Free tool · No sign-in
CVE radar: the latest vulnerabilities, explained.
Every new CVE from NVD, with whether it is exploited in the wild (CISA KEV), how likely it is to be (FIRST EPSS), and what it means for your architecture in plain language.
Updated 11 Nov, 20:27 UTC from NVD, CISA KEV and FIRST EPSSMarkdownRSSJSON Feed
Patch first
Exploited in the wild, newest first.
CISA adds a CVE to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog when attackers are using it. Patch these first, then CVEs with a high EPSS score, then the most severe, starting with anything reachable from the internet.
Microsoft Office Outlook Missing User Interaction for Potentially Unsafe Action Vulnerability
Medium6.5Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS not scored yetMicrosoft Office and 6 moreCVSS 3.1 · 6.5CWE-356
Google Chromium Use-After-Free Vulnerability
High8.8Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS not scored yetGoogle Chromium and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-416
Barracuda Networks Email Security Gateway (ESG) Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel Vulnerability
Critical9.3Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-13EPSS 1.6%, higher than 76% of scored CVEsBarracuda Email Security Gateway (ESG)CVSS 4.0 · 9.3CWE-288
Barracuda Networks Multiple Products OS Command Injection Vulnerability
High8.6Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-13EPSS 1.1%, higher than 65% of scored CVEsBarracuda Email Security Gateway (ESG) and 5 moreCVSS 4.0 · 8.6CWE-78
Openwave Messaging Limited Webtop Media Transcoder Incorrect Resource Transfer Between Spheres Vulnerability
Medium4.3Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS 0.27%, higher than 20% of scored CVEsOpenwave Messaging Limited Webtop Media Transcoder and 2 moreCVSS 3.1 · 4.3CWE-669
Trends
The last 30 days, by severity.
5,087 CVEs published, 367 of them critical. Many arrive without a score yet: NVD and the reporting organisations add CVSS over the following days.
Show the numbers
| Day | Critical | High | Medium | Low | Not scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13 Oct 2026 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 Oct 2026 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 Oct 2026 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 Oct 2026 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 Oct 2026 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 Oct 2026 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 Oct 2026 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1 Nov 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 Nov 2026 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 3 Nov 2026 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 4 Nov 2026 | 35 | 158 | 138 | 32 | 1 |
| 5 Nov 2026 | 55 | 213 | 148 | 36 | 1 |
| 6 Nov 2026 | 40 | 146 | 205 | 47 | 6 |
| 7 Nov 2026 | 57 | 161 | 232 | 11 | 13 |
| 8 Nov 2026 | 23 | 128 | 143 | 26 | 0 |
| 9 Nov 2026 | 22 | 149 | 218 | 42 | 39 |
| 10 Nov 2026 | 103 | 1150 | 590 | 43 | 230 |
| 11 Nov 2026 | 23 | 133 | 197 | 29 | 44 |
Exploit likelihood (EPSS), last 30 days
- Under 1%713
- 1% to 10%25
- 10% to 50%2
- 50% or more7
- Not scored yet4340
Most affected vendors, last 30 days
Most common weaknesses, last 30 days
- Cross-site scripting (CWE-79)394
- Heap-based buffer overflow (CWE-122)344
- Missing authorization (CWE-862)281
- Use after free (CWE-416)280
- Insecure direct object reference (CWE-639)179
- Out-of-bounds read (CWE-125)173
- Server-side request forgery (CWE-918)155
- Incorrect authorization (CWE-863)140
- Path traversal (CWE-22)136
- Out-of-bounds write (CWE-787)133
Matching CVEs
6,839 CVEs match these filters, page 122 of 274.
IBM Security Verify Directory information exposure
Medium4.3EPSS not scored yetIBM Security Verify Directory and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 4.3CWE-200
IBM Security Verify Directory 10.0.0 through 10.0.4 and IBM Verify Directory 11.0.0 exposes debug endpoints that disclose system information including server versions and session identifiers. This information can be used to identify vulnerable software versions.
IBM Security Verify Directory cross-site request forgery
Low3.5EPSS not scored yetIBM Security Verify Directory and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 3.5CWE-352
IBM Security Verify Directory 10.0.0 through 10.0.4 and IBM Verify Directory 11.0.0 does not set the SameSite attribute on session cookies, making it vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attacks. An attacker can cause authenticated users' browsers to send…
IBM Security Verify Directory session fixation
High8.8EPSS not scored yetIBM Security Verify Directory and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-384
IBM Security Verify Directory 10.0.0 through 10.0.4 and IBM Verify Directory 11.0.0 is vulnerable to session fixation. An attacker can establish a session and, after the victim authenticates, hijack the authenticated session to gain unauthorized access to the directory…
IBM Guardium Data Protection path traversal
Low3.1EPSS not scored yetIBM Guardium Data ProtectionCVSS 3.1 · 3.1CWE-22
IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2.4 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to improper limitation of a pathname to a restricted directory.
IBM Guardium Data Protection cross-site request forgery
Medium6.5EPSS not scored yetIBM Guardium Data ProtectionCVSS 3.1 · 6.5CWE-352
IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2.4 could allow a remote attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper validation of CSRF tokens for GET requests.
IBM Guardium Data Protection improper input validation
Low3.1EPSS not scored yetIBM Guardium Data ProtectionCVSS 3.1 · 3.1CWE-20
IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2.4 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to improper input validation.
IBM Guardium Data Protection SQL injection
Medium5.6EPSS not scored yetIBM Guardium Data ProtectionCVSS 3.1 · 5.6CWE-89
IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2.4 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary SQL commands due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an SQL command.
IBM Guardium Data Protection argument injection
Medium6.7EPSS not scored yetIBM Guardium Data ProtectionCVSS 3.1 · 6.7CWE-88
IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2.4 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands due to improper neutralization of argument delimiters.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data path traversal
Medium6.4EPSS not scored yetIBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for DataCVSS 3.1 · 6.4CWE-22
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to delete arbitrary files due to path traversal.
IBM Sterling B2B Integrator sensitive data in logs
Medium4.9EPSS not scored yetIBM Sterling B2B Integrator and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 4.9CWE-532
IBM Sterling B2B Integrator 6.2.1.0 through 6.2.1.2_1, 6.2.2.0 - 6.2.2.1_1 and IBM Sterling File Gateway 6.2.1.0 through 6.2.1.2_1, 6.2.2.0 - 6.2.2.1_1 Standard Edition could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to improper logging of…
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data XML external entity
Medium5.0EPSS not scored yetIBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for DataCVSS 3.1 · 5.0CWE-611
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM WebSphere Application Server - Liberty unsafe reflection
Medium4.3EPSS not scored yetIBM WebSphere Application Server - LibertyCVSS 3.1 · 4.3CWE-470
IBM WebSphere Application Server Liberty 17.0.0.3 through 26.0.0.10 is affected by an information disclosure vulnerability due to unsafe class reflection in the JMX REST connector body parser.
IBM Guardium Key Lifecycle Manager broken cryptography
Medium6.8EPSS not scored yetIBM Guardium Key Lifecycle ManagerCVSS 3.1 · 6.8CWE-327
IBM Guardium Key Lifecycle Manager 4.1, 4.1.1, 4.2, 4.2.1, 5.0, and 5.1 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to the use of a weak cryptographic algorithm.
IBM i missing authorization
Medium4.8EPSS not scored yetIBM iCVSS 3.1 · 4.8CWE-862
IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information from the Host-Based Printer Subsystem due to no authorization check. A bad actor could use this vulnerability to print files they should not be able to access.
IBM Content Navigator LDAP injection
Medium4.3EPSS not scored yetIBM Content NavigatorCVSS 3.1 · 4.3CWE-90
IBM Content Navigator 3.0.15.0, 26.0.0.0, 3.1.0.0, and 3.2.0.0 is vulnerable to LDAP injection. A remote authenticated attacker could send a specially crafted request that could allow enumeration of LDAP directory information.
IBM Concert OS command injection
Critical9.8EPSS not scored yetIBM ConcertCVSS 3.1 · 9.8CWE-78
IBM Concert 1.0 through 3.0.1.1 allows an attacker can supply crafted input that is incorporated into an operating system command without adequate validation or sanitization. Successful exploitation allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying…
IBM Cloud Pak for Data System incorrect privilege assignment
Medium6.5EPSS not scored yetIBM Cloud Pak for Data SystemCVSS 3.1 · 6.5CWE-266
IBM Cloud Pak for Data System 11.3.1.2 Interim Fix 001 through - 11.3.1.2 Interim Fix 002 could allow a user with administrative privileges to read and write arbitrary files on the system due to incorrect permission assignments.
IBM watsonx Orchestrate Cartridge for Cloud Pak for Data improper access control
Medium4.3EPSS not scored yetIBM watsonx Orchestrate Cartridge for Cloud Pak for DataCVSS 3.1 · 4.3CWE-284
IBM watsonx Orchestrate Cartridge for Cloud Pak for Data 4.8.4 through 4.8.5, and 5.0.0 through 5.4.2 allows low-privileged users to execute administrative functions by directly invoking backend APIs.As a result, UI-level access restrictions are ineffective, as the backend…
IBM watsonx Orchestrate Cartridge for Cloud Pak for Data missing authorization
Medium6.5EPSS not scored yetIBM watsonx Orchestrate Cartridge for Cloud Pak for DataCVSS 3.1 · 6.5CWE-862
IBM watsonx Orchestrate Cartridge for Cloud Pak for Data 4.8.4 through 4.8.5, and 5.0.0 through 5.4.2 fails to enforce backend authorization checks, allowing low‑privileged users to directly invoke administrative API endpoints. This bypasses UI‑level access restrictions and may…
IBM Sterling B2B Integrator improper authorization
Medium4.3EPSS not scored yetIBM Sterling B2B Integrator and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 4.3CWE-285
IBM Sterling B2B Integrator 6.2.1.0 through 6.2.1.2_1 and 6.2.2.0 through 6.2.2.1_1, and IBM Sterling File Gateway 6.2.1.0 through 6.2.1.2_1 and 6.2.2.0 through 6.2.2.1_1 Standard Edition could allow a remote authenticated attacker to access unauthorized pages due to improper…
IBM Storage TS4500 Library improper authorization
High8.1EPSS not scored yetIBM Storage TS4500 LibraryCVSS 3.1 · 8.1CWE-285
IBM Storage TS4500 Library 1.1.1.6 through 1.12.0.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to perform unauthorized account takeover due to improper authorization.
IBM CockroachDB PostgreSQL for IBM VPC improper privilege management
High7.1EPSS not scored yetIBM CockroachDB PostgreSQL for IBM VPCCVSS 3.1 · 7.1CWE-269
IBM CockroachDB PostgreSQL for IBM VPC 26.2.0 through 26.2.3, 25.4.0 through 25.4.12, and 25.2.0 through 25.2.20 is vulnerable to privilege escalation via user-defined function.
IBM Storage Scale System authentication bypass by alternate path
Medium6.0EPSS not scored yetIBM Storage Scale System and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 6.0CWE-288
IBM Storage Scale System 6.2.3.0 through 6.2.3.6, and 7.0.0.0 through 7.0.1.0 and IBM Storage Scale 6.0.0.0 through 6.0.1.0, and 5.2.3.0 through 5.2.3.8 could allow an attacker to leverage an undocumented flag to gain access to an unauthenticated path in the REST API.
IBM Sterling File Gateway protection mechanism failure
Medium6.5EPSS not scored yetIBM Sterling File GatewayCVSS 3.1 · 6.5CWE-693
IBM Sterling File Gateway 6.2.1.0 through 6.2.1.2_1 and 6.2.2.0 - 6.2.2.1_1 could allow a remote attacker to perform protocol downgrade attacks due to a security misconfiguration.
IBM CockroachDB PostgreSQL for IBM VPC server-side request forgery
Medium5.4EPSS not scored yetIBM CockroachDB PostgreSQL for IBM VPCCVSS 3.1 · 5.4CWE-918
IBM CockroachDB PostgreSQL for IBM VPC 26.2.0 through 26.2.3, 25.4.0 through 25.4.12, and 25.2.0 through 25.2.20 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to…
Reading the radar
CVSS, KEV and EPSS, briefly.
What is a CVE?
A CVE is a public identifier for one vulnerability in one product, such as CVE-2026-59310. The CVE program assigns it; NVD, run by the US National Institute of Standards and Technology, adds scores, weakness classes and affected product lists.
What does the CVSS score tell me?
CVSS rates how severe a vulnerability is on its own, from 0 to 10, and its vector says how it is reached: over the network or locally, with or without an account, with or without someone clicking. It says nothing about whether anyone is exploiting it. The radar shows the newest CVSS version scored and names it, because version 4.0 and 3.1 scores differ.
What is CISA KEV?
The Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog is CISA's list of CVEs with reliable evidence of exploitation in the wild. US federal agencies must fix each one by its due date, and it is the strongest signal of what to patch first.
What is EPSS?
FIRST's Exploit Prediction Scoring System estimates the probability that a CVE will see exploitation activity in the next 30 days, recomputed daily. Most CVEs score well under 1%, so the radar also shows the percentile: how a CVE ranks against every scored CVE.
How should I prioritise?
Patch what CISA lists as exploited first. Then CVEs with a high EPSS score, then the most severe by CVSS. Within each group, start with whatever is reachable from the internet without an account.
Where do the explanations come from?
Veriom writes them from fixed templates over each record: the weakness class says what went wrong and where in an architecture it lives, the CVSS vector says how it is reached and what it affects, and KEV, EPSS and CISA's assessment say whether it is exploited. Nobody reviews each CVE by hand, so read the description and the references before acting.
How fresh is the data?
New and changed CVEs arrive from NVD every hour, the KEV catalog every six hours and EPSS scores once a day. Each page shows when the data was last updated.
Know where a vulnerable component would sit in your systems.
A CVE names a product. Whether it matters depends on where that product sits in your systems: what reaches it, which trust boundary it guards and what it can reach once compromised. Veriom maps your components, their relationships and your trust boundaries from your code, cloud and delivery evidence, so you can see where a component like this sits. The radar itself does not look at your systems.
Sources
- CVE records and CVSS scores from the NVD CVE API. This product uses the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD.
- Exploitation status from CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.
- Exploit likelihood from FIRST’s Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS), refreshed daily.
- Explanations are written by Veriom from fixed templates over each record’s data, not by a person reviewing each CVE. Descriptions are quoted from the records as published. The radar covers CVEs published since 4 Nov 2026, plus every CVE in the KEV catalog.