Free tool · No sign-in
CVE radar: the latest vulnerabilities, explained.
Every new CVE from NVD, with whether it is exploited in the wild (CISA KEV), how likely it is to be (FIRST EPSS), and what it means for your architecture in plain language.
Updated 11 Nov, 04:49 UTC from NVD, CISA KEV and FIRST EPSSMarkdownRSSJSON Feed
Patch first
Exploited in the wild, newest first.
CISA adds a CVE to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog when attackers are using it. Patch these first, then CVEs with a high EPSS score, then the most severe, starting with anything reachable from the internet.
Microsoft Office Outlook Missing User Interaction for Potentially Unsafe Action Vulnerability
Medium6.5Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS not scored yetMicrosoft Office and 6 moreCVSS 3.1 · 6.5CWE-356
Google Chromium Use-After-Free Vulnerability
High8.8Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS not scored yetGoogle Chromium and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-416
Barracuda Networks Email Security Gateway (ESG) Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel Vulnerability
Critical9.3Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-13EPSS 1.6%, higher than 76% of scored CVEsBarracuda Email Security Gateway (ESG)CVSS 4.0 · 9.3CWE-288
Barracuda Networks Multiple Products OS Command Injection Vulnerability
High8.6Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-13EPSS 1.1%, higher than 65% of scored CVEsBarracuda Email Security Gateway (ESG) and 5 moreCVSS 4.0 · 8.6CWE-78
Openwave Messaging Limited Webtop Media Transcoder Incorrect Resource Transfer Between Spheres Vulnerability
Medium4.3Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS 0.27%, higher than 20% of scored CVEsOpenwave Messaging Limited Webtop Media Transcoder and 2 moreCVSS 3.1 · 4.3CWE-669
Trends
The last 30 days, by severity.
4,691 CVEs published, 346 of them critical. Many arrive without a score yet: NVD and the reporting organisations add CVSS over the following days.
Show the numbers
| Day | Critical | High | Medium | Low | Not scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13 Oct 2026 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 Oct 2026 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 Oct 2026 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 Oct 2026 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 Oct 2026 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 Oct 2026 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 Oct 2026 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1 Nov 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 Nov 2026 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 3 Nov 2026 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 4 Nov 2026 | 35 | 158 | 138 | 32 | 1 |
| 5 Nov 2026 | 55 | 213 | 148 | 36 | 1 |
| 6 Nov 2026 | 40 | 146 | 205 | 47 | 6 |
| 7 Nov 2026 | 57 | 161 | 232 | 11 | 13 |
| 8 Nov 2026 | 23 | 128 | 143 | 26 | 0 |
| 9 Nov 2026 | 22 | 149 | 218 | 42 | 39 |
| 10 Nov 2026 | 103 | 1151 | 587 | 43 | 233 |
| 11 Nov 2026 | 2 | 11 | 15 | 1 | 0 |
Exploit likelihood (EPSS), last 30 days
- Under 1%713
- 1% to 10%25
- 10% to 50%2
- 50% or more7
- Not scored yet3944
Most affected vendors, last 30 days
Most common weaknesses, last 30 days
- Heap-based buffer overflow (CWE-122)343
- Cross-site scripting (CWE-79)329
- Use after free (CWE-416)276
- Missing authorization (CWE-862)230
- Out-of-bounds read (CWE-125)172
- Insecure direct object reference (CWE-639)164
- Server-side request forgery (CWE-918)147
- Path traversal (CWE-22)128
- Out-of-bounds write (CWE-787)127
- Incorrect authorization (CWE-863)127
Matching CVEs
9 CVEs match these filters.
BlackBerry Ltd QNX Hypervisor stack-based buffer overflow
Low3.3EPSS not scored yetBlackBerry Ltd QNX Hypervisor and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 3.3CWE-121
Stack-based Buffer Overflow in the ACPI event handler of the QVM could allow an attacker in a guest to crash the QVM by sending a crafted ACPI request.
BlackBerry Ltd QNX Hypervisor time-of-check to time-of-use race
Low3.3EPSS not scored yetBlackBerry Ltd QNX Hypervisor and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 3.3CWE-367
Time-of-check Time-of-use (TOCTOU) Race Condition in the virtio network virtual device could allow an attacker in the guest to manipulate the virtual network device causing a crash of the QVM.
BlackBerry Ltd QNX Hypervisor out-of-bounds read
Medium4.4EPSS not scored yetBlackBerry Ltd QNX Hypervisor and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 4.4CWE-125
Out-Of-Bounds Read in the MSI-X table in the QVM could allow an attacker in the guest to cause an information disclosure or a crash of the QVM.
BlackBerry Ltd QNX Hypervisor out-of-bounds write
High7.7EPSS not scored yetBlackBerry Ltd QNX Hypervisor and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 7.7CWE-787
Invalid Memory Access via the MSI-X table in QVM could allow an attacker in the guest to execute arbitrary code in the QVM to cause memory corruption, information disclosure or a crash of the QVM.
BlackBerry Ltd QNX Software Development Platform vulnerability
Medium6.2EPSS not scored yetBlackBerry Ltd QNX Software Development PlatformCVSS 3.1 · 6.2CWE-1287
Improper Input Validation in the io-char library's DCMD_CHR_TCINJECTC devctl() handler could allow an attacker with local access to cause data tampering in the memory input buffer of the Character I/O device driver.
BlackBerry Ltd QNX Software Development Platform heap-based buffer overflow
High7.4EPSS not scored yetBlackBerry Ltd QNX Software Development PlatformCVSS 3.1 · 7.4CWE-122
Heap-based Buffer Overflow in the io-char library's DCMD_CHR_WAITINFO devctl() handler could allow an attacker with local access to cause data tampering, arbitrary code execution, or a crash in the Character I/O device driver.
BlackBerry Ltd QNX Software Development Platform heap-based buffer overflow
High8.4EPSS not scored yetBlackBerry Ltd QNX Software Development Platform and 2 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.4CWE-122
Heap-based Buffer Overflow in the DCMD_PROC_EVENT handler of the procnto could allow an attacker with local access to cause an information disclosure, data tampering or a crash of the QNX Neutrino kernel.
BlackBerry Ltd QNX Software Development Platform (SDP) untrusted pointer dereference
Medium4.0EPSS not scored yetBlackBerry Ltd QNX Software Development Platform (SDP) and 2 moreCVSS 3.1 · 4.0CWE-822
Invalid Pointer Reference in the TimerSettime() system call could allow an attacker with local access to arm a crafted timer event which can cause an information disclosure in the QNX Neutrino kernel.
BlackBerry Ltd QNX Software Development Platform (SDP) vulnerability
Medium4.0EPSS not scored yetBlackBerry Ltd QNX Software Development Platform (SDP) and 2 moreCVSS 3.1 · 4.0CWE-1287
Improper Input Validation in a procnto message handler could allow an attacker with local access to send a crafted message which can cause an information disclosure in the QNX Neutrino kernel
Reading the radar
CVSS, KEV and EPSS, briefly.
What is a CVE?
A CVE is a public identifier for one vulnerability in one product, such as CVE-2026-59310. The CVE program assigns it; NVD, run by the US National Institute of Standards and Technology, adds scores, weakness classes and affected product lists.
What does the CVSS score tell me?
CVSS rates how severe a vulnerability is on its own, from 0 to 10, and its vector says how it is reached: over the network or locally, with or without an account, with or without someone clicking. It says nothing about whether anyone is exploiting it. The radar shows the newest CVSS version scored and names it, because version 4.0 and 3.1 scores differ.
What is CISA KEV?
The Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog is CISA's list of CVEs with reliable evidence of exploitation in the wild. US federal agencies must fix each one by its due date, and it is the strongest signal of what to patch first.
What is EPSS?
FIRST's Exploit Prediction Scoring System estimates the probability that a CVE will see exploitation activity in the next 30 days, recomputed daily. Most CVEs score well under 1%, so the radar also shows the percentile: how a CVE ranks against every scored CVE.
How should I prioritise?
Patch what CISA lists as exploited first. Then CVEs with a high EPSS score, then the most severe by CVSS. Within each group, start with whatever is reachable from the internet without an account.
Where do the explanations come from?
Veriom writes them from fixed templates over each record: the weakness class says what went wrong and where in an architecture it lives, the CVSS vector says how it is reached and what it affects, and KEV, EPSS and CISA's assessment say whether it is exploited. Nobody reviews each CVE by hand, so read the description and the references before acting.
How fresh is the data?
New and changed CVEs arrive from NVD every hour, the KEV catalog every six hours and EPSS scores once a day. Each page shows when the data was last updated.
Know where a vulnerable component would sit in your systems.
A CVE names a product. Whether it matters depends on where that product sits in your systems: what reaches it, which trust boundary it guards and what it can reach once compromised. Veriom maps your components, their relationships and your trust boundaries from your code, cloud and delivery evidence, so you can see where a component like this sits. The radar itself does not look at your systems.
Sources
- CVE records and CVSS scores from the NVD CVE API. This product uses the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD.
- Exploitation status from CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.
- Exploit likelihood from FIRST’s Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS), refreshed daily.
- Explanations are written by Veriom from fixed templates over each record’s data, not by a person reviewing each CVE. Descriptions are quoted from the records as published. The radar covers CVEs published since 4 Nov 2026, plus every CVE in the KEV catalog.