bob ShellCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-94
IBM Bob 1.0.4 through 2.0.1 could allow a remote attacker to inject arbitrary code on the system, due to the improper control of user input code.
IBM Langflow OSS path traversal
High8.1EPSS 0.39%, higher than 34% of scored CVEsIBM Langflow OSS and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.1CWE-22
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.2 An authenticated flow author could write attacker-controlled file content into any directory writable by the service account, bypassing the platform's local file access isolation safeguard. Via a crafted on-disk index, the attacker could…
IBM Hibernate Validator uncontrolled resource consumption
High7.5EPSS 0.33%, higher than 26% of scored CVEsIBM Hibernate ValidatorCVSS 3.1 · 7.5CWE-400
Hibernate Validator could allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service due to uncontrolled resource consumption resulting from improper escaping of user-controlled data in Expression Language (EL) expressions.
IBM Security Verify Directory session fixation
High8.8EPSS 0.32%, higher than 26% of scored CVEsIBM Security Verify Directory and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-384
IBM Security Verify Directory 10.0.0 through 10.0.4 and IBM Verify Directory 11.0.0 is vulnerable to session fixation. An attacker can establish a session and, after the victim authenticates, hijack the authenticated session to gain unauthorized access to the directory…
IBM Storage TS4500 Library improper authorization
High8.1EPSS 0.30%, higher than 23% of scored CVEsIBM Storage TS4500 LibraryCVSS 3.1 · 8.1CWE-285
IBM Storage TS4500 Library 1.1.1.6 through 1.12.0.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to perform unauthorized account takeover due to improper authorization.
IBM CockroachDB PostgreSQL for IBM VPC improper privilege management
High7.1EPSS 0.14%, higher than 3% of scored CVEsIBM CockroachDB PostgreSQL for IBM VPCCVSS 3.1 · 7.1CWE-269
IBM CockroachDB PostgreSQL for IBM VPC 26.2.0 through 26.2.3, 25.4.0 through 25.4.12, and 25.2.0 through 25.2.20 is vulnerable to privilege escalation via user-defined function.
IBM App Connect Enterprise incorrect authorization
High7.5EPSS 0.49%, higher than 43% of scored CVEsIBM App Connect EnterpriseCVSS 3.1 · 7.5CWE-863
IBM App Connect Enterprise 13.0.1.0 through 13.0.8.2 could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information due to broken access control.
IBM webMethods Integration Server improper authentication
High8.8EPSS 0.37%, higher than 31% of scored CVEsIBM webMethods Integration ServerCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-287
IBM webMethods Integration Server 12.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper authentication.
IBM Qiskit SDK out-of-bounds write
High8.4EPSS 0.17%, higher than 6% of scored CVEsIBM Qiskit SDKCVSS 3.1 · 8.4CWE-787
IBM Qiskit SDK 2.4.0 through 2.6.1 could allow a local attacker to execute arbitrary code due to an out-of-bounds write caused by improper input validation when accessing a corrupted unitary matrix.
IBM Qiskit SDK deserialization of untrusted data
High8.4EPSS 0.25%, higher than 17% of scored CVEsIBM Qiskit SDKCVSS 3.1 · 8.4CWE-502
IBM Qiskit SDK 1.4.2 through 2.6.2 could allow a local attacker to execute arbitrary code due to deserialization of untrusted data.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform code injection
High8.8EPSS 0.57%, higher than 48% of scored CVEsIBM TRIRIGA Application PlatformCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-94
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.9 IBM TRIRIGA could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data server-side request forgery
High7.7EPSS 0.25%, higher than 16% of scored CVEsIBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for DataCVSS 3.1 · 7.7CWE-918
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability.
IBM QRadar cross-site scripting
High8.1EPSS 0.22%, higher than 12% of scored CVEsIBM QRadarCVSS 3.1 · 8.1CWE-79
IBM QRadar 7.5.0 through 7.5.0 Update Pack 16 Interim Fix 02, and 7.6.0.0 through 7.6.0.5 is vulnerable to Reflected XSS. A victim must open a specifically crafted URL while authenticated to QRadar to trigger this.
Reading the radar
CVSS, KEV and EPSS, briefly.
What is a CVE?
A CVE is a public identifier for one vulnerability in one product, such as CVE-2026-59310. The CVE program assigns it; NVD, run by the US National Institute of Standards and Technology, adds scores, weakness classes and affected product lists.
What does the CVSS score tell me?
CVSS rates how severe a vulnerability is on its own, from 0 to 10, and its vector says how it is reached: over the network or locally, with or without an account, with or without someone clicking. It says nothing about whether anyone is exploiting it. The radar shows the newest CVSS version scored and names it, because version 4.0 and 3.1 scores differ.
What is CISA KEV?
The Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog is CISA's list of CVEs with reliable evidence of exploitation in the wild. US federal agencies must fix each one by its due date, and it is the strongest signal of what to patch first.
What is EPSS?
FIRST's Exploit Prediction Scoring System estimates the probability that a CVE will see exploitation activity in the next 30 days, recomputed daily. Most CVEs score well under 1%, so the radar also shows the percentile: how a CVE ranks against every scored CVE.
How should I prioritise?
Patch what CISA lists as exploited first. Then CVEs with a high EPSS score, then the most severe by CVSS. Within each group, start with whatever is reachable from the internet without an account.
Where do the explanations come from?
Veriom writes them from fixed templates over each record: the weakness class says what went wrong and where in an architecture it lives, the CVSS vector says how it is reached and what it affects, and KEV, EPSS and CISA's assessment say whether it is exploited. Nobody reviews each CVE by hand, so read the description and the references before acting.
How fresh is the data?
New and changed CVEs arrive from NVD every hour, the KEV catalog every six hours and EPSS scores once a day. Each page shows when the data was last updated.
Know where a vulnerable component would sit in your systems.
A CVE names a product. Whether it matters depends on where that product sits in your systems: what reaches it, which trust boundary it guards and what it can reach once compromised. Veriom maps your components, their relationships and your trust boundaries from your code, cloud and delivery evidence, so you can see where a component like this sits. The radar itself does not look at your systems.
Sources
- CVE records and CVSS scores from the NVD CVE API. This product uses the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD.
- Exploitation status from CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.
- Exploit likelihood from FIRST’s Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS), refreshed daily.
- Explanations are written by Veriom from fixed templates over each record’s data, not by a person reviewing each CVE. Descriptions are quoted from the records as published. The radar covers CVEs published since 4 Nov 2026, plus every CVE in the KEV catalog.