Free tool · No sign-in
CVE radar: the latest vulnerabilities, explained.
Every new CVE from NVD, with whether it is exploited in the wild (CISA KEV), how likely it is to be (FIRST EPSS), and what it means for your architecture in plain language.
Updated 11 Nov, 04:49 UTC from NVD, CISA KEV and FIRST EPSSMarkdownRSSJSON Feed
Patch first
Exploited in the wild, newest first.
CISA adds a CVE to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog when attackers are using it. Patch these first, then CVEs with a high EPSS score, then the most severe, starting with anything reachable from the internet.
Microsoft Office Outlook Missing User Interaction for Potentially Unsafe Action Vulnerability
Medium6.5Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS not scored yetMicrosoft Office and 6 moreCVSS 3.1 · 6.5CWE-356
Google Chromium Use-After-Free Vulnerability
High8.8Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS not scored yetGoogle Chromium and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-416
Barracuda Networks Email Security Gateway (ESG) Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel Vulnerability
Critical9.3Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-13EPSS 1.6%, higher than 76% of scored CVEsBarracuda Email Security Gateway (ESG)CVSS 4.0 · 9.3CWE-288
Barracuda Networks Multiple Products OS Command Injection Vulnerability
High8.6Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-13EPSS 1.1%, higher than 65% of scored CVEsBarracuda Email Security Gateway (ESG) and 5 moreCVSS 4.0 · 8.6CWE-78
Openwave Messaging Limited Webtop Media Transcoder Incorrect Resource Transfer Between Spheres Vulnerability
Medium4.3Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS 0.27%, higher than 20% of scored CVEsOpenwave Messaging Limited Webtop Media Transcoder and 2 moreCVSS 3.1 · 4.3CWE-669
Trends
The last 30 days, by severity.
4,691 CVEs published, 346 of them critical. Many arrive without a score yet: NVD and the reporting organisations add CVSS over the following days.
Show the numbers
| Day | Critical | High | Medium | Low | Not scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13 Oct 2026 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 Oct 2026 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 Oct 2026 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 Oct 2026 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 Oct 2026 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 Oct 2026 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 Oct 2026 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1 Nov 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 Nov 2026 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 3 Nov 2026 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 4 Nov 2026 | 35 | 158 | 138 | 32 | 1 |
| 5 Nov 2026 | 55 | 213 | 148 | 36 | 1 |
| 6 Nov 2026 | 40 | 146 | 205 | 47 | 6 |
| 7 Nov 2026 | 57 | 161 | 232 | 11 | 13 |
| 8 Nov 2026 | 23 | 128 | 143 | 26 | 0 |
| 9 Nov 2026 | 22 | 149 | 218 | 42 | 39 |
| 10 Nov 2026 | 103 | 1151 | 587 | 43 | 233 |
| 11 Nov 2026 | 2 | 11 | 15 | 1 | 0 |
Exploit likelihood (EPSS), last 30 days
- Under 1%713
- 1% to 10%25
- 10% to 50%2
- 50% or more7
- Not scored yet3944
Most affected vendors, last 30 days
Most common weaknesses, last 30 days
- Heap-based buffer overflow (CWE-122)343
- Cross-site scripting (CWE-79)329
- Use after free (CWE-416)276
- Missing authorization (CWE-862)230
- Out-of-bounds read (CWE-125)172
- Insecure direct object reference (CWE-639)164
- Server-side request forgery (CWE-918)147
- Path traversal (CWE-22)128
- Out-of-bounds write (CWE-787)127
- Incorrect authorization (CWE-863)127
Matching CVEs
35 CVEs match these filters, page 2 of 2.
Samsung Semiconductor Exynos 1080 unchecked quantity
Critical9.8EPSS 0.15%, higher than 4% of scored CVEsSamsung Semiconductor Exynos 1080 and 4 moreCVSS 3.1 · 9.8CWE-1284
In the Exynos modem's IMS stack, Out of Bound access occurs due to improper validation.
Samsung Semiconductor Exynos 850 uncontrolled resource consumption
Critical9.8EPSS 0.18%, higher than 8% of scored CVEsSamsung Semiconductor Exynos 850 and 9 moreCVSS 3.1 · 9.8CWE-400
In the LTE RRC component, improper handling of messages before authentication triggers a data abort, which leads to a denial‑of‑service condition.
Samsung Semiconductor Exynos 850 infinite loop
High7.5EPSS 0.18%, higher than 7% of scored CVEsSamsung Semiconductor Exynos 850 and 9 moreCVSS 3.1 · 7.5CWE-835
In the NAS Authentication Request message decoding procedure, a missing lower bound check causes an infinite loop, leading to Denial of Service.
Samsung Semiconductor Exynos 1080 improper certificate validation
Medium5.3EPSS 0.14%, higher than 4% of scored CVEsSamsung Semiconductor Exynos 1080 and 4 moreCVSS 3.1 · 5.3CWE-295
An attacker may send a malicious IMS message to the target device, potentially leading to information exposure through the SIP message flow.
Samsung Semiconductor Exynos 1080 vulnerability
High7.5EPSS 0.15%, higher than 4% of scored CVEsSamsung Semiconductor Exynos 1080 and 9 moreCVSS 3.1 · 7.5CWE-1286
Processing a malformed RRC Reconfiguration message leads to an out-of-bounds (OOB) access, resulting in a denial-of-service (DoS) condition.
Samsung Semiconductor Exynos 1080 unchecked unusual condition
High7.5EPSS 0.15%, higher than 4% of scored CVEsSamsung Semiconductor Exynos 1080 and 2 moreCVSS 3.1 · 7.5CWE-754
Incorrect handling of SDP payload leads to a Denial of Service
Samsung Semiconductor Exynos 850 out-of-bounds read
High7.5EPSS 0.15%, higher than 4% of scored CVEsSamsung Semiconductor Exynos 850 and 9 moreCVSS 3.1 · 7.5CWE-125
Improper handling of NAS DLTransport messages may lead to a baseband crash.
Samsung Semiconductor Exynos 1280 improper array index validation
High7.5EPSS 0.14%, higher than 3% of scored CVEsSamsung Semiconductor Exynos 1280 and 9 moreCVSS 3.1 · 7.5CWE-129
Incorrect handling of unauthenticated downlink RRC Setup messages can cause the baseband to crash
Samsung Semiconductor Exynos 1080 unchecked unusual condition
Not scoredEPSS 0.15%, higher than 4% of scored CVEsSamsung Semiconductor Exynos 1080 and 4 moreNot scored yetCWE-754
Incorrect handling of SIP packets leads to baseband crashes
Samsung Semiconductor Exynos 850 unchecked unusual condition
High7.5EPSS 0.14%, higher than 3% of scored CVEsSamsung Semiconductor Exynos 850 and 9 moreCVSS 3.1 · 7.5CWE-754
Continuously sending control‑plane messages causes the baseband to crashes.
Reading the radar
CVSS, KEV and EPSS, briefly.
What is a CVE?
A CVE is a public identifier for one vulnerability in one product, such as CVE-2026-59310. The CVE program assigns it; NVD, run by the US National Institute of Standards and Technology, adds scores, weakness classes and affected product lists.
What does the CVSS score tell me?
CVSS rates how severe a vulnerability is on its own, from 0 to 10, and its vector says how it is reached: over the network or locally, with or without an account, with or without someone clicking. It says nothing about whether anyone is exploiting it. The radar shows the newest CVSS version scored and names it, because version 4.0 and 3.1 scores differ.
What is CISA KEV?
The Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog is CISA's list of CVEs with reliable evidence of exploitation in the wild. US federal agencies must fix each one by its due date, and it is the strongest signal of what to patch first.
What is EPSS?
FIRST's Exploit Prediction Scoring System estimates the probability that a CVE will see exploitation activity in the next 30 days, recomputed daily. Most CVEs score well under 1%, so the radar also shows the percentile: how a CVE ranks against every scored CVE.
How should I prioritise?
Patch what CISA lists as exploited first. Then CVEs with a high EPSS score, then the most severe by CVSS. Within each group, start with whatever is reachable from the internet without an account.
Where do the explanations come from?
Veriom writes them from fixed templates over each record: the weakness class says what went wrong and where in an architecture it lives, the CVSS vector says how it is reached and what it affects, and KEV, EPSS and CISA's assessment say whether it is exploited. Nobody reviews each CVE by hand, so read the description and the references before acting.
How fresh is the data?
New and changed CVEs arrive from NVD every hour, the KEV catalog every six hours and EPSS scores once a day. Each page shows when the data was last updated.
Know where a vulnerable component would sit in your systems.
A CVE names a product. Whether it matters depends on where that product sits in your systems: what reaches it, which trust boundary it guards and what it can reach once compromised. Veriom maps your components, their relationships and your trust boundaries from your code, cloud and delivery evidence, so you can see where a component like this sits. The radar itself does not look at your systems.
Sources
- CVE records and CVSS scores from the NVD CVE API. This product uses the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD.
- Exploitation status from CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.
- Exploit likelihood from FIRST’s Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS), refreshed daily.
- Explanations are written by Veriom from fixed templates over each record’s data, not by a person reviewing each CVE. Descriptions are quoted from the records as published. The radar covers CVEs published since 4 Nov 2026, plus every CVE in the KEV catalog.