Free tool · No sign-in
CVE radar: the latest vulnerabilities, explained.
Every new CVE from NVD, with whether it is exploited in the wild (CISA KEV), how likely it is to be (FIRST EPSS), and what it means for your architecture in plain language.
Updated 13 Nov, 15:14 UTC from NVD, CISA KEV and FIRST EPSSMarkdownRSSJSON Feed
Patch first
Exploited in the wild, newest first.
CISA adds a CVE to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog when attackers are using it. Patch these first, then CVEs with a high EPSS score, then the most severe, starting with anything reachable from the internet.
Microsoft Office Outlook Missing User Interaction for Potentially Unsafe Action Vulnerability
Medium6.5Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS 1.6%, higher than 76% of scored CVEsMicrosoft Office and 6 moreCVSS 3.1 · 6.5CWE-356
Google Chromium Use-After-Free Vulnerability
High8.8Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS 0.96%, higher than 62% of scored CVEsGoogle Chromium and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-416
Barracuda Networks Email Security Gateway (ESG) Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel Vulnerability
Critical9.3Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-13EPSS 11%, higher than 96% of scored CVEsBarracuda Email Security Gateway (ESG) and 5 moreCVSS 4.0 · 9.3CWE-288
Barracuda Networks Multiple Products OS Command Injection Vulnerability
High8.6Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-13EPSS 9.1%, higher than 95% of scored CVEsBarracuda Email Security Gateway (ESG) and 9 moreCVSS 4.0 · 8.6CWE-78
Openwave Messaging Limited Webtop Media Transcoder Incorrect Resource Transfer Between Spheres Vulnerability
Medium4.3Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS 0.64%, higher than 51% of scored CVEsOpenwave Messaging Limited Webtop Media Transcoder and 2 moreCVSS 3.1 · 4.3CWE-669
Trends
The last 30 days, by severity.
6,173 CVEs published, 473 of them critical. Many arrive without a score yet: NVD and the reporting organisations add CVSS over the following days.
Show the numbers
| Day | Critical | High | Medium | Low | Not scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15 Oct 2026 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 Oct 2026 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 Oct 2026 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 Oct 2026 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 Oct 2026 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1 Nov 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 Nov 2026 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 3 Nov 2026 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 4 Nov 2026 | 35 | 158 | 142 | 29 | 0 |
| 5 Nov 2026 | 55 | 213 | 149 | 36 | 0 |
| 6 Nov 2026 | 40 | 148 | 203 | 47 | 6 |
| 7 Nov 2026 | 54 | 164 | 232 | 11 | 13 |
| 8 Nov 2026 | 23 | 128 | 143 | 26 | 0 |
| 9 Nov 2026 | 31 | 165 | 231 | 42 | 1 |
| 10 Nov 2026 | 110 | 1199 | 601 | 45 | 159 |
| 11 Nov 2026 | 51 | 284 | 237 | 44 | 48 |
| 12 Nov 2026 | 28 | 172 | 129 | 23 | 6 |
| 13 Nov 2026 | 40 | 191 | 204 | 39 | 25 |
Exploit likelihood (EPSS), last 30 days
- Under 1%5904
- 1% to 10%217
- 10% to 50%4
- 50% or more4
- Not scored yet44
Most affected vendors, last 30 days
Most common weaknesses, last 30 days
- Cross-site scripting (CWE-79)475
- Missing authorization (CWE-862)359
- Heap-based buffer overflow (CWE-122)358
- Use after free (CWE-416)338
- Insecure direct object reference (CWE-639)221
- Out-of-bounds read (CWE-125)192
- Incorrect authorization (CWE-863)191
- Server-side request forgery (CWE-918)177
- Path traversal (CWE-22)174
- SQL injection (CWE-89)172
Matching CVEs
13 CVEs match these filters.
exceljs improper output encoding
Low2.3EPSS 0.30%, higher than 22% of scored CVEsexceljsCVSS 4.0 · 2.3CWE-116
ExcelJS through 4.4.0 contains a formula injection vulnerability in the totals row formula getter in lib/doc/table.js that fails to escape [, ], # and ' characters in structured reference column names. Attackers can supply column names containing ] via untrusted input like…
exceljs external control of a file name
High8.7EPSS 0.51%, higher than 44% of scored CVEsexceljsCVSS 4.0 · 8.7CWE-73
ExcelJS through 4.4.0 contains an arbitrary file read vulnerability in the streaming WorkbookWriter that allows attackers to read local files by supplying crafted image filenames to addImage. Attackers can inject ../ path segments into user-controlled image paths, causing…
exceljs incomplete cleanup
High8.7EPSS 0.63%, higher than 51% of scored CVEsexceljsCVSS 4.0 · 8.7CWE-459
ExcelJS through 4.4.0 contains a resource leak vulnerability in the streaming WorkbookReader.parse that leaves temporary files and open descriptors when sheet parsing fails or iteration stops early. Attackers can repeatedly upload malformed multi-sheet workbooks with worksheets…
exceljs regular expression denial of service
Medium6.9EPSS 0.52%, higher than 45% of scored CVEsexceljsCVSS 4.0 · 6.9CWE-1333
ExcelJS through 4.4.0 contains a regular expression denial of service vulnerability in slideFormula in lib/utils/shared-formula.js when translating shared formulas to child cells. Attackers can supply a crafted spreadsheet with very long master formulas, such as runs of…
exceljs allocation without limits
High8.7EPSS 0.63%, higher than 51% of scored CVEsexceljsCVSS 4.0 · 8.7CWE-770
ExcelJS through 4.4.0 contains a memory exhaustion vulnerability that allows attackers to crash applications by supplying a workbook with an unbounded image anchor column in the drawing part. Attackers can set an anchor column such as 300000000 in xl/drawings/drawing1.xml so…
exceljs vulnerability
High8.7EPSS 0.68%, higher than 53% of scored CVEsexceljsCVSS 4.0 · 8.7CWE-606
exceljs through 4.4.0 contains a denial of service vulnerability that allows attackers to block the event loop by supplying unbounded row r attributes parsed in row-xform.js. Attackers can craft an XLSX file with a row numbered far beyond Excel's limit, making getSheetValues(),…
exceljs vulnerability
High8.7EPSS 0.63%, higher than 51% of scored CVEsexceljsCVSS 4.0 · 8.7CWE-606
ExcelJS through 4.4.0 contains a denial of service vulnerability that allows attackers to block the event loop by supplying an unbounded sheetId in xl/workbook.xml. Attackers can provide a workbook with a huge sheetId, making the sparse worksheet array walk stall worksheets,…
exceljs allocation without limits
High8.7EPSS 0.63%, higher than 51% of scored CVEsexceljsCVSS 4.0 · 8.7CWE-770
ExcelJS through 4.4.0 contains a resource exhaustion vulnerability in data-validations-xform.js that allows attackers to exhaust CPU and memory by supplying unbounded sqref ranges. Attackers can provide a small crafted workbook with a sqref of A1:XFD1048576 to make xlsx.load()…
exceljs allocation without limits
High8.7EPSS 0.63%, higher than 51% of scored CVEsexceljsCVSS 4.0 · 8.7CWE-770
ExcelJS through 4.4.0 contains a memory exhaustion vulnerability that allows attackers to crash applications by supplying a workbook with an oversized defined-name range. DefinedNames.addEx expands ranges such as S!$A$1:$XFD$1048576 from xl/workbook.xml cell by cell, causing an…
exceljs allocation without limits
High8.7EPSS 0.70%, higher than 54% of scored CVEsexceljsCVSS 4.0 · 8.7CWE-770
ExcelJS through 4.4.0 contains a memory exhaustion vulnerability in Worksheet._parseMergeCells that allows attackers to crash applications by supplying unbounded mergeCell ranges. Attackers can craft a small workbook with a mergeCell ref like A1:XFD1048576, causing xlsx.load()…
exceljs allocation without limits
High8.7EPSS 0.63%, higher than 51% of scored CVEsexceljsCVSS 4.0 · 8.7CWE-770
exceljs through 4.4.0 contains a memory exhaustion vulnerability that allows attackers to crash applications by supplying a worksheet col element with an unbounded max attribute. Attackers can craft a small workbook with a huge max value, causing xlsx.load() to allocate…
exceljs prototype pollution
High8.3EPSS 0.45%, higher than 39% of scored CVEsexceljsCVSS 4.0 · 8.3CWE-1321
ExcelJS through 4.4.0 contains a prototype pollution vulnerability in mergeConditionalFormattings that allows attackers to modify Object.prototype by supplying an x14:cfRule id of __proto__. Attackers can craft an xlsx file that, when loaded with xlsx.load(), sets properties…
exceljs prototype pollution
Medium6.3EPSS 0.43%, higher than 37% of scored CVEsexceljsCVSS 4.0 · 6.3CWE-1321
ExcelJS through 4.4.0 contains a prototype pollution vulnerability that allows attackers to add numeric keys to Object.prototype through a crafted defined name referencing a __proto__ sheet. Attackers can supply an xlsx whose xl/workbook.xml definedName range targets __proto__,…
Reading the radar
CVSS, KEV and EPSS, briefly.
What is a CVE?
A CVE is a public identifier for one vulnerability in one product, such as CVE-2026-59310. The CVE program assigns it; NVD, run by the US National Institute of Standards and Technology, adds scores, weakness classes and affected product lists.
What does the CVSS score tell me?
CVSS rates how severe a vulnerability is on its own, from 0 to 10, and its vector says how it is reached: over the network or locally, with or without an account, with or without someone clicking. It says nothing about whether anyone is exploiting it. The radar shows the newest CVSS version scored and names it, because version 4.0 and 3.1 scores differ.
What is CISA KEV?
The Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog is CISA's list of CVEs with reliable evidence of exploitation in the wild. US federal agencies must fix each one by its due date, and it is the strongest signal of what to patch first.
What is EPSS?
FIRST's Exploit Prediction Scoring System estimates the probability that a CVE will see exploitation activity in the next 30 days, recomputed daily. Most CVEs score well under 1%, so the radar also shows the percentile: how a CVE ranks against every scored CVE.
How should I prioritise?
Patch what CISA lists as exploited first. Then CVEs with a high EPSS score, then the most severe by CVSS. Within each group, start with whatever is reachable from the internet without an account.
Where do the explanations come from?
Veriom writes them from fixed templates over each record: the weakness class says what went wrong and where in an architecture it lives, the CVSS vector says how it is reached and what it affects, and KEV, EPSS and CISA's assessment say whether it is exploited. Nobody reviews each CVE by hand, so read the description and the references before acting.
How fresh is the data?
New and changed CVEs arrive from NVD every hour, the KEV catalog every six hours and EPSS scores once a day. Each page shows when the data was last updated.
Know where a vulnerable component would sit in your systems.
A CVE names a product. Whether it matters depends on where that product sits in your systems: what reaches it, which trust boundary it guards and what it can reach once compromised. Veriom maps your components, their relationships and your trust boundaries from your code, cloud and delivery evidence, so you can see where a component like this sits. The radar itself does not look at your systems.
Sources
- CVE records and CVSS scores from the NVD CVE API. This product uses the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD.
- Exploitation status from CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.
- Exploit likelihood from FIRST’s Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS), refreshed daily.
- Explanations are written by Veriom from fixed templates over each record’s data, not by a person reviewing each CVE. Descriptions are quoted from the records as published. The radar covers CVEs published since 4 Nov 2026, plus every CVE in the KEV catalog.