Skip to main content
veriom
Menu

Explore Veriom products, resources, and account pages.

Free tool · No sign-in

CVE radar: the latest vulnerabilities, explained.

Every new CVE from NVD, with whether it is exploited in the wild (CISA KEV), how likely it is to be (FIRST EPSS), and what it means for your architecture in plain language.

Updated 12 Nov, 10:28 UTC from NVD, CISA KEV and FIRST EPSSMarkdownRSSJSON Feed

329Critical, last 7 days2,177High, last 7 days40Added to CISA KEV, 30 days1,779Exploited CVEs tracked

Patch first

Exploited in the wild, newest first.

CISA adds a CVE to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog when attackers are using it. Patch these first, then CVEs with a high EPSS score, then the most severe, starting with anything reachable from the internet.

  1. CVE-2026-124194

    Microsoft Office Outlook Missing User Interaction for Potentially Unsafe Action Vulnerability

    Medium6.5Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS 1.6%, higher than 76% of scored CVEs

    Microsoft Office and 6 moreCVSS 3.1 · 6.5CWE-356

  2. CVE-2026-125350

    Google Chromium Use-After-Free Vulnerability

    High8.8Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS 0.96%, higher than 62% of scored CVEs

    Google Chromium and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-416

  3. CVE-2026-116606

    Barracuda Networks Email Security Gateway (ESG) Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel Vulnerability

    Critical9.3Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-13EPSS 8.9%, higher than 95% of scored CVEs

    Barracuda Email Security Gateway (ESG)CVSS 4.0 · 9.3CWE-288

  4. CVE-2026-111560

    Barracuda Networks Multiple Products OS Command Injection Vulnerability

    High8.6Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-13EPSS 6.2%, higher than 94% of scored CVEs

    Barracuda Email Security Gateway (ESG) and 5 moreCVSS 4.0 · 8.6CWE-78

  5. CVE-2026-111793

    Openwave Messaging Limited Webtop Media Transcoder Incorrect Resource Transfer Between Spheres Vulnerability

    Medium4.3Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS 0.64%, higher than 51% of scored CVEs

    Openwave Messaging Limited Webtop Media Transcoder and 2 moreCVSS 3.1 · 4.3CWE-669

Every exploited CVE

Trends

The last 30 days, by severity.

5,432 CVEs published, 395 of them critical. Many arrive without a score yet: NVD and the reporting organisations add CVSS over the following days.

CriticalHighMediumLowNot scored14 Oct 2026 to 12 Nov 2026
Show the numbers
DayCriticalHighMediumLowNot scored
14 Oct 202622000
15 Oct 202612000
16 Oct 202600100
17 Oct 202600000
18 Oct 202600000
19 Oct 202600000
20 Oct 202600000
21 Oct 202620000
22 Oct 202620000
23 Oct 202600000
24 Oct 202600000
25 Oct 202600000
26 Oct 202600000
27 Oct 202600000
28 Oct 202601000
29 Oct 202600000
30 Oct 202600000
31 Oct 202601000
1 Nov 202600000
2 Nov 202611000
3 Nov 202600100
4 Nov 202635158138321
5 Nov 202655213148361
6 Nov 202640146205476
7 Nov 2026571612321113
8 Nov 202623128143260
9 Nov 2026221492184239
10 Nov 2026103115059043230
11 Nov 20264423322134132
12 Nov 202684630323

Exploit likelihood (EPSS), last 30 days

  1. Under 1%4630
  2. 1% to 10%174
  3. 10% to 50%2
  4. 50% or more5
  5. Not scored yet621

Most affected vendors, last 30 days

  1. Microsoft1095
  2. IBM322
  3. Google250
  4. Apache Software Foundation188
  5. FFmpeg121
  6. Adobe112
  7. Mozilla108
  8. Fortinet98
  9. Red Hat96
  10. JetBrains89

Matching CVEs

7,187 CVEs match these filters, page 213 of 288.

  1. CVE-2026-59263

    Apache OpenOffice vulnerability

    Low1.9EPSS 0.16%, higher than 5% of scored CVEs

    Apache OpenOffice and 1 moreCVSS 4.0 · 1.9CWE-349

    A manipulated document opened in Apache OpenOffice 4.1.16 or earlier may allow substituted content to be displayed manipulating the user. Such documents are corrupt and should not be opened. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.1.17, which fixes this issue.

  2. CVE-2026-115448

    Apache ZooKeeper allocation without limits

    High8.7EPSS 0.61%, higher than 50% of scored CVEs

    Apache ZooKeeperCVSS 4.0 · 8.7CWE-770

    Uncontrolled recursion in Apache ZooKeeper. The server serializes its data tree to a snapshot by recursing one stack frame per znode level, with no depth bound. A client permitted to create znodes (the default root ACL is open) can build a chain of nested znodes deep enough…

  3. CVE-2026-108946

    Apache ActiveMQ improper input validation

    Medium6.5EPSS 0.39%, higher than 33% of scored CVEs

    Apache ActiveMQ and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 6.5CWE-20

    Improper input validation vulnerability in Apache ActiveMQ, Apache ActiveMQ KahaDB. The ActiveMQ broker resolves connection, session and consumer state from ids that are user provided and in some scenarios does not validate that they ids are bound to that user. This allows an…

  4. CVE-2026-108500

    Apache ActiveMQ improper input validation

    Not scoredEPSS 0.22%, higher than 12% of scored CVEs

    Apache ActiveMQNot scored yetCWE-20

    Input validation vulnerability in Apache ActiveMQ configured to use the LDAPAuthorizationMapPlugin allows an authenticated attacker to create or address a destination with a crafted name containing LDAP DN special characters (such as comma, plus, equals, backslash) can…

  5. CVE-2026-103582

    Apache ActiveMQ NMS OpenWire Client Library excessive memory allocation

    High7.5EPSS 0.52%, higher than 45% of scored CVEs

    Apache ActiveMQ NMS OpenWire Client LibraryCVSS 3.1 · 7.5CWE-789

    Unbounded memory allocation and missing frame size validation in Apache NMS ActiveMQ (the .NET OpenWire client, package Apache.NMS.ActiveMQ) before 2.3.0. The OpenWire unmarshalling code trusted the frame size and the length and count fields read from the network. It did not…

  6. CVE-2026-102704

    Xen protection mechanism failure

    Medium4.4EPSS 0.14%, higher than 4% of scored CVEs

    XenCVSS 3.1 · 4.4CWE-693

    [This CNA information record relates to multiple CVEs; the text explains which aspects/vulnerabilities correspond to which CVE.] A common access pattern is a batch of Grant Copy operations acting on adjacent address ranges in the same source or destination page. For performance…

  7. CVE-2026-102703

    Xen vulnerability

    Medium4.4EPSS 0.14%, higher than 4% of scored CVEs

    XenCVSS 3.1 · 4.4CWE-704

    [This CNA information record relates to multiple CVEs; the text explains which aspects/vulnerabilities correspond to which CVE.] A common access pattern is a batch of Grant Copy operations acting on adjacent address ranges in the same source or destination page. For performance…

  8. CVE-2026-100302

    Apache ZooKeeper allocation without limits

    High7.1EPSS 0.53%, higher than 45% of scored CVEs

    Apache ZooKeeperCVSS 4.0 · 7.1CWE-770

    Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling in the multiRead request handler of Apache ZooKeeper allows a remote attacker to crash the server (denial of service) with a single small request. The multiRead handler places no limit on the number of bundled read operations…

  9. CVE-2026-100300

    Apache ZooKeeper improper exception handling

    High8.7EPSS 0.48%, higher than 42% of scored CVEs

    Apache ZooKeeperCVSS 4.0 · 8.7CWE-755

    Improper handling of exceptional conditions in the quota subsystem of Apache ZooKeeper allows an attacker able to write under the /zookeeper/quota subtree — unauthenticated on default deployments, where that subtree is world-writable — to crash the server's critical…

  10. CVE-2026-100252

    Apache ZooKeeper incorrect authorization

    High8.6EPSS 0.53%, higher than 45% of scored CVEs

    Apache ZooKeeperCVSS 4.0 · 8.6CWE-863

    Improper Authorization vulnerability in Apache ZooKeeper. When SASL authentication is enabled on the client port, the server's SASL callback handler grants every authorization identity (authzid) that a client requests, without checking it against the principal the client…

  11. CVE-2026-100235

    Apache ZooKeeper time-of-check to time-of-use race

    Medium6.0EPSS 0.34%, higher than 28% of scored CVEs

    Apache ZooKeeperCVSS 4.0 · 6.0CWE-367

    Incorrect authorization due to a time-of-check to time-of-use (TOCTOU) race condition in the setACL request handling of Apache ZooKeeper. When a node's ACL is changed via setACL, the pending change is not published to the server's outstanding change record for that node. Any…

  12. CVE-2026-95649

    I.R.I.S S.A. IRISPowerscan inclusion of untrusted functionality

    Medium6.1EPSS 0.14%, higher than 3% of scored CVEs

    I.R.I.S S.A. IRISPowerscanCVSS 4.0 · 6.1CWE-829

    IRISPowerscan insufficiently restrict the use of untrusted scripts. An authenticated user with access to script functionality can import or modify scripts that are executed by the application, potentially resulting in arbitrary code execution in the security context of the…

  13. CVE-2026-94460

    I.R.I.S S.A. IRISPowerscan incorrect default permissions

    High7.2EPSS 0.18%, higher than 8% of scored CVEs

    I.R.I.S S.A. IRISPowerscanCVSS 4.0 · 7.2CWE-276

    IRISPowerscan contain an insecure default configuration where the built-in installation account is assigned elevated privileges with a predictable password, which could allow an unauthenticated attacker to gain unauthorised access to privileged application functionality.

  14. CVE-2026-94459

    I.R.I.S S.A. IRISPowerscan vulnerability

    High7.2EPSS 0.15%, higher than 4% of scored CVEs

    I.R.I.S S.A. IRISPowerscanCVSS 4.0 · 7.2CWE-1392

    IRISPowerscan contain default user accounts with predictable credentials. An unauthenticated attacker with access to an affected installation could use these credentials to authenticate to the application and access functionality available to the affected accounts, potentially…

  15. CVE-2026-93900

    elliotvs Simple CAPTCHA with Cloudflare Turnstile cross-site scripting

    Medium6.4EPSS 0.33%, higher than 27% of scored CVEs

    elliotvs Simple CAPTCHA with Cloudflare TurnstileCVSS 3.1 · 6.4CWE-79

    The Simple CAPTCHA with Cloudflare Turnstile plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the 'id' attribute of the [gravity-simple-turnstile] shortcode in versions up to, and including, 1.44.3 This is due to insufficient input sanitization and output…

  16. CVE-2026-120554

    carazo Import and export users and customers incorrect authorization

    High8.8EPSS 0.55%, higher than 47% of scored CVEs

    carazo Import and export users and customersCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-863

    The Import and export users and customers plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Privilege Escalation in all versions up to, and including, 2.5.11 This is due to a non-atomic multi-option write sequence in the `ACUI_Cron::save_settings()` function, which persists…

  17. CVE-2026-120422

    Sogou Input Method vulnerability

    High8.9EPSS 0.45%, higher than 39% of scored CVEs

    Sogou Input MethodCVSS 4.0 · 8.9

    Sogou Input Method for Windows contains a vulnerability in the configuration retrieval mechanism of its SGTool.exe component. The application retrieves configuration data over unencrypted HTTP connections, allowing an attacker capable of manipulating network traffic to replace…

  18. CVE-2026-115498

    wingerspeed Slim Jetpack cross-site scripting

    High7.2EPSS 0.32%, higher than 26% of scored CVEs

    wingerspeed Slim JetpackCVSS 3.1 · 7.2CWE-79

    The Slim Jetpack plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the 'g<PAGE_ID>-website (Website contact-field)' parameter in all versions up to, and including, 2.7.0.1 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for…

  19. CVE-2026-111822

    Apache ActiveMQ missing authentication

    High8.1EPSS 0.36%, higher than 30% of scored CVEs

    Apache ActiveMQ and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.1CWE-306

    Improper invalidation of cached authorizations vulnerability in Apache ActiveMQ, Apache ActiveMQ Runtime Config. After the runtime configuration plugin removes a principal's write grant on a destination, an authenticated connection opened before the change can keep sending to…

  20. CVE-2026-111821

    Apache ActiveMQ improper input validation

    High7.5EPSS 0.52%, higher than 45% of scored CVEs

    Apache ActiveMQ and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 7.5CWE-20

    Improper input validation vulnerability in Apache ActiveMQ, Apache ActiveMQ KahaDB. A user can create a durable subscription with a clientId and subscription name that have a combined length > 65,535 (while separately being shorter) on a broker using KahaDB which can cause the…

  21. CVE-2026-111040

    Coupa Total Spend Management Platform cross-site scripting

    Medium5.1EPSS 0.23%, higher than 14% of scored CVEs

    Coupa Total Spend Management PlatformCVSS 4.0 · 5.1CWE-80

    The platform allows persistent HTML injection into editable fields managed by TinyMCE. An authenticated attacker with low privileges can inject unsanitised HTML content which is stored in the database and subsequently rendered in other users’ browsers, affecting the display of…

  22. CVE-2026-111038

    Coupa Total Spend Management Platform CSV formula injection

    High7.3EPSS 0.35%, higher than 29% of scored CVEs

    Coupa Total Spend Management PlatformCVSS 4.0 · 7.3CWE-1236

    CSV formula injection vulnerability in the export functionality of the Coupa Supplier Portal SaaS platform. The vulnerability arises because certain user-controlled data, such as event names or templates within the Tenders module, are not properly validated or sanitised before…

  23. CVE-2026-111037

    Coupa Total Spend Management Platform cross-site scripting

    Medium5.1EPSS 0.46%, higher than 41% of scored CVEs

    Coupa Total Spend Management PlatformCVSS 4.0 · 5.1CWE-79

    A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Tenders module of the Coupa Supplier Portal SaaS platform. The vulnerability arises because the `list_item_function` parameter is reflected in the server’s response without proper output encoding or sanitisation, and…

  24. CVE-2026-111036

    Coupa Total Spend Management Platform server-side request forgery

    High8.4EPSS 0.41%, higher than 36% of scored CVEs

    Coupa Total Spend Management PlatformCVSS 4.0 · 8.4CWE-918

    Server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the Coupa Supplier Portal SaaS platform, specifically in the document conversion functionality available in the ‘Contracts > Templates’ section. The vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of references to external…

  25. CVE-2026-110935

    Phoenix Contact PLCnext Engineer path traversal

    High8.6EPSS 0.19%, higher than 9% of scored CVEs

    Phoenix Contact PLCnext EngineerCVSS 4.0 · 8.6CWE-22

    The PFI plugin framework deployment routine does not validate path components when extracting archive entries to the local plugin repository. Archive entries containing relative path segments such as '..' are not rejected, allowing an unauthenticated local attacker to write…

Reading the radar

CVSS, KEV and EPSS, briefly.

What is a CVE?

A CVE is a public identifier for one vulnerability in one product, such as CVE-2026-59310. The CVE program assigns it; NVD, run by the US National Institute of Standards and Technology, adds scores, weakness classes and affected product lists.

What does the CVSS score tell me?

CVSS rates how severe a vulnerability is on its own, from 0 to 10, and its vector says how it is reached: over the network or locally, with or without an account, with or without someone clicking. It says nothing about whether anyone is exploiting it. The radar shows the newest CVSS version scored and names it, because version 4.0 and 3.1 scores differ.

What is CISA KEV?

The Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog is CISA's list of CVEs with reliable evidence of exploitation in the wild. US federal agencies must fix each one by its due date, and it is the strongest signal of what to patch first.

What is EPSS?

FIRST's Exploit Prediction Scoring System estimates the probability that a CVE will see exploitation activity in the next 30 days, recomputed daily. Most CVEs score well under 1%, so the radar also shows the percentile: how a CVE ranks against every scored CVE.

How should I prioritise?

Patch what CISA lists as exploited first. Then CVEs with a high EPSS score, then the most severe by CVSS. Within each group, start with whatever is reachable from the internet without an account.

Where do the explanations come from?

Veriom writes them from fixed templates over each record: the weakness class says what went wrong and where in an architecture it lives, the CVSS vector says how it is reached and what it affects, and KEV, EPSS and CISA's assessment say whether it is exploited. Nobody reviews each CVE by hand, so read the description and the references before acting.

How fresh is the data?

New and changed CVEs arrive from NVD every hour, the KEV catalog every six hours and EPSS scores once a day. Each page shows when the data was last updated.

Know where a vulnerable component would sit in your systems.

A CVE names a product. Whether it matters depends on where that product sits in your systems: what reaches it, which trust boundary it guards and what it can reach once compromised. Veriom maps your components, their relationships and your trust boundaries from your code, cloud and delivery evidence, so you can see where a component like this sits. The radar itself does not look at your systems.

See how Veriom maps an architectureTake the interactive tour

Sources

  • CVE records and CVSS scores from the NVD CVE API. This product uses the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD.
  • Exploitation status from CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.
  • Exploit likelihood from FIRST’s Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS), refreshed daily.
  • Explanations are written by Veriom from fixed templates over each record’s data, not by a person reviewing each CVE. Descriptions are quoted from the records as published. The radar covers CVEs published since 4 Nov 2026, plus every CVE in the KEV catalog.