Free tool · No sign-in
CVE radar: the latest vulnerabilities, explained.
Every new CVE from NVD, with whether it is exploited in the wild (CISA KEV), how likely it is to be (FIRST EPSS), and what it means for your architecture in plain language.
Updated 11 Nov, 04:49 UTC from NVD, CISA KEV and FIRST EPSSMarkdownRSSJSON Feed
Patch first
Exploited in the wild, newest first.
CISA adds a CVE to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog when attackers are using it. Patch these first, then CVEs with a high EPSS score, then the most severe, starting with anything reachable from the internet.
Microsoft Office Outlook Missing User Interaction for Potentially Unsafe Action Vulnerability
Medium6.5Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS not scored yetMicrosoft Office and 6 moreCVSS 3.1 · 6.5CWE-356
Google Chromium Use-After-Free Vulnerability
High8.8Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS not scored yetGoogle Chromium and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-416
Barracuda Networks Email Security Gateway (ESG) Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel Vulnerability
Critical9.3Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-13EPSS 1.6%, higher than 76% of scored CVEsBarracuda Email Security Gateway (ESG)CVSS 4.0 · 9.3CWE-288
Barracuda Networks Multiple Products OS Command Injection Vulnerability
High8.6Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-13EPSS 1.1%, higher than 65% of scored CVEsBarracuda Email Security Gateway (ESG) and 5 moreCVSS 4.0 · 8.6CWE-78
Openwave Messaging Limited Webtop Media Transcoder Incorrect Resource Transfer Between Spheres Vulnerability
Medium4.3Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS 0.27%, higher than 20% of scored CVEsOpenwave Messaging Limited Webtop Media Transcoder and 2 moreCVSS 3.1 · 4.3CWE-669
Trends
The last 30 days, by severity.
4,691 CVEs published, 346 of them critical. Many arrive without a score yet: NVD and the reporting organisations add CVSS over the following days.
Show the numbers
| Day | Critical | High | Medium | Low | Not scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13 Oct 2026 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 Oct 2026 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 Oct 2026 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 Oct 2026 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 Oct 2026 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 Oct 2026 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 Oct 2026 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1 Nov 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 Nov 2026 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 3 Nov 2026 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 4 Nov 2026 | 35 | 158 | 138 | 32 | 1 |
| 5 Nov 2026 | 55 | 213 | 148 | 36 | 1 |
| 6 Nov 2026 | 40 | 146 | 205 | 47 | 6 |
| 7 Nov 2026 | 57 | 161 | 232 | 11 | 13 |
| 8 Nov 2026 | 23 | 128 | 143 | 26 | 0 |
| 9 Nov 2026 | 22 | 149 | 218 | 42 | 39 |
| 10 Nov 2026 | 103 | 1151 | 587 | 43 | 233 |
| 11 Nov 2026 | 2 | 11 | 15 | 1 | 0 |
Exploit likelihood (EPSS), last 30 days
- Under 1%713
- 1% to 10%25
- 10% to 50%2
- 50% or more7
- Not scored yet3944
Most affected vendors, last 30 days
Most common weaknesses, last 30 days
- Heap-based buffer overflow (CWE-122)343
- Cross-site scripting (CWE-79)329
- Use after free (CWE-416)276
- Missing authorization (CWE-862)230
- Out-of-bounds read (CWE-125)172
- Insecure direct object reference (CWE-639)164
- Server-side request forgery (CWE-918)147
- Path traversal (CWE-22)128
- Out-of-bounds write (CWE-787)127
- Incorrect authorization (CWE-863)127
Matching CVEs
112 CVEs match these filters, page 5 of 5.
Apple Multiple Products Type Confusion Vulnerability
High8.8Exploited, CISA due date 2022-05-25EPSS 16%, higher than 97% of scored CVEsApple iOS and 9 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-843
A type confusion issue was addressed with improved memory handling. This issue is fixed in iOS 12.2, tvOS 12.2, watchOS 5.2, Safari 12.1, iTunes 12.9.4 for Windows, iCloud for Windows 7.11. Processing maliciously crafted web content may lead to arbitrary code execution.
Apple iOS Memory Corruption Vulnerability
High7.8Exploited, CISA due date 2022-06-13EPSS 4.6%, higher than 92% of scored CVEsApple iOS and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 7.8CWE-787
A memory corruption issue was addressed with improved input validation. This issue is fixed in iOS 12.1.4. An application may be able to execute arbitrary code with kernel privileges.
Apple Multiple Products Memory Corruption Vulnerability
High7.8Exploited, CISA due date 2022-06-13EPSS 16%, higher than 97% of scored CVEsApple iOS and 3 moreCVSS 3.1 · 7.8CWE-787
A memory corruption issue was addressed with improved input validation. This issue is fixed in iOS 12.1.4, macOS Mojave 10.14.3 Supplemental Update. An application may be able to gain elevated privileges.
Apple Multiple Products Memory Corruption Vulnerability
High7.8Exploited, CISA due date 2022-07-18EPSS 2.4%, higher than 84% of scored CVEsiOS, macOS, tvOS, watchOS and 4 moreCVSS 3.1 · 7.8CWE-119
A memory corruption issue was addressed with improved memory handling. This issue affected versions prior to iOS 12, macOS Mojave 10.14, tvOS 12, watchOS 5.
Apple iOS and macOS Group Facetime Vulnerability
High7.5Exploited, CISA due date 2022-05-03EPSS 2.6%, higher than 86% of scored CVEsApple iOS and macOS and 4 moreCVSS 3.1 · 7.5
A logic issue existed in the handling of Group FaceTime calls. The issue was addressed with improved state management. This issue is fixed in iOS 12.1.4, macOS Mojave 10.14.3 Supplemental Update. The initiator of a Group FaceTime call may be able to cause the recipient to answer.
Apple iOS Webkit Memory Corruption Vulnerability
High8.8Exploited, CISA due date 2022-06-14EPSS 67%, higher than 99% of scored CVEsApple iOS and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-787
WebKit in Apple iOS before 9.3.5 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (memory corruption) via a crafted web site.
Apple iOS Memory Corruption Vulnerability
High7.8Exploited, CISA due date 2022-06-14EPSS 24%, higher than 98% of scored CVEsApple iOS and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 7.8CWE-787
The kernel in Apple iOS before 9.3.5 allows attackers to execute arbitrary code in a privileged context or cause a denial of service (memory corruption) via a crafted app.
Apple iOS Information Disclosure Vulnerability
Medium5.5Exploited, CISA due date 2022-06-14EPSS 33%, higher than 98% of scored CVEsApple iOS and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 5.5
The kernel in Apple iOS before 9.3.5 allows attackers to obtain sensitive information from memory via a crafted app.
ISC BIND Data Processing Errors Vulnerability
High7.5Exploited, CISA due date 2026-10-11EPSS 100%, higher than 100% of scored CVEsISC BIND and 9 moreCVSS 3.1 · 7.5CWE-19, CWE-617
named in ISC BIND 9.x before 9.9.7-P2 and 9.10.x before 9.10.2-P3 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (REQUIRE assertion failure and daemon exit) via TKEY queries.
Apple OS X Authentication Bypass Vulnerability
High7.8Exploited, CISA due date 2022-08-10EPSS 9.9%, higher than 96% of scored CVEsApple OS X and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 7.8CWE-59
The XPC implementation in Admin Framework in Apple OS X before 10.10.3 allows local users to bypass authentication and obtain admin privileges via unspecified vectors.
Apple OS X Heap-Based Buffer Overflow Vulnerability
High7.8Exploited, CISA due date 2022-08-10EPSS 49%, higher than 99% of scored CVEsApple OS X and 3 moreCVSS 3.1 · 7.8CWE-787
Heap-based buffer overflow in IOHIDFamily in Apple iOS before 8 and Apple TV before 7 allows attackers to execute arbitrary code in a privileged context via an application that provides crafted key-mapping properties.
PHP-CGI Query String Parameter Vulnerability
Critical9.8Exploited, CISA due date 2022-04-15EPSS 100%, higher than 100% of scored CVEsPHP and 9 moreCVSS 3.1 · 9.8CWE-77
sapi/cgi/cgi_main.c in PHP before 5.3.12 and 5.4.x before 5.4.2, when configured as a CGI script (aka php-cgi), does not properly handle query strings that lack an = (equals sign) character, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by placing command-line options…
Reading the radar
CVSS, KEV and EPSS, briefly.
What is a CVE?
A CVE is a public identifier for one vulnerability in one product, such as CVE-2026-59310. The CVE program assigns it; NVD, run by the US National Institute of Standards and Technology, adds scores, weakness classes and affected product lists.
What does the CVSS score tell me?
CVSS rates how severe a vulnerability is on its own, from 0 to 10, and its vector says how it is reached: over the network or locally, with or without an account, with or without someone clicking. It says nothing about whether anyone is exploiting it. The radar shows the newest CVSS version scored and names it, because version 4.0 and 3.1 scores differ.
What is CISA KEV?
The Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog is CISA's list of CVEs with reliable evidence of exploitation in the wild. US federal agencies must fix each one by its due date, and it is the strongest signal of what to patch first.
What is EPSS?
FIRST's Exploit Prediction Scoring System estimates the probability that a CVE will see exploitation activity in the next 30 days, recomputed daily. Most CVEs score well under 1%, so the radar also shows the percentile: how a CVE ranks against every scored CVE.
How should I prioritise?
Patch what CISA lists as exploited first. Then CVEs with a high EPSS score, then the most severe by CVSS. Within each group, start with whatever is reachable from the internet without an account.
Where do the explanations come from?
Veriom writes them from fixed templates over each record: the weakness class says what went wrong and where in an architecture it lives, the CVSS vector says how it is reached and what it affects, and KEV, EPSS and CISA's assessment say whether it is exploited. Nobody reviews each CVE by hand, so read the description and the references before acting.
How fresh is the data?
New and changed CVEs arrive from NVD every hour, the KEV catalog every six hours and EPSS scores once a day. Each page shows when the data was last updated.
Know where a vulnerable component would sit in your systems.
A CVE names a product. Whether it matters depends on where that product sits in your systems: what reaches it, which trust boundary it guards and what it can reach once compromised. Veriom maps your components, their relationships and your trust boundaries from your code, cloud and delivery evidence, so you can see where a component like this sits. The radar itself does not look at your systems.
Sources
- CVE records and CVSS scores from the NVD CVE API. This product uses the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD.
- Exploitation status from CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.
- Exploit likelihood from FIRST’s Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS), refreshed daily.
- Explanations are written by Veriom from fixed templates over each record’s data, not by a person reviewing each CVE. Descriptions are quoted from the records as published. The radar covers CVEs published since 4 Nov 2026, plus every CVE in the KEV catalog.