Free tool · No sign-in
CVE radar: the latest vulnerabilities, explained.
Every new CVE from NVD, with whether it is exploited in the wild (CISA KEV), how likely it is to be (FIRST EPSS), and what it means for your architecture in plain language.
Updated 13 Nov, 10:12 UTC from NVD, CISA KEV and FIRST EPSSMarkdownRSSJSON Feed
Patch first
Exploited in the wild, newest first.
CISA adds a CVE to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog when attackers are using it. Patch these first, then CVEs with a high EPSS score, then the most severe, starting with anything reachable from the internet.
Microsoft Office Outlook Missing User Interaction for Potentially Unsafe Action Vulnerability
Medium6.5Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS 1.6%, higher than 76% of scored CVEsMicrosoft Office and 6 moreCVSS 3.1 · 6.5CWE-356
Google Chromium Use-After-Free Vulnerability
High8.8Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS 0.96%, higher than 62% of scored CVEsGoogle Chromium and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-416
Barracuda Networks Email Security Gateway (ESG) Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel Vulnerability
Critical9.3Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-13EPSS 8.9%, higher than 95% of scored CVEsBarracuda Email Security Gateway (ESG) and 5 moreCVSS 4.0 · 9.3CWE-288
Barracuda Networks Multiple Products OS Command Injection Vulnerability
High8.6Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-13EPSS 6.2%, higher than 94% of scored CVEsBarracuda Email Security Gateway (ESG) and 9 moreCVSS 4.0 · 8.6CWE-78
Openwave Messaging Limited Webtop Media Transcoder Incorrect Resource Transfer Between Spheres Vulnerability
Medium4.3Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS 0.64%, higher than 51% of scored CVEsOpenwave Messaging Limited Webtop Media Transcoder and 2 moreCVSS 3.1 · 4.3CWE-669
Trends
The last 30 days, by severity.
5,795 CVEs published, 440 of them critical. Many arrive without a score yet: NVD and the reporting organisations add CVSS over the following days.
Show the numbers
| Day | Critical | High | Medium | Low | Not scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15 Oct 2026 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 Oct 2026 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 Oct 2026 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 Oct 2026 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 Oct 2026 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1 Nov 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 Nov 2026 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 3 Nov 2026 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 4 Nov 2026 | 35 | 158 | 142 | 29 | 0 |
| 5 Nov 2026 | 55 | 213 | 149 | 36 | 0 |
| 6 Nov 2026 | 40 | 148 | 203 | 47 | 6 |
| 7 Nov 2026 | 54 | 164 | 232 | 11 | 13 |
| 8 Nov 2026 | 23 | 128 | 143 | 26 | 0 |
| 9 Nov 2026 | 31 | 165 | 231 | 42 | 1 |
| 10 Nov 2026 | 106 | 1189 | 596 | 45 | 178 |
| 11 Nov 2026 | 51 | 284 | 237 | 44 | 48 |
| 12 Nov 2026 | 28 | 172 | 129 | 23 | 6 |
| 13 Nov 2026 | 11 | 24 | 46 | 18 | 22 |
Exploit likelihood (EPSS), last 30 days
- Under 1%5232
- 1% to 10%188
- 10% to 50%2
- 50% or more4
- Not scored yet369
Most affected vendors, last 30 days
Most common weaknesses, last 30 days
- Cross-site scripting (CWE-79)432
- Heap-based buffer overflow (CWE-122)357
- Use after free (CWE-416)327
- Missing authorization (CWE-862)319
- Insecure direct object reference (CWE-639)202
- Out-of-bounds read (CWE-125)192
- Incorrect authorization (CWE-863)173
- Server-side request forgery (CWE-918)169
- Out-of-bounds write (CWE-787)161
- Path traversal (CWE-22)158
Matching CVEs
8 CVEs match these filters.
Edito CMS deserialization of untrusted data
High8.4EPSS not scored yetEdito CMSCVSS 4.0 · 8.4CWE-502
Edito CMS deserializes JSON data without further validation. A user (even an administrator) cannot exploit this vulnerability through the application's normal functionality. An attacker who could modify cache entries or inject them could execute code on the server. This issue…
Edito CMS vulnerability
Low2.1EPSS not scored yetEdito CMSCVSS 4.0 · 2.1CWE-598
Edito CMS sends JWT token via GET requests. This allows a local attacker with access to browser history to obtain valid JWT token and perform action on behalf of the victim. The token is valid for only short period of time; after that time, it expires and can no longer be used.…
Edito CMS unrestricted file upload
High7.1EPSS not scored yetEdito CMSCVSS 4.0 · 7.1CWE-434
Edito CMS restricts the ability to upload files via the UI to specific file types. However, an avatar upload functionality allows an attacker to upload files of any type and extension without restriction. This issue was fixed in version 5.10.2607. Hotfixes for older versions…
Edito CMS cross-site scripting
Medium5.1EPSS not scored yetEdito CMSCVSS 4.0 · 5.1CWE-79
Edito CMS is vulnerable to Stored XSS in avatar upload functionality. Authenticated attacker can inject arbitrary HTML and JS into website, which will be rendered/executed when visiting an URL leading to a edited avatar. This issue was fixed in version 5.10.2607. Hotfixes for…
Edito CMS cross-site scripting
Medium5.1EPSS not scored yetEdito CMSCVSS 4.0 · 5.1CWE-79
Edito CMS is vulnerable to Stored XSS via content parameter in Tiny editor functionality. Authenticated attacker can inject arbitrary HTML and JS into website, which will be rendered/executed when user tries to edit changed entry. This issue was fixed in version 5.10.2607.…
Edito CMS cross-site scripting
Medium5.1EPSS not scored yetEdito CMSCVSS 4.0 · 5.1CWE-79
Edito CMS is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS). Due to improper input validation, an authenticated attacker can inject malicious scripts into givenName and surname parameters via the /api/auth/profile endpoint. When an administrator visits the admin changelog…
Edito CMS expression language injection
High7.1EPSS not scored yetEdito CMSCVSS 4.0 · 7.1CWE-917
Edito CMS is vulnerable to Dynamic LINQ injection. Due to improper input validation, an authenticated attacker can inject conditional expressions into the sort parameter of paginated administrative endpoints. Analyzing the returned result order allows the attacker to extract…
Edito CMS improper signature verification
High8.7EPSS not scored yetEdito CMSCVSS 4.0 · 8.7CWE-347
Edito CMS is vulnerable to improper cryptographic signature verification in the JWT refresh logic. An authenticated low-privilege user can submit self-crafted JWT containing an existing user identifier and, due to the lack of signature validation, obtain a valid,…
Reading the radar
CVSS, KEV and EPSS, briefly.
What is a CVE?
A CVE is a public identifier for one vulnerability in one product, such as CVE-2026-59310. The CVE program assigns it; NVD, run by the US National Institute of Standards and Technology, adds scores, weakness classes and affected product lists.
What does the CVSS score tell me?
CVSS rates how severe a vulnerability is on its own, from 0 to 10, and its vector says how it is reached: over the network or locally, with or without an account, with or without someone clicking. It says nothing about whether anyone is exploiting it. The radar shows the newest CVSS version scored and names it, because version 4.0 and 3.1 scores differ.
What is CISA KEV?
The Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog is CISA's list of CVEs with reliable evidence of exploitation in the wild. US federal agencies must fix each one by its due date, and it is the strongest signal of what to patch first.
What is EPSS?
FIRST's Exploit Prediction Scoring System estimates the probability that a CVE will see exploitation activity in the next 30 days, recomputed daily. Most CVEs score well under 1%, so the radar also shows the percentile: how a CVE ranks against every scored CVE.
How should I prioritise?
Patch what CISA lists as exploited first. Then CVEs with a high EPSS score, then the most severe by CVSS. Within each group, start with whatever is reachable from the internet without an account.
Where do the explanations come from?
Veriom writes them from fixed templates over each record: the weakness class says what went wrong and where in an architecture it lives, the CVSS vector says how it is reached and what it affects, and KEV, EPSS and CISA's assessment say whether it is exploited. Nobody reviews each CVE by hand, so read the description and the references before acting.
How fresh is the data?
New and changed CVEs arrive from NVD every hour, the KEV catalog every six hours and EPSS scores once a day. Each page shows when the data was last updated.
Know where a vulnerable component would sit in your systems.
A CVE names a product. Whether it matters depends on where that product sits in your systems: what reaches it, which trust boundary it guards and what it can reach once compromised. Veriom maps your components, their relationships and your trust boundaries from your code, cloud and delivery evidence, so you can see where a component like this sits. The radar itself does not look at your systems.
Sources
- CVE records and CVSS scores from the NVD CVE API. This product uses the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD.
- Exploitation status from CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.
- Exploit likelihood from FIRST’s Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS), refreshed daily.
- Explanations are written by Veriom from fixed templates over each record’s data, not by a person reviewing each CVE. Descriptions are quoted from the records as published. The radar covers CVEs published since 4 Nov 2026, plus every CVE in the KEV catalog.