Free tool · No sign-in
CVE radar: the latest vulnerabilities, explained.
Every new CVE from NVD, with whether it is exploited in the wild (CISA KEV), how likely it is to be (FIRST EPSS), and what it means for your architecture in plain language.
Updated 11 Nov, 02:49 UTC from NVD, CISA KEV and FIRST EPSSMarkdownRSSJSON Feed
Patch first
Exploited in the wild, newest first.
CISA adds a CVE to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog when attackers are using it. Patch these first, then CVEs with a high EPSS score, then the most severe, starting with anything reachable from the internet.
Microsoft Office Outlook Missing User Interaction for Potentially Unsafe Action Vulnerability
Medium6.5Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS not scored yetMicrosoft Office and 6 moreCVSS 3.1 · 6.5CWE-356
Google Chromium Use-After-Free Vulnerability
High8.8Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS not scored yetGoogle Chromium and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-416
Barracuda Networks Email Security Gateway (ESG) Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel Vulnerability
Critical9.3Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-13EPSS 1.6%, higher than 76% of scored CVEsBarracuda Email Security Gateway (ESG)CVSS 4.0 · 9.3CWE-288
Barracuda Networks Multiple Products OS Command Injection Vulnerability
High8.6Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-13EPSS 1.1%, higher than 65% of scored CVEsBarracuda Email Security Gateway (ESG) and 5 moreCVSS 4.0 · 8.6CWE-78
Openwave Messaging Limited Webtop Media Transcoder Incorrect Resource Transfer Between Spheres Vulnerability
Medium4.3Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS 0.27%, higher than 20% of scored CVEsOpenwave Messaging Limited Webtop Media Transcoder and 2 moreCVSS 3.1 · 4.3CWE-669
Trends
The last 30 days, by severity.
4,675 CVEs published, 346 of them critical. Many arrive without a score yet: NVD and the reporting organisations add CVSS over the following days.
Show the numbers
| Day | Critical | High | Medium | Low | Not scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13 Oct 2026 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 Oct 2026 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 Oct 2026 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 Oct 2026 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 Oct 2026 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 Oct 2026 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 Oct 2026 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1 Nov 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 Nov 2026 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 3 Nov 2026 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 4 Nov 2026 | 35 | 158 | 138 | 32 | 1 |
| 5 Nov 2026 | 55 | 213 | 148 | 36 | 1 |
| 6 Nov 2026 | 40 | 146 | 205 | 47 | 6 |
| 7 Nov 2026 | 57 | 161 | 232 | 11 | 13 |
| 8 Nov 2026 | 23 | 128 | 143 | 26 | 0 |
| 9 Nov 2026 | 22 | 149 | 218 | 42 | 39 |
| 10 Nov 2026 | 103 | 1151 | 587 | 43 | 233 |
| 11 Nov 2026 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 1 | 0 |
Exploit likelihood (EPSS), last 30 days
- Under 1%713
- 1% to 10%25
- 10% to 50%2
- 50% or more7
- Not scored yet3928
Most affected vendors, last 30 days
Most common weaknesses, last 30 days
- Heap-based buffer overflow (CWE-122)343
- Cross-site scripting (CWE-79)323
- Use after free (CWE-416)276
- Missing authorization (CWE-862)229
- Out-of-bounds read (CWE-125)172
- Insecure direct object reference (CWE-639)164
- Server-side request forgery (CWE-918)147
- Path traversal (CWE-22)127
- Out-of-bounds write (CWE-787)126
- Incorrect authorization (CWE-863)126
Matching CVEs
6,427 CVEs match these filters, page 2 of 258.
Kong Gateway Enterprise vulnerability
High8.2EPSS not scored yetKong Gateway EnterpriseCVSS 4.0 · 8.2CWE-636
The ai-azure-content-safety plugin in Kong Gateway Enterprise skips inspection of request bodies larger than the in-memory body buffer, allowing prompts to bypass input content-safety checks.
Kong Gateway Enterprise improper output encoding
Medium6.3EPSS not scored yetKong Gateway Enterprise and 1 moreCVSS 4.0 · 6.3CWE-116
The proxy-cache and proxy-cache-advanced plugins in Kong Gateway Enterprise and Kong AI Gateway do not escape separator characters when building the cache key, allowing a remote attacker to cause a response cached for one request to be served for a different request on the same…
Kong Gateway Enterprise vulnerability
High8.7EPSS not scored yetKong Gateway Enterprise and 1 moreCVSS 4.0 · 8.7CWE-524
The proxy-cache and proxy-cache-advanced plugins in Kong Gateway Enterprise and Kong AI Gateway omit the request hostname from the cache key which may allow a response cached for a hostname to be served for another.
Kong Gateway Enterprise vulnerability
High8.2EPSS not scored yetKong Gateway Enterprise and 1 moreCVSS 4.0 · 8.2CWE-524
The caching plugins in Kong Gateway Enterprise and Kong AI Gateway may serve a response cached for a request carrying an Authorization or Proxy-Authorization to different callers.
Kong Gateway Enterprise vulnerability
High8.3EPSS not scored yetKong Gateway Enterprise and 1 moreCVSS 4.0 · 8.3CWE-524
The graphql-proxy-cache-advanced plugin in Kong Gateway Enterprise omits the caller's identity from the cache key, allowing a response cached for one caller to be served to another.
Kong Gateway Enterprise CRLF injection
High7.8EPSS not scored yetKong Gateway Enterprise and 1 moreCVSS 4.0 · 7.8CWE-93
Kong Gateway Enterprise and Kong AI Gateway include decoded CR/LF characters from the request path in the X-Forwarded-Prefix header on regex Routes, allowing HTTP header injection and request smuggling to the upstream.
Kong Gateway Enterprise improper authentication
High7.8EPSS not scored yetKong Gateway Enterprise and 1 moreCVSS 4.0 · 7.8CWE-287
The SAML plugin in Kong Gateway Enterprise does not enforce AudienceRestriction, allowing a valid assertion issued for another Service Provider to be replayed to authenticate to Kong.
N-able N-central missing authentication
High8.4EPSS not scored yetN-able N-centralCVSS 4.0 · 8.4CWE-306
Missing authentication for critical function vulnerability in N-able N-central allows Privilege Escalation. This issue affects N-central: before 2026.4.1.
zephyrproject zephyr null pointer dereference
Medium5.5EPSS not scored yetzephyrproject zephyrCVSS 3.1 · 5.5CWE-476
The user-mode syscall verifiers for the 16-bit ("wide data") UART API in drivers/serial/uart_handlers.c validated the wrong driver operation. z_vrfy_uart_poll_out_u16(), z_vrfy_uart_tx_u16() and z_vrfy_uart_rx_enable_u16() each ran K_SYSCALL_DRIVER_UART() against the 8-bit op…
zephyrproject zephyr out-of-bounds write
High7.8EPSS not scored yetzephyrproject zephyrCVSS 3.1 · 7.8CWE-787
The simulated EEPROM driver validated access ranges in eeprom_range_is_valid() (drivers/eeprom/eeprom_simulator.c) with a single test, (offset + len) <= config->size. Because offset is a signed off_t and len an unsigned size_t of the same rank, the addition is evaluated in…
zephyrproject zephyr out-of-bounds read
Medium4.3EPSS not scored yetzephyrproject zephyrCVSS 3.1 · 4.3CWE-125
bt_hci_le_per_adv_report_common() in subsys/bluetooth/host/scan.c handles the HCI_LE_Periodic_Advertising_Report (and _v2) event. It verified that the fixed event header was present and that the controller-declared Data_Length fits the tailroom of the periodic-sync reassembly…
XTemos Basel Post Types improper authentication
Critical9.8EPSS not scored yetXTemos Basel Post TypesCVSS 3.1 · 9.8CWE-287
The Basel Post Types plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Authentication Bypass in all versions up to, and including, 1.18. The vulnerability exists because a missing-quotes coding error in the defined() call for SECURE_AUTH_SALT inside BASEL_Auth::get_config() causes PHP to…
zephyrproject zephyr uncontrolled resource consumption
Medium6.5EPSS not scored yetzephyrproject zephyrCVSS 3.1 · 6.5CWE-400
The IEEE 1588 (PTP) port implementation in subsys/net/lib/ptp/port.c adopted the logMessageInterval field of a received Delay_Resp message without any validation. port_delay_resp_msg_process() stored the raw wire value (a full-range int8_t) into…
zephyrproject zephyr out-of-bounds write
Critical9.1EPSS not scored yetzephyrproject zephyrCVSS 3.1 · 9.1CWE-787
The HTTP/2 front-end of the Zephyr HTTP server aliased connection receive state as a scratch output. In subsys/net/lib/http/http_server_http2.c, handle_http2_static_fs_resource() passed &client->data_len as the file_size out-parameter of http_server_find_file().…
zephyrproject zephyr out-of-bounds read
High8.3EPSS not scored yetzephyrproject zephyrCVSS 3.1 · 8.3CWE-125, CWE-191
The RFCOMM multiplexer control-channel handler in subsys/bluetooth/host/classic/rfcomm.c computed the echo length for a BT_RFCOMM_TEST command as buf->len - 1 and passed it to rfcomm_send_test(), whose length parameter is a uint8_t. A malformed but FCS-valid UIH frame on DLCI 0…
Chargemap cross-site scripting
Medium5.1EPSS not scored yetChargemapCVSS 4.0 · 5.1CWE-79
Chargemap contains a stored cross site scripting vulnerability. A remote, unauthenticated attacker could craft a payload in the username field of the account registration page and associate the new account with a victim's email. The attacker could send a forgotten password…
Chargemap open redirect
Medium5.1EPSS not scored yetChargemapCVSS 4.0 · 5.1CWE-601
Chargemap contains an open redirect vulnerability in the authentication login endpoint. A remote, unauthenticated attacker could send a crafted URL to a victim and redirect them to an attacker controlled domain. Fixed 2026-07-17.
Chargemap cross-site scripting
Medium5.1EPSS not scored yetChargemapCVSS 4.0 · 5.1CWE-79
Chargemap contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability that allows a remote, authenticated attacker to craft a malicious payload in the user profile page that executes when another user views the attacker's profile. Fixed 2026-07-17.
AMD EPYC™ 9004 Series Processors unchecked unusual condition
Medium5.9EPSS not scored yetAMD EPYC™ 9004 Series Processors and 9 moreCVSS 4.0 · 5.9CWE-754
Improper check for unusual or exceptional conditions in AMD Secure Encrypted Virtualization - Secure Nested Paging (SEV-SNP) could allow a privileged attacker to potentially overlap MMIO regions with DRAM regions resulting in loss of integrity.
AMD EPYC™ 9004 Series Processors vulnerability
Medium4.0EPSS not scored yetAMD EPYC™ 9004 Series Processors and 6 moreCVSS 4.0 · 4.0CWE-193
An off-by-one error in AMD Secure Encrypted Virtualization (SEV) firmware could allow an attacker with hypervisor access to corrupt the Reverse Map Table (RMP) table, potentially resulting in loss of guest memory integrity.
AMD EPYC™ 9004 Series Processors authentication bypass by spoofing
Medium4.6EPSS not scored yetAMD EPYC™ 9004 Series Processors and 9 moreCVSS 4.0 · 4.6CWE-290
Authentication bypass by spoofing in AMD Secure Encrypted Virtualization (SEV) firmware could allow a malicious hypervisor to request attestation reports for VMPL 0.
AMD EPYC™ 9004 Series Processors vulnerability
Medium4.6EPSS not scored yetAMD EPYC™ 9004 Series Processors and 6 moreCVSS 4.0 · 4.6CWE-1250
Improper preservation of consistency between independent representations of shared state in AMD Secure Encrypted Virtualization (SEV) firmware could allow a malicious hypervisor to potentially affect cache coherency for guest context pages resulting in loss of integrity.
AMD EPYC™ 9004 Series Processors vulnerability
Medium5.9EPSS not scored yetAMD EPYC™ 9004 Series Processors and 9 moreCVSS 4.0 · 5.9CWE-841
Improper enforcement of behavioral workflow in AMD Secure Encrypted Virtualization (SEV) firmware could allow a malicious hypervisor to potentially launch a guest whose attestation report contains an ID key digest for an ID block that doesn't match the guest's measurement…
AMD EPYC™ 9004 Series Processors vulnerability
Medium5.9EPSS not scored yetAMD EPYC™ 9004 Series Processors and 9 moreCVSS 4.0 · 5.9CWE-1257
Improper Access Control Applied to Mirrored or Aliased Memory Regions in AMD Secure Encrypted Virtualization (SEV) firmware could allow a malicious hypervisor to change the encryption bit for guest context pages potentially resulting in loss of integrity.
rails vulnerability
High8.8EPSS not scored yetrailsCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-646
Active Storage makes it simple to upload and reference files in cloud services and attach those files to Active Record objects. Prior to 8.1.4.1 and 8.0.5.2, ActiveStorage::Blob#open writes a blob to a tempfile whose name carries the extension of the uploaded filename, and…
Reading the radar
CVSS, KEV and EPSS, briefly.
What is a CVE?
A CVE is a public identifier for one vulnerability in one product, such as CVE-2026-59310. The CVE program assigns it; NVD, run by the US National Institute of Standards and Technology, adds scores, weakness classes and affected product lists.
What does the CVSS score tell me?
CVSS rates how severe a vulnerability is on its own, from 0 to 10, and its vector says how it is reached: over the network or locally, with or without an account, with or without someone clicking. It says nothing about whether anyone is exploiting it. The radar shows the newest CVSS version scored and names it, because version 4.0 and 3.1 scores differ.
What is CISA KEV?
The Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog is CISA's list of CVEs with reliable evidence of exploitation in the wild. US federal agencies must fix each one by its due date, and it is the strongest signal of what to patch first.
What is EPSS?
FIRST's Exploit Prediction Scoring System estimates the probability that a CVE will see exploitation activity in the next 30 days, recomputed daily. Most CVEs score well under 1%, so the radar also shows the percentile: how a CVE ranks against every scored CVE.
How should I prioritise?
Patch what CISA lists as exploited first. Then CVEs with a high EPSS score, then the most severe by CVSS. Within each group, start with whatever is reachable from the internet without an account.
Where do the explanations come from?
Veriom writes them from fixed templates over each record: the weakness class says what went wrong and where in an architecture it lives, the CVSS vector says how it is reached and what it affects, and KEV, EPSS and CISA's assessment say whether it is exploited. Nobody reviews each CVE by hand, so read the description and the references before acting.
How fresh is the data?
New and changed CVEs arrive from NVD every hour, the KEV catalog every six hours and EPSS scores once a day. Each page shows when the data was last updated.
Know where a vulnerable component would sit in your systems.
A CVE names a product. Whether it matters depends on where that product sits in your systems: what reaches it, which trust boundary it guards and what it can reach once compromised. Veriom maps your components, their relationships and your trust boundaries from your code, cloud and delivery evidence, so you can see where a component like this sits. The radar itself does not look at your systems.
Sources
- CVE records and CVSS scores from the NVD CVE API. This product uses the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD.
- Exploitation status from CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.
- Exploit likelihood from FIRST’s Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS), refreshed daily.
- Explanations are written by Veriom from fixed templates over each record’s data, not by a person reviewing each CVE. Descriptions are quoted from the records as published. The radar covers CVEs published since 4 Nov 2026, plus every CVE in the KEV catalog.