Free tool · No sign-in
CVE radar: the latest vulnerabilities, explained.
Every new CVE from NVD, with whether it is exploited in the wild (CISA KEV), how likely it is to be (FIRST EPSS), and what it means for your architecture in plain language.
Updated 14 Nov, 16:21 UTC from NVD, CISA KEV and FIRST EPSSMarkdownRSSJSON Feed
Patch first
Exploited in the wild, newest first.
CISA adds a CVE to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog when attackers are using it. Patch these first, then CVEs with a high EPSS score, then the most severe, starting with anything reachable from the internet.
Check Point Multiple Products Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource Vulnerability
High7.8Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-16EPSS 1.3%, higher than 70% of scored CVEscheckpoint Quantum Security Gateway and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 7.8CWE-732, CWE-862
UnrealIRCd Improper Neutralization of Delimiters Vulnerability
High8.6Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-16EPSS 0.30%, higher than 23% of scored CVEsUnrealIRCdCVSS 3.1 · 8.6CWE-140
Microsoft Office Outlook Missing User Interaction for Potentially Unsafe Action Vulnerability
Medium6.5Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS 1.6%, higher than 76% of scored CVEsMicrosoft Office and 6 moreCVSS 3.1 · 6.5CWE-356
Google Chromium Use-After-Free Vulnerability
High8.8Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS 0.96%, higher than 62% of scored CVEsGoogle Chromium and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-416
Barracuda Networks Email Security Gateway (ESG) Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel Vulnerability
Critical9.3Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-13EPSS 11%, higher than 96% of scored CVEsBarracuda Email Security Gateway (ESG) and 5 moreCVSS 4.0 · 9.3CWE-288
Trends
The last 30 days, by severity.
6,519 CVEs published, 514 of them critical. Many arrive without a score yet: NVD and the reporting organisations add CVSS over the following days.
Show the numbers
| Day | Critical | High | Medium | Low | Not scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 Oct 2026 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 Oct 2026 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 Oct 2026 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 Oct 2026 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1 Nov 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 Nov 2026 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 3 Nov 2026 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 4 Nov 2026 | 35 | 158 | 142 | 29 | 0 |
| 5 Nov 2026 | 55 | 213 | 149 | 36 | 0 |
| 6 Nov 2026 | 41 | 148 | 202 | 47 | 6 |
| 7 Nov 2026 | 54 | 165 | 232 | 10 | 13 |
| 8 Nov 2026 | 23 | 128 | 143 | 26 | 0 |
| 9 Nov 2026 | 32 | 164 | 231 | 42 | 1 |
| 10 Nov 2026 | 117 | 1221 | 623 | 61 | 92 |
| 11 Nov 2026 | 51 | 285 | 237 | 44 | 47 |
| 12 Nov 2026 | 28 | 172 | 129 | 23 | 6 |
| 13 Nov 2026 | 67 | 327 | 337 | 52 | 9 |
| 14 Nov 2026 | 6 | 11 | 10 | 4 | 25 |
Exploit likelihood (EPSS), last 30 days
- Under 1%5902
- 1% to 10%217
- 10% to 50%4
- 50% or more3
- Not scored yet393
Most affected vendors, last 30 days
Most common weaknesses, last 30 days
- Cross-site scripting (CWE-79)526
- Missing authorization (CWE-862)385
- Heap-based buffer overflow (CWE-122)364
- Use after free (CWE-416)341
- Insecure direct object reference (CWE-639)229
- Incorrect authorization (CWE-863)212
- Out-of-bounds read (CWE-125)208
- SQL injection (CWE-89)185
- Server-side request forgery (CWE-918)183
- Path traversal (CWE-22)182
Matching CVEs
2,621 CVEs match these filters, page 101 of 105.
Linux vulnerability
High7.8EPSS 0.17%, higher than 6% of scored CVEsLinuxCVSS 3.1 · 7.8
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: xen-netback: defer xenvif_mcast_addr_list_free() In order for the function to legitimately avoid locking/RCU, it needs to run after all TX/RX processing has finished/stopped: Lookups happen from…
Skyline Communications DataMiner missing authentication
High8.7EPSS 0.31%, higher than 24% of scored CVEsSkyline Communications DataMinerCVSS 4.0 · 8.7CWE-306, CWE-798
Skyline DataMiner BrokerGateway contains an embedded API key vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to retrieve the installation-specific BrokerGateway key even while pairing mode is disabled. Attackers can use the retrieved key to obtain the unrestricted…
freescout-help-desk freescout cross-site scripting
High7.5EPSS 0.27%, higher than 19% of scored CVEsfreescout-help-desk freescoutCVSS 3.1 · 7.5CWE-79
FreeScout is a self-hosted help desk and shared mailbox. Prior to 1.8.230, a pre-authenticated attacker can place HTML in a failed-login email value that is copied through monitored user activity into a queued SendAlert job. If alert delivery fails, the serialized payload is…
open-wanderer wanderer insecure direct object reference
High7.5EPSS 0.28%, higher than 20% of scored CVEsopen-wanderer wandererCVSS 3.1 · 7.5CWE-639
Wanderer is a self-hosted trail database for saving and sharing adventures. Prior to 0.19.3, the unauthenticated GET /activitypub/trail/{id} and GET /activitypub/comment/{id} endpoints call ActivitypubTrail() and ActivitypubComment() to return full trail and comment records…
Monogramm erpnext_ocr path traversal
High7.1EPSS 0.45%, higher than 39% of scored CVEsMonogramm erpnext_ocrCVSS 4.0 · 7.1CWE-22, CWE-918
ERPNext OCR app for Frappe/ERPNext through 1.1.1 contains a missing authorization and path traversal vulnerability that allows any authenticated user to read arbitrary server files by passing a fully client-controlled path argument to the whitelisted read_document method.…
OHIF Viewers cross-site scripting
High8.8EPSS 0.42%, higher than 37% of scored CVEsOHIF ViewersCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-79
OHIF Viewers is a zero-footprint DICOM viewer with shared extension packages. From 3.5.0-beta.0 until 3.12.15, 3.13.7, and 3.14.0-beta.19, the dicom-pdf extension reads the attacker-controlled MIMETypeOfEncapsulatedDocument value in…
nuxt content uncontrolled resource consumption
High7.5EPSS 0.35%, higher than 29% of scored CVEsnuxt contentCVSS 3.1 · 7.5CWE-400, CWE-770
Nuxt Content is the file-based CMS for Nuxt applications, powered by Markdown and Vue components. From 3.0.0 until 3.15.2, the unauthenticated POST /__nuxt_content/:collection/query endpoint accepts an attacker-controlled sql field in src/runtime/api/query.post.ts and permits…
yuzutech kroki path traversal
High7.5EPSS 0.43%, higher than 38% of scored CVEsyuzutech krokiCVSS 3.1 · 7.5CWE-22
Kroki creates diagrams from textual descriptions. Prior to 0.31.2, the TikZ backend's tikz/tikz2svg guard used when KROKI_SAFE_MODE is enabled blocks only \verbatiminput while allowing native TeX file-read primitives including \openin, \read, \input, and \include. TeX Live's…
freescout-help-desk freescout server-side request forgery
High8.2EPSS 0.26%, higher than 18% of scored CVEsfreescout-help-desk freescoutCVSS 3.1 · 8.2CWE-918
FreeScout is a self-hosted help desk and shared mailbox. Prior to 1.8.230, multiple outbound paths in Helper::downloadRemoteFile(), Helper::checkPort(), Helper::sanitizeRemoteUrl(), MailboxesController.php, and ModulesController.php do not consistently enforce a sink-level…
freescout-help-desk freescout SQL injection
High7.7EPSS 0.26%, higher than 17% of scored CVEsfreescout-help-desk freescoutCVSS 3.1 · 7.7CWE-89, CWE-200
FreeScout is a self-hosted help desk and shared mailbox application. Prior to version 1.8.226, the polycast/receive endpoint fails to escape SQL LIKE wildcards in supplied channel names, while channel authorization applies only to names with specific prefixes. An…
freescout-help-desk freescout cross-site scripting
High7.6EPSS 0.21%, higher than 12% of scored CVEsfreescout-help-desk freescoutCVSS 3.1 · 7.6CWE-79
FreeScout is a self-hosted help desk and shared mailbox. Prior to 1.8.225, a user who can edit a mailbox signature can combine a scriptable file uploaded through /uploads/upload with nested tag fragments that bypass Helper::stripDangerousTags(). The resulting external script is…
Debian FreedomBox UNIX symbolic link following
High8.4EPSS 0.19%, higher than 9% of scored CVEsDebian FreedomBoxCVSS 3.1 · 8.4CWE-61
In FreedomBox before 26.15, unprivileged user accounts can read/write files for which they lack permissions by setting the authorized_keys file to be a symlink. NOTE: FreedomBox is a Debian Pure Blend, which means that it distributes its software through Debian repositories.
Snowflake Connector for Python SQL injection
High8.1EPSS 0.37%, higher than 32% of scored CVEsSnowflake Connector for Python and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.1CWE-89
When identifier escaping is disabled through a non-default configuration, the write_pandas() data-loading functionality in the Snowflake Connector for Python and the Snowflake Connector for Python (Universal Core) did not escape DataFrame column names before including them in…
JetBrains Toolbox App OS command injection
High7.5EPSS 0.68%, higher than 53% of scored CVEsJetBrains Toolbox AppCVSS 3.1 · 7.5CWE-78
In JetBrains Toolbox App before 3.6.1 command injection was possible via enterprise configuration URLs
JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA inclusion of untrusted functionality
High7.8EPSS 0.17%, higher than 7% of scored CVEsJetBrains IntelliJ IDEACVSS 3.1 · 7.8CWE-829
In JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA before 2026.3, 2026.2.2 code execution was possible in Safe Mode via project-controlled JVM options of the build process
JetBrains Junie GitHub Action incorrect authorization
High7.4EPSS 0.38%, higher than 32% of scored CVEsJetBrains Junie GitHub ActionCVSS 3.1 · 7.4CWE-863
In JetBrains Junie GitHub Action before 1.8.0 code execution with workflow credentials was possible via fork updates
JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA inclusion of untrusted functionality
High7.0EPSS 0.14%, higher than 4% of scored CVEsJetBrains IntelliJ IDEACVSS 3.1 · 7.0CWE-829
In JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA before 2026.3 code execution was possible in untrusted projects via the Terraform File Watchers
JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA vulnerability
High7.4EPSS 0.20%, higher than 10% of scored CVEsJetBrains IntelliJ IDEACVSS 3.1 · 7.4CWE-297
In JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA before 2026.3 host name verification was missing for server TLS certificates
JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA link following
High7.1EPSS 0.17%, higher than 6% of scored CVEsJetBrains IntelliJ IDEACVSS 3.1 · 7.1CWE-59
In JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA before 2026.3 arbitrary file write was possible via symlinks when extracting plugin archives
JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA link following
High7.8EPSS 0.19%, higher than 9% of scored CVEsJetBrains IntelliJ IDEACVSS 3.1 · 7.8CWE-59
In JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA before 2026.3 code execution was possible via symlinks in an imported settings archive
JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA inclusion of untrusted functionality
High7.8EPSS 0.17%, higher than 7% of scored CVEsJetBrains IntelliJ IDEACVSS 3.1 · 7.8CWE-829
In JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA before 2026.3 code execution was possible in Safe Mode via UI Designer form file
JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA OS command injection
High7.8EPSS 0.53%, higher than 45% of scored CVEsJetBrains IntelliJ IDEACVSS 3.1 · 7.8CWE-78
In JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA before 2026.3, 2026.2.1 command injection was possible in untrusted projects via Tomcat run configurations on WSL
JetBrains Datalore link following
High8.8EPSS 0.48%, higher than 42% of scored CVEsJetBrains DataloreCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-59
In JetBrains Datalore before 2026.4 workspace collaborators could obtain the owner's SSH private key via Git backup
JetBrains Datalore insecure direct object reference
High8.1EPSS 0.29%, higher than 22% of scored CVEsJetBrains DataloreCVSS 3.1 · 8.1CWE-639
In JetBrains Datalore before 2026.4 improper scope validation in database tasks allowed using another workspace's service account
sensiolabs symfony external control of a file name
High8.4EPSS 0.58%, higher than 48% of scored CVEssensiolabs symfonyCVSS 4.0 · 8.4CWE-73
The Symfony Serializer component DataUriNormalizer handles only the exact types SplFileInfo, SplFileObject, and File, so for a property typed with a subclass such as UploadedFile, ObjectNormalizer instantiates the object through its constructor from attacker-controlled data,…
Reading the radar
CVSS, KEV and EPSS, briefly.
What is a CVE?
A CVE is a public identifier for one vulnerability in one product, such as CVE-2026-59310. The CVE program assigns it; NVD, run by the US National Institute of Standards and Technology, adds scores, weakness classes and affected product lists.
What does the CVSS score tell me?
CVSS rates how severe a vulnerability is on its own, from 0 to 10, and its vector says how it is reached: over the network or locally, with or without an account, with or without someone clicking. It says nothing about whether anyone is exploiting it. The radar shows the newest CVSS version scored and names it, because version 4.0 and 3.1 scores differ.
What is CISA KEV?
The Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog is CISA's list of CVEs with reliable evidence of exploitation in the wild. US federal agencies must fix each one by its due date, and it is the strongest signal of what to patch first.
What is EPSS?
FIRST's Exploit Prediction Scoring System estimates the probability that a CVE will see exploitation activity in the next 30 days, recomputed daily. Most CVEs score well under 1%, so the radar also shows the percentile: how a CVE ranks against every scored CVE.
How should I prioritise?
Patch what CISA lists as exploited first. Then CVEs with a high EPSS score, then the most severe by CVSS. Within each group, start with whatever is reachable from the internet without an account.
Where do the explanations come from?
Veriom writes them from fixed templates over each record: the weakness class says what went wrong and where in an architecture it lives, the CVSS vector says how it is reached and what it affects, and KEV, EPSS and CISA's assessment say whether it is exploited. Nobody reviews each CVE by hand, so read the description and the references before acting.
How fresh is the data?
New and changed CVEs arrive from NVD every hour, the KEV catalog every six hours and EPSS scores once a day. Each page shows when the data was last updated.
Know where a vulnerable component would sit in your systems.
A CVE names a product. Whether it matters depends on where that product sits in your systems: what reaches it, which trust boundary it guards and what it can reach once compromised. Veriom maps your components, their relationships and your trust boundaries from your code, cloud and delivery evidence, so you can see where a component like this sits. The radar itself does not look at your systems.
Sources
- CVE records and CVSS scores from the NVD CVE API. This product uses the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD.
- Exploitation status from CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.
- Exploit likelihood from FIRST’s Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS), refreshed daily.
- Explanations are written by Veriom from fixed templates over each record’s data, not by a person reviewing each CVE. Descriptions are quoted from the records as published. The radar covers CVEs published since 4 Nov 2026, plus every CVE in the KEV catalog.