Free tool · No sign-in
CVE radar: the latest vulnerabilities, explained.
Every new CVE from NVD, with whether it is exploited in the wild (CISA KEV), how likely it is to be (FIRST EPSS), and what it means for your architecture in plain language.
Updated 11 Nov, 16:27 UTC from NVD, CISA KEV and FIRST EPSSMarkdownRSSJSON Feed
Patch first
Exploited in the wild, newest first.
CISA adds a CVE to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog when attackers are using it. Patch these first, then CVEs with a high EPSS score, then the most severe, starting with anything reachable from the internet.
Microsoft Office Outlook Missing User Interaction for Potentially Unsafe Action Vulnerability
Medium6.5Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS not scored yetMicrosoft Office and 6 moreCVSS 3.1 · 6.5CWE-356
Google Chromium Use-After-Free Vulnerability
High8.8Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS not scored yetGoogle Chromium and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-416
Barracuda Networks Email Security Gateway (ESG) Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel Vulnerability
Critical9.3Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-13EPSS 1.6%, higher than 76% of scored CVEsBarracuda Email Security Gateway (ESG)CVSS 4.0 · 9.3CWE-288
Barracuda Networks Multiple Products OS Command Injection Vulnerability
High8.6Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-13EPSS 1.1%, higher than 65% of scored CVEsBarracuda Email Security Gateway (ESG) and 5 moreCVSS 4.0 · 8.6CWE-78
Openwave Messaging Limited Webtop Media Transcoder Incorrect Resource Transfer Between Spheres Vulnerability
Medium4.3Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS 0.27%, higher than 20% of scored CVEsOpenwave Messaging Limited Webtop Media Transcoder and 2 moreCVSS 3.1 · 4.3CWE-669
Trends
The last 30 days, by severity.
4,964 CVEs published, 363 of them critical. Many arrive without a score yet: NVD and the reporting organisations add CVSS over the following days.
Show the numbers
| Day | Critical | High | Medium | Low | Not scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13 Oct 2026 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 Oct 2026 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 Oct 2026 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 Oct 2026 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 Oct 2026 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 Oct 2026 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 Oct 2026 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1 Nov 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 Nov 2026 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 3 Nov 2026 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 4 Nov 2026 | 35 | 158 | 138 | 32 | 1 |
| 5 Nov 2026 | 55 | 213 | 148 | 36 | 1 |
| 6 Nov 2026 | 40 | 146 | 205 | 47 | 6 |
| 7 Nov 2026 | 57 | 161 | 232 | 11 | 13 |
| 8 Nov 2026 | 23 | 128 | 143 | 26 | 0 |
| 9 Nov 2026 | 22 | 149 | 218 | 42 | 39 |
| 10 Nov 2026 | 103 | 1151 | 590 | 43 | 230 |
| 11 Nov 2026 | 19 | 82 | 152 | 17 | 32 |
Exploit likelihood (EPSS), last 30 days
- Under 1%713
- 1% to 10%25
- 10% to 50%2
- 50% or more7
- Not scored yet4217
Most affected vendors, last 30 days
Most common weaknesses, last 30 days
- Cross-site scripting (CWE-79)379
- Heap-based buffer overflow (CWE-122)343
- Missing authorization (CWE-862)280
- Use after free (CWE-416)277
- Out-of-bounds read (CWE-125)173
- Insecure direct object reference (CWE-639)171
- Server-side request forgery (CWE-918)152
- Incorrect authorization (CWE-863)136
- Path traversal (CWE-22)134
- Out-of-bounds write (CWE-787)131
Matching CVEs
6,716 CVEs match these filters, page 95 of 269.
SAP_SE SAP Web Dispatcher stack-based buffer overflow
High7.7EPSS not scored yetSAP_SE SAP Web DispatcherCVSS 3.1 · 7.7CWE-121
SAP Web Dispatcher does not sufficiently validate certain inputs during processing, which could lead to memory corruption. An attacker authenticated as a non-administrative user could exploit this vulnerability by providing specially crafted input, causing the Web Dispatcher…
SAP_SE SAP Cloud SDK for Python improper signature verification
High7.5EPSS not scored yetSAP_SE SAP Cloud SDK for PythonCVSS 3.1 · 7.5CWE-347
The SAP Cloud SDK for Python contains an improper cryptographic signature verification vulnerability (CWE-347) in IASContextProvider, the runtime-context provider registered by default via bootstrap(app).IASContextProvider extracted the app_tid, sap_gtid and user_uuid claims…
SAP_SE SAP BusinessObjects Business Intelligence Platform (Web Intelligence) XML external entity
Critical9.1EPSS not scored yetSAP_SE SAP BusinessObjects Business Intelligence Platform (Web Intelligence)CVSS 3.1 · 9.1CWE-611
SAP BusinessObjects Business Intelligence Platform (Web Intelligence) does not properly restrict external entity resolution when processing OLAP connection requests. An authenticated attacker could exploit this vulnerability to access restricted resources, enabling them to read…
SAP_SE SAP/astonish coarse access control
High7.1EPSS not scored yetSAP_SE SAP/astonishCVSS 3.1 · 7.1CWE-1220
In SAP/astonish, an authenticated user could potentially identify and operate on another team�s sandbox containers because of improper tenant isolation in the legacy Incus sandbox-management API handlers. The affected handlers did not use the tenant-aware session lookup path,…
SAP_SE SAP NetWeaver and ABAP Platform use of uninitialized resource
Medium4.3EPSS not scored yetSAP_SE SAP NetWeaver and ABAP PlatformCVSS 3.1 · 4.3CWE-908
SAP NetWeaver Application Server ABAP and ABAP Platform does not properly initialize memory in certain internal components. Under certain condition, an attacker with low privileges could disclose uninitialized memory contents under specific conditions. This results in a low…
SAP_SE S4CRM code injection
Critical9.9EPSS not scored yetSAP_SE S4CRMCVSS 3.1 · 9.9CWE-94
SAP NetWeaver does not perform necessary authorization checks and lacks sufficient input validation in certain remote-enabled functionality. An attacker with low privileges could send specially crafted input through a remote interface to inject and execute arbitrary code within…
SAP_SE SAP NetWeaver Application Server ABAP, ABAP Platform and SAP Web Dispatcher infinite loop
High7.5EPSS not scored yetSAP_SE SAP NetWeaver Application Server ABAP, ABAP Platform and SAP Web DispatcherCVSS 3.1 · 7.5CWE-835
SAP NetWeaver Application Server ABAP, ABAP Platform, and SAP Web Dispatcher do not sufficiently handle resource consumption when processing certain requests. An unauthenticated attacker could send specially crafted requests to the affected component, causing excessive resource…
SAP_SE SAP NetWeaver Application Server ABAP (Internet Communication Manager) and SAP W stack-based buffer overflow
High7.5EPSS not scored yetSAP_SE SAP NetWeaver Application Server ABAP (Internet Communication Manager) and SAP Web DispatcherCVSS 3.1 · 7.5CWE-121
SAP NetWeaver Application Server ABAP and SAP Web Dispatcher do not sufficiently validate certain header values processed during inbound request handling. An unauthenticated attacker could send a specially crafted request to cause the affected process to become unavailable.This…
WebPros Plesk extension "Site Import" path traversal
Critical9.2EPSS not scored yetWebPros Plesk extension "Site Import"CVSS 4.0 · 9.2CWE-22
The Plesk extension "Site Import" before 1.13.2 does not properly validate domain and session identifiers, allowing path traversal. This lets a non-owner subscription user redirect a privileged backend session into a directory they control, resulting in arbitrary code execution…
Versa VOS stack-based buffer overflow
Not scoredEPSS not scored yetVersa VOSNot scored yetCWE-121
Versa has confirmed a buffer overflow vulnerability in the IPsec implementation on VOS, aka Versa FlexVNF. Buffer Overflow Vulnerability Description When a maliciously crafted IKE Auth packet is sent to VOS, the vsmd process crashes, thereby resulting in a Denial of Service. An…
Versa VOS weak authentication
High7.6EPSS not scored yetVersa VOSCVSS 3.0 · 7.6CWE-1390
The Node.js web service on VOS (previously Versa FlexVNF) is used for URL-based Zero Touch Provisioning (ZTP) of the VOS appliance and is not required after provisioning is complete. The /decryptTest endpoint of this service is registered in server.js before the session…
Versa VOS hard-coded credentials
High7.6EPSS not scored yetVersa VOSCVSS 3.0 · 7.6CWE-798
The Node.js web service on VOS (previously Versa FlexVNF) is used for URL-based Zero Touch Provisioning (ZTP) of the VOS appliance and is not required after provisioning is complete. The express-session middleware in server.js is configured with a hardcoded secret that is…
Versa VOS predictable numbers or identifiers
Not scoredEPSS not scored yetVersa VOSNot scored yetCWE-340
The Node.js web service on VOS (previously Versa FlexVNF) is used for URL-based Zero Touch Provisioning (ZTP) of the VOS appliance and is not required after provisioning is complete. This service generates session identifiers using UUID version 1 (UUIDv1), which is derived from…
Versa VOS weak authentication
High7.6EPSS not scored yetVersa VOSCVSS 3.0 · 7.6CWE-1390
The Node.js web service on VOS (previously Versa FlexVNF) is used for URL-based Zero Touch Provisioning (ZTP) of the VOS appliance and is not required after provisioning is complete. This service authenticates users and administrators to its web interface during initial…
Versa VOS OS command injection
High7.6EPSS not scored yetVersa VOSCVSS 3.0 · 7.6CWE-78
The Node.js web service on VOS (previously Versa FlexVNF) is used for URL-based Zero Touch Provisioning (ZTP) of the VOS appliance and is not required after provisioning is complete. The /authenticate endpoint of this service passes user-supplied username and password values to…
ettercap vulnerability
High8.7EPSS not scored yetettercapCVSS 4.0 · 8.7CWE-124
Ettercap through 0.8.4.1 contains a stack buffer underwrite vulnerability in the telnet dissector in src/dissectors/ec_telnet.c that decrements the output pointer on backspace without a lower bound check. Attackers can send a telnet stream with more backspaces than preceding…
ettercap out-of-bounds read
High7.2EPSS not scored yetettercapCVSS 4.0 · 7.2CWE-125
Ettercap through 0.8.4.1 contains an out-of-bounds read vulnerability in Parse_NTLM_Auth() in src/dissectors/ec_http.c due to unvalidated NTLM message offsets. Attackers can send a crafted HTTP Authorization header observed by Ettercap to read beyond the buffer, disclosing…
ettercap integer underflow
High7.7EPSS not scored yetettercapCVSS 4.0 · 7.7CWE-191
Ettercap through 0.8.4.1 contains an integer underflow in ccmp_decrypt() in src/ec_encryption_ccmp.c that subtracts the 8-byte CCMP trailer without checking minimum length. Attackers on a network whose WPA key is loaded can send a short crafted CCMP frame to overflow a stack…
ettercap out-of-bounds read
High7.2EPSS not scored yetettercapCVSS 4.0 · 7.2CWE-125
Ettercap through 0.8.4.1 contains an out-of-bounds read and size_t underflow vulnerability in sslw_remove_sts() in src/ec_sslwrap.c, caused by a stale length and an unchecked memmem() result when stripping Strict-Transport-Security headers. A malicious HTTPS server whose…
ettercap out-of-bounds read
High7.2EPSS not scored yetettercapCVSS 4.0 · 7.2CWE-125
Ettercap through 0.8.4.1 contains a heap out-of-bounds read vulnerability in sslw_get_clienthello_sni() in src/ec_sslwrap.c that trusts the unchecked 16-bit SNI length field. Network-adjacent attackers can send crafted TLS ClientHello messages during SSL interception to leak up…
ettercap heap-based buffer overflow
High7.2EPSS not scored yetettercapCVSS 4.0 · 7.2CWE-122
Ettercap through 0.8.4.1 contains a heap buffer overflow vulnerability in gg_get_version() in src/dissectors/ec_gg.c that writes up to 44 bytes into a 30-byte allocation. Remote attackers can send Gadu-Gadu traffic on TCP port 8074 with a crafted version field through a…
ettercap use after free
High8.7EPSS not scored yetettercapCVSS 4.0 · 8.7CWE-416
Ettercap through 0.8.4.1 contains a use-after-free vulnerability in func_pcre() in src/ec_filter.c that reads the PCRE2 ovector after freeing match data. Network-adjacent attackers can send packets matching a loaded pcre_regex() substitution filter to corrupt memory and…
FluxionNetwork fluxion OS command injection
High8.6EPSS not scored yetFluxionNetwork fluxionCVSS 4.0 · 8.6CWE-78
Fluxion before 6.39 contains an OS command injection vulnerability in the fluxion.sh target scanner, which decodes access point ESSIDs with eval after escaping only single quotes. Attackers within Wi-Fi range can broadcast an access point with a crafted SSID to execute commands…
CoreBunch Instatic missing authorization
High7.1EPSS not scored yetCoreBunch InstaticCVSS 4.0 · 7.1CWE-862
Instatic before 0.0.21 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability in handleRowAuthor that allows authenticated users to skip table-level access checks by loading rows with getDataRow() instead of loadRowForAccess(). Attackers holding content.edit.any but lacking…
nocobase incorrect authorization
High7.1EPSS not scored yetnocobaseCVSS 4.0 · 7.1CWE-863
NocoBase plugin-ai 2.1.0 through 2.2.41 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability in getAccessibleAIEmployee() that lets authenticated users access unassigned AI employees by overriding the role-derived filter with a supplied username. Attackers can use the…
Reading the radar
CVSS, KEV and EPSS, briefly.
What is a CVE?
A CVE is a public identifier for one vulnerability in one product, such as CVE-2026-59310. The CVE program assigns it; NVD, run by the US National Institute of Standards and Technology, adds scores, weakness classes and affected product lists.
What does the CVSS score tell me?
CVSS rates how severe a vulnerability is on its own, from 0 to 10, and its vector says how it is reached: over the network or locally, with or without an account, with or without someone clicking. It says nothing about whether anyone is exploiting it. The radar shows the newest CVSS version scored and names it, because version 4.0 and 3.1 scores differ.
What is CISA KEV?
The Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog is CISA's list of CVEs with reliable evidence of exploitation in the wild. US federal agencies must fix each one by its due date, and it is the strongest signal of what to patch first.
What is EPSS?
FIRST's Exploit Prediction Scoring System estimates the probability that a CVE will see exploitation activity in the next 30 days, recomputed daily. Most CVEs score well under 1%, so the radar also shows the percentile: how a CVE ranks against every scored CVE.
How should I prioritise?
Patch what CISA lists as exploited first. Then CVEs with a high EPSS score, then the most severe by CVSS. Within each group, start with whatever is reachable from the internet without an account.
Where do the explanations come from?
Veriom writes them from fixed templates over each record: the weakness class says what went wrong and where in an architecture it lives, the CVSS vector says how it is reached and what it affects, and KEV, EPSS and CISA's assessment say whether it is exploited. Nobody reviews each CVE by hand, so read the description and the references before acting.
How fresh is the data?
New and changed CVEs arrive from NVD every hour, the KEV catalog every six hours and EPSS scores once a day. Each page shows when the data was last updated.
Know where a vulnerable component would sit in your systems.
A CVE names a product. Whether it matters depends on where that product sits in your systems: what reaches it, which trust boundary it guards and what it can reach once compromised. Veriom maps your components, their relationships and your trust boundaries from your code, cloud and delivery evidence, so you can see where a component like this sits. The radar itself does not look at your systems.
Sources
- CVE records and CVSS scores from the NVD CVE API. This product uses the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD.
- Exploitation status from CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.
- Exploit likelihood from FIRST’s Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS), refreshed daily.
- Explanations are written by Veriom from fixed templates over each record’s data, not by a person reviewing each CVE. Descriptions are quoted from the records as published. The radar covers CVEs published since 4 Nov 2026, plus every CVE in the KEV catalog.