Free tool · No sign-in
CVE radar: the latest vulnerabilities, explained.
Every new CVE from NVD, with whether it is exploited in the wild (CISA KEV), how likely it is to be (FIRST EPSS), and what it means for your architecture in plain language.
Updated 11 Nov, 02:49 UTC from NVD, CISA KEV and FIRST EPSSMarkdownRSSJSON Feed
Patch first
Exploited in the wild, newest first.
CISA adds a CVE to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog when attackers are using it. Patch these first, then CVEs with a high EPSS score, then the most severe, starting with anything reachable from the internet.
Microsoft Office Outlook Missing User Interaction for Potentially Unsafe Action Vulnerability
Medium6.5Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS not scored yetMicrosoft Office and 6 moreCVSS 3.1 · 6.5CWE-356
Google Chromium Use-After-Free Vulnerability
High8.8Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS not scored yetGoogle Chromium and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-416
Barracuda Networks Email Security Gateway (ESG) Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel Vulnerability
Critical9.3Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-13EPSS 1.6%, higher than 76% of scored CVEsBarracuda Email Security Gateway (ESG)CVSS 4.0 · 9.3CWE-288
Barracuda Networks Multiple Products OS Command Injection Vulnerability
High8.6Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-13EPSS 1.1%, higher than 65% of scored CVEsBarracuda Email Security Gateway (ESG) and 5 moreCVSS 4.0 · 8.6CWE-78
Openwave Messaging Limited Webtop Media Transcoder Incorrect Resource Transfer Between Spheres Vulnerability
Medium4.3Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS 0.27%, higher than 20% of scored CVEsOpenwave Messaging Limited Webtop Media Transcoder and 2 moreCVSS 3.1 · 4.3CWE-669
Trends
The last 30 days, by severity.
4,675 CVEs published, 346 of them critical. Many arrive without a score yet: NVD and the reporting organisations add CVSS over the following days.
Show the numbers
| Day | Critical | High | Medium | Low | Not scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13 Oct 2026 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 Oct 2026 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 Oct 2026 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 Oct 2026 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 Oct 2026 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 Oct 2026 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 Oct 2026 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1 Nov 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 Nov 2026 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 3 Nov 2026 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 4 Nov 2026 | 35 | 158 | 138 | 32 | 1 |
| 5 Nov 2026 | 55 | 213 | 148 | 36 | 1 |
| 6 Nov 2026 | 40 | 146 | 205 | 47 | 6 |
| 7 Nov 2026 | 57 | 161 | 232 | 11 | 13 |
| 8 Nov 2026 | 23 | 128 | 143 | 26 | 0 |
| 9 Nov 2026 | 22 | 149 | 218 | 42 | 39 |
| 10 Nov 2026 | 103 | 1151 | 587 | 43 | 233 |
| 11 Nov 2026 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 1 | 0 |
Exploit likelihood (EPSS), last 30 days
- Under 1%713
- 1% to 10%25
- 10% to 50%2
- 50% or more7
- Not scored yet3928
Most affected vendors, last 30 days
Most common weaknesses, last 30 days
- Heap-based buffer overflow (CWE-122)343
- Cross-site scripting (CWE-79)323
- Use after free (CWE-416)276
- Missing authorization (CWE-862)229
- Out-of-bounds read (CWE-125)172
- Insecure direct object reference (CWE-639)164
- Server-side request forgery (CWE-918)147
- Path traversal (CWE-22)127
- Out-of-bounds write (CWE-787)126
- Incorrect authorization (CWE-863)126
Matching CVEs
331 CVEs match these filters, page 2 of 14.
IBM i missing authorization
Medium4.8EPSS not scored yetIBM iCVSS 3.1 · 4.8CWE-862
IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information from the Host-Based Printer Subsystem due to no authorization check. A bad actor could use this vulnerability to print files they should not be able to access.
IBM Content Navigator LDAP injection
Medium4.3EPSS not scored yetIBM Content NavigatorCVSS 3.1 · 4.3CWE-90
IBM Content Navigator 3.0.15.0, 26.0.0.0, 3.1.0.0, and 3.2.0.0 is vulnerable to LDAP injection. A remote authenticated attacker could send a specially crafted request that could allow enumeration of LDAP directory information.
IBM Concert OS command injection
Critical9.8EPSS not scored yetIBM ConcertCVSS 3.1 · 9.8CWE-78
IBM Concert 1.0 through 3.0.1.1 allows an attacker can supply crafted input that is incorporated into an operating system command without adequate validation or sanitization. Successful exploitation allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying…
IBM Cloud Pak for Data System incorrect privilege assignment
Medium6.5EPSS not scored yetIBM Cloud Pak for Data SystemCVSS 3.1 · 6.5CWE-266
IBM Cloud Pak for Data System 11.3.1.2 Interim Fix 001 through - 11.3.1.2 Interim Fix 002 could allow a user with administrative privileges to read and write arbitrary files on the system due to incorrect permission assignments.
IBM watsonx Orchestrate Cartridge for Cloud Pak for Data improper access control
Medium4.3EPSS not scored yetIBM watsonx Orchestrate Cartridge for Cloud Pak for DataCVSS 3.1 · 4.3CWE-284
IBM watsonx Orchestrate Cartridge for Cloud Pak for Data 4.8.4 through 4.8.5, and 5.0.0 through 5.4.2 allows low-privileged users to execute administrative functions by directly invoking backend APIs.As a result, UI-level access restrictions are ineffective, as the backend…
IBM watsonx Orchestrate Cartridge for Cloud Pak for Data missing authorization
Medium6.5EPSS not scored yetIBM watsonx Orchestrate Cartridge for Cloud Pak for DataCVSS 3.1 · 6.5CWE-862
IBM watsonx Orchestrate Cartridge for Cloud Pak for Data 4.8.4 through 4.8.5, and 5.0.0 through 5.4.2 fails to enforce backend authorization checks, allowing low‑privileged users to directly invoke administrative API endpoints. This bypasses UI‑level access restrictions and may…
IBM Sterling B2B Integrator improper authorization
Medium4.3EPSS not scored yetIBM Sterling B2B Integrator and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 4.3CWE-285
IBM Sterling B2B Integrator 6.2.1.0 through 6.2.1.2_1 and 6.2.2.0 through 6.2.2.1_1, and IBM Sterling File Gateway 6.2.1.0 through 6.2.1.2_1 and 6.2.2.0 through 6.2.2.1_1 Standard Edition could allow a remote authenticated attacker to access unauthorized pages due to improper…
IBM Storage TS4500 Library improper authorization
High8.1EPSS not scored yetIBM Storage TS4500 LibraryCVSS 3.1 · 8.1CWE-285
IBM Storage TS4500 Library 1.1.1.6 through 1.12.0.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to perform unauthorized account takeover due to improper authorization.
IBM CockroachDB PostgreSQL for IBM VPC improper privilege management
High7.1EPSS not scored yetIBM CockroachDB PostgreSQL for IBM VPCCVSS 3.1 · 7.1CWE-269
IBM CockroachDB PostgreSQL for IBM VPC 26.2.0 through 26.2.3, 25.4.0 through 25.4.12, and 25.2.0 through 25.2.20 is vulnerable to privilege escalation via user-defined function.
IBM Storage Scale System authentication bypass by alternate path
Medium6.0EPSS not scored yetIBM Storage Scale System and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 6.0CWE-288
IBM Storage Scale System 6.2.3.0 through 6.2.3.6, and 7.0.0.0 through 7.0.1.0 and IBM Storage Scale 6.0.0.0 through 6.0.1.0, and 5.2.3.0 through 5.2.3.8 could allow an attacker to leverage an undocumented flag to gain access to an unauthenticated path in the REST API.
IBM Sterling File Gateway protection mechanism failure
Medium6.5EPSS not scored yetIBM Sterling File GatewayCVSS 3.1 · 6.5CWE-693
IBM Sterling File Gateway 6.2.1.0 through 6.2.1.2_1 and 6.2.2.0 - 6.2.2.1_1 could allow a remote attacker to perform protocol downgrade attacks due to a security misconfiguration.
IBM CockroachDB PostgreSQL for IBM VPC server-side request forgery
Medium5.4EPSS not scored yetIBM CockroachDB PostgreSQL for IBM VPCCVSS 3.1 · 5.4CWE-918
IBM CockroachDB PostgreSQL for IBM VPC 26.2.0 through 26.2.3, 25.4.0 through 25.4.12, and 25.2.0 through 25.2.20 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to…
IBM Secure Proxy improper input validation
Medium4.9EPSS not scored yetIBM Secure ProxyCVSS 3.1 · 4.9CWE-20
IBM Secure Proxy 6.1.0.0 through 6.2.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to cause a denial of service due to improper validation of listener IP address and port.
IBM ContextForge MCP Gateway incorrectly resolved name
Medium6.5EPSS not scored yetIBM ContextForge MCP Gateway and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 6.5CWE-706
IBM ContextForge MCP Gateway 1.0.0 through 1.0.11 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to cause a denial of service due to improper slug normalization causing tool name collisions.
IBM App Connect Enterprise cross-site scripting
Medium5.4EPSS not scored yetIBM App Connect EnterpriseCVSS 3.1 · 5.4CWE-79
IBM App Connect Enterprise 13.0.1.0 through 13.0.8.2, and 12.0.1.0 through 12.0.12.30 could allow a remote attacker to inject arbitrary HTML due to improper output neutralization.
IBM App Connect Enterprise cross-site scripting
Medium4.2EPSS not scored yetIBM App Connect EnterpriseCVSS 3.1 · 4.2CWE-79
IBM App Connect Enterprise 13.0.1.0 through 13.0.8.2, and 12.0.1.0 through 12.0.12.30 could allow a remote attacker to perform content spoofing due to improper output encoding of error messages.
IBM App Connect Enterprise clickjacking
Low2.5EPSS not scored yetIBM App Connect EnterpriseCVSS 3.1 · 2.5CWE-1021
IBM App Connect Enterprise 13.0.1.0 through 13.0.8.2 could allow a remote attacker to perform unauthorized actions due to missing anti-clickjacking controls.
IBM App Connect Enterprise incorrect authorization
High7.5EPSS not scored yetIBM App Connect EnterpriseCVSS 3.1 · 7.5CWE-863
IBM App Connect Enterprise 13.0.1.0 through 13.0.8.2 could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information due to broken access control.
IBM Optim path traversal
Critical9.1EPSS not scored yetIBM OptimCVSS 3.1 · 9.1CWE-22
IBM Optim 1.0.0, 1.1.0, and 1.2.0 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to path traversal.
IBM App Connect Enterprise path traversal
Medium5.5EPSS not scored yetIBM App Connect EnterpriseCVSS 3.1 · 5.5CWE-22
IBM App Connect Enterprise 13.0.1.0 through 13.0.8.2, and 12.0.1.0 through 12.0.12.29 could allow a local attacker to perform an arbitrary file write due to improper validation of pathnames during archive extraction.
IBM Netezza Appliance improper authorization
Medium6.5EPSS not scored yetIBM Netezza ApplianceCVSS 3.1 · 6.5CWE-285
IBM Netezza Appliance 11.3.0.2 Interim Fix 002 through 11.3.1.3 Interim Fix 006 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to change the passwords of other users due to improper authorization.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data path traversal
Medium6.5EPSS not scored yetIBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for DataCVSS 3.1 · 6.5CWE-22
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to write arbitrary files due to a path traversal vulnerability.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data path traversal
Medium6.5EPSS not scored yetIBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for DataCVSS 3.1 · 6.5CWE-22
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to write arbitrary files due to a path traversal vulnerability.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data cross-site scripting
Medium4.4EPSS not scored yetIBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for DataCVSS 3.1 · 4.4CWE-79
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary scripts due to improper neutralization of input in the X-Forwarded-Host header.
IBM Concert OS command injection
Critical9.8EPSS not scored yetIBM ConcertCVSS 3.1 · 9.8CWE-78
IBM Concert 1.0 through 3.0.1.1 contains components that allow potentially unsafe command execution, which could be exploited to run arbitrary system commands on the host.
Reading the radar
CVSS, KEV and EPSS, briefly.
What is a CVE?
A CVE is a public identifier for one vulnerability in one product, such as CVE-2026-59310. The CVE program assigns it; NVD, run by the US National Institute of Standards and Technology, adds scores, weakness classes and affected product lists.
What does the CVSS score tell me?
CVSS rates how severe a vulnerability is on its own, from 0 to 10, and its vector says how it is reached: over the network or locally, with or without an account, with or without someone clicking. It says nothing about whether anyone is exploiting it. The radar shows the newest CVSS version scored and names it, because version 4.0 and 3.1 scores differ.
What is CISA KEV?
The Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog is CISA's list of CVEs with reliable evidence of exploitation in the wild. US federal agencies must fix each one by its due date, and it is the strongest signal of what to patch first.
What is EPSS?
FIRST's Exploit Prediction Scoring System estimates the probability that a CVE will see exploitation activity in the next 30 days, recomputed daily. Most CVEs score well under 1%, so the radar also shows the percentile: how a CVE ranks against every scored CVE.
How should I prioritise?
Patch what CISA lists as exploited first. Then CVEs with a high EPSS score, then the most severe by CVSS. Within each group, start with whatever is reachable from the internet without an account.
Where do the explanations come from?
Veriom writes them from fixed templates over each record: the weakness class says what went wrong and where in an architecture it lives, the CVSS vector says how it is reached and what it affects, and KEV, EPSS and CISA's assessment say whether it is exploited. Nobody reviews each CVE by hand, so read the description and the references before acting.
How fresh is the data?
New and changed CVEs arrive from NVD every hour, the KEV catalog every six hours and EPSS scores once a day. Each page shows when the data was last updated.
Know where a vulnerable component would sit in your systems.
A CVE names a product. Whether it matters depends on where that product sits in your systems: what reaches it, which trust boundary it guards and what it can reach once compromised. Veriom maps your components, their relationships and your trust boundaries from your code, cloud and delivery evidence, so you can see where a component like this sits. The radar itself does not look at your systems.
Sources
- CVE records and CVSS scores from the NVD CVE API. This product uses the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD.
- Exploitation status from CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.
- Exploit likelihood from FIRST’s Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS), refreshed daily.
- Explanations are written by Veriom from fixed templates over each record’s data, not by a person reviewing each CVE. Descriptions are quoted from the records as published. The radar covers CVEs published since 4 Nov 2026, plus every CVE in the KEV catalog.